Inside the Current Issue

Cover Story
Basic instincts drive Mountain States’ forward momentum

Self Study Series

Newswire
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
H HPN Hall of Fame
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us Home
Subscribe
Special Event Photos

Contact Us

KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2009

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

hpnonline Daily Update

March  2008
 
March 3 March 4 March 5 March 6 March 7

 

March 7, 2008  Download print version

German authorities report problems with blood thinner

 

Drugs like aspirin could reduce breast cancer and help existing sufferers

GAO: Issues and challenges related to how hospitals submit quality data and how CMS ensures data reliability 


Vaccine could offer protection against high blood pressure

Cause of typhoid outbreak still a puzzle as cases rise  

New test for joint infection could spare some patients an unnecessary procedure

Criminal charges filed over poisonous toothpaste

Gettin' Jiggy with StyleView


German authorities report problems with blood thinner  

Concerns about the safety of the blood thinner heparin spread to Germany on Thursday after drug authorities there received reports of patients being sickened after taking the drug. Meanwhile, Food and Drug Administration officials announced that they were asking all companies in the United States that produce heparin to test it with two new procedures. The complex tests, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and capillary electrophoresis, are the only ones that can uncover whether the drug contains a possibly counterfeit ingredient. Dr. Janet Woodcock, deputy F.D.A. commissioner, said that the agency would post instructions online for the tests.  

Food and Drug officials said Wednesday that a possibly counterfeit ingredient had been found in certain batches of heparin linked to at least 19 deaths in the United States and more than 700 severe allergic reactions. Federal officials said they could not yet say that the contaminant, which mimics real heparin, caused the reactions. Until Thursday, federal investigators had been focusing on heparin manufactured by Baxter International. But Dr. Woodcock said that German health authorities told the F.D.A. that Baxter did not make the heparin linked to two separate outbreaks of allergic reactions in that country. Germany has reported fewer than 100 cases of patients suffering severe allergic reactions and shock, and no deaths.  

F.D.A. officials declined to say whether the raw ingredients for the suspect German heparin came from China, the source of the starting materials used to make the contaminated heparin in the United States. Most of the world’s heparin supply is from China. In the last six months, more than 30 Chinese companies could be found selling heparin products on major business-to-business Web sites. “We are working as quickly as possible to analyze any potential impact on the U.S. market and worldwide,” said Deborah Autor, the director of compliance for the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.  

In the first half of last year, China exported heparin products to 42 countries and regions, according to a September 2007 report by the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Medicines and Health Products. China exported the most heparin products, about 13 tons, to Germany. It also sent 11 tons to France and about 10 tons to the United States, the report said.  

Erin Gardiner, a spokeswoman for Baxter, said reports that her company was not responsible for making the suspect heparin in Germany would most likely point to a problem with the suppliers of crude heparin. “The news today indicates that the issue could be further back in the supply chain,” Gardiner said. Last week, Baxter withdrew from the market nearly all of its heparin products. Most supplies of heparin in the United States are now from APP Pharmaceuticals, of Schaumburg, IL. APP’s supplies have undergone the new tests. German authorities have identified Rotexmedica as a manufacturer of at least some of the suspect heparin there, F.D.A. officials said. F.D.A. officials said they were told that the German authorities had recalled an unspecified amount of heparin. (The New York Times) See THIS LINK

 

 


Drugs like aspirin could reduce breast cancer and help existing sufferers

Anti-inflammatory drugs like aspirin may reduce breast cancer by up to 20 percent, according to an extensive review carried out by experts at London’s Guy’s Hospital and published in the March issue of IJCP, the International Journal of Clinical Practice. But they stress that further research is needed to determine the best type, dose and duration and whether the benefits of regularly using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) outweigh the side effects, especially for high-risk groups. 

“Our review of research published over the last 27 years suggests that, in addition to possible prevention, there may also be a role for NSAIDs in the treatment of women with established breast cancer” said Professor Ian Fentiman from the Hedley Atkins Breast Unit at the hospital, part of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. “NSAID use could be combined with hormone therapy or used to relieve symptoms in the commonest cause of cancer-related deaths in women.”  

Professor Fentiman and Avi Agrawal reviewed 21 studies covering more than 37,000 women published between 1980 and 2007. Their review included 11 studies of women with breast cancer and ten studies that compared women who did and did not have the disease. “Having weighed up the findings from over 20 studies, we have concluded that NSAIDs may well offer significant protection against developing breast cancer in the first place and may provide a useful addition to the treatment currently available to women who already have the disease,” said Professor Fentiman. “Recent studies of NSAIDs use have shown about a 20 percent risk reduction in the incidence of breast cancer, but this benefit may be confined to aspirin use alone and not other NSAIDs.” 

Previous studies have suggested that NSAIDs like aspirin and ibuprofen, which have traditionally been used as mainstream non-prescription analgesics, may provide protection against coronary heart disease and some malignancies, such as colorectal cancer. But Professor Fentiman is urging caution until further research fully weighs up the pros and cons of using NSAIDs to prevent and treat breast cancer.

“Our review did not look at the potential side effects of using NSAIDs on a regular basis” stresses Professor Fentiman “These can include gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation which can carry a significant risk of ill health and death. “It would be essential to take these negative effects into account before we could justify routinely using NSAIDs like aspirin to prevent breast cancer. More research is clearly needed and we are not advocating that women take these non prescription drugs routinely until the benefits and risks are clearer. But our findings clearly indicate that these popular over-the-counter drugs could, if used correctly, play an important role in preventing and treating breast cancer.”

 
 

GAO: Issues and challenges related to how hospitals submit quality data and how CMS ensures data reliability 

Hospitals submit data on a series of quality measures to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and receive scores on their performance. CMS instituted the Reporting Hospital Quality Data for Annual Payment Update Program (APU program) to collect the quality data from hospitals and report their rates on the measures on its Hospital Compare Web site. For hospital quality data to be useful to patients and other users, they need to be reliable, that is, accurate and complete. The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 directed CMS to implement a value-based purchasing program for Medicare that beginning in fiscal year 2009 would adjust payments to hospitals based on factors related to the quality of care they provide.

This statement provides information on (1) how hospitals collect and submit quality data to CMS and (2) how CMS works to ensure the reliability of the quality data submitted. This statement is based primarily on Hospital Quality Data: HHS Should Specify Steps and Time Frame for Using Information Technology to Collect and Submit Data (GAO-07-320, Apr. 25, 2007) and Hospital Quality Data: CMS Needs More Rigorous Methods to Ensure Reliability of Publicly Released Data (GAO-06-54, Jan. 31, 2006). In preparing these reports, GAO conducted case studies of eight hospitals, and reviewed documents of, and interviewed officials at CMS.

What GAO found: GAO reported in April 2007 that the eight case study hospitals visited used six steps to collect and submit quality data, two of which (steps 2 and 3) involved complex abstraction—the process of reviewing and assessing all relevant pieces of information in a patient’s medical record to determine the appropriate value for each data element. The six steps were (1) identify patients for whom the quality data should be submitted, (2) locate needed information in the medical records, (3) determine the appropriate value for each data element, (4) transmit the data to CMS, (5) review reports to ensure acceptance of the data by CMS, and (6) supply copies of selected medical records to CMS for data validation.

Several factors account for the complexity of the abstraction process (steps 2 and 3), including the content and organization of the medical record, the scope of information and clinical judgment required for certain data elements, and frequent changes by CMS in its data specifications. GAO’s case studies also showed that existing information technology (IT) systems help hospitals gather some quality data but are far from enabling hospitals to automate the abstraction process. For more information see THIS LINK.

 

 

Vaccine could offer protection against high blood pressure

A vaccine that protects against high blood pressure by mopping up a hormone that makes blood vessels constrict has been developed by a team of scientists. A trial of the jab showed it significantly reduced blood pressure in 72 people with mild to moderate hypertension, and was particularly effective in the early hours of the morning, when people are most at risk of strokes and heart attacks.

Dr. Martin Bachmann and colleagues from University hospital, Lausanne, developed the vaccine to target a hormone, angiotensin 2, which causes blood vessels to tighten and so raise the pressure of blood flowing through them. Angiotensin-blocking drugs are the most common hypertension treatments today. To make the vaccine, the researchers attached molecules of angiotensin 2 to artificial viruses, harmless bundles of protein created in the lab which look like viruses but cannot replicate or cause damage. The researchers have formed a company, Cytos Biotechnology.

In the trial, volunteers were injected with either a placebo, 100 micrograms or 300 micrograms of the vaccine. Each person received three jabs, one on the first day of the trial, with the others following one and three months later. The blood pressure of each volunteer was taken one day before the trial and two week after the last injection.

According to a report in the Lancet, systolic blood and diastolic blood pressure fell by 9mm and 4mm respectively in patients given 300 micrograms of the vaccine. Those given a placebo showed no change in blood pressure. "What was quite remarkable and unexpected was the biggest falls in blood pressure were between 5am and 8am, when most strokes and heart attacks happen," said Bachmann. "This time is particularly risky because blood pressure surges in the morning as the body wakens, before patients have taken their medication ... With a vaccine, we hope they would only need an injection every six months." (The Guardian)
 

 

Cause of typhoid outbreak still a puzzle as cases rise  

As cases of typhoid fever continued to escalate and an already crowded government hospital had started putting patients under a tent, government and health officials in Calamba City, Philippines, were still uncertain of the cause of the outbreak. As of Thursday, the number of persons afflicted with typhoid fever in the community had increased from 1,041 to 1,149 and the confinement in six hospitals had risen from 426 to 522, Dr. Dennis Labro, city health office's spokesperson, told the Philippine Daily Inquirer, parent company of INQUIRER.net.

