Inside the Current Issue

Cover Story
Basic instincts drive Mountain States’ forward momentum

Self Study Series

Newswire
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
H HPN Hall of Fame
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us Home
Subscribe
Special Event Photos

Contact Us

KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2009

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

hpnonline Daily Update

October 2007
   

October 31, 2007   Download print version

Targeted cleaning of hand-touch surfaces could reduce
MRSA transmission in hospitals

HHS announces project to help 3.6 million consumers reap benefits of electronic health records

Microsoft to acquire healthcare technology and assets from Global Care Solutions

Chinese chemicals flow unchecked to world drug market

774 arrests in China over safety

New cancer recommendations; Diet, weight, alcohol and red meat
consumption all implicated in cancer risk

Kimberly-Clark Professional video contest is truly out of this world 


Targeted cleaning of hand-touch surfaces could reduce
 MRSA transmission in hospitals


Targeting hand-touch surfaces in hospitals that are likely to be contaminated by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), rather than a focus on removing visible dirt, is a feasible short-term strategy for tackling the transmission of MRSA, according to a Review in The Lancet Infectious Diseases to be published Online, October 31. Further, this additional cleaning would be easier to implement than improvements in hand-hygiene compliance. The public associate visibly dirty wards with increasing rates of MRSA, but there is little evidence for the effectiveness of basic cleaning on reducing the risk of acquiring MRSA in health-care institutions. Furthermore, hospital hygiene is usually assessed visually, but this does not necessarily correlate with microbiological risk and fails to recognise that microorganisms, including human pathogens such as MRSA, are invisible to the naked eye.

However, the current standards for assessing hospital hygiene use visible cleanliness as a performance criterion. Dr. Stephanie Dancer (
South General Hospital, Glasgow, UK) presents a robust case for targeted hospital cleaning as a strategy for controlling MRSA by reviewing the evidence for the potential impact of cleaning on each stage of the staphylococcal transmission cycle between patients, staff, and their environment. The author notes that cleaning is already accepted as an important factor in the control of other hardy environmental pathogens, such as Clostridium difficile, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, norovirus, and Acinetobacter spp, but argues that the role of near-patient hand-touch sites, such as door handles, bed rails, infusion pumps, and switches, in the transmission of MRSA and other pathogens, has not been given the priority it deserves.

According Dr. Dancer, in the UK, ward cleaners work to a set specification that gives emphasis to the cleaning of floors and toilets, and yet the evidence for MRSA contamination of a huge variety of hospital items, and particularly hand-touch sites is overwhelming. Indeed, the author notes that these hand-touch sites, which might harbor and transmit microbial pathogens, are poorly cleaned. The author concludes: “There can be no doubt that prioritizing hand hygiene is the single most beneficial intervention in the control of MRSA…[but] even if everyone does wash their hands properly, the effects of exemplary hand hygiene are eroded if the environment is heavily contaminated by MRSA”. She adds: “The increasing prevalence of MRSA and other multi-drug-resistant bacteria in UK hospitals support prioritization of cleaning and other control measures before definitive validation”. For more information see THIS LINK  
 


 

 

HHS announces project to help 3.6 million consumers reap benefits of electronic health records


HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt announced a five-year demonstration project that will encourage small to medium-sized physician practices to adopt electronic health records (EHRs). “This demonstration is designed to show that streamlining health care management with electronic health records will reduce medical errors and improve quality of care for 3.6 million Americans. By linking higher payment to use of EHRs to meet quality measures, we will encourage adoption of health information technology at the community level, where 60 percent of patients receive care,” Secretary Leavitt said. “We also anticipate that EHRs will produce significant savings for Medicare over time by improving quality of care. This is another step in our ongoing effort to become a smart purchaser of healthcare; paying for better, rather than simply paying for more.”

Conducted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the demonstration would be open to participation by up to 1,200 physician practices beginning in the spring. Over a five-year period, the program will provide financial incentives to physician groups using certified EHRs to meet certain clinical quality measures. A bonus will be provided each year based on a physician group’s score on a standardized survey that assesses the specific EHR functions a group employs to support the delivery of care. Under the CMS demonstration, all participating practices will be required to use a certified EHR system to perform specific functions that can positively affect patient care processes, such as clinical documentation and ordering prescriptions. The system, which must be in place by the end of the second year, must also be approved by a certification body officially recognized by HHS. The core incentive payment to practices will be based on performance on the quality measures, with an enhanced bonus based on the how well integrated the EHR is in helping manage patient care. During the five-year project, it is estimated that 3.6 million consumers will be directly affected as their primary care physicians adopt certified EHRs in their practices. In order to amplify the effect of this demonstration project, CMS is encouraging private insurers to offer similar incentives for EHR adoption.

 

 

 

 

Microsoft to acquire healthcare technology and assets from Global Care Solutions


Microsoft Corp. has agreed to acquire software, intellectual property and other assets from Global Care Solutions (GCS), a privately held company based in Bangkok, Thailand, that develops enterprise-class health information systems. The acquisition complements Microsoft’s portfolio of health solutions and will provide hospitals across international markets with a new alternative to achieve improved workflow and patient safety through information technology. GCS employees will join Microsoft’s Health Solutions Group, which will manage product development and delivery. Financial terms were not disclosed.


Global Care Solutions designed and developed its end-to-end system in collaboration with Bumrungrad International hospital, an internationally accredited facility based in Bangkok. The hospital, which treats more than 1.2 million patients from 190 countries each year, uses the GCS solution to efficiently manage clinical workflow, billing, regulatory compliance and medical records. Microsoft will continue to work closely with Bumrungrad to further build out the functionality and features of the GCS technology. “We have a diverse patient population at Bumrungrad, with over 400,000 foreign patients every year; half of the 3,200 patients we see each day arrive without appointments,” said Mack Banner, the chief executive officer of the hospital. “The GCS solution has allowed us to manage scheduling demands, multiple languages and medical records so efficiently that the average waiting time to see a doctor is only 17 minutes. The GCS software is a key to our service delivery, medical quality and financial performance, and we look forward to collaborating with Microsoft on extending its applications across our organization.”

Global Care Solution's system is a fully integrated suite of 50 clinical and back-office application modules designed and optimized to run all hospital clinical and administrative operations on Microsoft Windows Server 2003 and Microsoft SQL Server 2005. The new Microsoft offering based on the GCS technology will complement the company's current Azyxxi solution, which provides a data integration capability for hospitals with legacy systems already in place.


 

 

Chinese chemicals flow unchecked to world drug market


In January, Honor International Pharmtech was accused of shipping counterfeit drugs into the
United States. Even so, the Chinese chemical company, whose motto is “Thinking Much of Honor”, was openly marketing its products in October to thousands of buyers in Milan at the world’s biggest trade show for pharmaceutical ingredients. Other Chinese chemical companies made the journey to the annual show as well, including one manufacturer recently accused by American authorities of supplying steroids to illegal underground labs and another whose representative was arrested at the 2006 trade show for patent violations. Also attending were two exporters owned by China’s government that had sold poison mislabeled as a drug ingredient, which killed nearly 200 people and injured countless others in Haiti and in Panama. Yet another chemical company, Orient Pacific International, reserved an exhibition booth in Milan, but its owner, Kevin Xu, could not attend. He was in a Houston jail on charges of selling counterfeit medicine for schizophrenia, prostate cancer, blood clots and Alzheimer’s disease, among other maladies.

While these companies hardly represent all of the nearly 500 Chinese exhibitors, more than from any other country, they do point to a deeper problem: Pharmaceutical ingredients exported from China are often made by chemical companies that are neither certified nor inspected by Chinese drug regulators, The New York Times has found. Because the chemical companies are not required to meet even minimal drug-manufacturing standards, there is little to stop them from exporting unapproved, adulterated or counterfeit ingredients. The substandard formulations made from those ingredients often end up in pharmacies in developing countries and for sale on the Internet, where more Americans are turning for cheap medicine.

In Milan, The Times identified at least 82 Chinese chemical companies that said they made and exported pharmaceutical ingredients, yet not one was certified by the State Food and Drug Administration in China, records show. Nonetheless, the companies were negotiating deals at the pharmaceutical show. One of them was the Wuxi Hexia Chemical Company. When The Times showed Yan Jiangying, a top Chinese drug regulator, a list of 186 products being advertised by the company, including active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished drugs, Yan said, “This is definitely against the law.” Yet in
China, chemical manufacturers that sell drug ingredients fall into a regulatory hole. Pharmaceutical companies are regulated by the food and drug agency. Chemical companies that make products as varied as fertilizer and industrial solvents are overseen by other agencies. The problem arises when chemical companies cross over into drug ingredients. “We have never investigated a chemical company,” said Yan, deputy director of policy and regulation at the State Food and Drug Administration. “We don’t have jurisdiction.” China has an estimated 80,000 chemical companies, and the United States Food and Drug Administration does not know how many sell ingredients used in drugs consumed by Americans. A House hearing on F.D.A. oversight of foreign drug manufacturers is scheduled for Thursday. (The New York Times) For the complete story see THIS LINK  

 

 

 

 

 

774 arrests in China over safety


The Chinese government revealed that it had arrested 774 people over the last two months as part of a nationwide crackdown on the production and sale of tainted food, drugs and agricultural products. Government regulators hailed the arrests as a major step forward for food and drug safety, and said the “criminal suspects” were detained during nationwide inspections of thousands of restaurants, food and drug production plants and wholesale food markets. Determined to counter accusations that it has been producing and also exporting tainted goods, China has vowed to revamp its food and drug safety regulations and to close illegal manufacturers and exporters. In the summer, the government even executed the former head of the nation’s food and drug administration, Zheng Xiaoyu, after he was convicted of accepting bribes and failing to properly supervise food and drug companies, some of which had sold counterfeit drugs. But the government also acknowledged that problems remain.

In its announcement, it said that this month only 82 percent of food tested in medium and large cities in China met safety standards, and nearly 30 percent of the restaurants surveyed by regulators had failed food safety inspections. The announcement of the arrests offered few details about the nature and seriousness of the food and drug safety violations involved, or, indeed, who had been arrested or the size of their businesses. The government said only that it had investigated 626 criminal cases. The arrests came after nearly a year of high-profile recalls involving everything from tainted pet food ingredients to problem toys, and after repeated promises on the part of government regulators to crack down on tainted goods and restore confidence in the Made in China label. As part of its effort, the government is also trying to counter widespread concerns that the quality and safety of the food and drugs sold to its own citizens is far worse than the products it exports. In fact, China acknowledged this year that while it believes 99 percent of its food exports meet safety standards, only about 80 percent of food sold domestically has passed inspections. Today, the government said that a four-month campaign to root out bad food and drug producers and sellers was paying dividends. 

In a separate announcement, the Ministry of Agriculture said that it was revoking the registration of 11 highly toxic pesticides because of food safety concerns. The government also said this week that since July, inspectors working at Chinese ports have destroyed or recalled over 1,000 tons of fake products. China is also working with American and European regulators to cooperate on product safety and to put into place new methods to detect harmful products. (The New York Times) For the complete article see THIS LINK

 

 

 

 

 

 

New cancer recommendations; Diet, weight, alcohol and red meat
consumption all implicated in cancer risk


A team of top scientists from around the world spent five years reviewing 7,000 medical studies and concluded that diet and weight directly affect whether you'll get cancer. The landmark study also linked consumption of alcohol, red meat and processed meat to an increased risk of cancer. ABC News medical editor Dr. Tim Johnson broke down the new recommendations. You can also find more information at www.dietandcancerreport.org.

Recommendations include: Limit body fat. Your body mass index should be between 18.5 to 24.9. Weight around the waist is most dangerous. Limit red meat to 2.5 ounces a day. An additional 1.7 ounces a day increases cancer risk by 15 percent. That means an 8 ounce steak or a quarter-pound hamburger would be the limit for a week. Limit alcohol to two drinks a day for men, one drink a day for women. Limit salt intake to 2 grams a day. That’s about a teaspoon a day, instead of the teaspoon and a half that most people eat. To give you an idea of how much salt is in food, just one cup of cottage cheese has half the salt you should eat in a day: half a teaspoon. Processed foods are almost always higher in salt. Get nutrients from whole foods, not vitamin supplements. Mothers should breast-feed children. (ABC News) See THIS LINK

 

 

 

 

 

Kimberly-Clark Professional video contest is truly out of this world
 

After boldly going where no health and hygiene company had gone before with its launch of the first electronic touchless bath tissue dispenser, Kimberly-Clark Professional is now set to enter alien territory. And this time the public is invited to travel along, through a contest being announced today at www.aliendroppings.com. To enter, contestants must first view a quirky two-part video of a hapless earthling’s encounter with a superior life form inside a men’s room stall. The brief vignettes depict what happens when an alien competes with a human for access to a new restroom technology. The contest challenge is to watch both videos and create a three-minute script treatment for the duo’s close encounter of the third time. The grand prize winner will have their video produced and will also receive a SONY HD video camera. Additional prizes will be awarded for first and second place. Full contest rules and prize information are available at http://www.aliendroppings.com/welcome.html. The first video installment surfaces today. The second will materialize in late November. Contest entries must be received by January 31, 2008.

 

 

 

 


October 30, 2007   Download print version

Fire-related patient load lands on UCSD’s Hillcrest burn unit  

City hospital in Brooklyn reviews care of a boy, 12

Participants left uninformed in some halted medical trials

FDA issues early communication about an ongoing safety review of Aprotinin injection

Influx of medical students creates concern; Enrollment increase
means resident training needs to expand

Getinge contracts with GE Healthcare and Premier

More than 700 healthcare facilities respond to Cardinal Health
patient safety grant challenge


Fire-related patient load lands on UCSD’s Hillcrest burn unit             

The tenacity with which the 18-bed the burn unit at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Medical Center in Hillcrest (CA) has tackled the strains of an unprecedented fire emergency has once again made the hospital a hub of media attention, this time for treating victims of the devastating fires this week. Recognized as the only specialized burn unit in the San Diego and Imperial counties, the hospital has treated many of the area’s fire victims. To date, the unit has treated 47 fire-related injuries due to surface or inhalation burns. Currently, there are eight patients in critical condition and 10 in rehabilitation. Nineteen out of the 20 other patients that were previously in critical care have been upgraded to the hospital’s general ward. Laura Everett, an administrative assistant, described last week in the burn unit as “chaotic, but in control.” Burn Unit Charge Nurse Janine Dubina, like all of the staff, underwent a harrowing week dealing with crisis conditions in the unit. Living between Lakeside and Ramona, she had to evacuate early in the week, but still came to work ready and able. Most patients came in during the first two days of the fire, and while new cases have tapered off for the moment, Dubina said she expects the number of patients to increase as the weeks progress. She said that more people will likely start trickling in now that the fires have died down and residents are returning to their normal routines like after 2003’s Cedar Fires, the disaster that put the burn unit in the national spotlight.  


The current patients’ burn degrees range from 20-90 percent, some of them being treated for inhalation as well as surface burns. Although response efforts brought victims in quickly enough to be intubated before any internal swelling choked off their airways, some patients’ bodies have swelled so much internally that removal of intubation tubes is now impossible. Dubina said that one of the major health concerns from the fires is smoke inhalation. Having burned through many commercial and residential developments, smoke is rife with plastics, paint and other chemical pollutants that can cause lung damage. Smaller particles in the air farther away from the fires can be more hazardous than the smoke and ash closer to the fires themselves. In order to protect patients and staff from the outside air, high-efficiency particulate air filters are stationed near the unit’s doors, and indoor air quality is checked daily to ensure a sterile environment.

Lasting impressions from the Cedar Fires pushed the county to make sure that the same mistakes would not be repeated. For instance, the implementation of a reverse-911 program saved many more lives last week, allowing people to evacuate properly and be informed ahead of time of the disaster. The hospital also now has a better-developed relationship with Cal Fire, allowing for stronger lines of communication, Dubina said. “For everyone that complains about UCSD running disaster drills, this is the reason we knew what to do,” she said. The staff prides itself on a strong sense of camaraderie, a bond that staff members said helped strengthen their team’s efficiency when patients began to piling up at the burn unit. Many nurses and doctors  ignored orders to evacuate their homes, instead coming in to work 12-hour shifts and occasionally overtime, just to make sure the unit wasn’t left short-handed. On Oct. 21, the unit was graced with extra nurses, according to registered nurse Jami Lewellen. “Night shift nurses stepped outside and smelled smoke on the air, they just knew to come in,” she said. Even students from UCSD who normally volunteer at the hospital came to help, retrieving any extra equipment or blood that was needed, even though campus had shut down for the week. (UCSD Guardian) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 

 

 

City hospital in Brooklyn reviews care of a boy, 12


Officials at
Kings County Hospital Center said yesterday that they were “closely examining” why doctors there failed to detect a drug-resistant staph infection in a 12-year-old Brooklyn boy who died this month. The boy, Omar Rivera, was given only allergy medication at the hospital and was then sent home, a lawyer for the boy’s family said yesterday. A hospital spokeswoman, Hope Mason, confirmed that Omar was treated at the hospital shortly after midnight on Oct. 13. She said that the hospital would look into “what more could have been done to detect the infection at that time.” Omar was pronounced dead at Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center in Brooklyn at 10:25 a.m. on Oct. 14, city officials said. School officials have said that Omar, a student at Intermediate School 211 in Canarsie, was sick and stayed home from school on Oct. 9. On Oct. 9 or 10, his mother, Aileen Rivera, took him to a clinic, First Medcare, on Flatlands Avenue in Canarsie, said the family’s lawyer, Paul B. Weitz.

At First Medcare, Weitz said, doctors noted that Omar had one or two pus-filled boils on his buttocks, diagnosed an infection and prescribed an antibiotic, amoxicillin, along with ibuprofen. A manager at First Medcare said she could not comment on the case because of privacy laws. Late on Oct. 12, Weitz said, Omar still had a high fever, so his mother took him to the emergency room at
Kings County, a city-run hospital in East Flatbush, with one of the city’s busiest emergency rooms. Mason said she was not allowed to disclose who had treated Omar. Whoever it was, said Weitz, decided that Omar had an allergic reaction to ibuprofen and gave him Benadryl. Weitz’s account of Omar’s treatment at Kings County was reported yesterday in The New York Post. Blood tests done after Omar’s death determined that he was infected with the bacterium methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, health officials said. A determination on whether MRSA caused Omar’s death is not expected for several weeks. A student at another school in the metropolitan region, Trinity Elementary School, in New Rochelle, came down with an MRSA infection, but school officials said yesterday that the child was recovering. Custodians at the school were doing special cleaning before today’s classes, the officials said. (The New York Times)

 


 

 

Participants left uninformed in some halted medical trials


When Congress passed a bill last month requiring makers of drugs and medical devices to disclose the results of clinical trials for all approved products, advocates of greater study disclosure applauded the move. But a provision that would have mandated disclosures for another group of products never made it into the final version of the bill. It would have covered products tested on patients, but dropped before marketing. “Trial sponsors can still choose to keep information about some trials confidential, creating serious ethical concerns,” said Dr. Deborah A. Zarin, the director of ClinicalTrials.gov, a Web site run by the National Library of Medicine. Many experts said the recent Congressional debate underscored a troubling fact: some patients in clinical studies never learn about test results. The problem may be particularly relevant to those implanted with medical devices that stay with them long after a trial is over. For manufacturers and researchers alike, “there is a tremendous incentive to go on, to forget about the old and move on to the new,” said Drummond Rennie, a deputy editor at The Journal of the American Medical Association.

There are no data available for the number of patients who participate in studies of drugs and medical devices that never make it to the marketplace, though it is likely that the number runs into the thousands. A product may not reach the market for a variety of reasons; it may not perform well in trials, for example, or it may be rejected by regulators. Although researchers conducting clinical studies are not required to disclose test results to study participants, they must alert patients taking part in a test to emerging product dangers. Companies also have to keep promises made to regulators at the time a trial began, like agreements to follow the health of study patients. Such promises are often required to get approval to begin trials in the first place. But researchers and manufacturers do not always fulfill even those minimal requirements. And such failing may be particularly acute in trials of implanted devices, since those products remain inside patients. In August, for example, the Food and Drug Administration sent a warning to Boston Scientific after investigators discovered the company’s diligence in following up with patients faltered around the time it dropped a product under development. The product being tested was an experimental stent intended to prevent the rupturing of an aneurysm in the major abdominal artery. Among other things, agency investigators found that Boston Scientific, which halted development of the stent last year after a study showed it frequently fractured, had neglected to tell patients in that trial about the problem’s scope.

Because of loopholes in the recently passed Congressional bill, device makers like Boston Scientific will still have discretion whether to publicly reveal the results of studies like that of the failed stent. Under the law, device producers will have to report such “premarketing” studies and their results to the F.D.A. But that data will remain in a confidential “black box” until a product is approved; if a device is rejected or dropped, a company will not have to disclose those results or even publicly acknowledge that the trials occurred. Device makers lobbied against mandating disclosure for failed products, arguing that releasing such data would be confusing to patients and would give away valuable information to a company’s competitors about devices under development that might succeed in subsequent trials. “Such disclosures could have the unintended consequence of eliminating many small device makers from the marketplace,” Stephen J. Ubl, chief executive of the Advanced Medical Technology Association trade group, testified before Congress in June.
The new bill does allow for a mechanism under which the secretary of the Health and Human Services Department could release trial data about unapproved products if a public health issue exists, but such moves would be argued case by case. “This was a disappointment,” said Dr. Steven E. Nissen, the chairman of the cardiology department at the Cleveland Clinic, who helped draft the House version of the bill. (The New York Times) To read the original article see THIS LINK
 

 


 

 

FDA issues early communication about an ongoing safety review of Aprotinin injection


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Early Communication about an Ongoing Safety Review of Aprotinin Injection (marketed as Trasylol), a drug used to control bleeding during heart surgery.
Last week, FDA was notified that a Canadian research group stopped a study on Trasylol because the drug appeared to increase the risk for death compared to the other antifibrinolytic drugs used in the study. Antifibrinolytic drugs help slow the breakdown of blood clots and subsequent excessive bleeding. The data also suggested that fewer patients receiving the drug experienced serious bleeding events.

