Inside the Current Issue

Cover Story
Marked improvements build stronger case for instrument tracking

Self Study Series

Newswire
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
H HPN Hall of Fame
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us Home
Subscribe

 Sign up for HPN Daily Updates by E-mail

Special Event Photos

Contact Us

KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2010

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

hpnonline Daily Update

October 2008
 
October 20 October 21 October 22 October 23 October 24


October 24, 2008   Download print version

Prescription drug injuries and deaths reach record levels

3M is first to bring automated technology to rapid diagnostic flu test market

IHI shares achievements of the 5 million lives campaign

Premier healthcare alliance launches MS-DRG reimbursement calculators to help members highlight avoidable financial loss

Half of doctors routinely prescribe placebos

Amerinet plays key role in Utah Hospital construction cost savings

Study finds creating unique health ID numbers would improve health care quality, efficiency

Hospital rankings: More than meets the eye


Prescription drug injuries and deaths reach record levels

The number of deaths and serious injuries associated with prescription drug use rose to record levels in the first quarter of this year, with 4,825 deaths and nearly 21,000 injuries, a watchdog group said Wednesday. Those numbers represent a nearly threefold increase in deaths from the previous quarter and a 38% increase in injuries from last year's quarterly average, according to the Horsham, PA based Institute for Safe Medication Practices.

The most dangerous medications were the anti-smoking drug varenicline, which was linked to 1,001 injuries and 50 deaths in the three-month period ending in March, and the blood thinner heparin, which was associated with 779 injuries and 102 deaths. The heparin cases were associated with contaminated lots of the drug imported from China. The FDA has reported 238 deaths linked to the blood thinner since January, but the number dwindled once the problem was recognized and addressed.

The data came from voluntary reports of adverse effects to the Food and Drug Administration, which made the data public after stripping information that identified victims. Because the reporting is voluntary, researchers have speculated that fewer than 10% of adverse events actually make it into the system.
 
Varenicline remains a problem, however, according to institute officials. Since the drug -- sold in the United States by Pfizer Inc. under the brand name Chantix -- was approved in 2006, it has been linked to 3,325 serious injuries and 112 deaths. Some reports were linked to people attempting suicide or causing injury to themselves after using the drug, which can evoke serious psychiatric problems. Others were linked to blackouts, seizures or loss of consciousness, perhaps tied to sudden disturbances in heart rhythm.

One possible explanation for the link might have been the success of the drug and the large number of people using it, the report said. But investigation showed that, during the quarter, varenicline accounted for more reports of serious injury than the 10 bestselling prescription drugs combined. A Pfizer statement released Wednesday speculated that the large number of reports might be linked to the high level of adverse publicity associated with the drug. It noted also that nicotine withdrawal could cause irritability, depressed mood and other changes in behavior.

Many of the reports were linked to powerful painkillers or narcotics such as oxycodone, fentanyl, morphine, methadone and hydrocodone, all of which have a high potential for abuse. Acetaminophen and ibuprofen were among the top 10 drugs causing both injuries and deaths. The drugs are often used in suicide attempts because they are easily accessible. Overdosing or prolonged usage of either of the over-the-counter medications can cause side effects including gastrointestinal damage and heart attacks.(LA Times) Read the original story.

 

3M is first to bring automated technology to rapid diagnostic flu test market

Just in time for a new flu season, in which up to 20 percent of Americans may be affected, 3M is announcing nationwide availability of the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A+B Test, that is the first rapid flu test to provide automated results. The automated technology helps reduce user interpretation errors, which can lead to both false negative or false positive results. The 3M Rapid Detection Flu A+B Test will be able to deliver hospital and physician office laboratories reliable and objective electronic results in 15 minutes.

Requiring less than three minutes of prep time, the test detects positive or negative results, and differentiates influenza A and influenza B with results clearly displayed on the 3M Rapid Detection Reader. In addition to providing automated results, the

technology also enables labs to export data through laboratory information systems, further reducing the potential for reporting error by eliminating the need for manual recording and transferring of patient results. The test also reads and stores lab results, giving lab technicians more flexibility in time and test management.

A recent study evaluated the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A+B Test against the leading hospital brand and two conventional methods of diagnosing influenza A and B, direct fluorescent antibody staining (DFA) (1.5 to 3 hours for results) and rapid cell culture (R-Mix) (24 to 48 hours for results). Compared to the leading hospital brand, the 3M flu test demonstrated superior analytical and clinical sensitivity for the detection of both influenza A and B. Further, the study concluded that the automated reading of test results eliminated the potential for user misreading or misinterpretation of test results. Read the original article.

 

IHI shares achievements of the 5 million lives campaign

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) announced the progress of the organizations enrolled in the 5 Million Lives Campaign, a national effort to help U.S. hospitals dramatically reduce incidents of avoidable medical harm. The Campaign asks hospitals to introduce up to 11 evidence-based health care interventions and to engage their trustees in the effort, in order to protect patients across the nation from five million incidents of medical harm over a 24-month period, ending December 9, 2008. While the Campaign will continue for another six weeks and fuller reporting on progress will come after December, many hospitals participating in the effort have already dramatically improved the care patients receive, setting the stage for further progress.  

To date, 4,030 hospitals across the nation have enrolled in the Campaign – approximately 80% of U.S. hospital beds. Participating hospitals have committed to implementing up to 12 quality improvement changes, including: Preventing Adverse Drug Events ―by implementing medication reconciliation― (3,146 hospitals); Preventing Surgical Site Infections (3,045 hospitals); Deploying Rapid Response Teams (2,844 hospitals); Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (2,711 hospitals); Preventing Central-Line Infections (2,679 hospitals); Reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections (2,477 hospitals); and Getting Hospital Boards on Board with Quality Improvement (2,057 hospitals).

Eight other countries have launched initiatives inspired by the Campaign, including England, Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, Canada, Wales, Scotland, and Japan.

There will be a “National Network Day” on Monday, October 27th, during which over 4,000 doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals are expected to join in a series of free web-based learning exercises hosted by IHI and featuring exceptional facilities from around the nation.

At its 20th Annual National Forum on Quality Improvement in Health Care (December 10-11, Nashville, TN), IHI will celebrate the progress of facilities from across the nation. The Campaign will announce hospitals' progress in pursuit of a recently-issued "Boards Challenge" (an effort to get 80% of the nation's hospital boards to adopt the Campaign's governance intervention) and discuss the future direction of its national learning network. For a complete list of all interventions, along with a state-by-state list of hospitals taking part in the 5 Million Lives Campaign, please visit www.IHI.org.

 

Premier healthcare alliance launches MS-DRG reimbursement calculators to help members highlight avoidable financial loss

The Premier healthcare alliance has launched a set of reimbursement calculators to help member hospitals compare the individual hospitals’ costs to the reimbursement offered under the Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) system.

Available for cardiovascular, orthopedics and spine implants, the calculators can assist in reducing the number of inaccurate claims that result in lowered Medicare reimbursement without impacting the quality of patient care. The calculators automatically compare national average base reimbursement rates to the payment for a particular MS-DRG. In addition, hospitals can populate their individual reimbursement rates for a more customized report. The calculators also track reimbursement trends by displaying both the percentage and dollar amount changes in reimbursement payments from year to year.  

DRGs were developed for Medicare to classify hospital cases into groups expected to have similar hospital resource use. MS-DRGs were created to more accurately account for the severity of a patient's condition. The MS-DRG prospective payment system went into effect in October 2007. For more information, visit www.premierinc.com. 

 

Half of doctors routinely prescribe placebos

Half of all American doctors responding to a nationwide survey say they regularly prescribe placebos to patients. The results trouble medical ethicists, who say more research is needed to determine whether doctors must deceive patients in order for placebos to work. The study is being published in BMJ, formerly The British Medical Journal. One of the authors, Franklin G. Miller, was among the medical ethicists who said they were troubled by the results.

The most common placebos the American doctors reported using were headache pills and vitamins, but a significant number also reported prescribing antibiotics and sedatives. Although these drugs, contrary to the usual definition of placebos, are not inert, doctors reported using them for their effect on patients’ psyches, not their bodies. In most cases, doctors who recommended placebos described them to patients as “a medicine not typically used for your condition but might benefit you,” the survey found. Only 5 percent described the treatment to patients as “a placebo.”