Labro said the CHO, with the help of sanitary inspectors in the provincial level, was conducting an investigation and water sampling. He added that the test would take some time because their staff members were going from house to house in every village, including unaffected areas. The team also probed the possibility that there were leaks in the water facilities of the Calamba Water District (CDW). CDW earlier denied the allegations that the water it supplied to villages was contaminated. CDW general manager Alberto M. Cervancia said they had met the Department of Health's bacteriology standards for drinking water. CDW had also sought the assistance of the Aqua Laboratory Center, an accredited agency of DoH for water testing, he added. The Aqua Lab reported through physiochemical test on February 27 that the water sample from CWD passed the DOH standards and was negative for Salmonella typhi, the bacteria which causes typhoid fever. "There could be other causes aside from water," Cervancia said.

From 155 people, the hospital was accommodating 170 typhoid patients as of Thursday. Dr. Gonzalo Lavarias Jr., chief of hospital, said they would be setting up another makeshift tent to shelter the other patients as the hallways had become even more congested. An open makeshift tent near the hospital's chapel, which set up Sunday, is housing around 58 patients. Labro however clarified that typhoid cases might not really be increasing because some of the patients might have just sought hospitalization recently but had been enduring the disease for days. "There were also days with lower hospital admission but last Wednesday was one of the peak days," he said, adding: "This is because of the long incubation period of the disease." "The city government is both alarmed and concerned in what is happening. In declaring state of calamity, it would be easy to disburse calamity funds for medical supplies," Labro said. He said city residents were also alarmed and facing difficulties in terms of the water source. "Some residents are already thinking to move out of Calamba temporarily until the outbreak subsides," he said. (Inquirer.net) See THIS LINK


 

New test for joint infection could spare some patients an unnecessary procedure 

A potential diagnostic test that could help surgeons confirm or rule out the presence of infection-causing bacteria in prosthetic joints that require surgical revision has been developed by researchers at the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), a part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Such a test could spare a subgroup of people who need the surgery a time-consuming and costly treatment for infection, while helping to ensure that people who need the procedure get it. The test is described in the March issue of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Each year, hundreds of thousands of joint replacement surgeries are performed in this country. And each year, thousands of them must be revised (the prosthetic joint must be removed and replaced) due to severe pain and swelling. These symptoms are often due to infection, said Rocky S. Tuan, Ph.D., chief of NIAMS' Cartilage Biology and Orthopaedics Branch.

The standard treatment for suspected infection is to remove the joint prosthesis and replace it with a spacer that has been impregnated with antibiotics. After about six weeks, patients must undergo another surgery to remove the spacer. Only then can the surgeon implant the new prosthesis. The problem with this approach is that confirming the presence of infection-causing bacteria is an inexact science. Currently, doctors check for infection by culturing a sample of the joint fluid. A positive culture confirms live bacteria, making spacer surgery a certainty. A negative culture, however, does not necessarily mean there is no infection. In fact, Tuan says that estimates of the false negative rate for joint cultures in revision surgeries range from 27 percent to 50 percent. But because failure to treat an infected joint could lead to severe infection and limb amputation, spacer surgery is sometimes performed for safety's sake even when infection test results are inconclusive.

To get around the false-negative problem, Tuan and his colleagues developed a way to test for joint infections using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which detects the presence of bacterial DNA. However, this approach proved to have pitfalls, too. It picked up all bacteria, even dead or dying bacteria that cannot perpetuate infection, thereby giving false positives. Tuan says this new problem led them to expand their PCR approach by testing for bacterial messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA). "When bacteria are dying, their mRNA is one of the first things to go," he said. As a result, the researchers hypothesized that a good mRNA test would not only detect bacteria, but would likely tell them if any bacteria they detected were still viable. Unlike DNA, mRNA is not directly quantifiable by known techniques, so the mRNA test that Tuan's group developed employs a process called reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) to convert the mRNA into DNA for measurement.

Now Tuan's team is recruiting 50 people who need joint revision for a clinical trial that will involve testing patients' joint fluid for bacteria and then following them for 6 months to a year after surgery. They hope that the results from this study will validate the protocol to identify or rule out infections before a person begins a surgical revision. Tuan would like to be able to tell patients who need infection treatment, "There is a really bad infection and we know what to do." "But we also want to tell the person without infection that it's O.K. to put in a revision joint. That saves the spacer, the additional surgery and its associated risk, and 6 weeks of being laid up," Tuan said.

 


Criminal charges filed over poisonous toothpaste

Criminal charges have been filed against a company that prosecutors say imported and distributed nearly 90,000 tubes of Chinese toothpaste containing a poisonous substance, Los Angeles City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo announced Thursday. A wholesaler that supplied local stores with the tubes was also charged. Selective Imports sold the toothpaste containing diethylene glycol to distributors nationwide between December 2005 and May 2007, prosecutors said. Vernon Sales is accused of buying some of the tubes and reselling them to Los Angeles stores. Diethylene glycol is a chemical used in antifreeze and as a solvent. Chinese manufacturers have used the chemical, known as DEG, as a cheaper alternative to glycerin, which thickens toothpaste. Exposure to DEG, however, can cause kidney and liver damage over time. 

Vernon Sales President Kamyab Toofer and Vice President Pejman Mossay were charged with 14 criminal counts each of receiving, selling and delivering an adulterated drug. Selective Imports President Frahad Nazarian and Vice President Yones Ghermezi were charged with two criminal counts each of receiving, selling and delivering products containing DEG. Each count carries a maximum penalty of one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. The companies are liable for distributing the tainted product even if they had no direct knowledge of the risk because they were negligent in not ensuring the toothpaste was safe, Supervising Deputy City Attorney Jerry Baik said.  

Ghermezi said he had not seen the charges but was shocked by the filing. All the adulterated toothpaste was voluntarily pulled from shelves and from his Vernon, CA, company's inventory eight months ago and destroyed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration last month, he said. "Everything we had was destroyed by the FDA," Ghermezi said. "I thought the file had been closed." Ghermezi said he supplied the toothpaste to Vernon Sales, also based in Vernon. He said his company never knowingly sold adulterated toothpaste and thought the product had FDA approval.

"We didn't know of the ingredients of the toothpaste," he said. "We don't [have] any intention of hurting people." The charges stem from an inquiry after the FDA confiscated some 70,000 tubes of toothpaste delivered to the Port of Long Beach in May, Baik said. (Washington Post) See THIS LINK

 

 

Gettin' Jiggy with StyleView

Ergotron introduces all new powered and non-powered point-of-care computing carts, StyleView 31 and StyleView 32 that bring forward today’s most essential functionality features in a lightweight, highly maneuverable form factor. 

Ever wonder what happens in those medical product testing labs when no one is around?

Well take an entertaining, one-minute-and-thirty-second break from your busy day to find out what interesting things can happen when the Ergotron tester guy literally falls for his test subject.

Click this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mpFJF8ao2M
 

 


March 6, 2008  Download print version

HPN’s Critical Care Supply Innovator Award  

 

Mystery substance in Baxter's heparin; FDA: Tampering possible in China

AARP report finds brand name drug prices continue to soar

Medline and 3M agree to strategic partnership in electrosurgery 

Two tests added to recommended list to prevent or detect colorectal cancer

Type 2 diabetes may be caused by intestinal dysfunction

VHA Inc. helps hospitals in Central Atlantic Region
improve MRSA treatment

 



HPN’s Critical Care Supply Innovator Award  


Please submit your nomination of no more than 750 words for HPN's Critical Care Supply Innovator Award.


Highlight the problem, the solution, and who developed the solution. Deadline: Friday, March 14th.           


HPN will feature the winning facility in the May 2008 edition, as well as at the 2008 AACN/NTI in Chicago, May 3-8. 

Email your nomination to editor@hpnonline.com with “Critical Care Supply Innovator” in the subject line.  
 

 

Mystery substance in Baxter's heparin; FDA: Tampering possible in China


A significant amount of an unidentified foreign substance contaminated
Baxter International Inc.'s blood-thinning drug heparin, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday, raising the possibility of intentional tampering in a supply chain that begins with pig farms in China. The mysterious substance, which has a chemical makeup similar to heparin, comprises as much as 20 percent of the active ingredient in nine suspect lots produced by Baxter since September, the FDA said Wednesday. The suspect lots are connected to at least four deaths reported nationwide since Baxter noted a spike in adverse reactions to the drug in late December.

The FDA on Wednesday said heparin is connected to as many as 19 deaths and 785 serious illnesses since Jan. 1, 2007. But the FDA timeline extends well beyond the period from September to November, when Baxter's
Cherry Hill, NJ, plant produced the heparin connected to the recent rash of serious allergic reactions. The suspect active ingredient in heparin originated at a Changzhou, China, plant owned by Scientific Protein Laboratories, a Baxter supplier based in Waunakee, WI.

"We don't know whether the introduction of the contaminant was accidental, as part of the biological process, or if it was deliberate," said Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting director of the FDA's center for drug evaluation and research. At least one former top FDA official who helped lead the fight against counterfeit drugs indicated that some Chinese suppliers in the past have introduced foreign substances to boost production when supplies are tight. "The obvious question is, 'Are these plants back-dooring their supply in order to supplement their capacity?' " asked Benjamin England, who chaired the FDA's Counterfeit Drug Working Group before leaving for a private law practice in Washington, DC, in 2003.

Heparin is produced from an enzyme in the mucous lining of pig intestines. The suspect lots of heparin were made beginning in September, just after the peak in an epidemic of an often-fatal disease known as "blue ear" that afflicted more than 250,000 pigs throughout China. An FDA official at the press conference said it is possible supplies of the adulterated ingredient came from pig intestines. But FDA officials emphasized they have not pinpointed the source. Conventional quality and safety testing typically does not discover a foreign substance, England added, because the tests are not designed for that purpose. Scientific Protein's plant obtains heparin from bulk providers of raw material. From its plant in Changzhou, Scientific Protein ships raw heparin to the company's headquarters outside Madison, WI, then on to Baxter's Cherry Hill plant for final processing, packaging and shipping.


