| Inside the Current Issue | ||
|
||
|
Cover Story Managing critical care supply tensions |
||
![]() |
||
| Self Study Series | ||
| Purchasing Connection | ||
| Resources | ||
| Show Calendar | ||
| HPN Hall of Fame | ||
|
||
| Classifieds | ||
| Issue Archives | ||
| Advertise | ||
| About Us | ||
| Home | ||
| Subscribe | ||
|
For Email Marketing you can trust
|
||
| Special Event Photos | ||
| Contact Us | ||
|
KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2012 |
|
||
|
|
|
hpnonline Daily Update |
||||||||
|
September
13-17, 2010
September 17, 2010 Download print version Precursor to H.I.V. was in monkeys for millennia Victorville Hospital files for bankruptcy BagEasy manual resuscitation devices by Westmed, Inc.: Class 1 Recall Early registration is now open for the 2011 GHX Supply Chain Summit Calif. whooping cough: 9 dead, infections on rise Hospital files lawsuit against FEMA Disease transmission model says media coverage cuts infection rate and pandemic extent Precursor to H.I.V. was in monkeys for millennia In a discovery that sheds new light on the history of AIDS, scientists have found evidence that the ancestor to the virus that causes the disease has been in monkeys and apes for at least 32,000 years — not just a few hundred years, as had been previously thought. That means humans have presumably been exposed many times to S.I.V., the simian immunodeficiency virus, because people have been hunting monkeys for millenniums, risking infection every time they butcher one for food. And that assumption in turn complicates a question that has bedeviled AIDS scientists for years: What happened in Africa in the early 20th century that let a mild monkey disease move into humans, mutate to become highly transmissible and then explode into one of history’s great killers, one that has claimed 25 million lives so far? Among the theories different researchers have put forward are the growth of African cities and the proliferation of cheap syringes. Confirming that the virus is very old also helps explain why it infects almost all African monkeys but does not sicken them. Over many generations, as any disease kills off vulnerable victims, the host adapts to it. The new research, published Thursday in Science magazine, was relatively simple. Scientists tested 79 monkeys from Bioko, a volcanic island 19 miles off the West African coast. Bioko used to be the end of a peninsula attached to the mainland in what is now Cameroon, but it was cut off when sea levels rose 10,000 years ago at the end of the last ice age. Since then, six monkey species have developed in isolation on the island, and scientists from the National Primate Research Center at Tulane University in Louisiana and other American and African universities found that four of them — drills, red-eared guenons, Preuss’s guenons and black colobuses — had members that were infected with S.I.V. The four strains in the four species were genetically very different from one another — meaning they presumably did not come from monkeys carried over to the island by humans in the last few centuries. But each was close to the strain infecting members of the same four genuses on the mainland, meaning they must have existed before Bioko was cut off. Knowing that all four strains were at least 10,000 years old, scientists recalculated the virus’s “molecular clock,” measuring how fast it mutates. They now believe that all the S.I.V. strains infecting monkeys and apes across Africa diverged from a common ancestor between 32,000 and 78,000 years ago. “When we only had 25 years of data, we were dating from the tip at the end of a branch of the evolutionary tree,” said Preston A. Marx, a virologist at the Tulane primate center and an author of the paper in Science. “I knew that what we had before couldn’t be right, because the virus had spread from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean to the southern end of the continent, and it couldn’t have done that in a couple of hundred years.” The ancestor virus — which, like many diseases, may have crossed into simians from another, still-unknown species — may have existed for millions of years. That theory was given greater credence two years ago with the discovery that some Madagascar lemurs have in their genomes the remnants of a virus that was not an S.I.V., but related to it. Madagascar, a Texas-size island 250 miles off the southeastern African coast, separated from Africa 160 million years ago. It has no monkeys, but lemurs’ ancestors arrived there, possibly on floating mats of vegetation, probably more than 10 million years ago. H.I.V., which is almost universally fatal to humans, is obviously very new to us. As Dr. Marx pointed out, if it had been in humans before the 20th century, it would have arrived in the Americas in some of the 12 million Africans kidnapped for the slave trade. Its immediate ancestor is probably also relatively new to chimpanzees. The virus has probably crossed over from simians into humans at least five times. It is very likely, scientists said, that a little infected monkey or ape blood got into human veins many times in history as hunters cut themselves while butchering carcasses. But even if it sickened those hunters, it probably died out with them or their immediate contacts. The earliest confirmed H.I.V. case in humans was found in blood drawn in 1959 from a man in Kinshasa, in what was then called the Belgian Congo.