Dr. William Schreiber, an internist in Louisville, Ky., at first said in an interview that he did not believe the survey’s results, because, he said, few doctors he knows routinely prescribe placebos. But when asked how he treated fibromyalgia or other conditions that many doctors suspect are largely psychosomatic, Dr. Schreiber changed his mind. “The problem is that most of those people are very difficult patients, and it’s a whole lot easier to give them something like a big dose of Aleve,” he said. “Is that a placebo treatment? Depending on how you define it, I guess it is.”

But antibiotics and sedatives are not placebos, he said.

The American Medical Association discourages the use of placebos by doctors when represented as helpful.

Controlled clinical trials have hinted that placebos may have powerful effects. Some 30 percent to 40 percent of depressed patients who are given placebos get better, a treatment effect that antidepressants barely top. Placebos have also proved effective against hypertension and pain. (NY Times) Read the original article.

 

Amerinet plays key role in Utah Hospital construction cost savings

Amerinet Inc. recently expanded its partnership with a critical access hospital in west-central Utah and, through its Construction Solutions products and services, is playing a key cost savings role in the construction of a new facility there.

“Through our Total Spend Management Solutions, we are engaged at the earliest stages of a project, allowing us to anticipate and meet the unique clinical and financial needs of critical access hospitals and rural healthcare providers,” said Mike Reid, senior director, construction, capital and facility services at Amerinet. “Amerinet’s Construction Solutions offer members savings of 12 to 18 percent on construction, renovation and interior design projects.”

Groundbreaking for the new 25-bed Milford Valley Memorial Hospital in Milford, Utah, occurred in July 2008. The $8 million project is to be completed in summer 2009 and will replace an existing facility that is one of the oldest in the state.

 

Study finds creating unique health ID numbers would improve health care quality, efficiency

Creating a unique patient identification number for every person in the United States would facilitate a reduction in medical errors, simplify the use of electronic medical records, increase overall efficiency and help protect patient privacy, according to a new RAND Corporation study. Although creating such an identification system could cost as much as $11 billion, the effort would likely return even more in benefits to the nation's healthcare system, according to researchers from RAND Health.

Federal legislation passed over a decade ago supported the creation of a unique patient identifier system, but privacy and security concerns have stalled efforts to put the proposal into use. As adoption of health information technology expands nationally and more patient records are computerized, there have been increasing calls to create a system that would make it easier to retrieve records across varying systems such as those used by doctors and hospitals.

The RAND study concluded that one of the primary benefits created by broad adoption of unique patient identifiers would be to eliminate record errors, and help reduce repetitive and unneeded care. In the absence of unique patient identifiers, most health systems use a technique known as statistical matching that retrieves a patient's medical record by searching for attributes such as name, birth date, address, gender, medical record numbers, and all or part of a person's Social Security Number.

Reviewing past research studies, RAND researchers estimated that statistical matching returns incomplete medical records about 8 percent of the time and exposes patients to privacy risks because a large amount of personal information is exposed to computer systems during a search.

Some proposals have suggested using patients' Social Security Numbers as a medical identifier. But the RAND study found Social Security Numbers are a poor option because they are so widely used and they pose risks of identify theft. A genuine unique patient identification system would be more secure because it could include safeguards such as check codes that allow numbers to be easily screened for input errors. Such check codes are mathematical combinations of the other digits in the number and are commonly used in other digital IDs such as those in the product bar codes scanned at checkout counters.

 

Hospital rankings: More than meets the eye

Medicare's pay-for-performance program ranks and rewards hospitals according to how well they meet certain guidelines for clinical care. But researchers at Duke Clinical Research Institute say the program penalizes hospitals that care for the greatest numbers of the poor and needy by not taking into account their greater clinical burden.

Studies show that age, race and severity of disease can influence which patients get certain treatments and how they fare, and these factors vary significantly from hospital to hospital. "That means that hospitals serving large groups of the elderly, women, poor, uninsured or African American patients might have problems competing with institutions whose patients are younger, wealthy, insured, and white," says Dr. Eric Peterson, a cardiologist at Duke and the senior author of the study. "Hospitals are simply not starting out on the same playing field."

Under the current pay-for-performance system, hospitals in the top 20 percent of the rankings receive financial reward; those in the middle 60 percent receive nothing, and those at the bottom stand to loose Medicare reimbursement money. Currently, Medicare does not consider demographic variables and patients' existing health problems in figuring hospital rankings.

Peterson and colleagues in the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines program wanted to find out if those rankings would change if patient mix was included in the calculations. Investigators ranked the hospitals according to crude composite process performance scores and then grouped them according to Medicare's current system. Next, they ranked the same hospitals again, but this time taking into account the patients' demographic variables, their clinical characteristics and eligibility for certain procedures.

They found that the hospitals with the lowest crude composite scores tended to be smaller, non-academic institutions that treated a higher percentage of older, sicker and minority patients than those in the top group.

While there was general agreement on performance between the two ranking systems, researchers found that when taking into account patient characteristics and treatment opportunity, 16.5 percent, or 74 of the hospitals would fall into a different financial status category.

So why doesn't Medicare consider patient mix in tallying rankings? "On the surface, it may well seem to be the right thing to do, but some feel such a move would 'legitimize' less-than-optimal care," says Peterson. "At the same time, not taking these factors into consideration is like comparing apples to oranges."

Peterson says one solution might be to reward hospitals for improvement in adherence to evidence-based treatment, rather than rewarding a single score or ranking. Another option might involve separately reporting adherence data for older patients, women, or minorities. "That would surely draw more attention to any gaps in care, and might prompt better compliance."

 


October 23, 2008   Download print version

Better data management and more inspections are needed to strengthen FDA’s foreign drug inspection program

Amerinet announces new agreements with C.R. Bard’s medical division and Bard Urological

Food allergies up 18% among U.S. children

Researchers downplay MRSA screening as effective infection control intervention

The importance of melanoma screening

Patewood Memorial Hospital increases workflow efficiency and charge capture in surgical suites with Omnicell OptiFlex SS

X marks the spot: Sharpies get thumbs-up for marking surgery sites

Comprehensive tax reform could play important role in creating healthcare reform


Better data management and more inspections are needed to strengthen FDA’s foreign drug inspection program

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommends that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) improve the data that it uses to manage its foreign inspection program, conduct more inspections of foreign establishments, and ensure more timely inspection of foreign establishments where FDA has identified serious deficiencies.

GAO found that FDA databases contain inaccurate information on foreign establishments subject to inspection. FDA uses information from a database of establishments registered to market drugs in the United States and a database of establishments that shipped drugs to the U.S. to compile a list of establishments subject to inspection, but these databases contain divergent estimates—about 3,000 and 6,800, respectively. The accuracy of this information is important in FDA’s identification of foreign establishments subject to inspection.

FDA inspects relatively few foreign establishments each year to assess the manufacturing of drugs currently marketed in the U.S. FDA inspected 1,479 foreign drug manufacturing establishments from fiscal years 2002 through 2007. Because FDA does not know the number of establishments subject to inspection, the percentage of those inspected cannot be calculated with certainty. However, using a list FDA developed to prioritize foreign establishments for inspection in fiscal year 2007, GAO estimated that FDA may inspect about 8 percent of foreign establishments in a given year. At this rate, it would take the agency more than 13 years to inspect these establishments once. In contrast, FDA estimates that it inspects domestic establishments about once every 2.7 years.

FDA’s identification of serious deficiencies has led foreign establishments to take corrective actions, but inspections to determine continued compliance are not always timely. FDA identified deficiencies during most foreign inspections, but determining how the agency classified the results of a specific inspection is hindered by inconsistencies in its databases, particularly on the classification of inspections with serious deficiencies.

HHS agreed that FDA should conduct more foreign inspections, but noted that additional inspections are only one component of FDA’s strategy to enhance oversight and elaborated on other initiatives, such as database improvements, discussed in this report. Read the full report.