This most recent data support the results from other comparison studies of Trasylol. The comparison studies were discussed at a September 2007 joint meeting of FDA’s Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committees. FDA anticipates further review of the risk and benefits of Trasylol, which may result in additional labeling or other regulatory action. FDA will work with the sponsor of the recently terminated study to evaluate the data fully. In the meantime, FDA recommends that healthcare providers review the risks and benefits of Trasylol outlined in the label and in the Early Communication about an Ongoing Safety Review, and discuss the information with their patients. In 2006, FDA revised the labeling for Trasylol to strengthen its safety warning and limit its approved usage to patients at an increased risk for blood loss and blood transfusion during coronary bypass graft surgery. Trasylol is marketed by Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp.,
Leverkusen, Germany. Full text of the Early Communication about an Ongoing Safety Review can be found at http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/early_comm/aprotinin.htm.


 

 

Influx of medical students creates concern; Enrollment increase
means resident training needs to expand

Enrollment is increasing sharply at medical schools across the country, a trend that’s expected to help the nation combat a worsening shortage of physicians. But it’s also focusing attention on the need to expand the other half of the physician pipeline: residency programs. “If you don’t increase the second stage of the education process, you don’t end up with more practicing physicians,” said Edward Salsberg, director of the Association of American Medical Colleges’ center for workforce studies. A record number of students enrolled at medical schools this fall, including those in Houston, Salsberg’s group reported recently. But the higher numbers also mean more training positions in hospitals will be needed after those students graduate in four years. The enrollment jump was largely in response to the AAMC’s appeal to the nation’s 126 medical schools last year to increase class size by nearly one-third by 2015. This year’s increase to about 17,800 first-year students represents an 8 percent increase since 2002, the group’s benchmark year. Medical schools in Houston are contributing to that increase.

The University of Texas Medical School at Houston enrolled 230 first-year students this fall, up 12 percent from 206 students in 2002. And Baylor College of Medicine plans to increase its first-year class to 200 by 2011, a 19 percent increase over the 168 students in 2002. “We think the gradual increase will allow us to accommodate people and not affect their education,” said Dr. Stephen Greenberg, Baylor’s dean of medical education. Because the UT Medical School has added seats in recent years, enrollment will remain stable for the next few years, said Dr. Judianne Kellaway, assistant dean of admissions. But the number of applicants, which already has outpaced the increase in class size, is expected to continue to rise. Nearly 3,700 aspiring physicians applied this year, 5 percent more than last year. Though medical school enrollment is on the rise, increasing the number of residency positions is arguably more difficult. That’s mainly because programs in most states depend largely on funding from the federal government through Medicare, and that funding has remained static for the past few years. State funding in Texas, however, is improving. The Legislature this year approved an increase to $63 million for residency programs, the highest level ever and more than double the $25 million appropriated last year. Some state money could go toward a new neurology residency program at the UT Medical School here. Dr. Dong Kim, chairman of the department of neurosurgery, said seven positions could be approved by January. Until then, the university offers residency in every specialty except neurology, he said.

Like the rest of the country, Texas does not have enough physicians to keep up with a growing population that demands more specialty services. It ranked 42nd in the country for its patient-to-resident ratio in 2005, with 194 patient-care physicians per 100,000 residents, according to the American Medical Association. Lately, however, more doctors have applied for licenses in Texas, likely because of new limits in medical malpractice lawsuits that make it more appealing for physicians to practice here. The number of residency positions available in Texas climbed to 7,260 slots during the 2005-06 school year, an increase of about 4 percent in two years, according to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. That’s far fewer slots than other populous states; New York, for example, had more than twice as many residents that year, partly because the state secured nongovernmental funding. Without enough positions for its graduates, Texas could lose physicians-in-training to other states.  Nationwide, the number of residency slots is increasing at a similar rate. About 115,100 positions were available across the country during the 2005-06 school year, the ACGME reported. There's good reason to keep graduates in Texas for training, according to the Texas Medical Association, which represents physicians and medical students. The group reported that physicians who complete both medical school and residency here are nearly three times more likely to stay in the state to practice. (
Houston Chronicle) To read the original article see THIS LINK
 

 

Getinge contracts with GE Healthcare and Premier

Getinge USA, Rochester, NY, has entered into an agreement with GE Healthcare to service GETINGE washer/disinfectors and steam sterilizers in more than 200 facilities that contract with GE Healthcare to provide a host of asset management services, the company has announced. Getinge USA also has been awarded a contract with Premier Inc., one of the nation’s largest healthcare purchasing networks, to offer detergents and cleaners to 1,700 hospitals and more than 47,000 other healthcare sites. Getinge AB is a manufacturer and distributor of advanced infection control equipment, medical systems and extended care products for OR, ED, ICU, sterile processing and life science applications. For more information, see THIS LINK.
 

 

More than 700 healthcare facilities respond to Cardinal Health patient safety grant challenge

More than 10 percent of the nation’s healthcare facilities are seeking grants from Cardinal Health through a $1 million fund set up by the company to help improve patient safety. Company officials said more than 700 hospitals, health systems and community health clinics responded to their announcement in August about the grant program, which is the largest and first of its kind in the private sector. To support initiatives that enhance patient safety and quality of care, Cardinal Health will grant up to $50,000 per facility to fund new and innovative programs that establish or implement creative and replicable methods to address challenges in providing quality patient care and to help drive improvements. The company expects to fund up to 40 of the 730 grant requests.

In selecting grant recipients, Cardinal Health’s selection committee will look for: projects that respond to a clearly identified, high priority safety issue; projects that apply new thinking and approaches to development of solutions; collaborative programs; demonstrable and sustainable measures to assure that improvements hold up over time; model programs that can be replicated at other organizations. To be eligible for funding, facilities must be designated as 501(c)(3) by the IRS and were required to submit a letter of intent to submit a proposal by October 12. Approximately 100 to 150 institutions will be asked to submit a full proposal, with grants announced in March 2008.

 


October 29, 2007   Download print version

3M and Zargis announce global marketing alliance

State fines 9 hospitals; Under new law, California hospitals
penalized for putting the lives of patients at risk

Universal flu vaccine recommendation may be coming

WHO update: Avian influenza situation in Indonesia

Pediatricians urge autism screening

Cancer patients not getting live-saving flu and pneumonia shots

Health officials try to calm parents about staph


3M and Zargis announce global marketing alliance

3M and Zargis Medical Corp., a spin-off from Siemens Corporate Research and a majority-owned subsidiary of Speedus Corp. announced an exclusive multi-year marketing agreement involving Zargis’ heart sound analysis software and 3M Littmann’s next-generation electronic stethoscope. Under the agreement, Zargis will support 3M in its efforts to develop a next-generation stethoscope that will be compatible with Zargis’ heart sound analysis software. The date on which Zargis’ software will become available for use with a Littmann stethoscope has not yet been announced. In addition, the alliance provides Zargis with a wide-range of marketing and promotional opportunities along with exclusive rights to sell its heart sound analysis software through the global distribution network of the Littmann brand. The agreement grants 3M a minority equity position in Zargis, following the first sale of Zargis’ software through the 3M distribution channel, and a seat on Zargis’ board of directors. 

 



State fines 9 hospitals; Under new law,
California hospitals
penalized for putting the lives of patients at risk

State health officials fined nine California hospitals Thursday for infractions that put patients at imminent risk of injury or death, including a notorious case at Martin Luther King Jr.-Harbor Hospital in May in which a woman died after writhing unattended on the floor of the emergency room lobby. Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health Center, Garden Grove Hospital and Medical Center, and Kaiser Foundation Hospital Santa Clara were among the hospitals fined. King-Harbor and one other hospital, Feather River Hospital in Paradise, were fined for two infractions each. Each fine is for $25,000, the most allowed under the first phase of a law that went into effect Jan. 1. The hospitals have 10 days to file a notice of appeal. The fines are the first the state has levied against hospitals. And the penalties will bring hospitals in line with nursing homes and health plans, which already had been subject to fines.

Hospital industry representatives had managed until last year’s legislative session to resist fines, but their opposition was undermined by a series of transplant fiascoes in recent years and by the long history of lapses at King-Harbor, formerly known as King-Drew. The new law is intended to give state regulators more teeth, said Kathleen Billingsley, deputy director of the Center for Healthcare Quality at the California Department of Public Health. With fines, she said, “There is a sense of immediacy and responsiveness on the part of the provider to correct or modify the processes that have led to these quality problems.” Glenn Melnick, a health economist for Rand Corp., agreed, even though the fine in question, which can reach $50,000 as the law is phased in, is half the amount that can be levied against nursing homes. “The dollar amount of the fine is only one potential source of leverage,” he said. “What is the impact on the hospital’s reputation in the community? What’s the impact on the staff and the people who work there? If they take it seriously, that could be much more important than a $25,000 fine.” In a statement, Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health Center, which was fined for failing to follow policies and procedures for the safe administration of medication, said that hospital officials were taking the matter “very seriously.” “In collaboration with the California Department of Public Health, we have conducted a thorough investigation of this incident and taken appropriate action to protect all patients’ safety while in our facility,” the statement said.

Garden Grove Hospital and Medical Center, which was fined for being unaware of a drug’s possible adverse effects, issued a statement that said, “The state notified the hospital late in the day on March 20. . . that its practices did not conform with Medicare standards of participation. Overnight, the hospital developed a plan of corrective action which was accepted by the state the next morning at 9 a.m.” As for King-Harbor, the Los Angeles County-owned hospital closed its emergency room and in-patient beds in August after failing a string of federal inspections and losing federal funding. It now offers urgent care and out-patient clinics but no hospital services. “Both of the incidents described are unacceptable and do not reflect the department’s commitment to operate our hospitals in a manner that meets state and federal standards,” said Bruce Chernof, director and chief medical officer of the county Department of Health Services. The second incident involved a 38-year-old man with a headache and swelling in the brain who languished in the emergency room for four days in February before his family drove him to another hospital, where he received emergency surgery. (Los Angeles Times)
 

 

Universal flu vaccine recommendation may be coming

The time may soon come when doctors recommend that every American man, woman and child be vaccinated every year for influenza, an idea offered Wednesday by a leading expert in vaccines and preventive medicine. Dr. Gregory Poland, director of the Vaccine Research Group at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, testified Wednesday at a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the subcommittee at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that issues federal recommendations for the use of vaccines in the United States. In his testimony, Poland recommended that the United States should move to a so-called “universal recommendation” for vaccination against influenza, the virus that causes the flu. A universal recommendation would make official that Americans of all ages should receive an influenza vaccination every year. The testimony came at a time when the committee is considering a smaller step of recommending that all school-age children receive a yearly vaccine. “I think it’s a good idea to expand [vaccination] to all school-age children,” Poland said. “But a better idea is to say, ‘let’s not just go age group by age group; let’s just recommend that everybody get it.’”

Review of recent changes in the CDC recommendations shows that ACIP has been steadily increasing the indications for a flu vaccine for several years. Current estimates are that more than 70 percent of the U.S. population now meets one of the 15 published criteria for recommendation of a yearly flu vaccine. “We’ve changed the recommendation every year or two since ‘97,” Poland said. “It’s sort of a creeping incrementalism.” Instead of marking out ever-increasing numbers of groups that should get the flu vaccine yearly, Poland espoused a universal recommendation that all Americans should be getting the shot, with particular emphasis on vulnerable groups. “Let’s just make a universal recommendation, that all Americans should get vaccinated. But then note that there are particular high-risk groups that should be particularly recommended to get the vaccine.” 

Such a move would not come without difficulty. Currently, less than 40 percent of America’s 300 million people receive yearly flu shots, and many of those for whom it is recommended do not receive their immunizations. Other vaccine experts pointed out that any effort to vaccinate all Americans would face many logistical hurdles. Concerns included the availability of enough flu vaccine for the entire American population and the lack of a public health infrastructure to deliver that many vaccines. A move to vaccinate everyone could also face significant financial hurdles. “Who is going to pay for all of this?” asked Dr. William Schaffner, chair of the department of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University. “For example, we know that there are 40 million people who don’t have medical insurance. Who is going to get the vaccine to those people?” According to Poland, though, vaccine supplies have been increasing steadily since the widely publicized vaccine shortages from several years ago. “This year, manufacturers are going to make 130 million doses in America. Last year and we threw away about 12 million doses,” he said. 

According to Poland, there could be a very important hidden benefit to addressing these issues now: Americans would learn how to be prepared in case of a bioterrorist attack or a pandemic infectious disease. “Once you’ve made a recommendation and then implement the recommendations, you go a long way towards figuring out the ways to operationalize the ways to administer these things to all Americans,” Poland said. “You can’t make that happen in the middle of an emergency.” Schaffner agreed that the development of such public health infrastructure could be a critically important step for the future. “If we undertook to vaccinate a very substantial proportion of the U.S. population each year, you'd have to organize everything from vaccine development to production to delivery,” he said. “It’d be like a training session or a fire drill that we'd conduct each year. So if we had to do it in any kind of emergent situation, for example, anthrax, smallpox vaccine, delivering cipro [antibiotics], we’d have a trained provider network and a trained public,” he said.

“It may be something that could lay the groundwork for something looming down the line in the form of an avian flu pandemic,” said Dr. Peter Hotez, chair of the Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine at The George Washington University. “By getting this infrastructure into place by vaccinating the whole population against [seasonal] flu, you lay the groundwork to combat deadly avian influenza.” But according to Poland, this type of recommendation would likely need some advance warning to allow for the infrastructure to be built. “I suggest we make the recommendation in advance,” Poland said. “For example, something like ‘starting next year, we’ll be recommending all Americans get a flu vaccine.’” (ABC News)

 

 

 

 

WHO update: Avian influenza situation in Indonesia


According to the World Health Organization, the Ministry of Health of
Indonesia has announced a new case of human infection of H5N1 avian influenza. A 5-year-old female from the Tangerang District, Banten Province developed symptoms on October 14, was hospitalized on October 20 and died in an AI referral hospital on October 22. The investigation found that there were poultry deaths in the case’s neighborhood in the two weeks prior to her onset of symptoms. Of the 110 cases confirmed to date in Indonesia, 89 have been fatal.

 

 


Pediatricians urge autism screening

The country’s leading pediatricians group is making its strongest push yet to have all children screened for autism twice by age 2, warning of symptoms such as babies who don’t babble at 9 months and 1-year-olds who don’t point to toys. The advice is meant to help both parents and doctors spot autism sooner. There is no cure for the disorder, but experts say that early therapy can lessen its severity. Symptoms to watch for and the call for early screening come in two new reports. They are being released by the American Academy of Pediatrics on Monday at its annual meeting in San Francisco and will appear in the November issue of the journal Pediatrics and on the group’s Web site, http://www.aap.org/. The reports list numerous warning signs, such as a 4-month-old not smiling at the sound of Mom or Dad’s voice, or the loss of language or social skills at any age. Experts say one in 150 U.S. children have the troubling developmental disorder. “Parents come into your office now saying ‘I’m worried about autism.’ Ten years ago, they didn’t know what it was,” said Dr. Chris Johnson of the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio. She co-authored the reports.

The academy’s renewed effort reflects growing awareness since its first autism guidelines in 2001. A 2006 policy statement urged autism screening for all children at their regular doctor visits at age 18 months and 24 months. The authors caution that not all children who display a few of these symptoms are autistic and they said parents shouldn't overreact to quirky behavior. Just because a child likes to line up toy cars or has temper tantrums “doesn't mean you need to have concern, if they're also interacting socially and also pretending with toys and communicating well,” said co-author Dr. Scott Myers, a neurodevelopmental pediatrician in Danville, PA. “With awareness comes concern when there doesn’t always need to be,” he said. “These resources will help educate the reader as to which things you really need to be concerned about.”

Another educational tool, a Web site that debuted in mid-October, offers dozens of video clips of autistic kids contrasted with unaffected children's behavior. That Web site, http://www.autismspeaks.org/, is sponsored by two nonprofit advocacy groups: Autism Speaks and First Signs. They hope the site will promote early diagnosis and treatment to help children with autism lead more normal lives. The two new reports say children with suspected autism should start treatment even before a formal diagnosis. They also warn parents about the special diets and alternative treatments endorsed by celebrities, saying there’s no proof those work. Recommended treatment should include at least 25 hours a week of intensive behavior-based therapy, including educational activities and speech therapy, according to the reports. They list several specific approaches that have been shown to help. For very young children, therapy typically involves fun activities, such as bouncing balls back and forth or sharing toys to develop social skills; there is repeated praise for eye contact and other behavior autistic children often avoid. (The Associated Press) For more information see THIS LINK or see THIS LINK


 

Cancer patients not getting live-saving flu and pneumonia shots


Although flu and pneumonia can be lethal for cancer patients, more than one quarter of patients undergoing radiation therapy are not complying with national guidelines to be vaccinated against these potentially life-threatening yet preventable illnesses, according to a study presented October 28, at the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology’s 49th Annual Meeting in Los Angeles. While Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and the Joint Commission recommend an annual flu (influenza) vaccine for cancer patients aged 50 years or older, 25 percent of patients 50 years or older reported never having received the flu vaccine. Similarly, the pneumonia (pneumococcus) vaccine is recommended to all cancer patients 65 year or older; however, over one-third (36 percent) of cancer patients in this age range reported never having received the vaccine. Cancer patients are at a higher risk of acquiring and dying from these illnesses due to a weaker immune system, among other factors.

Three reasons accounted for almost 80 percent of why patients didn’t receive either vaccine: Patients either believed they didn’t need the vaccines, they didn’t know about the recommended vaccination guidelines or their physicians didn’t recommend the vaccines. While 44 percent of patients who received either vaccine reported that they were asked or informed about these vaccines by their family physicians or internists, only seven percent reported being asked or informed by their oncologists. “People undergoing cancer treatment and their loved ones should ask their oncologists about these vaccines. They are a very simple, yet very effective, way for people living with cancer to extend their lives,” said Neha Vapiwala, M.D., a study author and a radiation oncologist at the Hospital of the
University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. “Oncologists have the opportunity to talk to patients about recommended vaccines during their frequent interactions with patients, whether it be before, during, or after cancer therapy. This discussion could result in better cancer care and ultimately save lives.” This was the first study done to find out whether cancer patients receiving radiation therapy complied with national vaccination guidelines.

 

 

 

 

Health officials try to calm parents about staph


Some angry and nervous parents kept their children out of a Brooklyn (NY) middle school, after learning about the death of a student who had been infected with a virulent, drug-resistant strain of bacteria. But school and health officials tried to assure parents that all the proper procedures had been followed and that there was no cause for panic. The city’s health commissioner, Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, said yesterday that the bacteria was the probable cause of the death of the boy, Omar Rivera, 12. But he added, speaking at a news conference at health department headquarters in Manhattan, that it would be impossible to know for certain whether the bacteria had caused the death until an autopsy was complete, which could take several weeks. Omar had been absent from school since Oct. 9, Schools Chancellor Joel I.Klein told reporters at the news conference. After the boy died on Oct. 14, the principal notified health officials, who determined that the boy had been infected with the bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA. Dr. Frieden said that because the boy had not been involved in any organized team sport at school, there was no need to screen every student. He emphasized that the most important precaution was for students to wash their hands and not share personal items like towels and sports uniforms.

Officials at the school, Intermediate School 211 in Canarsie, notified parents of the boy’s death in a letter sent home with students on Thursday. In the letter, parents were told that the school would remain open and that health officials were available to answer questions. A complete wash-down of the school began on Wednesday and was completed on Thursday, school officials said. Over the last month, several schools in the New York region and in other states have reported cases of students infected with the MRSA bacteria. Health officials cautioned again that it was unclear whether there had been more cases, or simply more reports in the news media. Some parents at I.S. 211 expressed frustration that they had not been told sooner of the boy’s death, or had a personal phone call from school officials. Joel Lonergan, the head of school facilities at I.S. 211, said that in their wash-down of the school, custodians wiped off all flat surfaces with a disinfecting solution. The cleaning was completed Thursday night. A complete cleaning is done about three or four times a year, Lonergan said. Dr. Frieden commented: “Just please remember that cleaning of the environment is very unlikely to make any difference in the spread of infection. It’s something that’s done so people feel better, but this isn’t what’s going to reduce the spread of bacteria.”

School and health officials said they did not plan a scrub at other schools. Several students said soap at the school was often difficult or impossible to find. Lonergan said that soap dispensers were checked each morning and that there should be soap readily available. “It’s a custodial issue,” he said. “We inspect the schools on a regular basis, unannounced. So we would pick that up. But it could have been that a child was in there before and emptied the soap dispensers.” Across the region, health and education officials are scrambling to keep better track of MRSA cases in schools, and to educate teachers, students and parents on how to prevent the infection’s spread. Yesterday the Connecticut governor, M. Jodi Rell, authorized a new program that will enable the state health lab to pinpoint MRSA outbreaks more quickly by using DNA to determine whether bacteria from different patients are related. In some cases, school districts have learned about the infections only after the fact. (The New York Times) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 


October 26, 2007   Download print version

Maryland, DC schools report seven new MRSA cases

Knowledge is key weapon in fight against ‘superbug’

New watchdog for hospital superbugs in UK

Virus outbreak at British superbug hospital

Hospital association changes position on reporting medical errors

D.C. troubled by rise in avoidable hospitalizations

VHA Inc. study reveals hospitals planning to make major OR
and imaging equipment purchases in 2008

Masimo’s technologies the focus of multiple clinical studies
at ASA annual meeting


Maryland, DC schools report seven new MRSA cases

 

New drug-resistant staph infections have been reported this week in public schools in Montgomery County, MD, and in two charter schools in the District, bringing the total number of cases among students and educators in the region to at least 55. The total includes cases in Anne Arundel and Howard counties in Maryland and in Alexandria and Fairfax, Loudoun and Prince William counties in Virginia. In Montgomery, school officials said that eight cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been reported since Thursday, for a total of 22.
 