Baxter, in its own press conference, sought to point the investigative spotlight back to China. Baxter executives said the active pharmaceutical ingredient sourced from its China-based supplier is the focus of the company's investigation. "Either the problem lies further back in the supply chain, somewhere before the material gets to the processing plant, or there's something in the processing before it comes to Baxter," said Peter Arduini, president of Baxter's medication delivery business. Arduini said the company's Cherry Hill manufacturing plant, where multidose vials of heparin are finished and filled before shipment to hospitals and dialysis centers, recently passed an FDA inspection. Arduini said Baxter's investigation centers further into the "supply stream" in China. There could be "process issues" associated with Scientific Protein's Chinese manufacturing plant, he said. (Chicago Tribune) See THIS LINK




AARP report finds brand name drug prices continue to soar

According to a report released by AARP, pharmaceutical companies have substantially raised prices on 220 brand name prescription drugs most commonly used by people in Medicare Part D since the implementation of the drug benefit in 2006. AARP has studied drug prices since 2002 and reported the findings in a series of Watchdog reports. The report expands on the series by focusing its analysis on those brand prescription drugs most widely used by people enrolled in Medicare Part D.

The Watchdog report, which was produced by AARP’s Public Policy Institute (PPI), found that prices of brand name drugs most commonly used by people in Medicare Part D rose by an average of 7.4 percent in 2007, nearly two and a half times the rate of general inflation. The report concludes that rising prices threaten consumers by increasing the likelihood of higher insurance premiums and the chance that people will fall into the Medicare coverage gap, and increasing the out-of-pocket expenses of those who find themselves in this “donut hole.”

The average treatment cost exploded from $80 per year per prescription in 2002, to $151 in 2007. A person who took three brand name prescriptions to treat a chronic condition over this period saw an increase in their yearly costs of more than $1,600 between 2002 and 2007. The study found brand name drug prices increased far greater than general inflation since 2002, with dramatic spikes since 2006, the period when Medicare Part D was implemented. For the complete Watchdog report see
THIS LINK 


 

Medline and 3M agree to strategic partnership in electrosurgery 

Medline Industries Inc. and 3M Health Care announce an exclusive license and supply agreement for 3M's electrosurgical patient plates in the United States. Under this agreement, Medline has acquired the exclusive license and sales rights in the United States for 3M's electrosurgical patient plates and accessories. Included are the 1100 series electrosurgical patient plates and the 9100 series universal patient plates with proprietary safety ring. This product line will be sold under the Medline brand. 3M brand patient plates are featured in national group purchasing contracts and are currently sold through several distribution channels. Medline will continue to support all sales channels and build upon the relationships 3M has established with healthcare customers to ensure optimal supply costs and allow these customers to maintain their focus on patient safety. For more information, see THIS LINK.

 


Two tests added to recommended list to prevent or detect colorectal cancer

The American Cancer Society and other health groups are recommending two tests they had not previously endorsed to prevent or detect colorectal cancer, the groups said Wednesday. The new policy is based on evidence that the tests work well enough to recommend and applies to all adults 50 and older and to some younger people with symptoms or risk factors for colon cancer.
 

One test is virtual colonoscopy, which uses a CT scan to look for abnormal growths and, unlike the standard colonoscopy, does not require inserting a camera-tipped tube rectally. The other test examines stool to find abnormal DNA associated with cancer and requires an entire bowel movement be packed in a kit and sent to a laboratory. The tests are now part of a list of seven testing options from which people can choose. The medical groups are providing as many options as possible, they say, hoping patients find one acceptable.
 

Many people are so squeamish about tests for the disease that they skip them entirely. It is one of the very few cancers that can be entirely prevented by removing polyps or other precancerous growths or can be cured if detected early. “Fifty percent of the population gets no screening,” said Dr. Grace H. Elta, a gastroenterologist and professor at the University of Michigan who is president of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. “Any screening is better than that.”


The new guidelines organize the tests in two groups and specify the intervals to perform them. The first group consists of tests that can detect cancer or prevent it by finding precancerous growths. It includes colonoscopy, which examines the entire colon; flexible sigmoidoscopy, which examines part of the colon; barium enemas; and virtual colonoscopy. The second group primarily detects cancer, rather than preventing it. Two tests look for blood in the stool, and the third is the stool DNA test. Blood in the stool does not necessarily indicate cancer but requires follow-up.
 

“Prevention should be the primary goal,” said Dr. Robert Smith, director of screening for the cancer society. That would mean that the first group of tests is preferable. But Dr. Smith said some people were unwilling to have them or unable to afford them.
 

Right now, Dr. Elta said, insurers do not cover virtual colonoscopy, which she said costs $1,200 to $1,500. It is uncertain whether the new guidelines will lead to coverage changes. None of the tests are perfect. Doctors who perform colonoscopy, for instance, may fail to see precancerous lesions. Virtual colonoscopy will probably fail to detect lesions that are flat, a type that is especially risky and more common in the United States than previously realized, researchers reported Tuesday in The Journal of the American Medical Association.
 

Tests for blood in the stool generally miss polyps and detect just half of tumors. Sigmoidoscopy does not reach the upper stretches of the colon. As for the stool DNA test, Dr. Elta said, “It’s really not ready for prime time.” The test is not accurate enough, she said, and in many instances not reimbursed by insurers. “Most people are not using it right now,” she said. “The biggest hope of all is if it ever gets good enough to pick up polyps. It’s the test with the most promise, but right now it has no efficacy at picking up polyps.” (The New York Times) See THIS LINK
 


 

 


Type 2 diabetes may be caused by intestinal dysfunction


Growing evidence shows that surgery may effectively cure Type 2 diabetes, an approach that not only may change the way the disease is treated, but that introduces a new way of thinking about diabetes. A new article, published in a special supplement to the February issue of Diabetes Care by a leading expert in the emerging field of diabetes surgery, points to the small bowel as the possible site of critical mechanisms for the development of diabetes.
 

The study's author, Dr. Francesco Rubino of NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, presents scientific evidence on the mechanisms of diabetes control after surgery. Clinical studies have shown that procedures that simply restrict the stomach's size (i.e., gastric banding) improve diabetes only by inducing massive weight loss. By studying diabetes in animals, Dr. Rubino was the first to provide scientific evidence that gastrointestinal bypass operations involving rerouting the gastrointestinal tract (i.e., gastric bypass) can cause diabetes remission independently of any weight loss, and even in subjects that are not obese.
 

"By answering the question of how diabetes surgery works, we may be answering the question of how diabetes itself works," said Dr. Rubino, who is a professor in the Department of Surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College and chief of gastrointestinal metabolic surgery at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell. Dr. Rubino's prior research has shown that the primary mechanisms by which gastrointestinal bypass procedures control diabetes specifically rely on the bypass of the upper small intestine, the duodenum and jejunum. This is a key finding that may point to the origins of diabetes.
 

"When we bypass the duodenum and jejunum, we are bypassing what may be the source of the problem," says Dr. Rubino, who is heading up NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell's Diabetes Surgery Center. In fact, it has become increasingly evident that the gastrointestinal tract plays an important role in energy regulation, and that many gut hormones are involved in the regulation of sugar metabolism. "It should not surprise anyone that surgically altering the bowel's anatomy affects the mechanisms that regulate blood sugar levels, eventually influencing diabetes," Dr. Rubino said.

While other gastrointestinal operations may cure diabetes as an effect of changes that improve blood sugar levels, Dr. Rubino's research findings in animals show that procedures based on a bypass of the upper intestine may work instead by reversing abnormalities of blood glucose regulation.

In fact, bypass of the upper small intestine does not improve the ability of the body to regulate blood sugar levels. "When performed in subjects who are not diabetic, the bypass of the upper intestine may even impair the mechanisms that regulate blood levels of glucose," said Dr. Rubino. In striking contrast, when nutrients' passage is diverted from the upper intestine of diabetic patients, diabetes resolves. This, he explains, implies that the upper intestine of diabetic patients may be the site where an abnormal signal is produced, causing, or at least favoring, the development of the disease.

Dr. Rubino proposes an original explanation known in the scientific community as the "anti-incretin theory." Incretins are gastrointestinal hormones, produced in response to the transit of nutrients, that boost insulin production. Because an excess of insulin can determine hypoglycemia, a life-threatening condition, Dr. Rubino speculates that the body has a counter-regulatory mechanism, activated by the same passage of nutrients through the upper intestine. The latter mechanism would act to decrease both the secretion and the action of insulin.

"Further research on the exact molecular mechanisms of diabetes, surgical control of diabetes and the role played by the bowel in the disease may bring us closer to the cause of diabetes,” said Dr. Rubino. Today, most patients with diabetes are not offered a surgical option, and bariatric surgery is recommended only for those with severe obesity (a body mass index, or BMI, of greater than 35kg). "It has become clear, however, that BMI cut-offs can no longer be used to determine who is an ideal candidate for surgical treatment of diabetes," said Dr. Rubino.

 



 

VHA Inc. helps hospitals in Central Atlantic Region improve MRSA treatment

 

VHA Inc., the national health care alliance, launched a national MRSA initiative in 2006 to help hospitals rapidly implement methods to detect and treat methicillin-resistant Staphyloccus aureus (MRSA) and to prevent the spread of MRSA to other patients. Sixteen member hospitals from VHA’s Central Atlantic region have been working together to address MRSA, and after 12 months, they have seen a 27 percent improvement in hand hygiene and 24 percent improvement in barrier precaution protocol compliance, both of which are key to managing the spread of this infection.