 

Amerinet announces new agreements with C.R. Bard’s medical division and Bard Urological

Amerinet Inc. announces a new agreement with C.R. Bard’s Medical Division for acute urology products, effective, November 1, 2008, through October 31, 2011.

In addition Amerinet announces a new agreement with C.R. Bard’s Urological Division for specialty urology products, effective, November 1, 2008, through October 31, 2011.

 

Food allergies up 18% among U.S. children

The number of American kids with food allergies has soared 18 percent in the last decade, with an estimated 4 percent of children and teens now affected with the condition, a new federal report says. In 2007, approximately 3 million children under the age of 18 were reported to have had a food or digestive allergy in the previous 12 months, compared to slightly more than 2.3 million children (3.3 percent) in 1997, according to the report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The findings are published in a data brief, “Food Allergy Among U.S. Children: Trends in Prevalence and Hospitalizations.” The data are from the National Health Interview Survey and the National Hospital Discharge Survey, both conducted by CDC′s National Center for Health Statistics.

Eight types of foods account for 90 percent of all food allergies – milk, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, fish, shellfish, soy, and wheat. Allergic reactions to these foods can range from a tingling sensation around the mouth and lips, to hives and even death, depending on the severity of the reaction, the report’s authors said. The report also said that children with food allergies are two to four times more likely to have asthma or other allergies, compared to children without food allergies.

In 2007, 29 percent of children with food allergies also had reported asthma, compared to 12 percent of children without food allergy. And an estimated 27 percent of children with food allergies had reported eczema or skin allergy, compared to 8 percent of children without food allergies.

From 2004 to 2006, there were approximately 9,537 hospital discharges annually for children from birth to 17 years of age who were diagnosed with a food allergy. Hospital discharges with a diagnosed food allergy increased significantly from the period 1998-2000 to 2004-2006. This finding could owe to increased awareness, reporting, and use of specific medical diagnostic codes for food allergies. Or it could represent a real increase in children who are experiencing food-allergic reactions. Read the full report.

 

Researchers downplay MRSA screening as effective infection control intervention

Three Virginia Commonwealth University epidemiologists are downplaying the value of mandatory universal nasal screening of patients for MRSA, arguing that proven, hospital-wide infection control practices can prevent more of the potentially fatal infections. In a report published in the November issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, the team, composed of epidemiologists Richard P. Wenzel, M.D., Gonzalo Bearman, M.D., and Michael B. Edmond, M.D., of the VCU School of Medicine, said “hospitals get more bang for their buck with evidence-based infection control prevention.”

“The key safety question today, since it is possible to reduce the total risk of hospital infections by half with a broad-based infection control program, is what is the incremental benefit of a component focusing on a single antibiotic-resistant pathogen?” said Wenzel.

According to Wenzel, MRSA infections cause only 14 percent of hospital infections, and investing huge resources into their control would be less effective than implementing programs that would reduce the burden of all infections by 50 percent.

In their research model, the MRSA screening was inferior to the general infection control programs, preventing fewer infections, fewer deaths and was also less effective in reducing years of life lost from infections. The MRSA screening tests have false positives – leading to the isolation of patients who are non-MRSA carriers – as well as false negatives – missing some true carriers. Further, the cost of nasal swabbing tests for all patients in a screening program was estimated to be two to three times that of adding additional infection control nurses for a broad infection control program.

The authors acknowledge that there are some instances in which MRSA screening and topical antibiotic treatment of nares of carriers may add incremental benefit to a hospital wide, evidence-based program. For example, in a patient going for open heart surgery who is a MRSA carrier, a post-operative infection would be devastating.

Wenzel and his colleagues’ broad perspective is that a focused screening program would have made more sense in the late 1980s and early 1990s since MRSA was the key in antibiotic-resistant pathogen. However, in the last 15 years hospitals are facing multiple bacteria with broad resistance (Vancomycin-resistant enterococci, imipenam-resistant pseudomonas, totally drug resistant Acinetobacter and others).

 

The importance of melanoma screening

When it comes to melanoma, vanity may be a virtue. The most direct method for detecting this deadly skin cancer is to face a mirror, clothes off, and check for suspicious moles from head to toe. Moles at least the size of a pencil eraser are of greatest concern, since smaller spots are rarely cancerous, said Dr. David Polsky, a dermatologist at New York University School of Medicine. “To get hung up on the real small stuff is missing the bigger picture,” he said.

But changes to the color, size or shape of any mole may be an early indication of trouble, especially for someone who has a family history of melanoma or lots of unusual moles. And while sun-drenched areas on the head or legs are likely sites for other forms of skin cancer, melanoma can develop anywhere on the body.

About 90 percent of melanoma growths are curable if caught early and surgically removed, putting the impetus on people at home to look for cancerous spots. When growths are left unchecked, the chances of surviving the disease for long are worse than for lung or colon cancer.

But in the push to make everyone better skin cancer detectives, tough obstacles — and questions — remain. To locate the first signs of danger requires studious attention, and few people seem willing to bother. Nine to 18 percent of Americans regularly examine their own skin for melanoma, surveys show. Dermatologists, typically the first responders for skin cancer, may be quicker to schedule a Botox appointment than to verify a patient’s concern about changing moles, research shows. Furthermore, there is no proof so far that such screening will ultimately help save any of the estimated 8,400 lives lost to melanoma each year in the United States.

The stakes are high. The chance of surviving melanoma turns sharply for the worse once the tumors have spread beyond their original site on the skin, making it critical to find changes early. Yet in the rush to get the cancer out fast, experts say they are noticing a relaxing of standards in diagnosing melanoma. Doctors these days are more likely to take out any suspicious mole out of fear of missing a cancerous one, and possibly getting sued for a missed diagnosis, experts say. (NY Times) Read the original article.

 

Patewood Memorial Hospital increases workflow efficiency and charge capture in surgical suites with Omnicell OptiFlex SS

Omnicell Inc., a provider of system solutions to acute healthcare facilities, and Patewood Memorial Hospital, a part of the Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center (GHS), announced that Patewood has installed Omnicell OptiFlex SS systems for use in the hospital’s state-of-the-art digital surgical suites. With use of this automated physician preference card and perpetual inventory management system, Patewood Memorial is maximizing workflow efficiency, increasing productivity for both materials management and staff, plus decreasing inventory carrying costs.

Patewood Memorial chose to have a hybrid system of open shelving and closed secure cabinets for added flexibility and to bolster the automation process for improved overall inventory accuracy. The hospital uses closed cabinets in the actual OR suites providing additional security of inventory high-dollar items such as consigned implants. Materials management also picks supplies from open shelving in their supply area, giving them quick access to materials. Whether pulling items from open shelves or closed cabinets, OptiFlex SS barcoded preference cards drive the process and accurately track the utilization and charges it to a specific patient case.

Another significant improvement for Patewood Memorial was realized in knowing exactly what costs were being incurred in each OR case. By recording supply usage based on each patient case and by interfacing directly with the billing system, OptiFlex SS enables Patewood Memorial to consistently, effectively and accurately charge for product usage. Accuracy of this system is contingent upon a strong and enforced vendor policy, which imposes a logical, well-defined process that controls vendor access and introduction of new products.

 

X marks the spot: Sharpies get thumbs-up for marking surgery sites

A bit of good news out of the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry at the University of Alberta for patients undergoing surgery or an invasive procedure, their surgeons and cost-conscious hospital administrators. It’s standard practice for the surgeon or their designate, (in consultation with the patient when possible), to mark the operative/invasive site using a marking pen before an operation, a precaution to ensure surgeons cut the correct spot. But there was concern that germs would be spread from one patient to the next, so it has also become common procedure to throw away the marker each time, costing thousands of dollars a year.

Infection control specialists at the U of A, associate professor Dr. Sarah Forgie of the Department of Pediatrics and pediatric infectious diseases resident Dr. Catherine Burton, have shown that the tips of the Sharpies® don’t spread infection since the ink has an alcohol base.

This has caught the attention of organizers of a major conference on infectious disease taking place in Washington, D.C., at the end of October. They have invited Burton to share her work with other disease control specialists from around the world.

After asking around and finding out that many of the surgical teams in Edmonton liked using Sharpie brand markers, Forgie and Burton decided to put the common, everyday brand to the test along with another brand, the second one a sterile marker specifically intended for single use in operating rooms.