Montgomery officials said 10 students are receiving treatment, and 12 others have recovered. The cases span at least 13 schools. In a memo to its 58 member schools, the D.C. Public Charter School Board said that it knows of two staph cases: one at the SEED public charter school in Southeast, and another at the Arts and Technology Academy in Northeast. Both schools were closed for cleaning and are expected to reopen Thursday, a board spokesman said. The charter board said it was waiting for more guidance from the city health department, but in the meantime, “regular hand-washing and otherwise good hygiene practices should be practiced in schools.” The charter board recommended that schools contact the board and talk to city health officials before deciding to close a school building. In Virginia, cases were also reported this week at C.D. Hylton High School and Old Bridge Elementary schools in Prince William County. The two students with the infection have been successfully treated, officials said. (Washington Post)

 

 

 


Knowledge is key weapon in fight against ‘superbug’


More than a dozen cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections were reported in Indiana. But the infection is not new. “It’s something to be aware about, not to be afraid about,” said Dr. Christopher Belcher, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at Peyton Manning Children’s Hospital at St. Vincent (Indianapolis). “This has been a problem that’s been increasing in prevalence over the last seven to 10 years,’’ Belcher said. “What’s new here is the public awareness of it.” Ronald Sokolow, a fourth-grade substitute teacher in Indianapolis Public Schools, thought he had been bitten on the ankle by a mosquito last week. It was actually MRSA. He has no idea where he contracted the infection, which appeared as a painful lesion that developed into a boil. In an effort to notify parents at the school, Sokolow, 58, contacted the media. “I wanted to protect the kids,” he said. “I wanted their parents to know immediately.” Sokolow’s was not the only school-related case to surface this week. At least 14 such cases were reported across the state of Indiana in the wake of the CDC report. Parents in the affected schools have been notified, and classrooms that housed infected individuals have been disinfected and cleaned, she said. Two school football players in Southern Indiana recently were diagnosed with MRSA, as were two high school students in the Fort Wayne area. In an effort to stem hospital MRSA infections, a pilot project in Indianapolis is reinforcing the importance of hand hygiene in the hospital and screening of intensive-care patients for the bug. (The Indianapolis Star) To read the full article see THIS LINK 

 

 

 

 

New watchdog for hospital superbugs in UK


Inspectors will be able to close dirty hospitals to protect patients from infections as part of the British Government’s drive on superbugs. A health and social care regulator will be set up with powers to close wards, services or whole hospitals, sack bosses and issue warning notices and fines. Legislation to set up the Care Quality Commission will be included in the Queen’s Speech next month. Ministers are keen to be seen tackling superbugs after the deaths of 90 patients from Clostridium difficile at Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust over two-and-a-half years. The bug contributed to the deaths of 255 other patients. The regulator will also be responsible for care homes, GP surgeries and private hospitals. It will replace the Healthcare Commission, which was set up in 2004, and will take over the Social Care Inspectorate and the Mental Health Act Commission. The CQC will also regulate clinical performance, finances and patient safety. Alan Johnson, the Health Secretary, said the body would take “rapid and appropriate action” against any organization putting patients at risk.

Dr. Hamish Meldrum, chairman of the British Medical Association, said: "While we recognize some of the arguments for rationalizing the process of regulation, the BMA is concerned that, only a few years after the Healthcare Commission was set up, it is about to be abolished to make way for yet another, new regulatory body. The NHS has been suffering from too much reorganization and, it appears that, as soon as doctors and managers start getting used to one system, it’s all change.” (Telegrah.co.uk) To read the original article see THIS LINK


 

 

Virus outbreak at British superbug hospital

The hospital at the center of Britain’s deadliest superbug outbreak admitted it has been forced to close a ward after an outbreak of a vomiting virus. The outbreak of norovirus has affected 16 patients at Maidstone hospital in Kent, one of three hospitals run by Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust, where 90 people died in two outbreaks of the Clostridium difficile bug last year. A damning report by the Healthcare Commission this month accused the trust of “significant failings in infection control” after it found its hospitals had filthy wards and elderly patients were left to lie in their own feces. A trust spokesman said it had improved infection control measures since the C difficile outbreak, in which 1,100 patients were infected, and denied the ward closure was evidence that it was still failing to meet proper hygiene standards. “Ten of the 16 patients who contracted norovirus while on the same ward at Maidstone hospital have now recovered from their symptoms,” he said. “The other six patients’ symptoms are subsiding. No new cases of norovirus have been seen on the ward since the outbreak started on Monday night. The affected ward will remain closed to new admissions until all patients have recovered from the illness. Additional cleaning measures are in place on the ward and it will be deep cleaned before being reopened to the public. Staff are monitoring four further patients for norovirus today as a precautionary measure.”

Healthcare campaigners said they knew of another four trusts across the UK that had been hit by norovirus outbreaks in the past two weeks. The group Health Emergency warned outbreaks would undermine efforts to tackle stretched hospital capacity at a time when the NHS is struggling to cope with the continuing pressures of MRSA and C difficile. Hairmyres hospital in East Kilbride has closed 13 wards in the past two weeks; Pilgrim hospital in Boston, Lincolnshire, has closed one ward this week; and Royal Manchester Children’s hospital and Bridport Community hospital, Dorset, have also been hit by norovirus outbreaks. A spokeswoman for NHS Lanarkshire said 13 wards had to be closed at Hairmyres hospital two weeks ago after an outbreak of norovirus. She said only one ward remained closed and a “very small” number of staff and patients were still affected. Geoff Martin, head of campaigns at Health Emergency, said: “Norovirus is only a killer in very extreme circumstances but it is a virulent bug that can knock out whole wards overnight, putting massive pressure on beds and piling up the risk of other cross infections. With the ongoing severe problems with MRSA and C difficile we need a surge in norovirus like we need a hole in the head. As the virus gets a foot hold, large chunks of the NHS bed capacity could be put out of action with severe consequences for the fight against the other killer bugs.” (
Guardian Unlimited) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 



Hospital association changes position on reporting medical errors

The Washington State Hospital Association has reversed its position on the reporting of hospital mistakes after a public uproar over its efforts to keep such details from being released by the state. The association’s efforts to prevent disclosure were detailed in a front-page story Tuesday in The Seattle Times. Cassie Sauer, spokeswoman for the association, said the group now favors the disclosure of errors, which include operating on the wrong body part and other dangerous incidents, as long as the reports also include context, such as how many patients, and what types of patients, each hospital serves, what the hospital has done about the mistakes, and how it plans to prevent future problems. “We had a lot of discussion about your (The Seattle Times’) article, and a lot of calls,” Sauer said. “There’s been a lot of reaction to this, more than we expected. ... Your article made us realize that people really do want the information.”

Since 2000, hospitals have reported so-called “adverse events”, also including doing the wrong surgery or leaving foreign objects in a patient’s body, to the state Health Department, which has routinely disclosed the hospital-specific information. The hospital association had succeeded in arguing that a law passed last Legislative session now prevents such disclosure. Despite the reversal this week, Sauer said, the association can’t “unring the bell,” now that they’ve told the state Department of Health why the law passed last year prevents disclosure. Sauer said the association still believes its interpretation of the current law is correct. “We don’t have the power to tell them it’s OK to violate the law,” she said. So now the association will work with state lawmakers to change the law so that disclosure, along with needed context, can be released. (
Seattle Times) To read the original article see THIS LINK  

 


D.C. troubled by rise in avoidable hospitalizations

The District is seeing more avoidable hospitalizations among children and middle-aged adults, a puzzling trend that includes insured and uninsured groups and raises complex issues of healthcare access, quality and capacity. Statistics released by Rand, an independent research organization, show that the rate of these hospitalizations, which could have been averted through good primary care, climbed from 39.1 per 1,000 adults ages 40-64 in 2004 to 43.4 in 2006. Among children through age 17, the rate jumped from 8.9 to 12.1. Health officials said they cannot fully explain what is causing the increase. They began to see a rise in 2005 and tied most of it to skin infections involving MRSA, the antibiotic-resistant staph bacteria that has attracted attention recently because of diagnoses in school districts across the region. The 2006 numbers suggest that far more is to blame, including a primary care system that is overloaded, packed emergency rooms and potentially sicker patients. Higher rates of asthma among children in certain areas of the city appear to be a potential factor, too.

Whatever the reasons, officials described the trend as troublesome. “It’s a problem for all of us,” said Nicole Lurie, a physician and senior scientist at Rand. “These things are not headed in the right direction.” The
Rand analysis of healthcare patterns in the District was presented at the annual meeting of the D.C. Primary Care Association. At the association’s request, Rand has looked for several years at healthcare needs, especially as they relate to chronic disease, low-income residents and hospital use. The data released yesterday will soon become part of a $1.5 million study commissioned by the D.C. Council. By late December, officials said, they will have the fullest picture ever of the utilization of city emergency services, hospital overcrowding and, as Lurie put it, “who's getting what care where.” That information is supposed to guide the council in deciding how $116 million in tobacco settlement funds should be spent. Council members originally intended the money for a sophisticated health complex on the grounds of the former D.C. General Hospital in Southeast and several state-of-the-art community clinics that would bolster services in Wards 7 and 8. An additional $80 million was to go toward urgent or emergency care improvements, most likely at Greater Southeast Community Hospital and Howard University Hospital. The Rand study was to direct that allocation, too. But this week, the financial crisis that pushed Greater Southeast to the verge of closure prompted the council to agree to spend virtually all of the remaining tobacco money to help sell the facility and support an extensive rehabilitation. Yesterday's report is Rand’s most comprehensive on the subject because all District hospitals participated. (The Washington Post)

 


VHA Inc. study reveals hospitals planning to make major OR and imaging equipment purchases in 2008

VHA Inc., a national healthcare alliance, conducted research on 1,250 of its member hospitals to determine their capital equipment purchase plans for 2008. The study of operating room and radiology directors shows that VHA hospitals plan to purchase more than 5,500 pieces of equipment for use in operating rooms over the next 18 months and more than 1,400 pieces of imaging equipment over the same period. This represents $500 million in purchases, with high-end imaging equipment representing 65 percent of the total. In addition, only 20 percent of those that participated in the research said they have picked the manufacturer of the products, and 60 percent said that they plan to purchase these items using their GPO contracts. This study was the first of two annual research studies of member hospitals that VHA conducts on a yearly basis. Each study represents approximately 5,000 hours of market research and includes interviews with multiple people at each hospital. VHA uses this data to support its Group Buy and construction support programs.

Major movables and imaging equipment, such as CT scanners, hospital beds and laboratory instruments, is defined as equipment that has a depreciable life of three or more years. According to the study, the most popular items hospitals will purchase will be scopes, OR lights and stretchers.
“Hospitals have to keep pace with new equipment, and this is exactly what is fueling hospitals’ appetite for big spending in capital equipment, especially when it comes to keeping competition alive with other regional health care organizations,” said Nik Fincher, senior director of capital asset services at VHA Inc. According to the study, imaging continues to be an area where hospitals are investing, with the majority of hospitals intending to purchase: CT scanners, mammography units, C-Arms, ultrasounds and digital radiography equipment in the coming year. The following factors were listed as the most important decision criteria for purchasing movable capital equipment purchases: Product Superiority (42.2 percent); Standardization (28.5 percent); Price (13.9 percent). The study also showed that only 4.5 percent of the research participants said physician preference was a top priority in making these purchasing decisions.

 

 

Masimo’s technologies the focus of multiple clinical studies at ASA annual meeting

Masimo reported that multiple independent and objective clinical studies and a case study were presented last week at the 2007 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Annual Meeting in San Francisco focused on the unique benefits of Masimo’s noninvasive patient monitoring technologies in helping clinicians provide improved patient care. These new studies add to the more than 100 independent and objective studies demonstrating the superiority of Masimo SET pulse oximetry, as well as adding to the growing body of research proving the efficacy of Masimo Rainbow SET in providing accurate, reliable physiological measurements of multiple blood constituents that previously required invasive procedures. Built on Masimo SET Read-Through Motion and Low Perfusion technology, Masimo Rainbow SET is the first and only upgradeable technology platform capable of continuously and noninvasively measuring carboxyhemoglobin (SpCO), methemoglobin (SpMet) and pleth variability index (PVI), in addition to oxyhemoglobin (SpO2), perfusion index (PI) and pulse rate. 

The studies included: “New Generation and Old Generation Pulse Oximeters in Children with Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease”, “New Pulse Oximetry Sensors with Low Saturation Accuracy Claims - A Clinical Evaluation”, “Rad-57 Rainbow CO-Oximeter in Detecting Methemoglobin during Upper GI Endoscopy - A Case Report”, “Clinical Analyses of 429 Cases of Acute CO Poisoning,” “A Comparison of Finger, Ear and Forehead SpO2 on Detecting Oxygen Desaturation in Healthy Volunteers,” and “New Algorithm for Automatic Estimation of the Respiratory Variations in the Pulse Oximeter Waveform” For more information on the studies see THIS LINK

 


October 25, 2007   Download print version

AIDS vaccine volunteers among recipients who may be at higher risk of contracting virus

Drug eluting balloons show promise as a potential alternative
to drug eluting stents used in the treatment of coronary artery disease 

Hospitals adopt STERIS Advanced Room Sterilization Technology
in the fight against ‘Superbugs’

Steris Corporation wins U.S. EPA SmartWay Environmental Excellence award  

Healthcare Supply Chain Standards Coalition endorses standards
for organizational and product identifiers

6 Sigma decreases mortality in hospitalized patients;
Performance improvement initiative
decreases hospital stay and costs

Large avian flu outbreaks more likely to involve duck meat industry, experts find


AIDS vaccine volunteers among recipients who may be at higher risk of contracting virus

South African AIDS researchers have begun warning hundreds of volunteers that a highly touted experimental vaccine they received in recent months might make them more, not less, likely to contract HIV in the midst of one of the world's most rampant epidemics. The move stems from the discovery last month that an AIDS vaccine developed by Merck & Co. might have led to more infections than it averted among study subjects in the United States and other countries. Among those who received at least two doses of the vaccine, 19 contracted HIV compared with 11 of those given placebos.

Researchers shut down the trial on the grounds that the vaccine was proving ineffective, but the surge in infection among vaccinated volunteers prompted intense scientific debate and anxiety among researchers. The failure of the Merck vaccine is the latest in a series of disappointing results for research projects aimed at curbing AIDS.

Researchers in Soweto, Cape Town, Durban and two other sites began contacting South Africa's 801 trial participants on Tuesday, mainly by cellphone text message. The goal is to tell each one individually whether they had received a placebo or the vaccine, a process called "unblinding" the trial. Researchers are telling the roughly half who received the vaccine that it might have increased their risk of contracting HIV. Merck developed the vaccine in conjunction with the U.S. National Institutes of Health, and until September's announcement, researchers worldwide considered it the most promising candidate yet in a multibillion-dollar quest for an AIDS vaccine dating to the 1980s. Scientists crafted the vaccine by genetically altering a common virus to include elements of HIV. They hoped that it would trigger an immune response that would make recipients less likely to contract HIV, or at least delay the onset of full-blown AIDS.

The vaccine could not have caused infection, researchers say, but it could have caused immunological changes that made it easier for the virus to take hold during a later exposure. The Merck vaccine trials took place in 15 cities in the United States, including Boston, Los Angeles and New York, and three in Canada. There also were sites in Peru, Brazil, Australia, Haiti, the Dominican Republic and Jamaica. Those trials began in December 2004 and included 3,000 participants, mostly gay men.

In South Africa -- where an estimated 5.5 million people are infected with HIV, more than in any other country -- the study used the same vaccine but was administered separately. The trial here started later, with the first injections this year, and had its own ethics oversight board. Most of the subjects were heterosexual. The ethics oversight board in the United States, which monitored the trial everywhere but in South Africa, has not decided whether to tell participants if they received the placebo or the vaccine, said Mark Feinberg, vice president for medical affairs and policy for Merck. Continuing research could be compromised, he said,if participants were told immediately whether they received the placebo or the vaccine. Vaccine researchers are scheduled to meet in Seattle on Nov. 7. He added that individual participants who want to know whether they received the vaccine will be told. Researchers also are counseling all study participants that the vaccine may have increased HIV risk for those who received it.

Other AIDS studies also have had unexpected results. Trials of two vaginal microbicide gels to prevent HIV led to more infections among those using the products instead of placebos. A massive study in Zimbabwe of the ability of HIV counseling and testing to prevent the spread of the epidemic found more infections among those with expanded access to testing.

For the complete story, see THIS LINK.

 

Drug eluting balloons show promise as a potential alternative to drug eluting stents used in the treatment of coronary artery disease 

Drug eluting balloons could offer a viable alternative to drug eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Research results from two studies presented at the Late Breaking Trials sessions during the Cardiovascular Research Foundation’s (CRF) Nineteenth Annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium in Washington, D.C., support conducting further studies of the use of this potential therapeutic alternative. One of the studies marked the first direct comparison between DES and drug eluting balloons. Used to open atherosclerotic arteries, DES have come under intense scrutiny over the last several years, prompting the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to form a special advisory board to investigate claims of complications. Recent studies have suggested that the polymer coating of these stents might be implicated in the reported complications.

The “SeQuent Please” drug eluting balloon catheter from B. Braun Melsungen AG in Germany delivers drugs directly to the lesion during angioplasty. A pilot study published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine first shed light on this potential treatment option.  

In the PEPCAD II study, Dr. Martin Unverdorben (Rotenburg, Germany) directly compared “SeQuent Please” to another manufacturer’s DES in 131 patients over six months. The team evaluated restenosis, the re-closing or narrowing of the artery after a cardiac procedure, and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) such as heart attack, bypass, repeat stenosis, or death. Proving patients treated with the drug eluting balloons experienced only 3.7 percent restenosis and 4.8 percent MACE, as compared to patients with DES, wherein restenosis was 20.8 percent with 22.0 percent MACE rate. Further supporting these results, a separate study by Unverdorben evaluated the use of drug eluting balloons for the treatment of small vessel disease in 120 patients. PEPCAD I is the first study to investigate the use of drug eluting balloons in “native” lesions – those who have not already been treated by DES or bare metal stents.

After six months, native lesions treated solely with “SeQuent Please” showed only a 5.5 percent binary restenosis rate and 6.1 percent MACE. These results compare quite favorably with previously published results using drug-eluting stents for the treatment of small vessel disease with 31.2 percent restenosis and 18.9 percent MACE. The development of “SeQuent Please” for the treatment of coronary artery disease is made possible through B. Braun Melsungen AG agreement with Charité Hospital in Berlin, Germany. The product features a unique matrix coating which is fully bioabsorbable and polymer-free, enhancing the drug transfer into vascular tissue.

   

Hospitals adopt STERIS Advanced Room Sterilization Technology in the fight against ‘Superbugs’

STERIS Corporation announced it has received the first orders for its VaproSure Room Sterilizer from several U.S. hospitals. The VaproSure Room Sterilizer incorporates STERIS patented technologies and is the first product of its kind for the healthcare market. Since being introduced in June of this year, systems have been ordered by Wellmont Health System (VA, TN, KY) Lake Hospital System (OH), and the VA Boston Healthcare System (MA). These hospitals are demonstrating leadership in patient safety and infection control and will use their VaproSure Room Sterilizers to sterilize all the exposed surfaces in critical hospital rooms. As highlighted in recent national news media reports, the persistent spread of germs and infections in healthcare facilities is a significant challenge for patient safety and compromises the ability for hospitals to deliver economically efficient healthcare services.

With the VaproSure Room Sterilizer, it is now possible to sterilize all of the exposed pre-cleaned surfaces within a sealed room. STERIS is the only company to offer a complete hygiene solution to hospitals as a way to enhance their infection control programs and improve the efficiency of their operations. The VaproSure Room Sterilizer utilizes Vaprox Sterilant (EPA Registration No. 58779-4) to create a dry sterilization vapor that inactivates the full spectrum of biological contaminates on dry, pre-cleaned, exposed, porous and non-porous surfaces within a sealed hospital room. The chemistry is recognized as sporicidal, bacteriacidal, fungicidal and virucidal. Additionally, the technology is environmentally friendly, reducing to water vapor and oxygen at the conclusion of the cycle.

 

Steris Corporation wins U.S. EPA SmartWay Environmental Excellence award  

STERIS Corporation has received the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay Transport Partnership Environmental Excellence Award for its leadership in conserving energy and lowering greenhouse gas emissions from its transportation and freight activities. The awards were announced earlier this week at the annual conference of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals in Philadelphia, PA. STERIS was officially recognized by the U.S. EPA as a SmartWay Partner in January 2006. It achieved this distinction by using the highest possible percentage of SmartWay member carriers for the transport of STERIS materials and by instituting fuel-saving strategies for transport vehicles. SmartWay was introduced by the EPA and a select group of 15 shipping and business leaders in 2004 as an innovative, market-based partnership to reduce fuel use, greenhouse gas emissions, and air pollutants from the freight sector. Today, more than 600 businesses and organizations have joined the Partnership, including companies of all sizes, from Fortune 500 companies to family-owned businesses, each working to improve their environmental performance. Together, these companies, including STERIS, are conserving more than 600 million gallons of diesel fuel per year, saving the trucking industry nearly $2 billion in annual fuel costs, and eliminating nearly 7 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions. By 2012, the EPA estimates that its SmartWay program will achieve annual savings of 3.3 to 6.6 billion gallons of diesel fuel, eliminating 33-66 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions and almost 200,000 tons of nitrogen oxide emissions.

The companies receiving 2007 U.S. EPA SmartWay Environmental Excellence Awards by partner category are: IBM Corporation; Johnson & Johnson Sales & Logistics Company, LLC; JCPenney; Kimberly-Clark Corporation; Lowe's Companies Inc.; Michelin North America, Inc.; Office Depot; Sharp Electronics Corporation; and STERIS Corporation.

For more information about SmartWay visit: THIS LINK.

 

Healthcare Supply Chain Standards Coalition endorses standards for organizational and product identifiers   

In a major step aimed at making healthcare more affordable while strengthening patient safety and outcomes, the Healthcare Supply Chain Standards Coalition (Standards Coalition) is calling for industry-wide adoption of organizational and product identifiers from GS1, an international organization dedicated to designing and implementing supply chain standards. Specifically, the Standards Coalition, a collaborative of 28 organizations representing the entire healthcare supply chain, is endorsing GS1.s Global Location Number (GLN) for organizational identification and its Global Trade Identification Number (GTIN) for product identification. “We have the opportunity, and truly, the obligation, as an industry, to transform how we do business,” said Joseph Dudas, Standards Coalition co-chairman and Mayo Clinic’s director of accounting and supply chain informatics. “With universal standards, every supply chain participant will be able to identify every organization and every product the same way. This is a monumental step forward from our current state, where trading partners record organizational and product information differently and often manually, leading to tremendous inefficiency, waste, and inaccuracy, as well as countless opportunities for error.”