By establishing a “secret observer” program, Nash Health Care Systems in Rocky Mount, NC, was able to identify opportunities to increase hand hygiene compliance. “We identified areas for improvement and implemented measures to help remind staff about the importance of hand hygiene,” said Wanda Lamm, RN, BSN, CIC, infection control coordinator at Nash General Hospital. Measures included providing a button for staff to wear with a picture of a hand on it to remind staff to wash hands, as well as fostering a healthy competition between units to identify most compliant performers. Patients and family members are encouraged through dialogue, brochures and hospital TV programming to ask caregivers to wash hands before and after touching the patient. “Hand washing before touching the patient is up 77 percent and washing after touching the patient is up 80 percent, which is higher than the national average,” said Lamm. “Active surveillance efforts, combined with new barrier protection policies and isolation practice changes (carts are no longer shared between patients and isolation equipment is mounted directly on each patients door), and new lab media has allowed us to realize a 38 percent decrease in MRSA infection cases at our hospital.”
 

Wheeling Hospital in Wheeling, WV, joined the VHA program to help bolster staff and community education about MRSA. The hospitals active surveillance program includes: Frequent culturing of patients; An anonymous observer of the month for hand hygiene and barrier precaution compliance; Developing a clinical alert tag that flags high-risk patients through the hospital’s computer system; New housekeeping policies that require decontamination of high-touch surfaces in high-risk patient rooms two-to-three times a day; and developing and awarding a quarterly Golden Hand Award to units with exceptional compliance. “We have increased our hand hygiene and barrier precaution compliance levels to 96 percent and are planning to expand our MRSA control efforts to include those patients coming into our facility from the local nursing home communities,” said Laura E. Rafa, RN, BSN, infection control director at Wheeling Hospital. To learn more about VHA’s other clinical improvement programs, see THIS LINK.

 

 


March 5, 2008  Download print version

Cardinal Health agrees to acquire ChloraPrep manufacturer for $490 million

 

Researcher says 'unexpected' increase in cancer risk found in follow-up to women's health initiative

Costly placebo works better than cheap one

Non-polypoid (flat) colon lesions relatively common and associated with colorectal cancer

Cathedral Healthcare System to pay $5.3 million to resolve allegations involving inflated charges

Hospitals: No charge for mistakes

Broadlane’s Live Group buy saves client more than 30 percent on capital equipment purchase 

Amerinet Workforce Solutions fill positions to meet critical need



Cardinal Health agrees to acquire ChloraPrep manufacturer for $490 million


Cardinal Health announced a definitive agreement to acquire the assets of privately held Enturia for $490 million. The cash transaction includes Enturia’s line of infection prevention products sold under the ChloraPrep brand name and is expected to close within 60 days, subject to customary regulatory approvals and other conditions.

ChloraPrep brand products are used widely in U.S. hospitals and surgery centers to disinfect the skin before surgical and vascular procedures to help prevent blood stream and surgical site infections, two of the most common types of health care-associated infections (HAIs) among patients. The acquisition will complement Cardinal Health’s infection prevention offerings by adding a differentiated and proven product line to the company’s Medical Products and Technologies segment. Numerous organizations that focus on improving hospital safety have cited the active ingredient in ChloraPrep products as the clinically preferred antiseptic for preoperative skin preparation.


Cardinal Health plans to accelerate sales of ChloraPrep products to both hospital and alternate-care customers through its U.S. and international sales networks. Enturia’s rich product pipeline is expected to help expand the base of applications for ChloraPrep products.


Enturia (www.enturia.com) was founded as Medi-Flex Hospital Products in 1985. Over the past two years, the company’s revenue has grown more than 70 percent to approximately $140 million in 2007.

Separately, and as part of the company’s ongoing strategy to optimize  its portfolio of products and services, Cardinal Health has decided to pursue the sale of several smaller, non-core offerings within its Medical Products and Technologies segment. Details will be announced as there are significant developments in these transactions. For more information see
THIS LINK.



 

Researcher says 'unexpected' increase in cancer risk found in follow-up to women's health initiative


An increased cancer risk in post-menopausal women after they stopped taking combined hormone therapy was an “unexpected finding” in a study that will be reported in the March 5 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), said Rowan T. Chlebowski, M.D., Ph.D., a Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute (LA BioMed) lead investigator who contributed to the study.
 

“This latest study reinforces the original finding that combined hormone therapy of estrogen plus progestin should not be taken for the purpose of reducing disease in post-menopausal women,” Chlebowski said. “These findings also reinforce the need for monitoring for cancer in women who have taken the combination of estrogen plus progestin.”
 

Dr. Chlebowski is a medical oncologist who has led several prior reports focusing on hormone effects on malignancies, including breast and colorectal cancer. He was a member of the team of researchers, led by Gerardo Heiss, M.D., of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, who authored the March 5 JAMA report on a follow-up study of post-menopausal women enrolled in the Women’s Health Initiative. Dr. Chlebowski is available for comment for reporters seeking further insight into the study’s findings.


The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial began in 1993 to measure the effect of estrogen plus progestin on reducing disease in post-menopausal women. It included 16,608 postmenopausal women and assessed whether conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) prevents heart disease and hip fractures and increases the risk of breast cancer. The trial was stopped in 2002 when data indicated an increased risk of breast cancer and a failure to demonstrate an overall health benefit of the therapy. Further analysis showed that women taking the two hormones had higher risks of cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke and venous thromboembolism and lower risks of fracture and colorectal cancer.


After stopping intervention, WHI followed the trial participants using the same study protocol of semi-annual monitoring to identify and classify study outcomes, in order to evaluate the effects of stopping hormone therapy. Post intervention information for the period July 8, 2002 to March 31, 2005 was available on 95% of the women. In the three years after stopping hormone therapy women who previously used estrogen plus progestin no longer had an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (heart disease, stroke, and blood clots) compared with women on placebo.
 

The lower risk of colorectal cancer and fractures seen during the trial in women who previously used estrogen plus progestin disappeared after stopping the combined hormone therapy. But the risk of all cancers combined in women who previously used estrogen plus progestin increased after stopping the intervention compared to those previously on placebo. This was due to increases in a variety of cancers, including lung cancer. After stopping the hormone therapy, mortality from all causes was somewhat higher in women who previously used estrogen plus progestin compared with those taking a placebo.

 

 


Costly placebo works better than cheap one


A 10-cent pill doesn't kill pain as well as a $2.50 pill, even when they are identical placebos, according to a provocative study by Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist at Duke University. "Physicians want to think it's the medicine and not their enthusiasm about a particular drug that makes a drug more therapeutically effective, but now we really have to worry about the nuances of interaction between patients and physicians," said Ariely, whose findings appear as a letter in the March 5 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
 

Ariely and a team of collaborators at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology used a standard protocol for administering light electric shock to participants’ wrists to measure their subjective rating of pain. The 82 study subjects were tested before getting the placebo and after. Half the participants were given a brochure describing the pill as a newly-approved pain-killer which cost $2.50 per dose and half were given a brochure describing it as marked down to 10 cents, without saying why.

 

In the full-price group, 85 percent of subjects experienced a reduction in pain after taking the placebo. In the low-price group, 61 percent said the pain was less.


The finding, from a relatively small and simplified experiment, points to a host of larger questions, Ariely said. The results fit with existing data about how people perceive quality and how they anticipate therapeutic effects, he said. But what's interesting is the combination of the price-sensitive consumer expectation with the well-known placebo effect of being told a pill works. "The placebo effect is one of the most fascinating, least harnessed forces in the universe," Ariely said.


Ariely wonders if prescription medications should offer cues from packaging, rather than coming in indistinguishable brown bottles. "And how do we give people cheaper medication, or a generic, without them thinking it won't work"" he asks.

At the very least, doctors should be able to use their enthusiasm for a medication as part of the therapy, Ariely said. "They have a huge potential to use these quality cues to be more effective." The study was funded by MIT.

 

 


Non-polypoid (flat) colon lesions relatively common and associated with colorectal cancer


Flat, non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs), which may be difficult to detect, appear to be relatively common and may have a greater association with cancer compared with the more routinely diagnosed type of colorectal polyps, according to a study in the March 5 issue of JAMA. Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Prevention has focused on the detection and removal of polypoid (resembling a polyp) neoplasms (a new and abnormal growth). Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that colorectal cancer can also arise from NP-CRNs.

“Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms are more difficult to detect by colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography because the subtle findings can be difficult to distinguish from those of normal mucosa [membrane]. As compared with surrounding normal mucosa, NP-CRNs appear to be slightly elevated, completely flat, or slightly depressed,” the authors write.

Roy M. Soetikno, M.D., M.S., and colleagues with the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, examined data from a group of 1,819 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy to estimate the prevalence of NP-CRNs and to characterize the association of NP-CRNs with colorectal cancer. The overall prevalence of NP-CRNs was 9.35 percent. The prevalence of NP-CRNs in the subpopulations for screening, surveillance, and symptoms was 5.84 percent, 15.44 percent, and 6.01 percent, respectively. The overall prevalence of NP-CRNs with cancer that had not spread or had spread in tissue beneath the mucous membrane was 0.82 percent; in the screening population, the prevalence was 0.32 percent. Overall, NP-CRNs were nearly 10 times more likely to contain cancerous tissue than polypoid lesions, irrespective of the size.
 

The positive size-adjusted association of NP-CRNs with cancer that had not spread or had spread in tissue beneath the mucous membrane was also observed in subpopulations for screening and surveillance. The depressed type of NP-CRNs had the highest risk (33 percent). Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms containing cancer were smaller in diameter as compared with the polypoid ones.
 

“In conclusion, in this population of patients at a single Veterans Affairs hospital, NP-CRNs were a relatively common finding during colonoscopy. They were more likely to contain carcinoma compared with polypoid neoplasms, independent of lesion size. Recent studies have pointed out differences in the genetic mechanisms underlying nonpolypoid and polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Future studies on NP-CRNs should further evaluate whether the diagnosis and removal of NP-CRNs has any effect on the prevention and mortality of colorectal cancer and particularly focus on their genetic and protein abnormalities,” the authors write.
 