In a controlled experiment, marker tips were heavily contaminated with four types of bacteria that can cause surgical site infections; two of the germ types are of particular concern in hospitals since they are antibiotic-resistant, Burton explained. After recapping the markers and letting them sit for 24 hours, Burton and Forgie found that the sterile, one-use marker, which has a non-alcohol-base ink, was still contaminated. But the Sharpies were not.

In collecting an extremely large number of germs on the markers during their experiment, “we went much further than what would happen in real life,” said Forgie. She is confident that the marking tip of Sharpies does not pose a risk of bacterial transmission. As long as the rest of the pen is cleaned with an alcohol swab between patients (just as is done with stethoscopes), the Sharpies do not need to be discarded after each use. Safety is the priority, and in this case it can be done economically, Forgie said. Read the original article.

 

Comprehensive tax reform could play important role in creating healthcare reform

A proposal to implement a value-added tax for universal health insurance vouchers would also provide for significant decreases in other taxes, according to the authors of a commentary in the October 22/29 issue of JAMA, a theme issue on the Health of the Nation. They add that this plan would create incentives for cost-containment and healthcare quality.

Samuel Y. Sessions, M.D., J.D., of the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, presented the commentary at a JAMA media briefing at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

Dr. Sessions and co-author Philip R. Lee, M.D., of the University of California, San Francisco, write that the complex variety of healthcare funding sources has left U.S. healthcare finance in disarray. “It is time to consider a thorough overhaul of this non-system. The goal would be not only to strengthen healthcare finance for its own sake, but also to achieve fundamental reform of healthcare. In other words, along with a small but increasing number of other commentators, we contend that comprehensive tax reform could be a powerful driver of healthcare reform.”

“The 60 percent of U.S. healthcare costs financed by taxes equals 10 percent of U.S. gross national product or more than one-third of federal and state tax revenues,” they added. 

The authors propose, building on the work of Ezekiel J. Emanuel, M.D., Ph.D., and Victor R. Fuchs, Ph.D., a value-added tax (VAT) to finance a system of universal health insurance vouchers. “Insurers would be required to accept any applicant presenting a voucher regardless of health status. Risk adjustment, possibly with a backup reinsurance pool, would protect them against adverse selection. Households could purchase additional insurance, but with after-tax dollars only; the subsidy for employer-provided insurance would be repealed. Medicaid would be phased out under a set schedule. Medicare would also be phased out by not adding new enrollees and by allowing Medicare beneficiaries already enrolled to opt into the new system if they wanted to do so.”

Substituting VAT revenues for income taxes now used to pay for healthcare would make it possible both to remove many U.S. households from the income tax entirely and to institute significantly lower tax rates for the remainder. Also, many incomes would increase by the amount of premiums no longer paid by employers or employees.

“Because families and individuals would be able to choose freely among healthcare insurers, insurers would have to compete to secure and retain their customer base. This would weaken incentives to focus on cost-shifting gamesmanship and strengthen incentives to pursue customer satisfaction and long-term and short-term healthcare quality. It would also require establishing working relationships motivated by the same goals with individuals and institutions directly providing healthcare.” Read more about it.

 

HPN Blogline: Response to “Tap water versus bottled water” article 

In response to the Los Angeles Times article “Bottled water versus tap: Which is safer to drink?” reprinted in your Daily Update newsletter, I respectfully ask you consider the following:

“Dr. Janssen and the NRDC’s laudable agenda of improving public water systems is ill served by attacking the bottled water industry. The mantra of “tap water is just as good or better” - repeated often - will require return scrutiny of what we actually get out of the 55,000 different municipal systems in our country. Much of what is known is not all that pleasant.

I could begin to detail the low standards and lax regulation of tap water by the EPA instead of the more rigorous requirements imposed on bottled water by the FDA...”

To read the complete response and to post your own comments, visit HPN blogline: http://hpnblogline.blogspot.com

 


October 22, 2008   Download print version

Walgreen Co. to acquire specialty pharmacy business from McKesson Corporation

2008 national survey reveals vast majority of healthcare facilities have poor patient flow

Federal safety regulators to issue crib durability standards

Failing 125-year-old Lincoln Park Hospital cited for violations, to close

Lilly taking $1.4 billion charge over inquiries

Some cut back on prescription drugs in sour economy

Carraway Hospital closing its doors after 100 years

FDA warning on transvaginal placement of surgical mesh

Novation reusable sharps container survey reveals greater acceptance
of product

 


Walgreen Co. to acquire specialty pharmacy business from McKesson Corporation

Walgreen Co. announced a definitive agreement in which Walgreens will acquire McKesson Corporation’s specialty pharmacy, which is a business within McKesson’s Specialty division. Terms of the agreement were not disclosed. The acquisition will further strengthen Walgreens position as the fourth-largest specialty pharmacy in the country. Subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, the parties expect the transaction to close within 60 days. For more information visit here.


 

2008 national survey reveals vast majority of healthcare facilities have poor patient flow

StatCom announced the findings of the 2008 National Survey on Patient Flow Challenges and Technologies, an independent, nationwide survey of more than 200 healthcare executives. According to the findings, the overwhelming majority of U.S. healthcare executives (89 percent) reveal their facility has poor patient flow.  

While healthcare executives agree there is poor patient flow in their facility, they also reveal the following issues at the root of this problem: Poor communication (67 percent); Ineffective scheduling of activities and resources (36 percent); Lack of beds (36 percent); Lack of staff to help facilitate patient flow (34 percent); Poor centralized knowledge about the location and status of each patient (32 percent)

Surprisingly, more healthcare executives reveal in 2008 that they have not implemented a patient flow system at their facility (56 percent) compared to 50 percent in 2007.

Regarding the use of technology, it was nearly an even split with 52 percent of healthcare executives saying their facility utilizes bed management technology and 48 percent saying they rely on other methods. The current use of bed management technology shows a 12 percent increase from the previous year. In 2007, 60 percent of healthcare executive respondents said there was no bed management software or technology within their facilities. 

To help track patient status, U.S. healthcare executives say they are currently considering technologies such as bar-coding (62 percent), patient tracking software (38 percent), tablets or PDAs (33 percent), RFID (29 percent), inpatient scheduling modules (23 percent) and other technologies (12 percent).  

StatCom’s 2008 National Survey on Patient Challenges and Technologies was designed to capture the thoughts and opinions held by U.S. healthcare executives on issues facing their facilities regarding patient flow and technology. Results of the study can be downloaded at http://www.statcom.com/survey/national-survey-2008.aspx.  


 

Federal safety regulators to issue crib durability standards

After two infant deaths triggered the recall of 1.6 million cribs Monday, federal safety regulators are moving to address a longstanding gap in crib safety regulations: durability standards. The Consumer Product Safety Commission plans to issue new regulations that deal with the hardware problems that have been at the center of five recent crib recalls and contributed to the deaths of at least two other children.

Hardware can become worn down over time, unbeknownst to parents, who often reuse cribs, sell or pass them on – sometimes without all the parts or instructions. The two deaths, one in May 2007 and the other in July, that led to this week's recall by Delta Enterprise of New York City involved used cribs, CPSC spokeswoman Julie Vallese said.

Certain crib parts, such as mattress supports and side rails, are tested to meet durability standards. But the standards need to be more comprehensive and stringent, consumer advocates and federal safety regulators said. CPSC officials did not say how long it would take to issue a crib durability standard.

Cribs with drop sides are more likely to have hardware problems, the CPSC said. Drop sides can be moved up and down, usually along a track, to make it easier to get a child in and out of a crib. A CPSC analysis of more than 1,000 reports of potential crib failures over the past year found that in many cases the drop-side corners came off the tracks or hardware that is supposed to stop the side from moving failed to work. And the problems can get worse without parents noticing, as a baby pushes or leans against the crib. For more information on the Delta crib recalls, consumers can go to http://www.cribrecallcenter.com or call 800-816-5304. (Washington Post) Visit here for the complete story.