To reach its endorsements, the Standards Coalition spent the past year scoping the business problems, collecting industry input about identifiers, and evaluating standards options. As part of this effort, it conducted a survey that found 69 percent of 129 respondents were considering adopting an organizational identifier. Almost two-thirds said they were considering adopting GS1’s GLN. “After much work and consideration by the Standards Coalition subcommittees, we concluded that GS1’s standards offered the best solutions for the industry,” said Stephen D. Christian, Standards Coalition co-chairman. “GS1 offered a viable global approach, which is essential today, and healthcare organizations in other countries have already begun using its GLN and GTIN standards. GS1 has a successful track record that dates back to the universal product code (UPC) that was adopted by the retail and grocery industries over 30 years ago. We are working with GS1 standards to bring that measure of success to healthcare and streamline transactions and information across the entire supply chain.”

To aggressively move the industry toward adoption, the Standards Coalition is actively working with GS1 to enhance its standards to meet healthcare’s needs. The Standards Coalition is also recommending GS1.s Global Data Synchronization Network (GDSN) serve as the healthcare industry’s system for registering, validating, disseminating, and synchronizing product identification information. Additionally, the Standards Coalition plans to shortly introduce implementation roadmaps for supply chain participants, including providers, manufacturers, distributors, and group purchasing organizations.  In addition, the Standards Coalition has launched a website, www.hscsc.org, for healthcare organizations to learn more about the standards and other industry and government initiatives related to standards adoption and implementation.

Members of the Standard’s Coalition Oversight Committee are: Abbott, American Hospital Association, Amerinet, Ascension Health, Association for Healthcare Resource & Materials Management (AHRMM), BD, Cardinal Health, Coalition for Healthcare eStandards (CHeS), Consorta Catholic Resource Partners, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Geisinger Health System Foundation, GHX, HCA, Inland Northwest Health Services, Intermountain Healthcare, Johnson & Johnson Med. Devices & Diagnostics, Lawson, Mayo Clinic, McKesson Corporation, MedAssets, Mercy Health Systems ROI, Owens & Minor, Novation, Premier Inc., Sentara Healthcare, Strategic Marketplace Initiative (SMI) and University Hospitals. More Info: www.gs1.com.

 

6 Sigma decreases mortality in hospitalized patients; Performance improvement initiative decreases hospital stay and costs


Although Six Sigma practices are widely used in the manufacturing industry, the performance improvement system also may provide significant benefits for hospitals, medical professionals, and patients. A new study presented at CHEST 2007, the 73rd annual international scientific assembly of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), shows that Six Sigma performance improvement practices may help hospitals decrease in-patient mortality, length of hospital stay, and healthcare costs, and also improve compliance with Joint Commission (JCAHO) Core Measures as they relate to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). “Although national guidelines for CAP care existed, they were not being followed consistently throughout our organization and percentages of patients with core measures met were lower than best practice hospitals,” said study author Karen Gamerdinger, RN, MSN, Mercy Medical Center, Des Moines, IA. “By implementing Six Sigma practices, we showed that a quality improvement project can lead to benefits, not only to the patients in decreased mortality, but also to physicians and nurses by making it easier for them to provide the best, evidence-based, guideline-directed care possible, and to the hospital itself with decreased lengths of stay and decreased costs.”

Six Sigma is used the same way in healthcare as it is in technology and auto industries: to eliminate non value-added steps in processes and reduce defects and variation resulting in more efficient processes. “The focus is still on identifying defects and improving processes to reduce variation, whether that is improving how a patient navigates through the healthcare system or whether it is looking at how parts are assembled in an automobile factory,” said Gamerdinger. “This leads to improved quality care and cost-savings in healthcare organizations.” In a retrospective study, Gamerdinger and colleagues from Mercy Medical Center evaluated the outcomes of a Six Sigma performance improvement project focused on compliance with JCAHO CAP Core Measures to ensure that each measure of care was met. Utilizing Six Sigma methodology, researchers identified critical processes and key stakeholders in patient care and utilized specific tools for process flow, cause/effect matrices, and outcomes analysis.

The hospital also dedicated several full-time positions to the new methodology and trained more than 100 individuals in the Six Sigma program. When deviations from the Six Sigma protocol occurred, timely feedback was provided to care providers. After program implementation, researchers collected and analyzed data related to core measures, length of stay, and mortality in 1,550 patients with CAP admitted to the hospital during the study period. Results indicated that compliance scores for each JCAHO Core Measure improved from 70% to over 90%. CAP order usage improved from 40 %to 73%, yielding an 82.5% increase. Mean length of stay was reduced from 5.9 days to 5.1 days, a 13.56% reduction, which was associated with over $300,000 in cost savings. By the end of the study period, in-hospital mortality rates also decreased from 6.7% to 3.5%, a 47.8% reduction.

Although researchers specifically measured outcomes related to CAP, the hospital has applied Six Sigma to other in-patient populations, including patients with cardiac conditions, and to system-wide issues, such as delays in medical imaging, home medical equipment projects, and reducing patient registration times for in-patients.

 

 

Large avian flu outbreaks more likely to involve duck meat industry, experts find

Scientists at the University of Liverpool have found that 73% of avian flu outbreaks in the UK would not spread beyond the initial infected farm, but larger outbreaks are more likely to involve the duck meat industry. A team from the University’s Faculty of Veterinary Science and Department of Mathematical Sciences were approached by the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) to produce an avian flu model based on unique levels of detail including contact points between farms.

The studies team believes that duck meat is more likely to cause large outbreaks of avian flu because ducks often do not show signs of the disease and as such delays diagnosis and control of the infection. Scientists used a computer model to simulate millions of outbreaks of avian flu, so that even rare outbreak scenarios could be observed in order to further understanding of how the disease might spread across the UK.

Dr. Rob Christley from the University’s Faculty of Veterinary Science, explains: “Our model is unique in the level of detail regarding contact points between farms. We modelled four contact routes: local transmission, where infection is spread in the area due to wind and wild animals; transmission via delivery of feed where lorries may pick up the virus at one farm and carry it to another; transmission via slaughterhouse lorries and transmission via company workers, where personnel from a company may carry the virus to other farms within the same company as they go about their daily work. The model also provides analysis of government policy, such as the implementation of control zones. This strategy aims to limit the movement of birds as well as trace potential contacts where transmission of the disease is more likely. The team found that this strategy was beneficial in reducing the chance of very large outbreaks to almost zero. 

 


October 24, 2007   Download print version

Smoke in air driving more to seek help in hospitals


Pioneer heart patient marks medical field’s 30-year history


Study sees Medicare savings from drug-coated stents


2 carotid artery stenting studies show results comparable to AHA guidelines

Breast cancer chemo raises heart risks

FDA approves Ixempra for advanced breast cancer patients


Septic survival; Boys with blood infection suffer more severely than girls

Last Call - “Best of AHRMM” seminar is heading to Chicago
 


Smoke in air driving more to seek help in hospitals

As smoke from multiple wildfires has engulfed Southern California, health officials said Tuesday they have seen a dramatic increase in the number of people going to hospitals with asthma attacks and other respiratory problems. “We are seeing a real spike, a several-fold increase, in people coming in with respiratory complaints, particularly wheezing, coughing, tightness in the chest and difficulty breathing,” said Los Angeles County Public Health Officer Dr. Jonathan E. Fielding. Smoke and ash, along with dust raised by gusting winds, have exaserbated air quality in at least four counties, according to the South Coast Air Quality Management District. “It will affect everyone in some way because it’s a substantial exposure,” said Dr. Chand Khanna, pulmonologist at Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital. Overwhelming amounts of particulate matter can cause irritation and chest pain, which can lead to coughing and shortness of breath, Khanna said. And the poor air quality could linger, said Sam Atwood, AQMD spokesman.

Although the
Santa Ana winds are expected to decrease today, particulate matter blown out to the ocean can blow back. The result will be an increase in breathing problems. Local physicians also caution that particulate matter can affect the heart. “Small particles are extremely dangerous for the lungs, but also extremely dangerous for the heart,” said Dr. Lisa Matzer, director of the outpatient center at Glendale Adventist Hospital. “We’re seeing earlier signs of heart disease, and we're seeing more firemen coming in complaining of chest pains,” she said. “My message out there is, everybody should worry about your heart this week.” (LA Daily News) 

For information from the CDC on wildfire safety see THIS LINK

 


Pioneer heart patient marks medical field’s 30-year history

Few of the doctors in the crowded ballroom had ever met him, but Adolph Bachman was the patient who needed no introduction at this cardiology conference in Washington. Thirty years ago in Zurich he became the first person to have a blockage in a heart artery cleared without undergoing traumatic surgery, a procedure known as angioplasty that gave rise to an entire field of medicine in which doctors known as interventional cardiologists now specialize. More than 15 million patients have followed the trail Bachman blazed. “I feel compelled to give you all a big hug,” Bachman, 68, said to doctors here in a short talk. He recalled his angioplasty and Dr. Andreas Gruentzig, the charismatic doctor who invented the procedure and taught it to thousands of others before dying in a plane crash in 1985.

Bachman’s gratitude was a welcome balm for the doctors at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics conference, an annual gathering for the interventional cardiology field. Their specialty has been clouded in the last year by debate about whether some innovations, like stents are being overused and may even be compromising some patients’ health. The number of angioplasties performed fell 10 percent last year because of the “climate of calamity,” according to Dr. Martin Leon, a conference organizer. The meeting began Saturday with scientific sessions and will run through Thursday. The biggest priority for many in attendance, who include device makers and their investors, has been to overcome the staggering impact of safety questions about the most widely used devices: stents coated with drugs that are meant to deter subsequent blockages.

In session after session, speakers here are dwelling on the small number of deaths associated with the safety issue, a reported tendency for deadly clots to form in the stents long after they are implanted. Various studies show that the clot risk is slight, 0.2 percent to 0.6 percent annually, or a handful of patients among every 1,000, and that overall death rates are no different than for patients who use older bare-metal stents. Many of the sessions have questioned the reliability of the studies that raised the safety issues. Dr. Leon and Dr. Gregg Stone, another conference organizer, voiced a caution in a joint introductory session at the conference. They said that no clinical trials in the field had been big enough to clarify the safety profiles of all the different stents or to truly gauge angioplasty’s advantages in various types of patients. As a result, they said, no single study should govern doctors’ recommendations to patients. (The New York Times) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 


Study sees Medicare savings from drug-coated stents


Depending on whose interpretation one wants to believe, Medicare may, or may not, have saved money since the introduction of drug-coated heart stents in 2003. Researchers who analyzed Medicare data on a sampling of patients from 2001 and 2004 said today that the government spent 5.4 percent less, adjusted for inflation, in the more recent period for each patient who received treatment to reopen blocked coronary arteries. The more recent figure was $29,663, compared with $31,343 in 2001. That conclusion might seem to contradict the common wisdom that new drugs and devices are leading to higher, rather than lower, spending on healthcare. But it comes with several caveats, starting with the fact that the study was sponsored by Cordis, the stent-making subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. Moreover, one of the main reasons for the savings appeared to be a decline in the percentage of patients receiving heart bypass surgery to treat blocked arteries, compared with the rising use of balloon angioplasty and stenting.

Nearly one-third of the Medicare patients received bypass surgery in 2001. By 2004 that figure had fallen to just below one-fourth of patients. Because the study followed spending on the patients for only 13 months after their initial procedures, however, it was too short to examine one of bypass surgery’s supposed cost advantages, that although bypass costs more initially, it keeps arteries open far longer and so reduces spending on repeat procedures. “The surgeons would probably be screaming,” conceded Dr, Jason Ryan, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, who presented the data this morning. He said the authors were trying to get the paper published in a peer-reviewed journal, after which they would consider analyzing the data over a longer period.

Beyond cost savings from surgeries avoided, the other supposed cost benefit came from fewer repeat stenting procedures in the 2004 group. That gain apparently reflected the main advantage of drug-coated stents over the bare-metal versions used in the 2001 patients: the drug coatings are meant to deter arteries from becoming blocked again. The benefits were not only economic, according to the study. Death and heart attack rates were also lower in 2004. Numerous factors may have been involved, including improvements in stenting, better surgical techniques and the wider use of additional drugs like statins and beta-blockers on the patients. The Medicare data did not include spending on drug therapies. Since patients receiving drug-coated stents are currently also given Plavix, a blood thinner, for at least a year, the author’s estimated Plavix’s cost impact. That reduced the Medicare savings to $776 per patient, Dr. Cohen said.

At least one Medicare official expressed skepticism about the study. Stephen E. Phurrough, the director of coverage and analysis at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the agency that oversees Medicare, said that it missed the main question: How many patients received stents or surgery at Medicare’s expense who might have fared just as well without those treatments? “That seemed to be the message of Courage,” Phurrough said. He was referring to a clinical trial, known as Courage, which earlier this year concluded that many patients with chest pains who receive stents are no better off after five years than those who take the best available drugs and follow healthy lifestyles. (The New York Times)

 



 

2 carotid artery stenting studies show results comparable to AHA guidelines


Two carotid stenting trials examining patient outcomes demonstrated results that are comparable to guidelines established by the American Heart Association (AHA) for patients treated with carotid artery surgery. The results of these studies were presented at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation's 19th annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium by William A. Gray, M.D., FACC, associate professor of clinical medicine at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and director of Endovascular Services at the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center in New York. Dr. Gray is the director of Endovascular Services at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation.


An interim analysis of patients treated with carotid stents in Abbott’s CAPTURE 2 (Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events) and EXACT (Emboshield and Xact Post Approval Carotid Stent Trial) post-marketing trials, which enrolled 4,111 patients in over 150 sites, demonstrated 30 day patient outcome results consistent with longstanding AHA guidelines for patients with a severe carotid stenosis but who do not have symptoms. These guidelines recommend that rates of complications for carotid artery surgery to prevent stroke be less than 3 percent for patients without symptoms of stroke (asymptomatic) and 6 percent for patients with symptoms of stroke (symptomatic).

“In these two well-conducted carotid artery stenting studies, carotid stenting has achieved outcomes comparable guidelines established for patients who undergo carotid surgery, and has done so in a population of patients who are at high risk for experiencing adverse events from surgery,” said Dr. Gray. “This is a significant report because this is the first time that these guidelines have been achieved by any revascularization therapy in a large, multi-center examination of such patients, and although the guidelines were established for surgery (before stenting was practiced), there are no comparable surgical results in this group of patients.”

 

 


Breast cancer chemo raises heart risks

A study published in the October 9 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology has found certain treatments that cured breast cancer made women more susceptible to heart disease. “We always felt the benefit of savings lives outweighed the risks and were just part of the accepted cost,” said Pamela S. Douglas, M.D., chief of cardiology at Duke University and co-author of the JACC paper. But with the success of treatment and growing survivor numbers, Douglas and her colleagues are urging doctors to take the long view when deciding on a woman's breast cancer treatment. First treat the cancer, but don’t forget about cardiovascular health down the road.

The spike in heart disease risk comes from a variety of sources. Chest radiation, lack of exercise during treatments and stress are all part of the heart-hurting connection. But according to Douglas, the greatest damage comes from a breast cancer treatment mainstay, chemotherapy. Specifically, researchers are looking at chemotherapy medicines called anthracyclines. These compounds are used to treat a variety of cancers, including leukemia, lymphomas, uterine, ovarian and breast cancer. They are also known to harbor a well-known risk: They weaken some women’s hearts. “There are other drugs that are less harmful, and we know a little bit about how to lower the doses,” said Douglas, but it’s too soon to start completely overhauling breast cancer therapy, she said.

Instead, doctors and organizations including the National Breast Cancer Coalition are calling for more research into cancer treatments to see whether other drugs might yield the same result without the added long-term risk. Douglas also stresses that it is important to look at all the factors surrounding a woman's condition, as patients are “taking hits from multiple places.” While the cancer therapy might be one source of added cardiovascular risk, diet, weight and family history also play a major role. Her advice to patients who learn they have breast cancer, “First get cured!” But she adds: “Take seriously the consequences that dieting and regular exercise can have for your health while taking something that is not necessarily heart healthy.” (CNN)

 

 



FDA approves Ixempra for advanced breast cancer patients


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Ixempra (ixabepilone), a new anti-cancer treatment, for use in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer who have not responded to certain other cancer drugs. The FDA evaluated Ixempra under priority review, completing its assessment of the drug’s safety and effectiveness in six months. Ixempra was approved for use in combination with another cancer drug, capecitabine, in patients who no longer benefit from two other chemotherapy treatments. These prior treatments included an anthracycline (such as doxorubicin or epirubicin) and a taxane (such as paclitaxel or docetaxel). Ixempra was also approved for use alone in patients who no longer benefit from an anthracycline, a taxane and capecitabine. Metastatic breast cancer is the most advanced stage of breast cancer and has the potential to spread to almost any region of the body. Ixempra has been shown to bind to cancer cell microtubules, which are structures within cells that help to support and shape them. Microtubules also play a role in cell division.


The safety and efficacy of Ixempra in combination with capecitabine were evaluated in 752 patients in a randomized clinical trial comparing the combination to capecitabine alone. This combination therapy demonstrated improvements in delaying cancer progression or death compared to capecitabine alone. The safety and efficacy of Ixempra administered alone were evaluated in a study of 126 patients. Clinically significant tumor shrinkage occurred in 12 percent of the patients. Ixempra’s significant side effects included peripheral neuropathy (numbness, tingling or burning in the hands or feet) and bone marrow suppression. Women taking Ixempra should avoid taking drugs that are strong inhibitors of CYP3A4, one of the enzymes that metabolizes Ixempra. Ixempra should not be taken by women who have had severe allergic reactions to drugs that contain Cremophor or its derivatives, or by women who have baseline bone marrow suppression determined by low white blood cell or platelet count. The combination of Ixempra and capecitabine should not be given to patients with moderate or severe liver impairment due to the increased risk of toxicity and death. Ixempra is administered by intravenous infusion. It is distributed by Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company,
Princeton, NJ.

 


 

 

Septic survival; Boys with blood infection suffer more severely than girls


While survival rates for sepsis have increased over the past two decades, children under four and those in adolescence remain highly susceptible to the condition. Researchers in The Netherlands have now demonstrated that age and to a lesser extent, gender, are critical factors in whether or not a child sufferer will develop a more severe disease state and survive or not. These findings could help to improve the treatment of sepsis and improve survival rates further still. Writing in the online open access journal Critical Care, Jan Hazelzet and colleagues at the Erasmus MC-Sophia Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in
Rotterdam describe their study of almost 300 children admitted with sepsis and purpura (red patches caused by bleeding under the skin) between 1988 and 2006.
 

The results showed that the fatality rate from sepsis and purpura was 15.7%. However, during the study period, they observed a marked improvement in the numbers of children surviving sepsis. Nevertheless, they found that younger children were affected more severely and fatality rate was higher (4.3 times) for those under the age of three years. They found no difference in fatality rates between boys and girls, but boys were admitted to the PICU for longer periods and had more severe symptoms. The team found that the course of sepsis and purpura was not related to a child’s ethnic origin. In almost all cases, the infection that led to sepsis was Neisseria meningitidis, the bacterium commonly known as meningococcus. The team also reports how the drugs used to treat sepsis changed during the course of the study. There has been a marked reduction in the use of dopamine and a concomitant increase in the use of dobutamine, norepinephrine and corticosteroids to treat sepsis. “The finding of the important influence of young age and to a lesser extent gender can lead to a better understanding of the disease, which in turn can lead to better therapy”, said Jan Hazelzet.

 


 

 

Last Call - “Best of AHRMM” seminar is heading to Chicago

Did you or your staff miss out on AHRMM’s 45th Annual Conference & Exhibition in San Diego? Don’t worry, AHRMM’s “Passport to Success” is heading to the Midwest. Join us on November 2 at the Hyatt Regency O’Hare and attend some of the best Learning Lab sessions to come out this year’s AHRMM Conference. It’s a complete day of exceptional education close to home! The “Best of AHRMM” gives materials managers the unique opportunity to participate in five of this year’s most highly anticipated and well-attended presentations as well as network with other healthcare supply chain professionals located in the Midwest region. Sessions cover three key areas: distribution, strategic planning, and purchasing. Registration costs $299 for AHRMM members and $399 for non-members and includes: five educational sessions, dedicated face-to-face networking time, CEUs, presentation handouts, and continental breakfast, lunch, and two refreshment breaks. For complete information and registration, see THIS LINK
 

 


October 23, 2007   Download print version

WSJ: Putting superbugs on the defensive; hospitals begin to tout ability
to control infection; mining the available data


Stopping the spread of super bug


How has MRSA affected your community or hospital?
Tell us what you think on HPN Blogline

 

Scarce pandemic vaccine to be given in order

WHO launches hand hygiene initiative aimed at decreasing
healthcare-associated infection in developing countries


High numbers of men and women are overweight, obese
and have abdominal fat, worldwide

 

Hologic and Cytyc complete merger
 


WSJ: Putting superbugs on the defensive; hospitals begin to tout ability
to control infection; mining the available data

Hospitals are prime breeding grounds for antibiotic-resistant “superbugs” that kill tens of thousands of Americans each year. But most people have had no way of knowing how well their hospital keeps these bacteria, and infections in general, under control, reported The Wall Street Journal. That is starting to change. Nineteen states have adopted laws in recent years requiring hospitals to report overall infection rates publicly, with more likely to follow suit. And Thursday, nearly two dozen federal lawmakers, headed by Pennsylvania Rep. Tim Murphy, proposed legislation requiring nationwide public reporting. So far, just four states have published some infection rates for individual hospitals, and only one state, Pennsylvania, breaks out different types of infections. But even where patients can’t find state-mandated infection reports, they can increasingly get information from their local hospital about practices to prevent superbugs and other infections. Some hospitals have found a marketing opportunity in infection prevention: They are pushing overall infection rates toward zero, and advertising it. They are trumpeting prevention efforts, such as campaigns to improve hand washing. And some are tracking patients who have been infected with superbugs such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, and monitoring them to prevent the spread. “This is one of those cases where quality is also the best business case,” said Jonathan Perlin, chief medical officer at hospital chain HCA Inc., which has enlisted staffers and visitors alike in its own campaign to keep germs away from patients.