In an accompanying editorial, David Lieberman, M.D., of Oregon Health & Science University, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, comments on the findings of Soetikno and colleagues. “[Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms] may be biologically distinct from polypoid lesions and appear to be more likely to harbor malignant features. Detection and complete removal at colonoscopy may be challenging. The current study emphasizes the importance of quality in the performance of colonoscopy,” he writes.

 



Cathedral Healthcare System to pay $5.3 million to resolve allegations involving inflated charges

Cathedral Healthcare System Inc. has agreed to pay the US $5.3 mln, plus interest, to settle allegations that it defrauded the federal Medicare program, the Justice Dept announced earlier today. The settlement resolves allegations that the Newark NJ-based hospital system improperly increased charges to Medicare patients in order to obtain enhanced reimbursement from the federal health care program.

In addition to its standard payment system, Medicare pays supplemental reimbursement to hospitals, called outlier payments, in cases where the cost of care is unusually high. Congress enacted the supplemental outlier payment system to ensure that hospitals have the incentive to treat inpatients whose care requires unusually high costs. The government alleged that for Jan 1998-Aug 2003, Cathedral improperly inflated charges for inpatient and outpatient care to make these cases appear more costly than they actually were, and thereby obtained outlier payments from Medicare that it was not entitled to receive.

The civil settlement agreement resolves allegations against Cathedral that were filed in 3 separate federal lawsuits brought by whistleblowers under the federal False Claims Act. The False Claims Act permits private citizens to bring lawsuits on behalf of the US. Under the settlement, Peter Salvatori and Sara Iveson, the relators in the first of the 3 lawsuits, will receive $848,000.

Cathedral has also entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the US DHHS Office of Inspector General. The Corporate Integrity Agreement contains measures to ensure compliance with Medicare regulations and policies in the future.

 



Hospitals: No charge for mistakes


The board of trustees for the Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems has unanimously adopted guidelines to ensure that no patient or payer foots the bill for hospital care related to adverse medical events. The leadership board for the statewide trade association in February pledged that all 57 Oregon hospitals would not seek payment for costs associated with the occurrence of serious adverse events if an investigation by the hospital determines that the event was preventable and was in the control of the hospital. The hospital association's list of qualifying adverse events were adapted from the list published by the Oregon Patient Safety Commission.

The list includes mistakes like operating on the wrong body part, performing the wrong surgical operation on a patient, inadvertently leaving a foreign object inside a surgery patient and administering the wrong blood type to a patient. "With these guidelines widely adopted, our patients are the real winners," said Norm Gruber, chair of the hospital association Board of Trustees, and CEO of Salem Health, in a statement.

The move follows similar actions by some of the nation's largest payers and healthcare purchaser groups. Medicare announced in August 2007 it would no longer pay for certain serious medical errors. The Leapfrog Group in 2006 convened a group of large employers who also pledged not to pay for such errors. Washington's hospitals joined the list in February 2008, joining Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Massachusetts. A variety of large-scale studies have shown that between 3.7 percent and 16.6 percent of total hospital admissions are associated with adverse medical events. (Portland Business Journal) See
THIS LINK.

 

Broadlane’s Live Group buy saves client more than 30 percent on capital equipment purchase 

Broadlane’s Live Group Buy recently saved Randolph Medical Center in Roanoke, AL, more than 30 percent on a new Computed Tomography (CT) scanner compared to best price quote they received. Broadlane’s Live Group Buys are unique because they are conducted in-person as a client-driven process designed to help providers acquire the best technology at the best possible value.   

Chief executive officer Timothy Harlin and chief financial officer Jeff Kirkpatrick of Randolph Medical Center faced the challenge of buying a new CT scanner. They needed to determine and acquire the best technology to meet the current and future needs of their community, while remaining fiscally responsible. They attended Broadlane’s Live Group Buy after hearing about it through peers. “The savings exceeded our expectations,” said Harlin. “We paid 30 percent less than what was offered through the best quote we obtained on our own. Not only did we get state-of-the-art technology, but savings of this magnitude allowed us to fund other needed capital equipment.” 

Broadlane has invited ECRI Institute as an unbiased expert for two upcoming Live Group Buys: Computed Tomography (CT) Live Group Buy – March 26-28 and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Live Group Buy – May 28-30. ECRI Institute, an independent, nonprofit organization that researches the best approaches to improving patient care, will serve as an unbiased expert, offering equipment purchasing clients the inside track on the latest medical equipment. 

For more information see THIS LINK.

To view the Randolph Medical Center case study, see THIS LINK.



Amerinet Workforce Solutions fill positions to meet critical need

With labor shortages looming nationwide in all healthcare disciplines, Amerinet’s Workforce Solutions and its supplier partners are successfully filling critical workforce needs in the healthcare industry. Challenged to find physicians in specialty areas like pulmonology, nephrology or neurology, Wyoming Medical Center (WMC), a 200-bed hospital in Casper, WY, turned to Amerinet for help. Within just a few weeks, CareerStaff Unlimited, an Amerinet partner, presented a locum tenens physician to meet the request.  

In another instance, Adirondack Medical Center (AMC), a hospital of more than 650 unionized employees, had recently acquired two nursing homes with 250 non-union employees. The challenge was to integrate all of the employees within a few weeks; however, the vice president of human resources had resigned. The medical center needed to fill this crucial position immediately and provide a smooth transition for all of its new employees.

For more information, email info@amerinet-gpo.com.

 


March 4, 2008  Download print version

Related Nevada clinics closed amid safety fears

Ban on gifts to doctors sought

As drug ads surge, more get Rx's filled

Immune systems increasingly on attack

CHeS sponsors new Web Series on Healthcare Data Synchronization


Antipsychotic Abilify cleared for use in youths

New detection tool saves medical industry money

Premier extends partnership with SterilMed
 


Related Nevada clinics closed amid safety fears

With public fear and outrage growing, Clark County, NV, health officials on Monday shut down three clinics owned by the same medical group that exposed patients to incurable diseases at its Las Vegas clinic. County agents hand-delivered orders suspending the licenses of the Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center, the Gastroenterology Center of Nevada and the Spanish Hills Surgical Center hours after city administrators upheld the suspension of the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada.

In written statements, county leaders indicated that no evidence points to patients being exposed to deadly diseases at the three clinics they closed Monday. Suspending the business licenses was a precaution, they said. "The practices at their sister facility requires us to take action to protect the public," Commissioner Rory Reid said, referring to the Las Vegas clinic. "When dealing with such serious matters, it is best to treat each situation with an abundance of caution to minimize the risk to the public."

County commissioners will review the clinics' suspended licenses at their March 18 meeting. The endoscopy and gastroenterology clinics are at 4275 Burnham Ave., near Flamingo Road, and the surgical center is at 5915 S. Rainbow Blvd., near Russell Road. The city of Las Vegas shut down the endoscopy clinic at 700 Shadow Lane on Friday after investigators found that staff reused syringes, contaminating vials of medication and infecting six people with hepatitis C. The Southern Nevada Health District last week sent out 40,000 letters to that clinic's patients, urging them to get tested for hepatitis C and B and HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

The Burnham center improperly allowed vials to be used multiple times but did not reuse syringes, so there was no proof of contamination, state health officials said last week. Still, county leaders insisted that the reported medical practices were alarming enough to shut down the clinics in their jurisdiction. "These are serious accusations and call for an equally serious response," Commissioner Lawrence Weekly said. "We are dealing with deadly diseases and so, to put it simply, it is better to be safe than sorry."

In a Monday afternoon meeting with city officials, attorneys and doctors representing the Shadow Lane clinic failed to persuade the city to reinstate its business license. "It is the decision of the undersigned ... that the appeal is denied," said Mayor Oscar Goodman, who announced the results of the hearing but did not attend. "Now it's suspended. For the time being, we have their license and the license will remain with us."

The clinic has the option of taking the license suspension to court. "We haven't made any decisions at this point," said Abe Vigil, a lawyer representing the clinic. "We have to assess how to proceed." He declined to discuss the hearing itself, saying only, "We definitely tried to put our best foot forward. We were grateful for the opportunity." A city statement issued Monday noted that although the center has agreed to no longer engage in the practice of reusing syringes on vials, "city business license officials are not confident the practice will stop."

Doctors Dipak Desai and Clifford Carrol attended the meeting, along with three attorneys representing them. The other doctors listed on the license are Eladio Carrera and Vishvinder Sharma. Both Desai and Carrol have hospital privileges at Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center as well Valley Hospital Medical Center. Officials from both medical facilities said the two physicians are still on staff and continue to see patients. "We cannot speak to the practice inside other facilities,'' said Ashlee Seymour, a spokeswoman for Sunrise. "We can however speak to the practices at Sunrise. We do not reuse syringes." (

CDC warns of safety problems at clinics” see THIS LINK


 

Ban on gifts to doctors sought

Senate President Therese Murray proposed a total ban on all gifts and freebies to doctors from pharmaceutical companies, a move that would make Massachusetts the first state in the country to ban such gifts outright. The measure is part of a set of healthcare reform measures Murray filed in a bill yesterday that also includes requiring all doctors statewide to adopt electronic medical records by 2015, allowing patients to choose nurse practitioners as primary care providers, and forcing public reviews of any insurance company efforts to boost annual premiums by more than 7 percent. "There's going to be a climate change, and there has to be a climate change; otherwise our healthcare reform will implode, just under the costs," Murray said at a press conference at the University of Massachusetts Medical School yesterday.

The ban forbids the pharmaceutical industry from giving - and doctors, their families or employees from receiving - gifts from drug companies. Gifts include payments, entertainment, meals, travel, honorariums, subscriptions, even a pen with a drug company logo. The legislation would continue to permit distribution of drug samples to doctors for the exclusive use of their patients. Anyone who violates the ban could be fined $5,000, face two years imprisonment, or both, under the proposal.