 


Failing 125-year-old Lincoln Park Hospital cited for violations, to close

Chicago - Lincoln Park Hospital has been in violation of state health and safety codes that put patients at risk and threaten the facility's ability to get federal funding in the future, according to state and federal health records and a national hospital accreditor. The 125-year-old North Side hospital, which is closing in the face of financial troubles, has been operating since at least July despite the violations, which include ineffective communication among staff and inadequate monitoring of patients, according to records. In addition, its policies related to "infant abduction security" were flawed, state health officials said.

Separately, the Joint Commission made the rare move last week to deny Lincoln Park Hospital its seal of approval, the organization confirmed Tuesday. In August, a preliminary denial of accreditation was issued, something that happens to less than 1 percent of hospitals.

Lincoln Park executives said they "corrected immediate clinical deficiencies" and "worked to develop a plan to bring the building up to standard in the next two years," in a statement Tuesday to the Tribune. "It became clear the total cost of reaching compliance would be at least $7 million dollars, which would include extensive facility upgrades for long term accreditation," the statement added.

The allegations are serious and would have to be addressed by the new owner should a buyer emerge and want to maintain the hospital as a healthcare facility, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said. The current owner, Merit Health Systems of Louisville, plans to liquidate the equipment and related healthcare operation, company spokesman Joseph Poulos said. Lincoln Park officials a week ago said it filed a letter of intent with the state to close the facility. The hospital discharged its last patient Thursday night, the state Health Department said, adding that the closure plan was proceeding.

Despite its location in the nice Lincoln Park neighborhood on the North Side, the hospital faced many challenges, including having nearby community and teaching hospitals that are better capitalized.

The hospital also lost $15 million last year on $163 million in annual revenue, according to the latest data available on the American Hospital Directory's Web site. (Chicago Tribune) Visit here for the complete story.


 

Lilly taking $1.4 billion charge over inquiries

Eli Lilly & Company will record a $1.4 billion charge in the third quarter, related to allegations of improper marketing of its top-selling schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa, and is in advanced talks to resolve the investigations, the company said on Tuesday. The company has faced long-running accusations by various states that it improperly marketed Zyprexa to patients who were not approved users and that it played down side effects like weight gain, which can increase the risk of diabetes.

While doctors are free to prescribe drugs in any way they see fit, drug companies may promote them only for uses approved by federal health regulators. The United States attorney’s office in Philadelphia began an investigation into the matter in 2004, and Lilly received a grand jury subpoena for Zyprexa-related documents last November, the company said.

If the discussions are successfully concluded, the company said it expected it would settle the Zyprexa-related federal claims as well as the Medicaid-related claims. It said the $1.4 billion charge reflected its “currently estimable exposure” with respect to the claims. (NY Times) Visit here for the complete story.


 

Some cut back on prescription drugs in sour economy

For the first time in at least a decade, the nation’s consumers are trying to get by on fewer prescription drugs. As people around the country respond to financial and economic hard times by juggling the cost of necessities like groceries and housing, drugs are sometimes having to wait. On Tuesday, the drug giant Pfizer, which makes Lipitor, the world’s top-selling prescription medicine, said United States sales of that drug were down 13 percent in the third quarter of this year.

Through August of this year, the number of all prescriptions dispensed in the United States was lower than in the first eight months of last year, according to a recent analysis of data from IMS Health, a research firm that tracks prescriptions. Although other forces are also in play, like safety concerns over some previously popular drugs and the transition of some prescription medications to over-the-counter sales, many doctors and other experts say consumer belt-tightening is a big factor in the prescription downturn.

The trend, if it continues, could have potentially profound implications. If enough people try to save money by forgoing drugs, controllable conditions could escalate into major medical problems. That could eventually raise the nation’s total healthcare bill and lower the nation’s standard of living.

Although the overall decline in prescriptions in the IMS Health data was less than 1 percent, it was the first downturn after more than a decade of steady increases in prescriptions, as new drugs came on the market and the population aged.

Overall spending in the United States for prescription drugs is still the highest in the world, an estimated $286.5 billion last year. But that number makes up only about 10 percent of this country’s total health expenditures of $2.26 trillion. Pharmaceutical companies have long been among those arguing that drugs are a cost-effective way to stave off other, higher medical costs.

The recent prescription cutbacks come even as the drug industry was already heading toward the “generic cliff,” as it is known — an approaching period when a number of blockbuster drugs are scheduled to lose patent protection. Already, a migration to generic drugs means that 60 percent of prescriptions over all are filled by off-brand versions of drugs. But with money tight, even cheaper generic drugs may not always be affordable drugs. (NY Times) For the complete story visit here.

Editor’s Note: For another article on a related topic from The Wall Street Journal, “Patients Seek Financial Aid to Buy Medicine”, visit here.


 

Carraway Hospital closing its doors after 100 years

Birmingham - Physicians Medical Center Carraway is closing after 100 years and filed for bankruptcy protection Monday to liquidate the assets. Hospital leaders told employees and doctors the facility would close by Oct. 31, with most patients discharged or transferred to other hospitals by this Friday. The emergency department closed Monday and new patients were not admitted.

This is the second bankruptcy for the hospital. A group of 52 local doctors bought Carraway Methodist Medical Center at a bankruptcy auction in November 2006 and attempted to revive the struggling healthcare institution. But they suffered from too little operating capital and too few patients.

Neighborhood leaders bemoaned the impending loss of the anchor in Birmingham's Norwood community. Employees, physicians and doctors-in-training at Physicians Carraway scrambled Monday to figure out their next step.

In recent weeks, Kuruvilla George, vice president of operations, bought $9,000 worth of medicine with his personal credit card to stock the hospital because vendors were accepting only cash and the hospital didn't have any. He was repaid Monday morning, before the bankruptcy filing, he said.

At the bankruptcy hearing Monday, the judge approved a $3.5 million budget for the hospital to pay employees this Friday and Oct. 31 and fund a third week to allow for final shutdown procedures. The money will come from patient revenues that continue to come in. The hospital employs about 1,000 people but is expected to shrink that number rapidly and keep only those needed to treat the patients who remain. The hospital is licensed for 617 beds but has staffed for about 200 daily hospitalized patients. In recent weeks, however, the number of daily patients has slipped below 100.

Patrick Darby, an attorney for Physicians Carraway, told the judge the money was crucial to protect the remaining patients, which he said was the first priority for the hospital's owner and landlord. The hospital had 88 patients Monday morning and was down to 56 by Monday evening. (Birmingham News) Visit here for the complete story.


 

FDA warning on transvaginal placement of surgical mesh

FDA informed healthcare professionals of serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Over the past three years, FDA has received over 1,000 reports from nine surgical mesh manufacturers of complications that were associated with surgical mesh devices used to repair POP and SUI.

The most frequent complications included erosion, infection, pain, urinary problems, and recurrence of prolapse and/or incontinence. There were also reports of bowel, bladder, and blood vessel perforation during insertion. In some cases, vaginal scarring and mesh erosion led to a significant decrease in patient quality of life due to discomfort and pain, including dyspareunia. FDA provided recommended actions for both physicians and patients to reduce the risks. Read the entire 2008 MedWatch Safety Summary here.


 

Novation reusable sharps container survey reveals greater acceptance of product

Recently, Novation conducted a reusable sharps container survey to capture thoughts regarding the containers. Members from VHA Inc. and University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) participated in the survey, including materials managers, facilities executives, infection control, medical/surgical nurses and risk management officers. The survey revealed a sharp contrast to the results of its 2006 survey. Of the respondents, fully 60 percent reported that they believe the product is safe, compared to only 38 percent in 2006. 

“Dispelling the ‘ick-Factor’ of reusable sharps containers has been an educational focus of Novation since our last survey in 2006,” said Jay DeLuca, Novation vice president contract and program services, med/surg distribution contracts.

Survey highlights include: Only eight percent of respondents feel sharps containers are not safe. In 2006, 23 percent said the same; Cleanliness of the product is the number one reason why respondents do not feel the product is safe; 51 percent of current disposable sharps containers users would consider switching to a reusable product if it was part of the facility’s environmental sustainability initiatives.

Reducing costs is the number one reason for those currently using reusable containers. Those that do not use reusable containers said environmental factors would be the number one reason to switch. For more information on Novation, visit www.novationco.com. 
 