Among the four states that have published infection rates, Missouri and Vermont let consumers learn the number of blood infections related to central lines and how that compares with state or national averages. Pennsylvania provides multiple reports on different kinds of infections, and lets consumers look up infection-related mortality, length-of-stay and cost data for several kinds of infections. A Web site from Consumers Union, www.stophospitalinfections.org, has links to reports from each state, including
Florida, according to Lisa McGiffert, director of the Stop Hospital Infections Campaign. Information from Florida is nearly two years old, and Missouri’s dates to December 2006. But the information released so far is an important start, say public-health experts, since most of the hospital-infection reports mandated by the new state laws won’t be available before about 2009.

Nashville, TN-based HCA has been putting up posters exhorting doctors to wash their hands, and is even distributing a card to visitors that explains the importance of hand washing when coming in contact with patients. The company says its purchases of hand-sanitizing alcohol gel, available from dispensers throughout its hospitals, have risen 600% since early this year. (Company officials say they didn’t measure infection rates at the start of the campaign and so don’t know how much infections have fallen.) Other hospitals say they have pushed antibiotic-resistant-infection rates down sharply through a combination of techniques. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, for example, has cut MRSA infection rates in half at its main hospital since 2001 in part by screening all intensive-care patients to see if they are carrying the bug; it is now expanding use of the tests. To reduce certain kinds of bloodstream infections, the 19-hospital system bundles sterile material needed to insert central lines and has stepped up training; central-line associated blood-infection rates have fallen by 80% since 2002, to fewer than one per thousand such procedures. It also has taken steps to deal with the emergence of a different strain of bacteria that can cause potentially fatal diarrhea. The hospital lets nurses order tests for the bug; requires longer isolation periods for those infected with it; gives their rooms an additional cleaning with bleach; and requires physicians to get approval from an antibiotic-management team when using certain high-powered antimicrobials that could affect the body’s natural defenses against the bacteria. UPMC’s infection rates for the organism, Clostridium difficile, have fallen two-thirds since a spike in 2000.

Intermountain Healthcare, a Salt Lake City-based chain of 21 hospitals, keeps a database of every patient who has been infected with MRSA. Those who return to the hospital for some other reason are immediately monitored by an infection-control nurse and tested to see if they are carrying the bacteria. Together with a concerted campaign to improve hand-washing, the database has helped stop an increase in the number of MRSA infections at the hospital over the past year. Some states are also beginning to mandate broader testing specifically for MRSA, since patients can carry the bug and spread it without showing signs of infection. Pennsylvania will soon require hospitals to test high-risk patients, including those admitted from nursing homes. In August,
New Jersey and Illinois adopted legislation requiring hospitals to identify patients carrying MRSA and isolate them, among other provisions. Some hospitals have been turning to a variety of new technologies to try to cut down on infections, particularly superbugs, ranging from antibiotic-coated catheters to work surfaces made of copper, which has antimicrobial properties, as well as software. (The Wall Street Journal) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 

Stopping the spread of super bug

It can start with a wound as small as a scratch or pinprick that goes unnoticed but then bubbles up into a tiny boil. It looks like a spider bite, and many people infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, think it is and make the dangerous mistake of ignoring it. Often within 24 hours, the tiny wound grows into a deep and painful abscess, a sign that tissue destruction that comes with a MRSA infection is well under way. Waiting longer to visit a doctor could lead to the infection burrowing deep into the body and causing bone and blood infections and affecting the heart valves and lungs. Studies show that nationally, MRSA infections are up from 3 percent of cultured infections in 2001 to 60 percent today. And the story is no different locally in Sarasota, FL.

Officials at
Sarasota Memorial Hospital noticed an increase in MRSA-related infections about three years ago and began culturing all abscessed wounds. The hospital found that the spread of MRSA in Sarasota is up from an estimated 3 percent in 2001 to 30 or 40 percent three years ago and rising, said Dr. William Colgate, medical director, Sarasota Memorial emergency care center. Statistics from Manatee Memorial Hospital and Fawcett Memorial Hospital in Charlotte County are similar, officials said. “It has doubled especially in the ER in the last six months,” said Cassie Molina, infection control coordinator for Manatee Memorial Hospital. Increasing numbers of the infections at Manatee Memorial's pediatric unit mirror those from the emergency room, Molina said. “If we see an increase in the ER, we know we are going to see one in pediatrics,” she said. Melanie Hall, who heads infection control at Fawcett in Punta Gorda, FL, said she has also seen dramatic increases in MRSA coming into the hospital, even among people who do not know they are infected. Hall said the hospital decided in May to screen a variety of patients coming in for MRSA, including those who were there for joint replacement surgery, anyone coming in from a nursing home or prison, and people with a history of having MRSA infections or kidney dialysis. Among those, Hall has seen the numbers jump in just a few months. “The people I have had to start putting in isolation, the numbers have gone up 40 percent,” she said. For the rest of the hospital, the numbers are similar, with a 50 percent increase in the number of patients having community-acquired MRSA since 2004. “And it is continuing on an upward trend,” Hall said. “It has not leveled off.”

Hospitals report seeing the fastest growth in community-acquired MRSA. “People come in to the emergency room and think they have a bug bite,” said Cassie Molina, infection control coordinator for Manatee Memorial Hospital. “But it never is.” Though the infections can be difficult to treat, they are less so when caught early. “You keep it dry, do warm compresses,” said Scott Pritchard, Sarasota County epidemiologist. “Some doctors will cut it open if it’s a bigger infection.” MRSA getting into the bloodstream ups the ante and requires more aggressive treatment, including potent antibiotics. But those cases are “fairly rare,” Pritchard said.

Every health official had the same information for people wanting to avoid community-acquired MRSA: do not touch your face when out in public, thoroughly wash your hands frequently and consider all surfaces that other people touch contaminated. Because of the increased incidence of MRSA infections, police and sheriff's deputies in the region are wearing gloves, wiping down their cars and gear with disinfectant and treating every encounter with the public as a doorway for the bacteria. Among the most vulnerable to MRSA are the homeless because they share personal items and have limited access to clean facilities where they can shower and launder their clothes, authorities say. Officer Scott Patrick, transient coordinator for the Sarasota Police Department, said he has seen a marked increase in the infections among the people he works with. Officials at the Sarasota County Jail say they have so far not seen any cases of the skin infection, but they have procedures in place to catch anyone who might be infected before they enter the general jail population. (Sarasota Herald Tribune) To read the original article see THIS LINK

For a related Q&A feature from The New York Times, “Drug-resistant staph: What you need to know”, see THIS LINK

And for another related article from The Wall Street Journal, “Wash Your Hands, and Don't Shave Your Legs: Advice to Avoid Infection”, see THIS LINK

 

 

How has MRSA affected your community or hospital? Tell us what you think on HPN Blogline

Superbugs such as MRSA are in the spotlight around the country. Tell us how MRSA is affecting your community. What is your hospital doing to fight back? Share your stories and post comments on our Blog at THIS LINK

 

 

Scarce pandemic vaccine to be given in order

In the early weeks of a flu pandemic, the first to receive scarce supplies of vaccine will include the military, medical and emergency workers, pregnant women and babies, nearly 23 million people, under a draft federal plan to be outlined Tuesday in Washington. At the back of the pack, in a pandemic of the sort that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918, would be 74 million sick and elderly adults and 122 million healthy people ages 19-64. The plan was developed by a government working group that met with scientists and business and community representatives over several months. It provides guidelines for pandemic planners and offers a glimpse into some agonizing decisions that could be necessary in the context of a swift-moving infectious disease and a shortage of protective vaccine. “Once a pandemic starts, vaccine will come rolling off the line in lots, so there has to be a priority scheme on who would receive it first,” said William Raub, science adviser to Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt. “The committee tried to identify those who would be critical to national and homeland security, critical to fighting the flu itself, and critical to maintaining a functioning society.”

In meetings, the working group and other participants highlighted pregnant women and children as a priority, the report says. This also is an efficient use of vaccine, it says, because immunizing pregnant women protects their newborns, too, and children need lower doses, stretching limited supplies. Jeffrey Levi of Trust for America’s Health, an advocacy group, says the report, being presented at a meeting of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee, is “logical,” but more discussion is needed to refine how vaccine will be distributed and used in different populations. The plan provides for changes based on local needs and severity. In mild pandemics, which cause fewer deaths among the young and healthy, it makes sense to move those at risk of serious illness, such as the elderly and people with chronic illnesses, higher on the list, Raub said. For instance, the plan doesn’t target such groups as banking, food and agriculture, postal or chemical workers in a mild or moderate pandemic. But in a severe pandemic, those groups are in the third tier for vaccination, just behind electricity, natural gas, communications and water personnel and essential government workers. ”
The more severe the pandemic, the more aggressive people would be in trying to protect critical workers,” Raub said. “But if it’s at the milder end, critical workers would be a smaller group, so there would be more emphasis on getting everyone vaccinated. The disruption of society wouldn’t be the same.” (USA Today) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 


WHO launches hand hygiene initiative aimed at decreasing
healthcare-associated infection in developing countries


An open-access commentary in the December 2007 issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology examines a recently launched a global initiative by the World Health Organization (WHO) to combat healthcare-associated infection by improving hand hygiene in healthcare. The commentary is part of the Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development. An international collaboration organized by the Council of Science Editors of simultaneously published research from more than 200 medical and scientific journals, the Global Theme Issue aims to raise awareness of the relationship between poverty and human development. Authors Benedetta Allegranzi, MD (World Alliance for Patient Safety, World Health Organization), and Didier Pittet, MD, MS (Infection Control Program, University of Geneva Hospitals, Geneva), note that healthcare-associated infection is a major patient safety problem found in every hospital, healthcare system, and country.

The risk of healthcare-associated infection is 2 to 20 times higher for patients in developing countries than for patients in industrialized countries. A complex array of factors contribute to that increased risk, including lack of resources, inappropriate use of antibiotics, use of counterfeit drugs, understaffing and lack of training of health care professionals, and governments that are overwhelmed with larger health issues and cannot commit to infection control procedures and standards. The WHO recently launched the First Global Patient Safety Challenge, “Clean Care is Safer Care,” to reduce healthcare-associated infection worldwide. “The First Global Patient Safety Challenge represents an unprecedented initiative to improve infection control practices and procedures in any healthcare setting, regardless of the level of economic development,” explained Dr. Pittet. “Never before in the history of infection control has there been such an opportunity to improve the health of so many millions of individuals by promoting basic but essential practices through the powerful channels of the WHO, which allow the involvement of governments and influence their healthcare systems.”

The ministries of health from 43 countries have already signed the pledge to reduce healthcare-associated infection and another 20 are expected to join by the end of 2007. The WHO developed guidelines on hand hygiene in healthcare based on scientific evidence and international expertise. A multimodel implementation strategy will turn the guidelines into practice and will suggest feasible ways to induce changes that will result in increased hand hygiene compliance and reduced morbidity and mortality due to healthcare-associated infection. Part of the effort is to make the indications for hand hygiene universally understandable and not open to interpretation. It focuses on only five points when hand hygiene is required when providing healthcare. A worldwide pilot test of the strategy and tools is under way to evaluate the feasibility, sustainability, cost-effectiveness and cultural adaptation of a multimodel strategy for hand hygiene improvement. For more information see THIS LINK.

 


 

 

High numbers of men and women are overweight,
obese and have abdominal fat, worldwide
 


A new global study revealed that 40 percent of men and 30 percent of women are overweight, while 24 percent of men and 27 percent of women are obese, researchers reported in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. In the study, 168,159 people (69,409 men, 98,750 women) from 18 to 80 years old (average age 48) in 63 countries across five continents were evaluated by their primary care physicians. “This is the largest study to assess the frequency of adiposity (body fat) in the clinic, providing a snapshot of patients worldwide,” said study lead author Beverley Balkau, Ph.D., director of research at INSERM in
Villejuif, France. (INSERM is the French equivalent of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.)

The International Day for Evaluation of Abdominal Obesity (IDEA) was a cross-sectional, epidemiological study conducted on two pre-specified half-days by randomly selected physicians, representative of urban and rural areas of individual countries. “The study results show that excess body weight is pandemic, with one-half to two-thirds of the overall study population being overweight or obese,” Balkau said. “Central adiposity adds significantly to the risk of developing heart disease and particularly of developing diabetes.” Physicians recorded age, gender, presence of heart disease or diabetes and measured waist circumference (WC). Weight and height were measured and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. “WC is a more powerful clinical marker of heart disease and diabetes than BMI,” Balkau said. “Visceral fat is an important determinant of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, and the WC is closely related with visceral fat as evaluated by CT scans. The WC is so easy to measure in the clinic.” Being overweight or obese has health consequences, but abdominal obesity has even worse consequences, she added.

As measured by WC using International Diabetes Federation Caucasian criteria, more than half the study population, 56 percent of men and 71 percent of women, had abdominal adiposity. “Overall there’s a significant increase in the frequency of heart disease and diabetes with increasing waist circumference,” Balkau said. “For men, each increase of approximately 5.5 inches means an increased frequency of about 35 percent for heart disease and for women an increase of approximately six inches equates to a 40 percent increase for heart disease. Even in people who are lean, an increasing waist circumference means increasing risk for heart disease and diabetes.” As measured by BMI, more than 60 percent of men and 50 percent of women were either overweight or obese, with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or more. The overall frequency of overweight was 40 percent in men and 30 percent in women, with similar frequency across geographical regions. The frequency of obesity, a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or more, differed between regions and ranged from a low of 7 percent in both men and women in South and East Asia, to 36 percent in Canadian men and women.

 

The study showed the overall frequency of heart disease was 16 percent in men and 13 percent in women, higher in men than in women. There was a high frequency of heart disease in Eastern European men, 27 percent, and women, 24 percent, in contrast to Canada where the frequency in women was 8 percent, and in men 16 percent. The frequency of diabetes varied more across regions than CVD. Overall, 13 percent of men and 11 percent of women were diagnosed with diabetes. Both diabetes and heart disease were more common in men than women. Balkau called upon governments to take more preventive measures to stem the tide of obesity and overweight, such as providing more access to physical activity and encouraging people to exercise. 

 

 

 


Hologic and Cytyc complete merger


Hologic Inc. and Cytyc Corporation announced the completion of the combination of the two companies, creating one of the largest companies in the world focused on advanced technology in women’s health.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Cytyc shareholders received 0.52 shares of Hologic common stock and $16.50 in cash for each share of Cytyc common stock held by them, with aggregate consideration paid to Cytyc shareholders totaling approximately $6.2 billion, payable in approximately 65,800,000 shares of Hologic common stock and approximately $2.1 billion in cash. Hologic will continue to trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “HOLX” while Cytyc will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hologic and will cease trading on the NASDAQ as of the close of trading on October 22, 2007.
 

 


October 22, 2007   Download print version

Tests reveal high chemical levels in kids’ bodies


FDA expands age range for use of bacterial meningitis vaccine


Internists endorse 2007-08 adult immunization schedule
and publish in Annals of Internal Medicine

 

Breast cancer calculator clarifying the unknown

The asterisk on cancer deaths

Exposure to sunlight may decrease risk of advanced breast cancer by half

 

Nationwide survey findings underscore challenges, identify actions
in addressing healthcare-associated infections

 


Tests reveal high chemical levels in kids’ bodies

Michelle Hammond and Jeremiah Holland were intrigued when a friend at the Oakland Tribune asked them and their two young children to take part in a cutting-edge study to measure the industrial chemicals in their bodies. Fascination soon changed to fear, as tests revealed that their children, Rowan, then 18 months, and Mikaela, then 5, had chemical exposure levels up to seven times those of their parents. “[Rowan's] been on this planet for 18 months, and he’s loaded with a chemical I’ve never heard of,” Holland said. “He had two to three times the level of flame retardants in his body that’s been known to cause thyroid dysfunction in lab rats.” The technology to test for these flame retardants, known as polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and other industrial chemicals is less than 10 years old. Environmentalists call it “body burden” testing, an allusion to the chemical “burden”, or legacy of toxins, running through our bloodstream. Scientists refer to this testing as “biomonitoring”.

Most Americans haven't heard of body burden testing, but it’s a hot topic among environmentalists and public health experts who warn that the industrial chemicals we come into contact with every day are accumulating in our bodies and endangering our health in ways we have yet to understand. “We are the humans in a dangerous and unnatural experiment in the United States, and I think it’s unconscionable,” said Dr. Leo Trasande, assistant director of the Center for Children’s Health and the Environment at the Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City. Dr. Trasande said that industrial toxins could be leading to more childhood disease and disorders. “We are in an epidemic of environmentally mediated disease among American children today,” he said. “Rates of asthma, childhood cancers, birth defects and developmental disorders have exponentially increased, and it can't be explained by changes in the human genome. So what has changed? All the chemicals we’re being exposed to.” Elizabeth Whelan, president of the American Council on Science and Health, a public health advocacy group, disagrees. “My concern about this trend about measuring chemicals in the blood is it’s leading people to believe that the mere ability to detect chemicals is the same as proving a hazard, that if you have this chemical, you are at risk of a disease, and that is false,” she said. Whelan contends that trace levels of industrial chemicals in our bodies do not necessarily pose health risks.
 

In 2004, the Hollands became the first intact nuclear family in the United States to undergo body burden testing. Rowan, at just 1½ years old, became the youngest child in the U.S. to be tested for chemical exposure with this method. Rowan’s extraordinarily high levels of PBDEs frightened his parents and left them with a looming question: If PBDEs are causing neurological damage to lab rats, could they be doing the same thing to Rowan? The answer is that no one knows for sure. In the three years since he was tested, no developmental problems have been found in Rowan’s neurological system. Dr. Trasande said children up to six years old are most at risk because their vital organs and immune system are still developing and because they depend more heavily on their environments than adults do. “Pound for pound, they eat more food, they drink more water, they breathe in more air,” he said. Studies on the health effects of PBDEs are only just beginning, but many countries have heeded the warning signs they see in animal studies. (CNN) For more information see THIS LINK

 


 


FDA expands age range for use of bacterial meningitis vaccine


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration expanded the approved age range for Menactra, a bacterial meningitis vaccine, to include children ages 2 to 10 years. Menactra was first approved by FDA in January 2005 for people ages 11 to 55 years. Previously, Menomune was the only meningococcal vaccine available in the United States for use in children, ages 2 years and older. Both products are manufactured by sanofi pasteur Inc. of Swiftwater, PA. Both vaccines offer protection against four groups of Neisseria meningitidis, the bacterium that can cause meningitis.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) currently recommends meningococcal vaccination for children ages 2 to 10 years who are at increased risk of developing meningococcal disease, such as those who have had their spleen removed or whose spleen is not functioning; those with a medical condition called terminal complement component deficiency which makes it difficult to fight infection; and those who expect to travel to areas outside of the United States where the disease is common. Vaccination also is used to control outbreaks of bacterial meningitis. 

 


 

 

Internists endorse 2007-08 adult immunization schedule
and publish in Annals of Internal Medicine


The American College of Physicians (ACP), with membership of 124,000 internal medicine physicians (internists), related subspecialists, and medical students, endorses the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) adult immunization schedule for 2007-2008 and publishes the recommendations on the Web site of its flagship journal, Annals of Internal Medicine, on October 18. This is the first time the journal has published the recommendations. The CDC has released the Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule each year since 2002 to guide physicians and other clinicians about the appropriate vaccines for their adult patients. The schedule does not include travel-related vaccines. “Vaccines and immunizations are not just for kids,” said Sandra Fryhofer, MD, a member of the ACP Adult Immunization Advisory Board and an
Atlanta physician in private practice. “And flu shots aren’t the only vaccines adults should get.” New information in this year’s adult immunization schedule: Vaccination for varicella (chickenpox) is now recommended for all adults with no evidence of immunity to varicella; Vaccination for zoster (shingles) has been added to the list of vaccines for adults age 60 or older, regardless of whether they report having a prior episode of shingles.
 

“Physicians should be aware of the schedule, know that it has been recently updated and advise their patients of the appropriate vaccines. Patients should ask their physician about adult immunization and what vaccines are appropriate for them,” said Dr. Fryhofer. To reinforce the importance of the adult immunization guidelines, ACP will notify its members of the guidelines through its monthly magazine, ACP Observer. The organization hopes to make the full text of the guidelines and chart available at Internal Medicine 2008, ACP’s annual scientific meeting, in Washington, DC. In an accompanying editorial, Gregory A. Poland, MD, and William Schaffner, MD, also members of ACP’s Adult Immunization Advisory Board, point out the almost 50,000 Americans die of vaccine-preventable diseases each year and that 99 percent of them are adults. They say that it will be difficult to achieve the same level of success in adult immunization as the U.S. childhood immunization program, but actions such as endorsement by the American College of Physicians and publication in Annals of Internal Medicine are “an important step.” The new schedule, “Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule. United States October 2007-September 2008,” appears online at the Web site of Annals of Internal Medicine www.annals.org. It will be published in the Nov. 20, 2007, print edition of the journal.

 

 

 

 

Breast cancer calculator clarifying the unknown

 

A new service is available to help women work out whether they have an increased risk of getting breast cancer. It is an online calculator and its aim is to give women earlier diagnosis and treatment. The increase in the incidence of breast cancer has been blamed on everything from stress to underarm deodorant. Dr Helen Zorbas of the National Breast Cancer Centre says many women are confused about what puts them at risk of developing the illness. “One in three women think that a knock or bump to the breast increases their risk significantly yet they don’t believe that alcohol poses any risk for breast cancer,” she said.

At today’s annual pink ribbon breakfast, the National Breast Cancer Centre launched a new interactive risk calculator. Women are asked about a range of factors including age, family history, alcohol intake and use of hormones. While nothing can be done about some risk factors, 15 percent of breast cancers could be avoided by reducing alcohol intake and boosting exercising. The calculator is being run by the national breast cancer center on their web site, www.nbcc.org.au. Meanwhile, scientists say a new research collaboration could see survival rates for many cancers increase.  Michelle Haber from the Children’s Cancer Institute says the Lowy Cancer Centre is an Australian first, bringing childhood and adult cancer research together at the one site. “The vision of the Institute is to work to curing 100 percent of children diagnosed with cancer,” she said. The facility will be one of the largest research centers in the southern hemisphere. (ABC News)

 

 

 


The asterisk on cancer deaths


There was good news about cancer last week, a report that death rates in the United States have begun falling by 2.1 percent a year, nearly twice the rate of previous declines. But the same report, by the American Cancer Society and other groups, also said certain cancers seem to be becoming more common, not hugely so, but noticeable. Among those increasing in men and women are myeloma and cancers of the thyroid and kidney. In women, melanoma and cancers of the bladder have increased; in men so have cancers of the liver and esophagus. Why? Experts point to a mixed bag of facts, theories and educated guesses. One overarching culprit may be America’s level of obesity, which has been linked to increased risk of several types of cancer, including tumors of the kidney, liver and esophagus.
 