Massachusetts law already prohibits gifts to legislators and other public officials of "anything of substantial value," or anything worth more than $50. The ban on drug and device company gifts to physicians was first proposed in 2005 by state Senator Mark C. Montigny, a New Bedford Democrat. Montigny said he grew concerned about the cost of drugs bought through state-sponsored healthcare programs as chairman of the Senate's Healthcare Committee. He said he was disturbed to see drug companies hire salespeople including "former beauty queens and cheerleaders" who wine and dine doctors and encourage them to prescribe drugs that may not be the most cost-effective. "You would not believe the conflict of interest here," Montigny said. "Of all the nasty manipulation that's gone on, there's no more effective group at getting more than they deserve at the expense of the taxpayer than the pharmaceutical industry." He said the state continues to overpay for drugs.

Julie Corcoran, deputy vice president of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a trade organization based in Washington D.C., said the industry's sales people are "highly educated and trained by their companies." The group opposes any ban, saying the pharmaceutical industry is already heavily regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. "I'm not aware of any kind of evidence or studies that link promotional or marketing materials with the cost of healthcare," she said.

Mike Webb, chairman of the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council, said in a statement that he applauded the scope of Murray's healthcare proposal, but was "concerned about any measures, such as bans on interactions with physicians, which could negatively impact information flow to practitioners and ultimately hurt patient care." The proposed ban is also more strict than the current policy proposed by the American Medical Association. That policy bans cash gifts, but allows doctors to receive textbooks, modest meals, and "other gifts that serve a genuine educational function." The association also allows doctors to receive drug samples for personal or family use.

Money for Murray's proposal to spend $25 million annually to implement electronic health records reform would come from a House-proposed $1 cigarette tax hike. Murray estimated the new tax would produce up to $175 million in new revenue. (Boston Globe) See THIS LINK


 

As drug ads surge, more get Rx's filled

Prescription-drug ads prompt nearly one-third of Americans to ask their doctors about an advertised medicine, and 82% of those who ask say their physicians recommended a prescription. The findings in a national survey by USA TODAY, the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Harvard School of Public Health come as drug advertising hit a record $4.8 billion in 2006, up from $2.6 billion in 2002. "Our survey shows why the drug companies run all these ads: They work," says Drew Altman, president of the Kaiser Foundation. "Many people get drugs they otherwise wouldn't. While there's a debate about whether that's a good thing for patients, it does cost the country more."

Among people who requested a drug, 44% said physicians gave the one they asked about, while slightly more than half said doctors prescribed a different drug. Sometimes, doctors did both. When duplicate answers were removed, the poll found 82% of patients got some type of prescription. The percentage of people getting a drug after asking about an ad shows an uptick from 2005, when Kaiser found that 75% said the doctors recommended some type of drug. The USA began allowing drug ads in 1997.

Americans are nearly evenly divided in their views of the industry: 47% have a favorable impression, and 44% have an unfavorable view, frequently citing high prices, large profits or company greed as the reason. Billy Tauzin, president of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the industry's lobbying group, says many of those surveyed were likely reacting to increasing co-payments from insurers rather than escalating drug prices. Drug costs rose an average of 3.5% in 2006 over 2005, government data show.

The poll also found that cost pressures have led 29% of Americans not to fill a prescription in the past two years and 23% to cut pills in half or skip doses to make their medications last longer. Buying drugs is sometimes a problem for 41% of families because of cost. (USA Today) See THIS LINK
 

 

Immune systems increasingly on attack

First, asthma cases shot up, along with hay fever and other common allergic reactions, such as eczema. Then, pediatricians started seeing more children with food allergies. Now, experts are increasingly convinced that a suspected jump in lupus, multiple sclerosis and other afflictions caused by misfiring immune systems is real. Though the data are stronger for some diseases than others, and part of the increase may reflect better diagnoses, experts estimate that many allergies and immune-system diseases have doubled, tripled or even quadrupled in the last few decades, depending on the ailment and country. Some studies now indicate that more than half of the U.S. population has at least one allergy.
 

The cause remains the focus of intense debate and study, but some researchers suspect the concurrent trends all may have a common explanation rooted in aspects of modern living, including the "hygiene hypothesis" that blames growing up in increasingly sterile homes, changes in diet, air pollution, and possibly even obesity and increasingly sedentary lifestyles. "We have dramatically changed our lives in the last 50 years," said Fernando Martinez, who studies allergies at the University of Arizona. "We are exposed to more products. We have people with different backgrounds being exposed to different environments. We have made our lives more antiseptic, especially early in life. Our immune systems may grow differently as a result. And we may be paying a price for that."

Along with a flurry of research to confirm and explain the trends, scientists have also begun testing possible remedies. Some are feeding high-risk children gradually larger amounts of allergy-inducing foods, hoping to train the immune system not to overreact. Others are testing benign bacteria or parts of bacteria. Still others have patients with MS, colitis and related ailments swallow harmless parasitic worms to try to calm their bodies' misdirected defenses.

"If you look at the incidence of these diseases, a lot of them began to emerge and become much more common after parasitic worm diseases were eliminated from our environment," said Robert Summers of the University of Iowa, who is experimenting with whipworms. "We believe they have a profound symbiotic effect on developing and maintaining the immune system."

Although hay fever, eczema, asthma and food allergies seem quite different, they are all "allergic diseases" because they are caused by the immune system responding to substances that are ordinarily benign, such as pollen or peanuts. Autoimmune diseases also result from the body's defense mechanisms malfunctioning. But in these diseases, which include lupus, MS, Type 1 diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease, the immune system attacks parts of the body such as nerves, the pancreas or digestive tract.

"Overall, there is very little doubt that we have seen significant increases," said Syed Hasan Arshad of the David Hide Asthma and Allergy Centre in England, who focuses on food allergies. "You can call it an epidemic. We're talking about millions of people and huge implications, both for health costs and quality of life. People miss work. Severe asthma can kill. Peanut allergies can kill. It does have huge implications all around. If it keeps increasing, where will it end?"

One reason that many researchers suspect something about modern living is to blame is that the increases show up largely in highly developed countries in Europe, North America and elsewhere, and have only started to rise in other countries as they have become more developed. The leading theory to explain the phenomenon holds that as modern medicine beats back bacterial, viral and parasitic diseases that have long plagued humanity, immune systems may fail to learn how to differentiate between real threats and benign invaders, such as ragweed pollen or food. Or perhaps because they are not busy fighting real threats, they overreact or even turn on the body's own tissues. "Our immune systems are much less busy," said Jean-Francois Bach of the French Academy of Sciences, "and so have much more strong responses to much weaker stimuli, triggering allergies and autoimmune diseases."


Several lines of evidence support the theory. Children raised with pets or older siblings are less likely to develop allergies, possibly because they are exposed to more microbes. But perhaps the strongest evidence comes from studies comparing thousands of people who grew up on farms in Europe to those who lived in less rural settings. Those reared on farms were one-tenth as likely to develop diseases such as asthma and hay fever. (Washington Post) See THIS LINK

 

 

CHeS sponsors new Web Series on Healthcare Data Synchronization

Product information in the healthcare supply chain is inconsistent and inaccurate. Currently, the industry suffers from the lack of a systematic way to consistently identify distinct medical/surgical products, which negatively impacts the rest of the supply chain. With e-commerce now defining the day-to-day business processes in the healthcare setting, the healthcare industry must leverage technology advances to create a more efficient and effective supply chain, to reduce unnecessary costs and to improve patient safety.   

Unlike other multi-billion industries, the healthcare industry has not yet enjoyed the benefits of widespread synchronization efforts or adoption of a Product Data Utility (“PDU”). Healthcare standards advocacy groups are driving the effort to educate professionals from provider and supplier organizations, and the industry is seeing great momentum in adopting the standards necessary to streamline business processes and reduce costs. 

AHRMM, the Coalition for Healthcare eStandards (CHeS), and the Healthcare Supply Chain Standards Coalition (HSCSC), which have endorsed GS1 standards for healthcare, are co-sponsoring a five-part webinar series this spring on product data and synchronization in healthcare. Each session will focus its attention on GS1 standards and the GDSN for healthcare.

Registration is free for all five webinars. AHRMM members will receive 0.1 CEU credits (1 contact hour) for attending each session. Register now at www.regonline.com/AHRMM_CHeS_HSCSC.

Session I: Defining a Healthcare Product Data Utility (PDU)

Thursday, March 20 • 1:00 – 2:00 pm (Central)

Kathleen Garvin, Program Manager for Data Synchronization, DoD GDSN Pilot, Department of Defense and Joe Pleasant, CIO, Premier, Inc., Chair, Coalition for Healthcare eStandards (CHeS)

Session II: What is the Global Data Synchronization Network for Healthcare?

Thursday, March 27 • 1:00 – 2:00 pm (Central)

Peter J. Alvarez, Senior Director, GDSN Healthcare, GS1 GDSN, Inc.

Session III: Retail Success Story – A Case of GDSN Leadership for the Healthcare Industry

Thursday, April 17 • 1:00 – 2:00 pm (Central)

Marianne Timmons, VP Supply Chain and Global Business to Business, Wegmans and Michael Gross, Director of Data Synchronization, Wegmans

Session IV: PDU – How Hospitals Are Taking the Lead

Thursday, April 24 • 1:00 – 2:00 pm (Central)

Curtis Dudley, Resource Optimization & Innovation, an Operating Division of the Sisters of Mercy Health System and Joe Dudas, Director of Accounting and Supply Chain Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Chair, Healthcare Supply Chain Standards Coalition (HSCSC)

Session V: Healthcare PDU Success Story in Australia

Wednesday, April 30 • 3:00 – 4:00 pm (Central)

Tracey McAlister, Customer Solutions Manager, BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company); Ken Nobbs, National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), Australia and Marcel Sierra, Manager Business Development & Professional Services, GS1 Australia

For more detailed descriptions of the Webinars see THIS LINK
and click on Virtual Event Details.