 


October 21, 2008   Download print version

Experts predict next epidemic will start in animals

Questions continue about using beta blockers before surgery; study finds increased risk of death, heart attacks

Children’s Hospital first in California to offer private NICU rooms

Private cleaners barred in war on hospital bugs

Ascent adds reusable ablation cables to approved products program to help hospitals reduce environmental impact and save resources 

HPN to recognize "Supply Chain-Focused CEOs" in January 2009 edition

Bottled water versus tap: Which is safer to drink? Both have their risks, but your home's water is subject to broader scrutiny

Amerinet announces agreements with Bioseal and Falcon Distribution
 


Experts predict next epidemic will start in animals

A report by the non-profit Trust for America's Health, to be released next week, asserts that infectious diseases from the developing world are anything but "a back-burner concern." The report, "Germs Go Global: Why Emerging Infectious Diseases Are a Threat to America," cites National Intelligence Estimates that conclude outbreaks of new and resurgent infectious diseases, many of which "originate overseas," kill more than 170,000 people in the U.S. each year. The death toll would climb much higher in the event of a new global pandemic or bioterror attack. Infectious diseases, the report concludes, have become "a matter of national security."

The leaders of Google.org, Google's philanthropic arm, regard the threat as so pressing that the organization today gave out $15 million in grants to epidemic investigators. Google's goal is to exploit technology — high-resolution satellite imagery, powerful computers and ultra-fast genetic analysis — to identify "hot spots" where new infectious diseases might emerge, detect and identify new microbes and establish early-warning networks in developing countries so that local authorities can stamp out outbreaks before they go global.

Ever since Surgeon General William Stewart famously declared in the late 1960s that it was time "to close the book" on infectious disease, new outbreaks have come in waves, among them: Legionnaire's disease, hantavirus, West Nile virus, bird flu, salmonella, drug-resistant tuberculosis and AIDS. One of the scariest diseases is bird flu, H5N1, which has killed millions of birds but few people. That's no reason to write it off. Of 387 people infected as of Sept. 10, WHO reports, 245 have died.

How to avert the next big one? That's one of many questions on the agenda this month at a joint meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy in Washington, D.C. To get answers, public health experts are expanding research into how outbreaks get their start. A study in the journal Nature in February offers a critical clue. Researchers analyzed 335 outbreaks worldwide between 1940 and 2004. More than 60% of epidemics, including HIV and SARS, began when a germ leapt from wildlife into humans.

What may be most surprising is that germs don't make the leap more often. "There are 50,000 vertebrate species," says Peter Daszak of Columbia University, an author of the Nature study. "If you assume each one has 20 unknown viruses, that makes a million unknown viruses in wildlife." Opportunities for microbes and humans to mingle are growing, he says, thanks to global warming, deforestation, urban crowding and the encroachment of humans and animals into one another's habitats. Given the likelihood the next epidemic will start in animals, human and veterinary infectious disease experts, once worlds apart, have conceptually merged their approach into what they call "one health."

Chikungunya may well become the next epidemic to reach the US. Carrying an African name that roughly means "bent over," chikungunya is a mosquito-borne illness that causes severe flu-like symptoms and muscle aches that may last a lifetime. In the past two years, the disease traveled from East Africa to French-speaking islands in the Indian Ocean, afflicting 266,000 people, swamping hospitals and causing 255 deaths, said Antoine Flahault of the L'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique in Paris, who coordinated the research into the island outbreaks.

From there, the virus leapt to the Indian mainland, infecting more than 1.5 million people and killing up to 90,000, most of them elderly. Today, it is making its way through Southeast Asia, aided by a genetic mutation that enabled it to adapt to the tiger mosquito, also found in the US. In August, chikungunya turned up in Ravenna, Italy, a city on the same latitude as Bangor, Maine, carried by a South Indian man who was visiting relatives, according to a report in Lancet. Tiger mosquitoes in Ravenna feasted on the visitor and caused a local outbreak, spreading the disease to more than 250 people.

Researchers from the University of Marseille reported last year in The New England Journal of Medicine that chikungunya turned up in more than 1,000 people returning from outbreak areas to Europe and the US. "It clearly has the ability to come to the U.S.," said Larry Madoff of ProMed and Harvard University. (USA Today) Visit here for the complete article. 

For a related article, “Plague emerges in Grand Canyon, kills biologist” from USA Today, see THIS LINK.


 

Questions continue about using beta blockers before surgery;
study finds increased risk of death, heart attacks

A new study adds to doubts about using beta blockers to reduce the risks of surgery. The death rate for people given beta blockers before non-cardiac surgery was 10 times higher in the 30 days after an operation than for those not getting the drugs (2.52 percent vs. 0.25 percent), according to a report in the October issue of the Archives of Surgery. The incidence of heart attacks was four times higher (2.94 percent vs. 0.74 percent).

"This is very much in line with the latest publications showing that one has to be very careful in using them," said study co-author Dr. Kamal Itani, chief of surgery at the Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System and a professor of surgery at Boston University.

Beta blockers are commonly given before surgery to reduce cardiac risk by slowing the heartbeat. The Boston study found that the risk of problems was concentrated in those whose heart rates remained high despite beta-blocker treatment.

The new results differ somewhat from those of a major international study reported earlier this year. The POISE study of 8,351 people having non-cardiac surgery found a 27 percent reduction in heart attacks but an overall 33 percent higher death rate for those getting beta blockers.

The important point is to be sure that the target heartbeat rate is achieved, Itani said. The American College of Cardiology recommends 50 beats to 60 beats per minute before surgery, not to exceed 80 beats per minute, he noted. "Those patients who do not have the target rate going into surgery will not do as well," Itani said. "Giving the drugs without achieving the full potential might be dangerous."

But the study indicates that the guidelines "need to be revisited," said Dr. Jeffrey H. Peters, chief of surgery at the University of Rochester, NY. "This paper adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that the routine use of beta blockers to reduce cardiac morbidity in surgery needs to be reconsidered," Peters said.

Another paper published in the Oct. 28 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology raises doubts about the use of beta blockers to control high blood pressure. Analysis of data from nine controlled trials found a higher incidence of deaths, heart attacks, strokes and heart failure for people whose heart rate was lowered by beta-blocker treatment, said the report from cardiologists at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. (HealthDay News)


 

Children’s Hospital first in California to offer private NICU rooms

Children’s Hospital Central California debuted its new Neonatal Intensive Care Unit expansion featuring private rooms, a first in California. Now parents of Children’s NICU patients will be able to remain at their premature baby’s bedside throughout their stay, bonding and participating in their care. 

This expansion of Children’s NICU includes 21 private and 2 semi-private rooms. The semi-private rooms house two babies and can be used for parents who have twins. Each room has a private bathroom, a sleeping couch for parents, and full equipment to care for a premature infant. The rooms provide parents with privacy and comfort not always found in a standard NICU. 

The private rooms with the ability to sleep-in offer a level of comfort that encourages mothers to stay longer at their child’s bedside. This helps to develop and support parent/child bonding by providing an environment where the baby and parents can interact like they would at home. The private rooms also eliminate some of the interruptions that visiting hours, shift changes, or proximity to other parents can provide. 

Children’s NICU provides 24 hour coverage by board certified neonatologists with consultations from medical and surgical subspecialists. In addition, care is provided by NICU nurses that are part of the broader Children’s Nursing team that has just been re-designated with the distinguished Magnet Nursing Award. Children’s NICU supports almost 1,000 neonatal cases and cares for 20,000 patient days annually. For more click here.


 

Private cleaners barred in war on hospital bugs

Scotland's hospitals are to be banned from contracting out cleaning and catering services to private firms as part of a new drive towards cutting the spread of deadly superbugs in the NHS. In a speech to the SNP conference in Perth, Scottish Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon announced that each of Scotland's 14 health authorities is to be barred from outsourcing cleaning and catering, and will in future be responsible for such services in-house as part of a bid to reduce infections such as MRSA and Clostridium difficile.