But there are much stronger risk factors for liver cancer. The major ones are the viruses that cause hepatitis B and C. In some people, those infections turn chronic and gradually lead to tumors. A vaccine that can prevent hepatitis B is used routinely in the United States. But not every country uses it, and liver cancer here may be rising in part because of cases among immigrants. Hepatitis C is more of a homegrown problem. There is no vaccine, and infections surged in the 1960s and 1970s among drug users who shared needles. The virus then spread into the blood supply and may have infected tens of thousands of transfusion recipients before a test was developed to screen donated blood. Liver cancer is still turning up in people infected decades ago. When it comes to thyroid cancer, researchers do not know whether the incidence of the disease is actually increasing, or simply being diagnosed more often because of improved tests. But it is a cause for concern. Increases in kidney cancer can probably be traced mostly to increased detection. As for melanoma, the increases probably come from both better detection and a real rise in cases due to sun exposure, researchers said.


Smoking raises the risk of bladder cancer. Rates in women may be rising because they started smoking, and quitting, later than men did, said Elizabeth Ward, director of cancer surveillance for the American Cancer Society. There has been a similar trend with lung cancer. But over all, men have much higher rates of bladder cancer, possibly due to higher smoking rates and chemical exposures on the job. Trends in myeloma, a bone marrow cancer, have researchers puzzled. “It could be improvements in diagnosis,” Dr. Ward said. “It bears looking into, though, because it is more common in blacks than whites, and I don’t think we have a huge amount of knowledge about risk factors.” (The New York Times) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 

 

 

Exposure to sunlight may decrease risk of advanced breast cancer by half

A research team from the Northern California Cancer Center, the University of Southern California, and Wake Forest University School of Medicine has found that increased exposure to sunlight, which increases levels of vitamin D in the body, may decrease the risk of advanced breast cancer. In a study reported online in the American Journal of Epidemiology, the researchers found that women with high sun exposure had half the risk of developing advanced breast cancer, which is cancer that has spread beyond the breast, compared to women with low sun exposure. These findings were observed only for women with naturally light skin color. The study defined high sun exposure as having dark skin on the forehead, an area that is usually exposed to sunlight.

The scientists used a portable reflectometer to measure skin color on the underarm, an area that is usually not directly exposed to sunlight. Based on these measurements, they classified the women as having light, medium or dark natural skin color. Researchers then compared sun exposure between women with breast cancer and those without breast cancer. Sun exposure was measured as the difference in skin color between the underarm and the forehead. In women with naturally light skin pigmentation, the group without breast cancer had significantly more sun exposure than the group with breast cancer. The fact that this difference occurred only in one group suggests that the effect was due to differences in vitamin D production, and wasn’t just because the women were sick and unable to go outdoors. In addition, the effect held true regardless of whether the cancer was diagnosed in the summer or in the winter. The difference was seen only in women with advanced disease, suggesting that vitamin D may be important in slowing the growth of breast cancer cells. “We believe that sunlight helps to reduce women’s risk of breast cancer because the body manufactures the active form of vitamin D from exposure to sunlight,” said Esther John, Ph.D., lead researcher on the study from the Northern California Cancer Center. “It is possible that these effects were observed only among light- skinned women because sun exposure produces less vitamin D among women with naturally darker pigmentation.”

These new findings about breast cancer risk and sun exposure based on skin color measurements are consistent with previous research by John and colleagues that had shown that women who reported frequent sun exposure had a lower risk of developing breast cancer than women with infrequent sun exposure. The researchers stressed that sunlight is not the only source of vitamin D, which can be obtained from multivitamins, fatty fish and fortified foods such as milk, certain cereals and fruit juices. Women should not try to reduce their risk of breast cancer by sunbathing because of the risks of sun-induced skin cancer, they said. “If future studies continue to show reductions in breast cancer risk associated with sun exposure, increasing vitamin D intake from diet and supplements may be the safest solution to achieve adequate levels of vitamin D,” said Gary Schwartz, Ph.D., a co-researcher from the Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest University School of Medicine. “Since many risk factors for breast cancer are not modifiable, our finding that a modifiable factor, vitamin D, may reduce risk is important,” said Sue Ingles, Ph.D., a co-researcher from University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine.


 

Nationwide survey findings underscore challenges,
identify actions in addressing healthcare-associated infections

Hospital professionals identified tracking infections across the entire hospital, and the control of resistant organisms, as their top challenges related to managing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), according to a survey of over 800 hospital clinicians involved in infection prevention. (To access survey results, please visit www.premierinc.com/quality-safety/tools-services/safety/news/). Survey respondents, which include quality, safety, risk management and infection control professionals representing all sizes of hospitals, also identified measuring compliance with hand hygiene and state mandated public reporting as major challenges.  

Respondents cited catheter-associated urinary tract infections (49 percent) and pressure ulcers (30 percent) as the most challenging to prevent among infections identified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for non-payment in 2008. Under current payment rules, CMS typically pays hospitals more for treating a patient who develops an infection. CMS announced that, beginning October 1, 2008, it will no longer reimburse hospitals for treating certain preventable conditions, including errors, injuries and infections that occur in hospitals. “This is an important assessment of what infection control and quality experts see as their greatest clinical challenges in managing hospital-acquired conditions,” said Premier Safety Institute Vice President Gina Pugliese. “The Premier healthcare alliance will be using this information to continue working with experts in hospitals on steps and best practices to address all causes of infection.”

The survey also found inadequate staffing for infection prevention (47 percent) and funding and budget constraints (34 percent) to be the most significant issues their hospitals face in meeting current infection prevention challenges. “This finding underscores that healthcare professionals are dealing with a variety of competing demands in working to prevent healthcare-associated infections,” said Blair Childs, Premier’s senior vice president of Public Affairs. “To date, 26 states have public reporting requirements that are placing new demands on hospitals, the new ‘present on admission’ coding system mandated by CMS needs to be implemented, and there are new reporting requirements from government and accreditation organizations. These demands are complicating what is already a significant task of monitoring and preventing HAIs.”

Hospitals are clearly turning to technology as a way to manage these demands. More than 22 percent of respondents currently utilize an automated surveillance system, up from 13 percent in February. An additional 47 percent of respondents are actively considering implementing this technology, shown to make surveillance more efficient and to free up time for prevention activities. “More and more hospitals are starting to use automated surveillance systems to accomplish timely and efficient tracking of HAIs across the entire patient population,” said Dan Peterson, M.D., M.P.H., medical advisor for Premier. “Such systems are also key to meeting the ever increasing regulatory, reporting, and accreditation requirements around infection prevention.”
 

 


October 19, 2007   Download print version

HPN to recognize “Supply Chain-Focused CEOs”

WSJ: Heart wires may pose more risk for the young


AHRMM Launches a Salary Compensation Survey

 

Grading New York City’s public hospitals

HPV test beats Pap in detecting cervical cancer

Alarming MRSA infection rates underscore need for public reporting
of hospital-acquired infections

 

Billions per year lost in empty hospital beds, research shows 
 


HPN to recognize “Supply Chain-Focused CEOs”

Many industries outside of healthcare recognize and respect the value that effective and efficient supply chain management contributes to the top and bottom lines. Among healthcare providers, such recognition and support is growing, slowly but surely, from the top post in the executive suite. That’s why Healthcare Purchasing News launched its yearly search for “supply chain focused CEOs" three years ago. We wanted to locate forward-thinking men and women to share their insights with you, and you’ve helped us do that. In fact, we’ve profiled of 10 of them already since January 2005.

Well, it’s that time of the year again – time to nominate noteworthy hospital presidents/CEOs for HPN’s fourth annual “S.U.R.E. Award for Supply Chain Focused CEOs” award. We’re looking to recognize chief executives who support, understand, recognize and empower the materials management department to do what needs to be done to achieve bottom-line savings and top-line revenue. We ask you, our dedicated readers, to recommend worthy candidates for recognition in our January 2008 edition by e-mailing us reasons how and why they deserve the spotlight – no more than a couple of paragraphs are needed for each of the four S.U.R.E. categories listed above that comprise the “SURE” acronym.

For your nomination to qualify, please be sure to comply with the following rules:

1. Any nomination must be original and exclusive to HPN and not have been submitted, either original or edited, to any other publication or online media outlet currently or within the previous year.

2. GPO and distributor support is commendable, but we’re looking for internally driven details beyond GPO- and distributor-driven contributions.

3. Any nominated executive (or nominator) must be willing to share relevant basic financial details with our readers, including annual revenues, annual expenses and annual purchasing volume.

Help us share the stories of these remarkable CEOs in our January 2008 edition so that the industry may learn from them and be inspired. Thanks in advance.
E-mail us your nominations by Wednesday, November 14, to editor@hpnonline.com.

 

 


WSJ: Heart wires may pose more risk for the young


The defibrillator leads pulled off the market this week by Medtronic Inc. may pose a higher risk of fracture in younger adults and children, a population for whom the devices were particularly popular in part because of their small diameter. Children make up a relatively small share of patients who receive the implanted devices. But leads tend to come under greater stress in more-active people, including kids, adolescents and younger adults. Monday, Medtronic, based in
Minneapolis, announced it would stop selling its Sprint Fidelis leads because of a risk of fractures that could erroneously dispatch jolts of electricity. The company said that of the 268,000 Sprint Fidelis leads implanted, 2,085 were in patients under the age of 21. About 235,000 patients still have the leads, and the company said the fractures may have contributed to five deaths. The deceased patients’ ages haven’t been made public. Preliminary data from physicians at 32 institutions who specialize in treating pediatric patients and adults with congenital heart disease showed a fracture rate of 6.7% among 569 patients with Sprint Fidelis leads over 30 months. The “vast majority” of the patients are likely to be under the age of 21, given the physicians involved, said Wayne H. Franklin, an associate professor at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, who gathered the physician reports.

Medtronic has reported a lower failure rate, 2.3% after 30 months, for all patients implanted with one particular Sprint Fidelis model. For that same model, Dr. Franklin saw a fracture rate of 4.9% among 304 patients in his survey. The real difference may be slightly greater, because the failure rate from Medtronic includes more than just fractures. “It’s fairly concerning,” said Dr. Franklin, a pediatric cardiac electrophysiologist. He began gathering the data from colleagues belonging to a society of similar specialists after leads in two of his own young patients fractured, leading to shocks. He and other doctors say that despite the potentially higher risk for young people, they aren’t currently suggesting patients replace the wires pre-emptively, which involves surgery that can carry more risk than that of a lead's fracturing. They said they will urge young patients to monitor their leads closely. They also say they don't have pediatric data for other leads; all lead models tend to have higher fracture rates in young patients. If a lead is found to be fractured, patients can have the lead extracted or a new lead may be able to be threaded through the same vein.

“To actually remove one of these things is not just difficult, but can be dangerous,” said George Van Hare, a professor at Stanford Medical School who knows of two fractures among 40 pediatric patients who got Sprint Fidelis leads at his center. The center gets some research and training funding from Medtronic, and he consults for one rival device maker. When a lead fractures, patients can get unnecessary and massive shocks, or not get the shock when they need it to save their lives after cardiac arrest. Dr. Franklin's data add to those released Monday by Medtronic. Doctors say the Sprint Fidelis leads were especially useful in children, adolescents and young adults because of their narrow girth, which made them easier to thread into small veins. They also left space for replacement leads as patients needed updates over time. A lead prone to fracture might break more often in younger, more active people, whose hearts beat faster and place more stress on the leads. Even at rest, children’s hearts tend to beat more quickly than those of adults. (Source: The Wall Street Journal) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 

AHRMM launches a Salary Compensation Survey

The Association for Healthcare Resource & Materials Management (AHRMM) is conducting a Salary Compensation Survey designed specifically for the healthcare supply chain. The survey will help professionals measure, identify, and compare current industry trends and demographics to better determine their fair market value. To participate in AHRMM’s Salary Compensation Survey, please click on the link below. The entire survey should only take about 10 minutes to complete. Note: information gathered is strictly confidential. Data will be reported in aggregate, not individually. http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=Bxb4Hxb0UDPp6hgmeakuEg_3d_3d

Once AHRMM has compiled the data, the association will generate both general and customized reports of the findings, including a professional's market value when compared to like facilities, job titles, geographical areas, responsibilities, and more. General salary survey reports will be available to AHRMM members for free and to non-members for $49.95. Customized reports, based on selecting specific variables, will be available to AHRMM members for $49.95 and to non-members for $79.95. Instructions for ordering both reports will come from AHRMM in early 2008. To complete the survey see THIS LINK    

 

 
Grading
New York City’s public hospitals

New York City is a world of infinite decisions: Japanese or Vietnamese, a ball game or the opera and the subway or a cab. Some decisions, though, involve more serious matters. Selecting a hospital is one. But now New Yorkers trying to decide whether to go to Coney Island Hospital or Kings County Hospital Center have a little more information to guide them. Last month on its Web site, the city’s Health and Hospitals Corporation voluntarily released infection and mortality rates for each of its 11 public hospitals. It was the first hospital system in the state to do so, said the corporation’s chief executive officer and president, Alan D. Aviles. The data, which is accessible at THIS LINK, compares the corporation’s facilities with regional and national averages and allows New Yorkers to analyze and compare hospital against hospital. Hailed by healthcare advocates for casting light on a secretive industry, the release of this data has shifted attention to the perception of public hospitals and their ability to provide quality care in all five boroughs. Although the corporation’s acute care facilities score above state and national averages, a familiar discrepancy emerges within its own network: Hospitals in lower income areas tend to do worse than those in higher income areas.

 

Although most of the information the corporation has posted on its Web site is regurgitated from either the state or federal hospital reporting system (which are also available online federally and on the state level), the corporation added specific mortality data on each hospital and statistics on infections acquired in hospitals. Since the corporation took this step last month, another New York hospital–North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, has already followed its lead. New York State began releasing hospital mortality data on coronary bypass surgery in the late 1980s. Then, the public information movement stalled. In 2005, the state legislature approved more rigorous reporting standards, which would result in the release of hospital report cards and hospital-related infection rates in 2009. Those regulations are currently being rolled out. The Health and Hospitals Corporation’s voluntary release of its data puts it a step ahead of the state statute.
 

Overall, the corporation’s hospitals have average mortality rates that are better than state, regional and federal averages. However, its average mortality rate following heart attacks is slightly worse than the statewide figure, the corporation had 15.8 patients die within 30 days of a heart attack from July 2005 to June 2006, while the statewide average is 15.6. For heart failure, based on the same 30-day measure in the same time period, the corporation scored better than the statewide average, 10.6 compared to 11. Data on the death rates from heart failure and heart attacks were provided by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which take into account only Medicare patients. Those patients, said Aviles, comprise just 15 percent of the corporation’s patient base. When comparing the corporation’s 11 hospitals, a familiar outcome is apparent: Facilities in the outer boroughs and in more impoverished neighborhoods have higher mortality rates than those in Manhattan. “Quite frankly, we’re talking about the hospitals in the outer boroughs and the health of the communities is often poorer,” said Aviles. “There are more patients with low incomes, that are uninsured,” he added. For hospital wide mortality rates, the lowest ranking facilities, Coney Island Hospital in Brooklyn at 3.14 percent, Kings County Hospital Center in Brooklyn at 1.72 percent and Elmhurst Hospital Center in Queens at 1.64 percent, are all located in the outer boroughs. The hospital wide mortality rates are not risk adjusted, Aviles said, and so do not take into account the types of patients or trauma seen at each location. (Gotham Gazette) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 

HPV test beats Pap in detecting cervical cancer

A new study led by McGill University researchers shows that the human papillomavirus (HPV) screening test is far more accurate than the traditional Pap test in detecting cervical cancer. The first round of the Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Trial (CCCaST), led by Dr. Eduardo Franco, Director of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology at McGill's Faculty of Medicine, concluded that the HPV test's ability to accurately detect pre-cancerous lesions without generating false negatives was 94.6%, as opposed to 55.4% for the Pap test. The results of the study, first-authored by Dr. Franco’s former McGill PhD student Dr. Marie-Hélène Mayrand of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), with colleagues from McGill, Université de Montréal, the Newfoundland and Labrador Public Health Laboratory and McMaster University, are published in the October 18 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine.

CCCaST is the first randomized controlled trial in North America of HPV testing as a stand-alone screening test for cervical cancer. The first round followed 10,154 women aged 30 to 69 in Montreal, Quebec and St. John’s, Newfoundland who were enrolled in the study from 2002 to 2005. The study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). The study concluded that while the HPV test's sensitivity was nearly 40% greater than the Pap test’s, the Pap did, however, slightly edge out HPV for accuracy on the specificity scale, its ability to accurately detect pre-cancerous lesions without generating false positives, at 96.8% versus 94.1%. “We already knew before conducting this study that the sensitivity of Pap left a lot to be desired,” said Dr. Franco, James McGill Professor in the Departments of Oncology and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Director of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology at McGill University's Faculty of Medicine. “However, 55.4% accuracy is only slightly above chance. Flipping a coin gives you 50%.”

Though the results of the CCCaST study might have a bearing on the ongoing debate about vaccinating young women against HPV, Dr. Franco stressed that the two issues should be considered separately. “Vaccination is primary prevention; this study is about secondary prevention, which refers to screening. Even women who take the vaccine will still need to be screened, because the vaccines that are available now only prevent about 70% of all cervical cancers, and they're primarily for young women. The HPV test may be ideal for vaccinated women once they reach screening age, because it gives us an opportunity to monitor the protection that the vaccine is supposed to give them.” Dr. Franco added that, while the HPV screening test is now more expensive than a Pap test, that will likely change over time. “Moreover, because of its higher sensitivity and only slightly lower specificity, patients would only require an HPV test once every three years instead of annually, as is necessary with the Pap test.”


 

Alarming MRSA infection rates underscore need for public reporting
of hospital-acquired infections

A new study that estimates nearly 19,000 Americans died in 2005 from a virulent, antibiotic-resistant infection acquired mostly in the hospital underscores the need for Congress to require public reporting of patient infection rates, according to Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports. The study by researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) concluded that almost 95,000 people developed Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections that year, and that 85 percent of the infections were acquired in health care settings. “Every day, fifty Americans die from MRSA because hospitals aren't doing enough to protect patients from these deadly infections,” said Lisa McGiffert, Director of Consumers Union’s Stop Hospital Infections campaign (http://www.StopHospitalInfections.org). “The public deserves to know which hospitals are doing a good job preventing infections and keeping patients safe.”

HR 1174, a bipartisan measure sponsored by Rep. Tim Murphy, R-PA, would require the public reporting by hospitals and surgical centers of one or more types of healthcare-acquired infections. Under the bill, the Secretary of Health and Human Services would determine which of the major types of infections would need to be reported. HHS would submit an annual report to Congress on steps being taken to reduce infections, and there would be a pilot program to assist certain hospitals in developing anti-infection programs. “By making infection rates public, HR 1174 will encourage hospitals to improve patient care and ultimately save lives and dollars,”  said McGiffert. Earlier this week, Consumers Union called on hospitals nationwide to disclose their hand hygiene compliance rates. For more information see THIS LINK  or THIS LINK

 

 

Billions per year lost in empty hospital beds, research shows 

The average 300-bed hospital can net $10 million a year in new revenue by adding just 12 turnovers per bed, a healthcare industry researcher told a record 200 U.S and Canadian attendees during a TeleTracking Technologies international client conference last week in Naples, FL. Other items which came to light during the conference: The average hospital can treat more than 3,500 additional patients by eliminating ‘lost bed days’ through more efficient management of bed turns; the impact of overcrowding on patient safety is becoming increasingly important to hospitals; patient flow technology is playing a greater role in disaster planning.  

Keynote speaker Erik Johnson, managing director of The Advisory Board Company’s IT Insights Division, showed detailed research on the potential return on investment delivered by improved patient flow. Johnson said increasing the turnovers of each bed from 49.7 per year (the 40th percentile ranking nationally) to 61 per year (the 75th percentile) can increase revenue potential in a 300-bed hospital by over $10 million per year and allow 3,500 more admissions without adding more beds. While the financial impact is compelling, said TeleTracking CEO Anthony M. Sanzo, better patient flow more importantly means better patient care. “Unless we are willing to make improved patient flow a top industry priority, we cannot say that we are committed to delivering the highest possible care to the communities we serve,” Sanzo said.

 

 


October 18, 2007   Download print version

As cases arise, schools act to ward off virulent staph

Staph infections hit Florida high school


Tests of heart devices to get review

 

FDA approves new HIV drug; Raltegravir tablets
used in combination with other antiretroviral agents


Malaria vaccine is safe, immunogenic and efficacious in young infants

FDA approves new drug to treat complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections

 

B. Braun and Premier renew agreement for Introcan Safety IV Catheter
 


As cases arise, schools act to ward off virulent staph

As national estimates focus on an increase in serious infections caused by an antibiotic-resistant germ, officials in the Washington, D.C., region have identified more than a dozen cases among students and are organizing extensive cleanups of numerous schools, reported The Washington Post. The confluence of circumstances, highlighted by the death of a teenager this week in Bedford County, VA, has put administrators and parents on edge and pushed the superbug, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, into the forefront of public attention. As of yesterday, Montgomery County, MD, schools had 14 cases, and lab results were pending in two dozen suspected cases. Anne Arundel County schools have recorded one MRSA infection and have received 57 reports from parents about possible cases. Two cases have been confirmed at Wilde Lake High School in Howard County.