 

Antipsychotic Abilify cleared for use in youths

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. said the Food and Drug Administration approved the supplemental new-drug application for Abilify to treat manic and mixed episodes associated with Bipolar I Disorder in patients 10 to 17 years old. The antipsychotic drug already has been approved to treat bipolar disease in adults. Japan-based Otsuka discovered Abilify; the companies have an agreement to co-promote the drug in the U.S. until 2012. Bristol records 65% of U.S. sales. For the fourth quarter, Bristol-Myers said sales of Abilify rose 28% from a year earlier to $462 million. (The Wall Street Journal) See THIS LINK



New detection tool saves medical industry money

Medical Cost Containment Systems, LLC has announced the release of the GuardianOR Surgical Instrument Detector. By greatly reducing the cost of replacing accidentally discarded medical instruments, the GuardianOR Surgical Instrument Detector can save the medical industry money.

The GuardianOR Surgical Instrument Detector is a loop type metal detector imbedded in the lid of a standard sized hamper stand that is designed to alert medical staff whenever a metal object such as surgical instruments and tools are accidentally discarded into medical waste receptacles or linen bags. By sounding an immediate alert, the staff is able to quickly retrieve the discarded instruments at the point of loss.

A digital numeric counter tracks the number of detection events that pass through the detector, thereby allowing staff to easily determine the effectiveness of the detector, and the alertness and performance of personnel in the OR suite. The use of the GuardianOR enables staff to have their awareness raised, and good habits reinforced in order to help prevent loss of costly surgical instruments. The GuardianOR even functions as a theft deterrent since it provides measurable accountability standards of surgical instruments to a specific OR suite.    

The GuardianOR Surgical Instrument Detector is key-operated, preventing staff from circumventing the detector. Only those holding the keys can turn the detector on or off in order to ensure monitoring of the digital counter. The detector fits snugly onto a 15” X 15” PVC hamper stand which is the most commonly used stand in operating rooms. The relatively low cost of the GuardianOR Surgical Instrument Detector means that it can pay for itself in a very short time. For more information see THIS LINK
 

 

Premier extends partnership with SterilMed

Premier Inc., the largest healthcare alliance in the United States, has renewed its reprocessing agreement with SterilMed, Inc., a leading third-party reprocessor of single-use medical devices (SUDs), for its facilities nationwide. SterilMed's experience has determined that a typical 200-bed hospital could save more than $650,000 and eliminate nearly 20,000 pounds of medical waste under the three-year contract extension.

SterilMed uses proprietary cleaning, testing and sterilization processes to convert single-use medical devices into reusable devices so hospitals can reduce device purchasing costs up to 50 percent. State-of-the-art reprocessing technologies enable SterilMed to supply over 8,000 different single-use devices in all OR departments as well as for the GI and EP/Cath labs. SterilMed is ISO 13485 certified and compliant with the FDA’s Quality System Requirements. 
 

 

 

 


March 3, 2008  Download print version

HealthSpring's Pay for Quality pilot results show increased prevention, healthier members

Florida emergency rooms can't find enough doctors

Customized treatments for sepsis lower treatment time and reduce length of ICU stays

FDA to increase warnings, advisories on side effects

FDA approves Nexium for use in children ages 1-11 years


CDC study reveals adults may not get enough rest or sleep
 


HealthSpring's Pay for Quality pilot results show increased prevention, healthier members

HealthSpring Inc. has released preliminary results from its Pay for Quality pilot program showing significant improvements in quality of care and reductions in emergency room and hospital admissions and healthcare costs. “While these are preliminary results, we feel very encouraged that the numbers show our Pay for Quality pilot has made a significant impact on care and quality of life for our members,” HealthSpring Chairman, President and CEO Herb Fritch said.

The pilot covered three states and nine practices with 87 physicians and 7,468 members in 2007. Duration for the pilot is three years for one practice and one year for all others. Preliminary results show improvement in every preventative screening area measured: Mammography - 68% increase in use by physicians; Pneumonia - 65% increase; Influenza - 192% increase; Colon CA - 27% increase; Diabetic Eye Exam - 93% increase; Diabetic Foot Exam - 378% increase.                                                           

Healthcare Utilization by Members: ER visits per 1,000 - 7% reduction; Hospital admissions per 1,000 - 11% reduction; Health plan's medical cost ratio - 8% reduction.                               

HealthSpring’s Pay for Quality pilot structures reimbursements for physicians to encourage more extensive preventive care, rewarding physicians for performing key preventive screenings and check-ups. “The focus is on preventing complications and catching problems before they become serious,” HealthSpring Medical Director of Quality William Anderson, M.D., said. “This is a win for everyone involved. Providers are rewarded for delivering the highest quality care, members are healthier and enjoy a better quality of life, and healthcare costs are reduced because the member doesn’t need treatment for serious complications.”

“The success of this pilot also demonstrates the importance of building relationships with physicians and other providers,” Anderson said. “With our Pay for Quality program, we’re working together with our providers rather than forcing something on the physicians that doesn’t work for them. “We help provide resources the providers need, such as support for electronic medical record technology or additional nursing resources to help with more extensive preventive care.”

HealthSpring continues to expand its Pay for Quality pilot. The program currently includes 27 sites, 348 physicians and 25,000 members with plans to further expand to a total of 35-40 practices, more than 400 physicians and more than 40,000 members by the end of the year. Based in Nashville, TN, HealthSpring is one of the country’s largest coordinated care plans whose primary focus is the Medicare Advantage market.

For more information, see https://www.healthspring.com/.

 

Florida emergency rooms can't find enough doctors

When Bayfront Medical Center (St. Petersburg, FL) had to turn away trauma patients last week because the hospital didn't have enough neurosurgeons, it exposed an emergency system in crisis. That crisis goes far beyond one hospital. Regional Medical Center Bayonet Point also has told state regulators it doesn't have neurosurgeons on call full time. Orlando and Palm Beach hospitals have had shortages. And it isn't just brain surgery. Across Florida, hospitals lack enough specialists to cover emergencies. If you sever your fingers in Florida, Tampa may be the only place to get them sewn back on. If you're pregnant in Polk County, don't count on delivering in Bartow. The hospital had to close its obstetrics service.  

"What we have here in Florida is a critical shortage of specialists who are willing to take call in emergency rooms," said Dr. Larry Hobbs, president of the Florida College of Emergency Physicians and emergency medical director of Southwest Florida Regional Medical Center. Emergency doctors say the problem will only get worse. Hospitals are shipping patients across the state, paying more to specialists to get them to work, lobbying for more legal protections, and desperately trying to hire more doctors.

Dr. Al Hess is a senior hand surgeon on call at Tampa General Hospital. Some of Hess' patients come from so far away that their severed fingers or hands can't be saved. Dr. Hess and three of his colleagues are among the only Florida surgeons willing and able to perform such delicate microsurgery in emergencies. Hess is on call every third night. As one of only seven Level I trauma centers in the state, Tampa General expects to see the most disastrous injuries from west-central Florida. But Hess and his colleagues see cases from all over the state, once even from Georgia. Hess and Dr. Roy Sanders, president of the Florida Orthopaedic Institute and orthopedics chief at Tampa General, say the hand surgeons reattach fingers about once a week. Every few days, they get calls about hand injuries, and Sanders sorts through whether they should take the patient.  

As the crisis gets worse, Sanders said local hospitals are trying to send cases with less severe injuries to Tampa General. "It's difficult to understand why a patient needs to come from a completely different region of the state by helicopter," Sanders said. The crush of cases isn't because there aren't enough surgeons, the doctors said. "If every hand surgeon in Florida took call, there wouldn't be a problem," Hess said. Once, most doctors were willing to be on call for emergencies, for free. It was part of a code: Doctors got the "privilege" of being on staff at the hospital. In return, they gave their time in the emergency room. Often, they benefited by gaining new patients.  

But the code has broken. Fewer doctors want to work 100 hours a week. They don't want to practice in the ER, where they say they're less likely to be paid by uninsured patients and more likely to be sued by strangers. Working emergencies often means they actually lose money, because they have to cancel paying patients. Even doctors who do work emergencies have become more specialized and often are more reluctant than they used to be to perform an operation on a child, or out of their subspecialty.  

In Tampa Bay, hospitals have resorted to paying doctors to be on call. The money adds up. It costs All Children's Hospital in St. Petersburg about $6-million a year to be a trauma center, said Gary Carnes, the hospital's president and CEO. But money isn't enough. For some specialties no amount of pay is worth it to them, including eye and plastic surgeons, said Mark Vaaler, vice president of medical affairs for St. Joseph's Baptist Healthcare. "It's a huge headache, but we've been able to Band-Aid it. I am very, very concerned about what's going to happen in the next several years." State medical leaders are asking legislators to give doctors more protection from malpractice lawsuits when they're treating emergency patients.

What specialties are the worst? "Any pediatric specialty at all. Ob-gyns. Most surgical subspecialties: orthopedics, thoracic, gastroenterology, urology,” said Dr. Vidor Friedman, director of emergency services for Florida Hospital Celebration. “There aren't enough interventional cardiologists." Really, he says, there's not enough of anybody. Friedman has no orthopedists to work on hip injuries.

Update: Bayfront Medical Center began accepting trauma patients again Thursday. But until the hospital signs up more neurosurgeons, it will likely have to divert trauma patients again. Two of the hospital's neurosurgeons recently stopped taking emergency calls, dropping its on-call staff to two. The hospital has had to suspend its status as a trauma center three times this month. During that time, it has remained open for regular emergencies. (St. Pete Times) See THIS LINK.

 

Customized treatments for sepsis lower treatment time and reduce length of ICU stays

Using a blood test and a decision algorithm, rather than standard hospital protocols, to determine the appropriate length of antibiotic therapy in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock can reduce duration of treatments, shorten ICU stays, and lower hospital costs, all without adverse effects on patients, according to new research.