Last year there were 6,430 cases of C. difficile infections in Scotland, of which 597 proved fatal. The problem was highlighted by an outbreak of the infection earlier this year at the Vale of Leven hospital in Dunbartonshire which affected 55 people. The infection was identified as either the cause of, or a contributory factor in, the death of 18 patients. That led to accusations in the Scottish Parliament that Sturgeon had failed to act quickly enough to tackle the outbreak.

Although rates of MRSA are falling, she said the Scottish government is determined to tackle C. difficile by setting a new target for health authorities to reduce the rate of infection by at least 30 percent within three years.

In a bid to help health boards achieve the target, £2m will be paid to the authorities as part of a proposed £54m package allocated for combating Healthcare Acquired Infections over the next three years, including the funding of a national MRSA screening program, prudent prescribing of antibiotics and greater compliance with hand-washing rules. The new target will force the health authorities to let contracts with existing suppliers run out and prevent them from entering into any extensions or new arrangements.

Sturgeon has already introduced plans to give senior charge nurses the same responsibility for ward hygiene as matrons used to have. (Guardian) For more click here.


 

Ascent adds reusable ablation cables to approved products program to help hospitals reduce environmental impact and save resources 

Ascent Healthcare Solutions has added reusable ablation cables to its extensive product offering for the treatment and management of cardiac arrhythmias. Under a new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation, hospitals are required to run their EtO sterilizers at full capacity except in medically necessary circumstances.  Ascent offers hospitals a cost-effective sterilization option that eliminates any threat to the ozone layer from harmful ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions.

Ascent extended its offering to add reusable ablation cables at the request of hospitals that do not want the added expense and workflow demands of purchasing, storing and maintaining significantly more expensive original cables to ensure they have an adequate supply on hand. Many of Ascent's environmentally responsible hospital partners have already responded to global environmental concerns about the impact of EtO emissions by moving away from in-house EtO sterilization and choosing third party re-sterilization facilities, which also reduces their solid and hazardous waste. EtO tonnage dropped from 1,000 in 1995 to just 135 in 2005; however, some medical devices such as ablation cables cannot be sterilized using alternate methods. Unlike most hospital sterilizers, Ascent's state-of-the-art, validated EtO sterilizers capture and recycle all EtO emissions.

Using validated cleaning, testing and packaging procedures, Ascent re-sterilizes reusable ablation cables according to the original equipment manufacturer's instructions. The highest quality is ensured through lead-to-lead continuity testing on 100 percent of the re-sterilized cables. www.ascenths.com


 

HPN to recognize "Supply Chain-Focused CEOs" in January 2009 edition

Many industries outside of healthcare recognize and respect the value that effective and efficient supply chain management contributes to the top and bottom lines. Among healthcare providers, such recognition and support is growing, slowly but surely, from the top post in the executive suite.

That’s why Healthcare Purchasing News launched its yearly search for "supply chain focused CEOs four years ago. We wanted to locate forward-thinking men and women to share their insights with you, and you’ve helped us do that. In fact, we’ve profiled of 13 of them already since January 2005.

Well, it’s that time of the year again – time to nominate noteworthy hospital presidents/CEOs for HPN’s 5th Annual "S.U.R.E. Award for Supply Chain Focused CEOs" award. We’re looking to recognize chief executives who support, understand, recognize and empower the materials management department to do what needs to be done to achieve bottom-line savings and top-line revenue.

We ask you, our dedicated and loyal readers, to recommend worthy candidates for recognition in our January 2009 edition by e-mailing us reasons how and why your CEO deserves the spotlight – no more than a couple of paragraphs are needed for each of the four S.U.R.E. categories listed above that comprise the "SURE" acronym. Please describe how and why he or she supports, how and why he or she understands, how and why he or she recognizes and how and why he or she empowers the materials management department and its top executive.

For your nomination to qualify, please be sure to comply with the following rules:

1. Any nomination must be original and exclusive to HPN and not have been submitted – either original or edited – to any other publication or online media outlet currently or within the previous year.

2. GPO and distributor support is commendable, but we’re looking for internally driven details beyond GPO- and distributor-driven contributions, including outsourcing operations to a GPO or distributor.

3. Any nominated executive (or nominator) must be willing to share relevant basic financial details with our readers – specifically annual revenues, annual expenses and annual purchasing volume.

4. Only administrators/CEOs are eligible for consideration – not COOs or executive/senior vice presidents.

Help us share the stories of these remarkable CEOs in our January 2009 edition so that the industry may learn from them and be inspired. Thanks in advance.

E-mail us your nominations by Friday, November 7, to editor@hpnonline.com


 

Bottled water versus tap: Which is safer to drink? Both have their risks,
but your home's water is subject to broader scrutiny

Those ubiquitous plastic water bottles have been increasingly vilified in recent years. Los Angeles, San Francisco and Santa Barbara, CA, among others, have banned them from purchase with city funds. A few restaurants, and even some markets and hotels, have banned them too. The trend has left many consumers wondering: Isn't bottled safer than tap?

"Bottled water isn't any safer or purer than what comes out of the tap," said Dr. Sarah Janssen, science fellow with the Natural Resources Defense Council in
San Francisco, which conducted an extensive analysis of bottled water back in 1999. "In fact, it's less well-regulated, and you're more likely to know what's in tap water."

Bottled and tap water come from essentially the same sources: lakes, springs and aquifers, to list a few. In fact, a significant fraction of the bottled water products on store shelves are tap water, albeit filtered and treated with extra steps to improve taste. The great majority of the tap water in the country meets the Environmental Protection Agency's drinking-water standards, which regulate the levels of roughly 90 different contaminants, including germs such as giardia, heavy metals such as lead and dozens of industrial chemicals.

But standards can't account for aging pipes that carry water from public lines into those of people's homes, which can leach copper and lead. Plus, there are certain contaminants water treatment plants just aren't designed to take out, such as medications that wash into the sewers via human excretion or drugs being dumped down the drains.  

Coming as it does from many of the same sources as tap, bottled water is subject to many of the same contaminants, noted Benjamin Grumbles, assistant administrator for water with the EPA. It's held to essentially the same standards as tap water, albeit by the Food and Drug Administration and not the EPA. And while large public water supplies are often tested for contaminants up to several times a day, the FDA requires private bottlers to test for contaminants only once a week, once a year or once every four years, depending on the contaminant.

Tap water suppliers are also required by law to publish and circulate an annual Consumer Confidence Report, which states their sources of water and any contaminants found. The FDA doesn't require this of bottled-water makers, and though inspectors can drop in on water-bottling plants, such visits are assigned low priority, FDA press officer Michael Herndon said. Companies also aren't required to share any contamination episodes with their customers.

However, it's the environmental toll of mass consumption (Americans have consumed more than 9 billion gallons so far this year) that's driving some consumers back to the tap. Nationwide, just 15% of the tens of billions of bottles consumed each year are recycled. The Pacific Institute, a research group based in
Oakland, calculates that in 2006, manufacturing those billions of bottles required 17 million barrels of oil.

Which relates to the final argument against bottled water: cost. Price it by the gallon, and water in those single-serve bottles is more expensive than even today's high-priced gasoline. (Los Angeles Times) Visit here for the complete article.


 

Amerinet announces agreements with Bioseal and Falcon Distribution

Amerinet Inc., a national healthcare group purchasing organization, announces a new agreement with Bioseal Corporation (Bioseal) for specialty sterilization services for various medical devices and products. Effective, October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2010, the contract offers access to Bioseal’s cost-effective customized packaging and sterilization services for single-use items used in the operating room. Their services can help eliminate facility labor and replace in-house put ups.

Amerinet also announces a new agreement with Falcon Distribution. Effective, October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2009, the agreement offers Amerinet members in the Texas region access to savings on a wide variety of medical surgical products through Falcon.
 

 


October 20, 2008   Download print version

Novation announces appointment of Jody Hatcher as interim president

HHS preparing to open FDA offices in China, India, Europe, and Latin America this year

Patient sues after assault in the ER

Medicaid spending projected to rise much faster than the economy

Ex-R.I. hospital executive wants convictions overturned

British GPs paid not to refer patients to hospital

FDA safety concerns and labeling changes for psoriasis drug Raptiva

International Infection Prevention Week (IIPW)
 


Novation announces appointment of Jody Hatcher as interim president

Novation announced late Friday that Joellyn Willis, who was serving as president, has left the company to pursue other interests and Jody Hatcher is assuming the role of interim president, effective immediately. 