Administrators in several jurisdictions have sent notices to parents about steps that school systems are taking. Some have adopted policies that include requiring gym equipment to be wiped down after use. In Arlington County, school nurses are giving information to students about how to care for cuts. Just beyond Northern Virginia, the Rappahannock County school system recently finished a comprehensive cleaning of its two campuses. One of that system’s two MRSA cases involved a high school athlete who was hospitalized after his diagnosis. Rappahannock hired a company to clean locker and weight rooms and sent all football equipment to Philadelphia to be professionally washed. Rappahannock Superintendent Bob Chappell said school employees also followed a local hospital’s advice to mop hallways and classrooms with a bleach solution. The cost of the cleanup: more than $10,000.

“What’s clear to us is that this bacteria is coming into our schools from the community because the cases are so widespread, and there appears to be no pattern,” said Montgomery schools spokesman Brian Edwards. All 14
Montgomery students with confirmed infections have been treated and are doing well, county Health Officer Ulder Tillman said. The first of those cases occurred in June with a member of the Sherwood High School football team; in August, diagnoses were confirmed in six of his teammates. The remaining students attend four other high schools and three elementary schools. With the sudden rise in cases, Tillman and Superintendent Jerry D. Weast sent a letter yesterday to Montgomery parents outlining the problem and steps they can take to prevent infection.

School officials in Prince George’s County said they have had no confirmed cases of MRSA. Because of reports in other jurisdictions, they have begun cleaning locker rooms and showers with a hospital-grade disinfectant. A D.C. Health Department epidemiologist said no MRSA cases have been identified in the city’s public schools this fall. But officials are counting cases diagnosed in District hospitals. Five facilities, including Children’s Hospital, logged more than 1,300 confirmed cases between December and September. “They come in from all over,” said Nalini Singh, chief of the infectious diseases division at Children’s Hospital.

Few jurisdictions mandate MRSA reporting, although Maryland is working on a system to track and publicly disclose infections in hospitals and other healthcare institutions. An advisory committee is to release its report on implementation in November, and the collection of data from hospitals is expected to begin next year. By then, more than three dozen facilities in Maryland, the District and Northern Virginia will be involved in a national project to encourage common-sense approaches to block MRSA in institutional settings. Some surprising measures are being put into practice. Clergy visiting patients are covering their Bibles with surgical caps, and housekeeping employees are testing their thoroughness with glow-in-the-dark chemicals. (Washington Post) To read the complete article see THIS LINK

 


Staph infections hit
Florida high school


Florida Department of Health workers have told staff and students at
Hardee High School in Wauchula to be on alert. Five junior varsity football players have been diagnosed with staph infections, and one of the players was left fighting for his life.  ABC 7 spoke with the family of Jonathon Kelly Wednesday night. They said this has been a very scary experience for them, and it started with a scab on Jonathon's elbow that wouldn’t heal. It wasn’t long after that he was rushed by ambulance to the hospital. Five JV football players at Hardee High School diagnosed with staph infections, one of the players girlfriend’s, and now maybe a family member of one of the players. But 15-year-old Jonathon Kelly’s case is the worst so far.  He was diagnosed first with a staph infection, then MRSA. Then he had an allergic reaction to the antibiotics, causing Stevens Johnson’s Syndrome, and put his life on the line. “His staph infection triggered that which made his whole body break out into lesions. He had sores all up and down his arms and legs and it was really difficult for him to breathe because the mucus linings of his lungs and trachea got attacked.” 

Jonathon's older brother James says he was taken by ambulance to the intensive care unit at children's hospital in St. Petersburg. “He couldn’t open his eyes. It hurt him to talk. He couldn’t move without being in pain.” The CDC in Atlanta has contacted the Kelly family to track what appears to be the latest in a nationwide spike in staph infections. In the meantime, the Florida Department of Health is urging everyone at Hardee High School to practice good hygiene, properly cover all cuts and abrasions, and seek medical treatment for any wounds that appear infected. Advice the Kelly family wishes Jonathon had before. Jonathon's family says he is getting better, but they don’t know when he'll be released from the hospital. But even after that, doctors tell them Jonathon’s immune system is too weak to return to school for at least two months. (My Suncoast.Com) See THIS LINK

 

 


Tests of heart devices to get review


The Food and Drug Administration is likely to study whether to require more extensive tests of critical heart-device components before they are sold, as a result of Medtronic’s recent problems with such a product, an agency official said yesterday. “We are going to be looking at this to see whether the failure can help us design better tests,” said the official, Megan Moynahan. Moynahan, a branch chief at the F.D.A.’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said the agency would examine whether the stress tests it currently required were sufficient to catch problems with the leads. On Sunday, Medtronic urged doctors to stop using a family of leads called Sprint Fidelis because they were prone to cracking, with potentially life-threatening consequences like firing repeatedly and unnecessarily, or not sending a jolt when needed. The company has said it thinks at least five patients might have died because of the flaw and that 4,000 to 5,000 patients would encounter problems with the leads, which would force them to undergo potentially risky replacement procedures. An estimated 235,000 patients are thought to have Sprint Fidelis leads.

Questions have been raised both about whether Medtronic acted quickly enough in stopping use of the leads and about whether the agency sufficiently scrutinized the Sprint Fidelis before approving it in 2004 and after it reached the market. Late Tuesday, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, sent letters to officials at Medtronic and the agency that he wanted them to meet with members of his staff to discuss their handling of the situation. “What I found troubling is that Medtronic took months to stop the sales of the faulty lead, even though the problem had been reported in a peer-reviewed journal months prior,” he wrote to Medtronic. Officials of Medtronic, which is based in Minneapolis, have insisted that they acted prudently and halted sales of the product even though they said the data they had about the product’s fracture rate was equivocal.


Dr. Robert J. Myerburg, a professor of medicine at the University of Miami who headed an outside panel that issued a report in 2006 that was highly critical of Guidant’s handling of problems related to defibrillators, said it was difficult to judge how Medtronic handled the issue without knowing more information. For example, Dr. Myerburg said he would want to know how the company’s anticipated rate of failure for the Sprint Fidelis compared with the reality. A Medtronic spokesman has said it anticipated that the Sprint Fidelis would perform at least as well as older leads. As for the F.D.A., Moynahan said that although the agency had required Medtronic to test an earlier version of a defibrillator lead in patients before approval, it had not required the company to do so for the Sprint Fidelis. That was because it the agency had determined that the Sprint Fidelis was not a significant, or “generational,” change in product design, she said.

The Sprint Fidelis lead is thinner than the earlier version, the Sprint Quattro, which has performed very well. Several experts have said the thinner design of the Fidelis model is probably what makes it less durable and more prone to fracturing. Before approving it, the
agency did not require clinical testing of the Fidelis. Moynahan said she believed that clinical tests would not have identified the problem, because the number of patients in the study group would have been too small and because the fracture problems developed well after implantation. Instead, the F.D.A. required the product to pass only tests intended to identify design flaws. Those were principally mechanical stress tests meant to recreate the pressures in the body. Because the Fidelis passed those tests, Moynahan said, the agency must review why the tests did not pick up the problem. (The New York Times) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 


FDA approves new HIV drug; Raltegravir tablets
used in combination with other antiretroviral agents

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved raltegravir tablets for treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents in treatment-experienced adult patients who have evidence of viral replication and HIV-1 strains resistant to multiple antiretroviral agents. Raltegravir is the first agent of the pharmacological class known as HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors, designed to interfere with the enzyme that HIV-1 needs to multiply. Raltegravir, sold under the trade name Isentress, received a priority review by the FDA. “This is an important new product for many HIV-infected patients whose infections are not being controlled by currently available medications,” said Janet Woodcock, M.D., FDA’s deputy commissioner for scientific and medical programs, chief medical officer and acting director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

When used with other anti-HIV medicines, raltegravir may reduce the amount of HIV in the blood and may increase white blood cells, called CD4+ (T) cells, that help fight off other infections. FDA’s approval of raltegravir is based on data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in 699 HIV-1 infected adult patients with histories of extensive antiretroviral use. A greater proportion of the patients who received raltegravir in combination with other anti-HIV drugs experienced reductions in the amount of HIV in the blood, compared with patients who received placebo in combination with other anti-HIV drugs. Caution is advised when using raltegravir in patients at increased risk for certain types of muscle problems, including those who use other medications that can cause muscle problems. Patients taking raltegravir may still develop infections, including opportunistic infections or other conditions that may develop in patients living with HIV-1 infection. The long-term effects of raltegravir are not known, and its safety and effectiveness in children less than 16 years of age has not been studied. Raltegravir also has not been studied in pregnant women. 


 

Malaria vaccine is safe, immunogenic and efficacious in young infants

Initial findings from studies to test a malaria vaccine in African infants are promising, conclude authors of an Article published early Online and in an upcoming edition of The Lancet. Dr Pedro Alonso, Manhica Health Research Centre, Mozambique, amd Hospital Clinic of the Universitat de Barcelona, Spain, and colleagues, did a double-blind trial of 214 infants in Mozambique to test the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02D. Children were randomly assigned to received three doses of the vaccine or hepatitis B vaccine Energix-B (as a control) at ages 10 weeks, 14 weeks and 18 weeks, as well as routine immunisation vaccines given at eight, 12, and 16 weeks of age. They found that the vaccine was safe (the primary purpose of the trial), since there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events in either the vaccine or control groups, nor an imbalance in unsolicited adverse events between the two groups. Further, they found that for children vaccinated, the risk of new contracting new malaria infections reduced by 65%, compared with a previous efficacy of 45% reported in a trial of children aged one to four years.

The authors point out that all study participants were provided with free-insecticide-treated bednets and their homes were sprayed with insecticide twice. They say: “The trial was undertaken in an area of high transmission, but in the context of renewed and intense malaria control activities; the future use and deployment of a malaria vaccine should be seen in the context of comprehensive malaria control programmes.” They conclude that the study provides evidence of a strong association between vaccine induced antibodies and reduction of risk of malaria infection. They say: “This is of great significance because up until now, immunogenicity was a marker of response with no clearly proven relation to protection, which in turn could only be established with a clinical trial. This finding needs to be corroborated further in other trials, but this observation might be important in the clinical development plan of this vaccine.”


 

FDA approves new drug to treat complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved doripenem injection, 500 mg intravenous infusion, for the treatment of complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections. Doripenem injection, sold under the trade name Doribax, has been shown to be active against several strains of bacteria. “This is a significant new drug in the treatment of hospitalized patients with serious bacterial infections,” said Janet Woodcock, M.D., FDA’s deputy commissioner for scientific and medical programs, chief medical officer and acting director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. In several multi-center, multinational studies, doripenem was shown to have a cure rate comparable to the currently prescribed medications levofloxacin, for complicated urinary tract infections, and meropenem, for complicated intra-abdominal infections. The safety and effectiveness of doripenem injection in pediatric patients have not been established. Doripenem has not been studied in pregnant women, and the drug should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed. Doripenem injection is manufactured by Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC,
Raritan, NJ.

 

 

B. Braun and Premier renew agreement for Introcan Safety IV Catheter

In a move to increase healthcare worker safety, B. Braun Medical Inc. recently announced Premier Purchasing Partners, LP, the healthcare purchasing unit of Premier, Inc., has renewed its agreement for B. Braun’s line of safety IV catheters. B. Braun’s Introcan Safety IV Catheters are designed with passive-safety features that automatically activate to help minimize accidental needle-stick injury. The three-year contract went into effect on October 1, 2007 and will complement Premier’s existing five-year agreement encompassing all major B. Braun safe solutions. The passive Introcan Safety IV Catheter is designed to minimize accidental needle-sticks without requiring user activation – less stress, less injuries. A stainless steel clip shields the needle tip. This passive design eliminates the risk of inadvertent activation while offering a short learning curve with minimal in-service training. Along with Introcan Safety IV Catheters, Premier members will have access to B. Braun's safety-engineered infusion products including the Outlook Safety Infusion System, ULTRASITE Needle-Free IV System, Excel PVC-Free/DEHP-Free IV Containers, and DUPLEX Drug Delivery System. For more information see THIS LINK.

 

 


October 17, 2007   Download print version

CDC estimates 94,000 invasive drug-resistant staph infections
occurred in the U.S. in 2005


Recent death, new research, point to community presence
of invasive strains


California Governor vetoes hospital disclosure proposal

 

Bacterial strain that causes ear infections emerges;
resistant to antibiotics, pneumococcal vaccine


Financial relationships between industry and medical schools,
teaching hospitals highly prevalent


Cefotetan available in ready-to-use IV container;
B. Braun adds new antibiotics to DUPLEX System

 


CDC estimates 94,000 invasive drug-resistant staph infections
occurred in the U.S. in 2005

Methicillin–resistant staph aureus (MRSA) caused more than 94,000 life–threatening infections and nearly 19,000 deaths in the United States in 2005, most of them associated with healthcare settings, according to the most thorough study of life–threatening infections caused by these bacteria, experts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report. The study in the Oct. 17 edition of the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) establishes the first national baseline by which to assess future trends in invasive MRSA infections. MRSA infections can range from mild skin infections to more severe infections of the bloodstream, lungs and at surgical sites.

The study found about 85 percent of all invasive MRSA infections were associated with healthcare settings, of which two–thirds surfaced in the community among people who were hospitalized, underwent a medical procedure or resided in a long–term care facility within the previous year. In contrast, about 15 percent of reported infections were considered to be community–associated, which means that the infection occurred in people without documented healthcare risk factors. The 2005 rates of invasive infection were highest among people 65 years of age or older. African Americans were affected at twice the rate of
Caucasians, which could be due to higher rates of chronic illness among African Americans.

“Healthcare facilities need to make MRSA prevention a greater priority. The closer we get to 100 percent compliance with CDC recommendations, the greater the impact on patient health and safety,” said Denise Cardo, M.D., director of CDC′s Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion. Experts arrived at the new national estimate by projecting from the number of invasive MRSA cases from nine U.S. sites. The sites included the state of Connecticut; the Atlanta metropolitan area; the San Francisco Bay area; the Denver metropolitan area; the Portland, OR, metropolitan area; Monroe County, NY; Baltimore City, MD; Davidson County, TN; and Ramsey County, MN. In healthcare settings, MRSA occurs most frequently among patients who undergo invasive medical procedures or who have weakened immune systems and are being treated in hospitals and healthcare facilities such as nursing homes and dialysis centers. For more information on CDC′s guidelines for the prevention of MRSA in healthcare settings, see THIS LINK.

 

To view the JAMA article see THIS LINK

 





Recent death, new research, point to community presence of invasive strains


After a weeklong hospitalization, Ashton Bonds, a high school student from Bedford, VA, died Monday after a mysterious infection had spread to his kidneys, liver, lungs and the muscles around his heart. The infection turned out to be a drug-defying bug called methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, otherwise known as MRSA. What makes this case shocking is the fact that Bonds was seemingly healthy just weeks ago. And the case seems to underscore another concern about the deadly infection, once only a hospital-based concern, MRSA has spread its wings within the community setting as well. Disease experts say anyone can be affected by the disease. “I have seen children with severe and fatal pneumonia from presumed, or known, community-acquired MRSA,” said Dr. Jerome Klein, professor of pediatrics at the Boston University School of Medicine. “Although children and adults with underlying diseases are at risk, much of the community-acquired MRSA disease occurs in children without known risk factors.”

Traditionally, staphylococcus aureus has been considered to be primarily a skin infection. However, the new research shows that the invasive form of the bug, the one that enters the body and wreaks havoc within, is becoming a bigger threat. “We are in the middle of something explosive,” said Dr. Stuart Levy, professor of medicine and microbiology at the Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, MA, and author of the book The Antibiotic Paradox. The presence of MRSA in the community setting may also serve as a grim reminder of how the overuse of antibiotics can facilitate the spread of this deadly infection. (ABC News Medical Unit) To read the full article see THIS LINK



California
Governor vetoes hospital disclosure proposal

Under pressure from the politically robust hospital industry, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has rebuffed a legislative proposal that could help California catch up with other parts of the nation by allowing patients to learn the safety and surgical success rates of specific hospitals and doctors. Healthcare experts say that one of the most inexpensive and effective ways to encourage hospitals to improve patient care is to make their failures public. Schwarzenegger has endorsed this approach, saying as recently as March that greater transparency would “drive healthcare providers to perform at peak levels,” “boost the power of consumer choices,” “save a lot of money” and “save a lot of lives.” But the governor on Friday vetoed a bill passed by the Legislature that contained provisions that would have made it easier for the public to review hospital performance.

The governor’s own healthcare bill, released last week, adopted many sections of the legislative plan. But he omitted or weakened patient-oriented provisions that are objectionable to the California Hospital Assn., one of Sacramento’s biggest lobbyists and donors. The proposal does not require the state to release any information to the public, leaving those decisions to the discretion of the governor. “Without addressing quality shortfalls, we’re just adding people onto a sinking ship,” said Peter Lee, chief executive of the Pacific Business Group on Health, a coalition of more than 50 large employers. “Instead of putting a stake in the ground, we’re going to issue a report? That is all this requires to be done.” Kimberly Belshe, Schwarzenegger’s secretary for health and human services, defended his proposal Thursday, saying it struck the right “balance” and would go “far beyond what the state has done so far.”

More than two decades after the state started collecting data from hospitals, the state’s performance continues to be less than inspiring. California has issued studies on how hospitals handle just two conditions, heart attacks and pneumonia, and one operation, coronary artery bypass grafts, even though a 1980s law requires the state to complete at least nine reports each year. The few studies that are released become obsolete quickly. When the bypass report was published in July, its data were already 3 years old. The state's latest pneumonia report relies on 2004 information, and the most recent heart attack data are from 1998. “The record is dismal,” said Dr. Robert Brook, a UCLA professor of medicine who sits on a panel that advises the state on putting together its studies. “All the ice in the Arctic will have melted before we have a real transparent system in California unless we really change what we’re doing.”

Other states, including New Jersey, Kentucky, Missouri and Maryland, are doing more. Last month, New York City began releasing annual infection and death rates at the city's 11 public hospitals. Healthcare experts say Pennsylvania does the best job, reporting each year how effectively its hospitals treat 19 common ailments, including blood clots, heart and kidney failure and strokes. Pennsylvania also publishes data showing how well its hospitals repaired hip fractures, unblocked seized-up hearts and performed 10 other procedures. California is particularly far behind other states in compelling hospitals to reveal how likely patients are to contract an infection while in a hospital. Prodded by Consumers Union, a nonprofit advocacy group, lawmakers in 19 other states have mandated that hospitals release that data. Infections acquired at California hospitals, nursing homes and similar institutions cost $3.1 billion to treat, according to a state estimate. (Los Angeles Times) To read the original article see THIS LINK

 

 

 

Bacterial strain that causes ear infections emerges;
resistant to antibiotics, pneumococcal vaccine


A strain of the bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae, which can cause ear infections in children, has been detected that is resistant to all FDA-approved antibiotics for treatment of ear infections and is not covered by the pneumococcal 7-valent conjugate vaccine, according to a study in the October 17 issue of JAMA. Antibiotic resistance to the bacteria pneumococci has been a focus in community-based pediatric medicine because it is the most frequent cause of bacterial respiratory infections, especially acute otitis media (AOM; middle ear infection), which is the most commonly treated bacterial infection in children.

“The introduction in 2000 of a pneumococcal 7-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in the
United States offered considerable promise in curtailing pneumococcal infections in children, with a particularly favorable impact on penicillin- and multidrug-resistant strains,” the authors write. In the early years following widespread use of PCV7, the incidence of AOM decreased by 20 percent and the frequency of persistent and recurrent AOM has been reduced by 24 percent, according to the article. Because of overuse of antibiotics for children, there has been concern that a bacterial strain could emerge that would be untreatable by U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved antibiotics. Michael E. Pichichero, M.D., and Janet R. Casey, MD, of the University of Rochester and Legacy Pediatrics, Rochester, NY, examined the shifts in bacteria causing ear infections following the introduction of PCV7 in the strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae that cause AOM, with particular attention to certain pneumococcal serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility. Among 1,816 children in whom AOM was diagnosed, tympanocentesis was performed in 212, yielding 59 cases of S pneumoniae infection.

The researchers found that one strain of S pneumoniae belonging to serotype 19A was a new genotype and was resistant to all antibiotics approved by the FDA for use in children with AOM. This strain was identified in nine cases (2 in 2003-2004, 2 in 2004-2005, and 5 in 2005-2006). Four children infected with this strain had been unsuccessfully treated with two or more antibiotics, including high-dose amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate and three injections of ceftriaxone; three had recurrent AOM; and for two others, the infection was the first one in their life. The first four cases required tympanostomy (the creation of a hole in the tympanic membrane) tube insertion after additional unsuccessful antibiotic therapies. Levofloxacin was used in the subsequent five cases, with resolution of infection without surgery. “While the studied children represent a relatively small subset of all children in our practice with AOM, these observations are clearly worrisome, especially since there are no new antibiotics in phase 3 clinical trials for AOM in children. The study suggests that an expanded pneumococcal conjugate vaccine to include additional serotypes may be needed sooner than previously thought, with an outer-membrane protein-based vaccine to follow,” the authors write. “Changes in the pathogen distribution and antibiotic resistance patterns of bacteria that cause AOM will require continuous monitoring, especially as new vaccines become available.”

 

 


 

Financial relationships between industry and medical schools,
teaching hospitals highly prevalent


In a national survey of department chairs at medical schools and teaching hospitals, more than half report relationships with industry, including receiving financial and in-kind support, according to a study in the October 17 issue of JAMA. The authors suggest that these findings underscore the need for the disclosure and management of these relationships. “Institutional academic–industry relationships (IAIRs) exist when academic institutions, or any of their senior officials, have a financial relationship with or financial interests in a public or private company,” the researchers write. “Similar to relationships between individual faculty members and industry, relationships between academic institutions and industry, when they conflict, or have the appearance of conflicting, with the core missions of academic medical centers create an institutional conflict of interest, which exists when a department chair supervises faculty who conduct research for companies with which the chair has a personal financial relationship.”

There have been calls for the establishment of policies and practices for disclosure, evaluation, and management of IAIRs. No national data exist that describe the extent of IAIRs or that could be used for the development of policy. Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., of
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and colleagues conducted a study to determine the nature, extent, and consequences of IAIRs by surveying department chairs of 125 accredited allopathic medical schools and the 15 largest independent teaching hospitals in the United States. The researchers found almost two-thirds (60 percent) of department chairs had some form of personal relationship with industry, including having served: as a paid consultant for a company (27 percent); as a member of a scientific advisory board (27 percent); as an officer or executive of a company (7 percent); as a founder of a company (9 percent); as a member of a board of directors (11 percent); and as a paid speaker (14 percent).