“We have shown that it is possible to customize antibiotic treatment duration in patients with septicemia based on a reliable and robust blood test,” says Jérôme Pugin, M.D., of the Intensive Care Unit at the University Hospital in Geneva, Switzerland.

The findings appear in the first issue for March of the American Journal of Respiratory and Clinical Care Medicine, published by the American Thoracic Society. The researchers randomized 79 patients to receive a treatment course of antibiotics either according standard treatment protocols administered by the treating physicians, or according to the decision algorithm based on measured blood levels of procalcitonin (PCT), a marker for severe bacterial infection in patients with suspected sepsis.

For patients randomized to the PCT-based treatment there were predetermined “stopping rules” based on circulating PCT levels at which point investigators encouraged treating physicians to discontinue antibiotic therapy, although the treating physician retained the ultimate decision-making power.

In the analysis that included all 79 patients, the median treatment time for the PCT group was 3.5 fewer days than that of the control group, although the difference was not significant. However, once the investigators controlled for early drop-outs, previously undiagnosed infections, and patients whose physicians declined to stop antibiotic treatment when the algorithm would have dictated it, they found that patients treated by the PCT algorithm had a significantly shorter treatment time at 6 days, than patients treated according to standard protocols, who averaged 12.5 days on antibiotics.

“Our study is the first randomized clinical trial in which a surrogate biochemical parameter was used to reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy in a population of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU for severe sepsis and septic shock,” wrote Dr. Pugin. “Despite the relatively short duration of treatment in bacteremic patients assigned to the PCT group, no case of recurrence of infection was observed in these patients.”

Following the PCT algorithm had another benefit: patients randomized to the PCT treatment had significantly shorter stays in the ICU than control patients, an average of three days versus five. Customizing treatment does more than simply save hospitals money and patients precious days in the ICU, said Dr. Pugin. Overuse of antibiotics can result in antibiotic resistance. “Given the diversity of the types of infections, bacterial strains and levels of host immune defense, every infected patient should benefit from a personalized treatment, and particularly, a personalized treatment duration,” he said.

The investigators hope that customized treatments will continue to improve care for sepsis patients around the world. “We have now implemented this new algorithm based on procalcitonin guidance in our ICU for patients presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock, and are following the outcome of those patients,” said Dr. Pugin. “Currently, three large multi-center trials are ongoing in France, Denmark and Germany, with a design similar to that of our study. Results from these studies will be important to determine whether such a protocol of procalcitonin guidance is definitely safe and can be generalized worldwide.” 

 

 

 

FDA to increase warnings, advisories on side effects

 

Top Food and Drug Administration officials said last week consumers should expect to see more advisories and warnings from the agency about drug-side effects. For years, the agency has issued dozens of so-called Medwatch safety alerts reports each year, aimed at healthcare professionals, to inform them of changes to drug labels, and that practice still continues. But since Merck & Co.'s Vioxx was pulled off the market more than three years ago, the agency has stepped up the number of public-health advisories aimed at consumers and more recently has started issuing so called "early communications," informing the public that the agency is looking at a possible problem. Previously, the agency wouldn't inform doctors or consumers about a problem until it was fairly certain it was linked to a particular product.
 

"I feel strongly it's important for us to communicate early, but in communicating early we are acting with a much smaller degree of certainty," FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach told the agency's new risk-communication advisory committee Thursday, which wrapped up its first two-day meeting Friday. But, "we are trying to get people to understand that we haven't said there's a problem, only that we are concerned there's a problem."
 

The advisory panel, which is made up of outside academic and industry experts, has been established to help the FDA better communicate risks and benefits to the products the agency regulates; chiefly drugs, medical devices and certain foods.

 

"It's a time in which, quite frankly, if you look at external data there has been an erosion of trust," von Eschenbach said. "Perhaps because they need to better understand and appreciate what we are doing people's confidence has been eroded."


Indeed, Janet Woodcock, an FDA deputy commissioner and acting head of the agency's drug center, told reporters that the agency is finding more drug side effects, mostly because the agency is looking for them after drugs are put on the market. Until Congress approved new legislation last year giving the FDA additional money and authority, much of FDA's drug-center budget was aimed at reviewing drugs to get them on the market rather than continuing to monitor drugs once they are on the market.
 

"Consumers will know we are on the case," she said. However, she explained that the agency's goal is to find out which consumers benefit the most from a particular drug and which ones should avoid it, rather than pulling drugs off the market, a notion that's becoming more of a reality with increased use of genetic testing.


Woodcock said the agency is continuing work on a public-private network that will allow the agency to more quickly track drug-side effects by tapping into medical databases as well as updating the computer software that runs the agency's own adverse-event reporting system to make it easier for FDA staff to track problems.


So far this year the FDA has issued four public-health advisories, which are aimed at warning the public about a particular health problem, and at least three so-called "early communications" after issuing 11 public health advisories involving drugs for all of 2007. The agency also highlighted a warning about suicides associated with epilepsy drugs that was aimed at doctors. According to agency's Web site, 16 drug-related public health advisories were issued in both 2006 and 2005 compared to five in 2004, two in 2003 and one in 2002.
 

One of the advisories, issued Feb. 1, involved Pfizer Inc.'s smoking-cessation drug Chantix and warned about severe changes in mood and behavior in patients taking the drug. It followed a previous "early communication" issued in November that said the agency evaluating reports of suicidal thoughts and aggressive and erratic behavior in patients who had taken Chantix.

On the flip side the FDA has cleared drugs after previously stating it was looking at a problem. In January the agency said a review of clinical studies involving AstraZeneca PLC's reflux drugs Nexium and Prilosec don't show an increase in heart attacks and sudden death. (Wall Street Journal) See THIS LINK.


 

 

FDA approves Nexium for use in children ages 1-11 years


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Nexium (esomeprazole magnesium) for short-term use in children ages 1-11 years for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The agency approved Nexium in two forms, a delayed-release capsule and liquid form. Nexium is approved in 10 milligrams (mg) or 20 mg daily for children 1-11 years old compared to 20 mg or 40 mg recommended for pediatric patients 12 to 17 years of age.
 

"This approval provides important information for appropriate dosing for children ages 1-11 years with GERD," said Julie Beitz, M.D., director of the FDA's Office of Drug Evaluation III in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. "Children prescribed this drug should be monitored by their physicians for any adverse drug reactions."
 

Nexium is part of a class of drugs known as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). PPIs decrease the amount of acid produced in the stomach and help heal erosions in the lining of the esophagus known as erosive esophagitis. FDA approved the use of Nexium in patients 1 to 11 years for short-term treatment of GERD based upon the extrapolation of data from previous study results in adults to the pediatric population, as well as safety and pharmacokinetic studies performed in pediatric patients. In one study, 109 patients 1-11 in age, diagnosed with GERD, were treated with Nexium once-a-day for up to eight weeks to evaluate its safety and tolerability. Most of these patients demonstrated healing of their esophageal erosions after eight weeks of treatment.
 

The most common adverse reactions in children treated with Nexium were headache, diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, gas, constipation, dry mouth and sleepiness. The safety and efficacy of Nexium has not been established in children less than one year of age. Nexium is manufactured by AstraZeneca of Wilmington, DE.

 

 


CDC study reveals adults may not get enough rest or sleep


About 10 percent of adults report not getting enough rest or sleep every day in the past month, according to a new four-state study released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention′s (CDC) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The data from the four states–Delaware, Hawaii, New York, and Rhode Island–may not reflect national trends. But an additional study conducted by CDC utilizing data from the National Health Interview Study indicated that across all age groups the percentage of adults who, on average, report sleeping six hours or less has increased from 1985 to 2006. Nationwide, an estimated 50 to 70 million people suffer from chronic sleep loss and sleep disorders. Sleep loss is associated with health problems, including obesity, depression, and certain risk behaviors, including cigarette smoking, physical inactivity, and heavy drinking.
 

“It′s important to better understand how sleep impacts people′s overall health and the need to take steps to improve the sufficiency of their sleep,” said Lela R. McKnight-Eily, Ph.D., the study′s lead author and a behavioral scientist in CDC′s Division of Adult and Community Health. “There are very few studies to assess and address sleep insufficiencies; therefore, more needs to done to better understand the problem and to develop effective sleep interventions.”
 

The study, “Perceived Insufficient Rest or Sleep--Four States, 2006,” analyzed data from CDC′s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey. Among the four states, the percentage of adults who reported not getting enough rest or sleep every day in the past 30 days ranged from 14 percent in Delaware to 8 percent in Hawaii.
 

People concerned about chronic sleep loss should consult a physician for an assessment and possible treatment, such as behavioral or medical interventions, McKnight-Eily said. They can also try setting a regular sleep schedule and avoiding caffeine or other stimulants before bed, she said. Variation for insufficient rest and sleep may be due to occupational or lifestyle factors. The causes of sleep loss could include busy schedules or shift work; irregular sleep schedules; or lifestyle factors such as heavy family demands, late–night television watching and Internet use, or the use of caffeine and alcohol, according to a 2006 Institute of Medicine report. The National Sleep Foundation reports that most adults need 7-9 hours of sleep each night to feel fully rested while school children aged 5-12 years require 9-11 hours, and adolescents aged 11-17 years require 8.5–9.5 hours each night.
 

The MMWR report said the definitions of “enough” (sufficient) sleep and “rest,” and responses to the survey question were subjective and were not measured or equated to reports of hours of sleep per night. The report said the analysis cannot be compared directly with studies measuring hours of sleep. The survey question also did not define or distinguish between “rest” and “sleep.” The study comes just before National Sleep Awareness Week, an annual campaign held in conjunction with Daylight Saving Time.

 

For more information on National Sleep Awareness Week, held March 3-9, see THIS LINK.

For more information on CDC′s Sleep and Sleep Disorders Program, see http://www.cdc.gov/sleep/.
 


 

back to home page