Hatcher is a long-time leader at Novation, with nearly 20 years of experience working on behalf of VHA and UHC members. Hatcher has served as senior vice president leading key business areas, including: strategic sourcing, research, strategic planning, comparative analysis, custom services, regional contracting services, business development, alliance linkages, information technology, operational improvement and marketing. Hatcher also is a highly-visible figure within the larger healthcare group purchasing sector, working to raise awareness about the important value GPOs provide hospitals.  


 

HHS preparing to open FDA offices in China, India, Europe, and Latin America this year

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will send the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff to China, India, Europe, and Latin America before the end of 2008, HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt announced.

“We’re making steady progress to better safeguard our supply of food and medicines, though much work remains,” Secretary Leavitt said. “Increasing our presence overseas will provide greater protections to American consumers at home and benefit our host countries as well,” he added.

The first overseas office will be in China, its second overseas office in the Republic of India. In both nations, personnel would work closely with local authorities as well as industries that ship food and medical products to the U.S. to improve safety efforts. Their activities will include providing technical advice, conducting additional inspections, and working with government agencies and private sector entities interested in developing certification programs.

HHS/FDA will also be opening overseas offices in Europe and with in the Middle East. Department officials are also working with Belize, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua and Panama on product safety. Their collaborations could include information-sharing on their respective regulatory systems and joint workshops and training on the safety of food and medical products. The parties will also make efforts to find opportunities for joint training for food-borne illnesses and the oversight of food traded internationally.

More information on efforts to improve import safety, including the new report “Import Safety – Action Plan Update,” is available at www.importsafety.gov.

 


Patient sues after assault in the ER

A former Sinai Hospital patient is suing the hospital and a security guard for $77 million after he says he was assaulted in the emergency room on Labor Day. Felony assault and attempted-murder charges had been filed against the guard but the state's attorney's office intends to reduce those charges to misdemeanors, the patient's attorney said yesterday. The case goes to trial today.

The security guard, Timothy Hough, filed second-degree assault charges against the patient, Gerrod Lewis, on Sept. 2. Sinai Hospital spokeswoman Sandra Crockett said in a statement that it was unfortunate that the incident occurred, but "Officer Timothy Hough was defending himself against a violent and out-of-control patient." He remains on staff at the hospital.

According to court documents, Lewis was in an exam room at Baltimore’s Sinai Hospital on September 1 when an emergency room technician told him to remove his earring. Lewis said he did not want to, and Hough repeated the instruction. Lewis alleges in his suit that when the technician left the room and Lewis turned his head, Hough began to beat him on the head and body. Lewis suffered injuries to his head and eye, including nasal and orbital fractures, said the patient's attorney, Quinton M. Herbert. (Baltimore Sun) Visit here for the complete story.

 


Medicaid spending projected to rise much faster than the economy

Under current law, spending on Medicaid is expected to substantially outpace the rate of growth in the U.S. economy over the next decade, according to a new annual report released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The report projects that Medicaid benefits spending will increase 7.3 percent from 2007 to 2008, reaching $339 billion and will grow at an annual average rate of 7.9 percent over the next 10 years, reaching $674 billion by 2017. That compares to a projected rate of growth of 4.8 percent in the general economy.

At this rate, Medicaid growth is projected to slightly exceed growth in overall healthcare expenditures, which is projected by CMS actuaries and economists to increase by 6.7 percent per year over the next 10 years, or over twice the rate of general inflation. Additionally, Medicaid’s share of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is projected to reach about three percent in 2017. The combined share of GDP spending for Medicare and Medicaid is projected to be 6.9 percent by 2017.       

As a partnership program, both states and the federal government pay for services to Medicaid beneficiaries. The federal government matches state expenditures based on a formula that yields subsidies ranging from 50 percent to as high as 83 percent.  The average federal medical assistance percentage is 57 percent.

Other findings from the report include: average Medicaid enrollment is projected to increase 1.8 percent to 50 million people in 2008 and is projected to reach 55.1 million by 2017; the estimated average cost of a person covered by Medicaid in 2007 is $6,120; however, per-enrollee spending for non-disabled children ($2,435) and adults ($3,586) was much lower than that for aged ($14,058) and disabled beneficiaries ($14,858), reflecting the differing health status of these groups.

The full report can be viewed here.


 

Ex-R.I. hospital executive wants convictions overturned

PROVIDENCE - A former hospital president found guilty of buying the influence of a state senator has asked a judge to throw out the convictions, saying prosecutors presented "innocent evidence in a negative light" and the case should never have gone to a jury.

Lawyers for Robert Urciuoli said in court papers filed Wednesday that federal prosecutors didn't present evidence to support his convictions earlier this month of one count of conspiracy and 35 counts of mail fraud. They say the government's case was built on speculation and inferences that "invited the jury to fill in the blanks."

A jury convicted Urciuoli, the former president and chief executive officer of Roger Williams Medical Center, of hiring former state senator John Celona to do the hospital's bidding at the State House. Defense attorneys said there was ample evidence that Celona was hired to do legitimate consulting and community outreach work for a senior center affiliated with the medical center. They said they clearly showed that Urciuoli had been assured by lawyers for the hospital and by the state Ethics Commission that the relationship was legal. (Boston Globe – Associated Press) Visit here for the complete story


 

British GPs paid not to refer patients to hospital

A scheme that pays bonuses to GPs for not referring patients to hospital has branded "absolutely ridiculous" by a patient group. Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust (PCT) has introduced a policy which means doctors' surgeries can be rewarded for reviewing and reducing referral rates. An average sized practice can earn up to £20,000 extra per year. If doctors hit their targets, Oxfordshire PCT would pay out £1.2m, but it said that was justified because increasing hospital referrals were costing the trust £6m.

The number of patients referred to Oxford Radcliffe Hospital NHS Trust and Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust is up by 8%. The payment is for the time it takes to do the review and a bonus if they manage to bring the referral rates down. Surgery practices with 10,000 patients will get £10,000 to review referral procedures, and up to £10,000 more for reducing rates.

Sue Woollacott, chairman of the Nuffield patient support group, said: "I think it's absolutely ridiculous. It seems to imply that GPs aren't presently making good judgements and need financial incentives in order to do that.”

Dr Laurence Buckman, chairman of the British Medical Association's GP Committee, said: "I don't think that patients' services should be treated as a commodity which is incentivised if you don't do something.

Shadow Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: "It is inefficient and unethical to pay GPs to refer fewer patients to hospital. It would be so much better if GPs, not bureaucrats, had responsibility for their patients budgets.”

A spokesman for the Department of Health said parts of the country had experienced a big increase in referrals to hospital by GPs. (BBC News) Visit here for the complete story


 

FDA safety concerns and labeling changes for psoriasis drug Raptiva

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced labeling changes, including a boxed warning, to highlight the risks of life-threatening infections with the use of Raptiva (efalizumab). FDA is also requiring the drug’s manufacturer to submit a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), which will include a Medication Guide for patients and a timetable for assessment of the REMS.

Raptiva is a once-weekly injection approved for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic (whole body) therapy or phototherapy (treatment with light) to control their psoriasis. It is manufactured by Genentech Inc. of San Francisco, CA.

FDA has received reports of serious infections leading to hospitalizations, and deaths in some cases, in people who use Raptiva. The now-required boxed warning will highlight the risk of bacterial sepsis, viral meningitis, invasive fungal disease, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), and other infections. PML is a rare but life-threatening disorder that affects the central nervous system.’’ Visit here for more information


 

International Infection Prevention Week (IIPW)

International Infection Prevention Week (IIPW) is October 19-25. Throughout the country and the world, the spotlight is on infection preventionists as they conduct education, health fairs, and a variety of special activities in their facilities to emphasize critical infection prevention practices. Annually, APIC pursues both congressional and state proclamations, conducts media outreach, and convenes a commemorative event that is webcast live. Visit here for more information.

 
 

 


back to home page