Clinical chairs were significantly more likely than nonclinical chairs to have served on a speakers’ bureau. Two-thirds (67 percent) of departments as administrative units had relationships with industry. Clinical departments were significantly more likely than nonclinical departments to receive research equipment (17 percent vs. 10 percent), unrestricted funds (19 percent vs. 3 percent), support for research seminars (36 percent vs. 13 percent), support for residency and fellowship training (37 percent vs. 2 percent), and support for department-administered continuing medical education (65 percent vs. 3 percent). Clinical departments were also significantly more likely than nonclinical departments to receive discretionary funds to purchase food and beverages in the department, support for professional meetings, and subscriptions to professional journals. Nonclinical departments were significantly more likely to receive money from licensing of intellectual property developed by researchers in the department. More than two-thirds of department chairs perceived that having a relationship with industry had no effect on their professional activities, 72 percent viewed a chair’s engaging in more than one industry-related activity (substantial role in a start-up company, consulting, or serving a company’s board) as having a negative impact on a department’s ability to conduct independent unbiased research.

“This study presents the first empirical data showing that IAIRs are frequent in medical schools and teaching hospitals and thus deserving of attention. Future research is needed to better understand the impact of IAIRs on the independent unbiased performance of the education and research missions of medical schools, the management and disclosure of these relationships at the institutional level, and the impact of institutional policies. Failure to address the existence and influence of industry relationships with academic institutions could endanger the trust of the public in U.S. medical schools and teaching hospitals,” the authors conclude.
 

 


Cefotetan available in ready-to-use IV container;
B. Braun adds new antibiotics to DUPLEX System 

Helping to reduce medication errors, patients prescribed Cefotetan for bacterial infections can now have the antibiotic delivered to them in a safe, ready-to-use I.V. drug delivery system. B. Braun Medical Inc. announced that Cefotetan 1g and 2g is available to healthcare facilities nationwide in its DUPLEX Drug Delivery System. With a unique closed system design, the DUPLEX System helps ensure accurate dosage delivery and allows for room-temperature storage to decrease waste often associated with I.V. antibiotics. “Cefotetan is the fifth antibiotic drug made available in the DUPLEX System since the product was introduced,” said Rick Williamson, Director of Marketing, Drug Delivery, B. Braun Medical Inc.

DUPLEX, a dual chamber pre-filled, PVC-free, DEHP-free, and Latex-free IV container, stores the drug and diluent in separate compartments until the seal is broken just prior to administration, helping clinicians comply with The Joint Commission and USP <797> Guidelines that specify medicines should be dispensed in their “most ready-to-use form.” Prior to activation, it can be stored at room temperature for up to 12 months and does not require thawing. The system is also equipped with a unique barcode system that references the final admixture which can be used to reduce medication errors, automate patient charting, track inventory and facilitate reimbursement tracking. B. Braun is currently assisting customers with orders for DUPLEX for use with Cefotetan. B. Braun can be reached at 1-800-BBRAUN-2 (800-227-2862). For more information see THIS LINK.

 


October 16, 2007   Download print version

Superbug outbreak hits baby unit

Hospital trust boss resigns after superbug outbreak


Approximately $71,000 of dietary supplements seized at FDA request

 

$1.9 billion debt deal sours

2 studies highlight the risks and significant healthcare costs
of NSAIDs injury


Dräger celebrates double centennial of medical and safety
technology excellence

 

Amerinet announces two agreements with Skytron
 


Superbug outbreak hits baby unit

Infection experts are battling an MRSA outbreak at a neo-natal unit in England after six babies tested positive for the bug. The neo-natal unit of the Royal Blackburn Hospital in Lancashire closed to new admissions last month when the PVL strain of the MRSA outbreak was found. The East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust has said MRSA was found to have “colonized” the babies, but had not entered their bloodstream, which can lead to serious complications and death. A spokeswoman said none of the babies had fallen ill. Since the outbreak infection control has been called in and no new cases have been found. The hospital said it hoped the unit would reopen to new admissions soon.

Rineke Schram, medical director for East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, said: “I can confirm our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit has been closed to admissions since mid-September when the MRSA organism was identified in the unit. We have very recently found out that the strain is Panton Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) positive MRSA, a strain which can cause more serious illnesses in immuno-suppressed people, that is the elderly, severely ill or people with blood poisoning and wound infections. We are closely monitoring the situation and the babies who have been identified as carrying the organism are being treated in accordance with infection control guidelines. The babies are not seriously ill due to the PVL positive MRSA and are receiving treatment but continue to be nursed in separate areas within the unit, which is also in line with the guidance. Other babies within the unit are being screened on a regular basis to ensure we keep in control of the situation.”
 

There have been seven deaths in England and Wales associated with the PVL strain of MRSA over the last two years, including the two recently reported at a hospital in the West Midlands. Most of these were unrelated to hospital care. PVL-MRSA is resistant to some, but not all, antibiotics, and is therefore treatable. (The Independent) For more information see THIS LINK

 

 

 


Hospital trust boss resigns after superbug outbreak


The chairman of the hospital trust that was hit by an outbreak of a killer bug, claiming the lives of at least 21 patients has resigned. James Lee stood down after Alan Johnson, the Health Secretary, announced a Department of Health review of his role leading the
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells Hospitals NHS Trust in Kent. The trust faced withering criticism from the Healthcare Commission in a report into outbreaks of the C. difficile infection between 2004 and 2006. Describing its findings as a “truly shocking document”, Johnson told MPs he wanted to apologize on behalf of the Government and the NHS. Lee faced criticism when it emerged that the trust’s former chief executive Rose Gibb, who resigned days before the report’s publication, was offered a severance package worth a reported £250,000. Johnson ordered the trust to withhold the payment, pending legal advice.

The Commission found that 1,176 patients were infected with C. difficile during two outbreaks of the bug at the
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells Hospitals NHS Trust between April 2004 and September 2006, of whom at least 345 later died. Its report concluded that C. difficile was probably or definitely the main cause of death in 90 cases and that there was no doubt it was to blame in at least 21 of the deaths. Johnson said: “We must all shoulder our share of the blame. But I hope the House will recognize the awful failures in Maidstone and Tunbridge are entirely unrepresentative of the standards of care that patients and the public rightly expect and is delivered across the country, day after day.” Andrew Lansley, the shadow Health Secretary, said the outbreak was not an isolated occurrence. He said: “We have had other cases and the common link is that managers in the NHS have been more focused on the Government's targets ... than they have on patient safety.” (The Independent) For more information see THIS LINK

 

 



Approximately $71,000 of dietary supplements seized at FDA request

 

At the request of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Marshals seized on Tuesday approximately $71,000 of goods from FulLife Natural Options Inc., of Boca Raton, FL, which marketed and distributed Charantea Ampalaya Capsules and Charantea Ampalaya Tea. Although these products are labeled as dietary supplements, they are being promoted by FulLife for use in treating serious conditions, such as diabetes, anemia, and hypertension. These claims are evident in the products’ labeling, including promotional literature and FulLife’s Internet Web site. FDA considers these products to be unapproved new drugs because they make claims related to the prevention or treatment of diseases in the products’ labeling. Tuesday’s action protects consumers who may rely on unapproved products and unsubstantiated claims associated with these products when making important decisions about their health.

The Complaint, filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, charges the products are in violation of the drug and misbranding provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Following an investigation of the firm’s marketing practices, FDA officials advised FulLife that the claims related to prevention or treatment of diseases made these products subject to regulation as drugs. Despite FDA’s warnings, the firm failed to bring its marketing into compliance with the law. During subsequent inspections, FDA inspectors found that the offending claims were still being made. The seizure Tuesday at FulLife is the second such enforcement action in two months taken by FDA against dietary supplements being promoted with drug claims to cure or treat diabetes and other diseases or conditions.  On August 23, 2007, at the request of FDA, U.S. Marshals in the Northern District of Florida seized an estimated $41,000 worth of inventory of Glucobetic, Neuro-betic, Ocu-Comp, Atri-Oxi, Super-Flex, MSM-1000, and Atri-E-400 capsules being promoted and distributed by Charron Nutrition of Tallahassee, FL, for use in treating diabetes, arthritis, and other serious health conditions.

 


 

 

$1.9 billion debt deal sours

 

Jackson Memorial Hospital’s deal to sell eight years worth of outstanding patient bills has drawn a lawsuit from the buyer, a collection company claiming the accounts were undervalued and the hospital told debtors not to pay. The suit provides a glimpse into the inner workings of South Florida’s largest hospital, strapped for cash, facing more budget cuts and getting little return on nearly $2 billion in unpaid bills. International Portfolio Inc. (IPI), of West Conshohocken, PA, filed the complaint against Jackson and the Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County in Miami federal court on Oct. 2. It accuses the hospital of breach of contract, breach of implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, and not fulfilling accounting obligations. In a prepared statement, Jackson said it strongly disagrees with the allegations and will defend its position vigorously. Jackson has 1,757 licensed beds and has the worry of major budget cuts amid the push to cut taxes in Florida. Last December, IPI signed a deal to pay Jackson $5.7 million for patient accounts receivable with a balance of $1.87 billion. These past-due self-pay, insurance and managed care accounts were from 1998 through 2005. IPI planned to liquidate those accounts over 16 months and recover 5.8 percent of the balance, which would be $108.6 million.

 

Most public hospitals pay collection agencies a contingency fee and rarely sell their accounts receivable, said Bob Campbell, a vice chairman of Deloitte & Touche based in Austin, TX, and head of the accounting firm’s public sector practice. Selling the accounts outright is more common in industries such as student lending. Under Jackson’s agreement with IPI, these accounts couldn’t be for patients who had their liability to pay released. But by February, Jackson found that $984 million of the accounts it sold IPI weren’t qualified to be part of the agreement, the plaintiffs allege. The problems included patients who were dead, bankrupt, on Medicare or Medicaid, plus those who didn’t owe anything or had duplicate accounts. The agreement called for the hospital to give IPI new collection accounts rather than a refund of its purchase price. So in March, Jackson replaced the $984 million in unqualified accounts with another batch of receivables. But IPI says the replacement accounts were worth $682 million, or $302 million less than what it paid. The hospital also purged these replacement accounts from its records, IPI says, which prevented IPI from getting enough information on the debtors to pursue collection. When debtors paid the hospital for an account purchased by IPI, Jackson was supposed to forward that money to the company, according to the agreement. The lawsuit said that didn’t happen for the $682 million in replacement accounts because Jackson didn’t recode them as belonging to IPI. In August, Jackson offered to refund the entire purchase amount and take the accounts back, but IPI wants the hospital to stick to the agreement and give it enough accounts to boost the value back to $1.87 billion. (South Florida Business Journal) To read the original article see THIS LINK  


 

 

 

 

2 studies highlight the risks and significant healthcare costs
of NSAIDs injury


Patients underreported their use of common but potentially dangerous over-the-counter pain medications known as NSAIDs, according to research presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the
American College of Gastroenterology. “This is a serious issue given what we know about the significant risk of injury and bleeding in the GI tract in patients using NSAIDs,” said David Johnson, M.D., FACG, one of the researchers and President of the America College of Gastroenterology. Serious gastrointestinal complications such as bleeding, ulceration and perforation can occur with or without warning symptoms in people who take NSAIDS (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.) Ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding are serious health problems in the United States. With millions taking NSAID pain medications every day, it is estimated that more than 100,000 Americans are hospitalized each year and between 15,000 and 20,000 Americans die each year from ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding linked to NSAID use.  Of particular concern are patients with arthritic conditions. More than 14 million such patients consume NSAIDs regularly. Up to 60 percent will have gastrointestinal side effects related to these drugs and more than 10 percent will cease recommended medications because of troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms.

Dr. Johnson and his colleagues at Eastern Virginia Medical School administered a survey to patients in a private GI practice after a written and verbally confirmed report of current medications to nursing staff. Almost one in five respondents to the survey noted use of an NSAID that had not been reported verbally to nursing staff, including 8 percent who reported daily use. For 22 percent of respondents, they did not think the medications were important enough to list, while 30 percent cited the fact that the drugs were not prescribed by a physician. “This reflects a common misperception that these medications are insignificant or benign when actually their chronic use, particularly among the elderly and those with conditions such as arthritis, is linked to serious and potentially fatal GI injury and bleeding,” noted Dr. Johnson. Physician experts from the American College of Gastroenterology warn that patients who take over-the-counter pain medications on a regular basis should talk with their physician about the potential for ulcers and other GI side effects. Recent research suggests a role for acid suppression therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for patients at risk of developing stomach ulcers due to long-term use of NSAIDs.

In another study presented at the American College of Gastroenterology, a VA researcher, Neena S. Abraham, M.D. looked at the burden of cost from hospitalization for GI bleeding related to NSAID use, and conducted a cost benefit analysis of using PPIs to help protect against serious potential injury to the GI tract. “Our analysis of a large patient population suggests that it is cost beneficial to administer a proton pump inhibitor with NSAIDs and points to significant savings in hospital costs relating to GI injury and bleeding in the Veterans’ Administration medical setting,” explained Dr. Abraham. Dr. Abraham and her colleagues reviewed prescription records linked to inpatient, outpatient and death files for the VA medical system and Medicare. In an overall population of almost half a million veterans, Dr. Abraham identified 3,200 events of GI bleeding, of which 36 percent were treated by the VA. A review of their prescription and hospitalization records revealed that half of those with GI bleeding events were hospitalized.

Importantly, the one third of patients with GI bleeding events prescribed a PPI were 60 percent less likely to be hospitalized. Their overall median total medical costs were significantly lower than patients who were not prescribed a PPI. “This reduction in the risk of hospitalization is where significant savings occur due to lower utilization of health resources, endoscopy and surgery, not to mention the impact on patients’ quality of life,” explained Dr. Abraham. While there are costs to treat patients on NSAIDs prophylactically with PPIs, these findings suggest that reduced hospitalization costs offset higher pharmacy costs. “These are powerful data, especially because of the high risk for GI bleeding in elderly patients who are in the highest risk category for GI bleeding,” according to Dr. Abraham.

 



 

Dräger celebrates double centennial of medical and safety technology excellence

 

Draeger Medical Inc. celebrates 100 years of ventilation technology in October of this year. In 1907, the company delivered the Pulmotor, the first-ever mobile short-term respirator. 2007 also marks 100 years in the United States for Drägerwerk AG, Draeger Medical’s parent corporation. As part of its ongoing celebration of these milestones, Draeger Medical will showcase an original Pulmotor alongside of its latest respiratory care devices at the annual ASA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, CA, October 13-17 and at the AARC Respiratory Congress in Orlando, FL, December 1-4, 2007. Shortly after its release, the Pulmotor became widely used by mine rescue teams across America, Germany, England and Mexico and by mountaineering rescue squads in England. Due to its use in the harsh environments of underground mines and in high altitudes, the reputation of the breathing device quickly grew. The first users of the ventilation products were soon dubbed “Draegermen;” and ever since, the term has been synonymous with mine rescue teams worldwide. The use of Dräger breathing apparatus quickly spread to other emergency services fields. For more information, visit www.draeger.com to download or read “The History of Dräger” brochure.

 

 

Amerinet announces two agreements with Skytron

Amerinet announces new agreements with Skytron for OR lights, booms and OR tables. Effective through August 31, 2010, these new agreements provide Amerinet members with tremendous savings on Skytron’s lights, booms and OR tables, as well as other value-added services and programs. Headquartered in Grand Rapids, MI, Skytron is a division of the KMW Group Inc. For more information, see THIS LINK

 

 


October 15, 2007   Download print version

Medtronic suspends distribution of Sprint Fidelis defibrillation leads


Even occasional use of spray cleaners may cause asthma in adults

 

Statins reduce loss of function, keeping old lungs young, even in smokers

 

Blood test takes step toward predicting Alzheimer’s risk,
Stanford researchers find


Annual report to the nation finds cancer death rate decline doubling

Mortality rates 71 percent lower at top-rated hospitals: HealthGrades 2008 hospital-quality study

B. Braun Contiplex Stim System redefines standards for stimulating catheters; optimized for nerve stimulation, easily visible under ultrasound
 


Medtronic suspends distribution of Sprint Fidelis defibrillation leads

Medtronic Inc. has voluntarily suspended worldwide distribution of the Sprint Fidelis family of defibrillation leads because of the potential for lead fractures. In addition, the company recommends against new implants of the leads (Sprint Fidelis Models: 6930, 6931, 6948, 6949). The Sprint Fidelis leads are used to deliver therapy in defibrillators only, including Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy – Defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Approximately 268,000 Sprint Fidelis leads have been implanted worldwide. This action does not affect Medtronic pacemaker patients. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) intends to issue a public statement regarding Medtronic’s decision at www.fda.gov.

Medtronic, its Independent Physician Quality Panel, and Bruce Lindsay, M.D., Professor of Medicine, Director of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Washington University School of Medicine and President of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), do not recommend that patients seek prophylactic replacement of Sprint Fidelis leads, as the risks of removal or insertion of another lead exceed the small risk to patients of a lead fracture. Medtronic has provided patient management recommendations that should reduce risks in the affected population and recommends that patients with questions consult their physicians. Information is also available for patients and physicians at www.medtronic.com/fidelis. This decision is based on a variety of factors that, when viewed together, indicate that suspending distribution is the appropriate action. Based on Medtronic’s extensive performance data, Sprint Fidelis lead viability is trending lower than Medtronic’s Sprint Quattro lead at 30 months (97.7% Sprint Fidelis vs. 99.1% Sprint Quattro). This difference is not statistically significant; however, if the current lead fracture rates remain constant, it will become so over time. Medtronic believes that given this performance trend and its ability to identify the primary fracture locations, this action is in patients’ best interest. Lead fractures may present clinically as audible alerts, inappropriate shocks and/or loss of output. Based on current information regarding the 268,000 implanted leads, Medtronic has identified five patient deaths in which a Sprint Fidelis lead fracture may have been a possible or likely contributing factor.

In conjunction with Medtronic’s Independent Physician Quality Panel, Medtronic today communicated, via letter and direct outreach with more than 13,000 physicians worldwide, the Sprint Fidelis lead performance data and updated patient management recommendations for patients who are implanted with Sprint Fidelis leads. These recommendations include device programming and patient management recommendations that will ensure a patient’s device is set to more effectively monitor for potential problems and provide an audible alert in the event of lead fractures. Medtronic recommends that patients, who believe they may have a Fidelis lead, consult with their physicians. It is important to note that Medtronic pacemaker patients are not affected by this action. Medtronic will communicate directly to affected patients and encourage them to contact their physicians for more information. Medtronic has established the following website – www.medtronic.com/fidelis – and a toll-free number (1-800-551-5544 ext. 41835) for patients seeking information.

Editor’s Note: For a related article in The New York Times see THIS LINK 

 

 

 

Even occasional use of spray cleaners may cause asthma in adults


Using household cleaning sprays and air fresheners as little as once a week can raise the risk of developing asthma in adults, say researchers in
Europe. Such products have been associated with increased asthma rates in cleaning professionals, but a similar effect in nonprofessional users has never before been shown. “Frequent use of household cleaning sprays may be an important risk factor for adult asthma,” wrote lead author Jan-Paul Zock, Ph.D., of the Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology at the Municipal Institute of Medical Research in Barcelona, Spain. The epidemiological study, the first to investigate the effects of cleaning products on occasional users rather than occupational users, appeared in the second issue for October of the American Thoracic Society’s American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. The investigators used baseline data from the first phase of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS I), one of the world’s largest epidemiologic studies of airway disease, and interviews conducted in the follow-up phase, ECRHS II. Altogether, the study included more than 3,500 subjects across 22 centers in 10 European countries. Subjects were assessed for current asthma, current wheeze, physician-diagnosed asthma and allergy at follow-up, which took place an average of nine years after their first assessment. They were also asked to report the number of times per week they used cleaning products. Two-thirds of the study population who reported doing the bulk of cleaning were women, about six percent of whom had asthma at the time of follow-up. Fewer than ten percent of them were full-time homemakers.

The risk of developing asthma increased with frequency of cleaning and number of different sprays used, but on average was about thirty to fifty percent higher in people regularly exposed to cleaning sprays than in others. The researchers found that cleaning sprays, especially air fresheners, furniture cleaners and glass-cleaners, had a particularly strong effect. “Our findings are consistent with occupational epidemiological studies in which increased asthma risk was related to professional use of sprays among both domestic and non-domestic cleaning women,” wrote Dr. Zock. “This indicates a relevant contribution of spray use to the burden of asthma in adults who do the cleaning in their homes.” The design of the study was not intended to determine the biological mechanism behind the increase in asthma with exposure to cleaning sprays, but Dr. Zock and colleagues propose a number of hypotheses, including the possibility that asthma is partially irritant-induced, that sprays contain sensitizers that are specific to asthma, and/or that an inflammatory response is involved in asthma development. “Clinicians should be aware of the potential for cleaning products used in the home to cause respiratory symptoms and possibly asthma,” wrote Kenneth D. Rosenman, M.D., professor at
Michigan State University, in an editorial in the same issue of the journal. The research may have also significant implications for public health. “The relative risk rates of developing adult asthma in relation to exposure to cleaning products could account for as much as 15 percent, or one in seven of adult asthma cases,” wrote Dr. Zock.
 

 

Statins reduce loss of function, keeping old lungs young, even in smokers


Statins are known to be good for lowering cholesterol and maybe even fighting dementia, and now they have another reported benefit: they appear to slow decline in lung function in the elderly, even in those who smoke. According to researchers in
Boston, it may be statins’ anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that help achieve this effect. Their findings were published in the second issue for October in the American Thoracic Society’s American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. “We hypothesized that statins would have a protective effect on decline in lung function,” wrote Dr. Joel Schwartz, Ph.D., professor of environmental epidemiology at Harvard School of Public Health, a lead researcher on the study, the first to examine the relationships between statins and lung function decline. “The link between lung function and mortality and the reduced levels of lung function in the elderly indicates the importance of a possibility of reducing the rate of decline,” wrote Dr. Schwartz.

To investigate whether statins had an effect of loss of lung function, the researchers used data from the ongoing and longitudinal Veterans Administration Normative Aging Study, which began