Sometime
between the 1800s and 1959, something presumably allowed a human infection
with a chimpanzee virus to spread widely enough to evolve into modern H.I.V.-1,
which could spread easily among humans. Dr. Marx believes that the crucial
event was the introduction into Africa of millions of inexpensive,
mass-produced syringes in the 1950s. Campaigns to wipe out yaws, syphilis,
malaria, smallpox and polio required syringes, and many were reused, often
with official approval. Traditional healers adopted them for injecting their
decoctions, and they became status symbols; a study in Uganda in the 1960s
found that 80 percent of families owned one.
Visit the New York Times for the article.
Victorville Hospital files for bankruptcy Victor Valley Community Hospital in Victorville, CA, has filed for bankruptcy protection after mounting debt and thin caseloads made it impossible to maintain a viable operation, administrators said. Just over half of the nonprofit hospital’s 101 beds are filled, with many patients relying on the state’s Medi-Cal program for the poor that does not cover the full cost of their care, the hospital said. In a last-ditch effort to ward off bankruptcy, the hospital earlier this month laid off 30 part-time or on-call workers, including administrative staff and nursing assistants, leaving it with about 600 employees. No doctors or nurses were fired. Even after that step, Victor Valley faces $20 million in debt and is anticipating a looming cut in reimbursements from the federal Medicare insurance program for the elderly.
The
43-year-old hospital, one of four in the High Desert region, filed for
bankruptcy Monday evening. Its chief executive said it would remain open as
it pursues a new owner, possibly the nonprofit Prime Healthcare Foundation
Inc. in Ontario.
Visit the Los Angeles Times for the article.
BagEasy manual resuscitation devices by Westmed, Inc.: Class 1 Recall Westmed, Inc. is initiating a nationwide recall of 24,384 units of BagEasy Manual Resuscitation Devices. The BagEasy device have been found to have a potential for disconnection at the retention ring of the patient port manifold. Disconnection causes the unit to be inoperable, which potentially could result in treatment delays while another unit is obtained or technician switches to a different method of resuscitation.
Westmed has
become aware of a potential for disconnection at the patient port retention
ring assembly of the BagEasy manual resuscitation device after receiving
reports from three separate facilities regarding units disconnecting during
setup or use. The BagEasy manual resuscitation device was distributed to
other medical device distribution companies as well as directly to hospitals
and other treatment facilities.
Read the complete MedWatch Safety Alert.
Early registration is now open for the 2011 GHX Supply Chain Summit Registration is now open for the 11th annual Supply Chain Summit being held Monday, April 18 - Wednesday, April 20, in Dallas, TX. The summit offers attendees the ability to interact with and learn from industry experts. Join more than 500 large and small organizations seeking solutions to a common goal: creating a supply chain that strategically strengthens business performance. Learn how leading organizations are adjusting their strategies and practices to offset declining revenues, measure and improve patient outcomes, and ensure professional caregivers are empowered to provide the best possible patient care. Register early for the Summit and get ready to:
The Summit
takes place annually, but that doesn't mean any two programs are ever alike!
Each year, as our environment changes and new opportunities are created, the
agenda is packed with all new sessions, speakers and networking
opportunities, focusing on today's most progressive and successful supply
chain management practices.
Register Early and Save.
Calif. whooping cough: 9 dead, infections on rise State health officials reported Thursday that California is on track to break a 55-year record for whooping cough infections in an epidemic that has already claimed the lives of nine infants. At least 4,017 cases of the highly contagious illness have been reported in California, according to the state. Data from the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control show 11,466 cases nationwide, though the federal numbers are known to lag behind local reporting. Whooping cough is a cyclical illness that peaks in number of infections every five years. Symptoms are similar to the common cold, making it a challenge to diagnose, which in turn makes it difficult for officials to determine if the worst has passed, said Dr. Gil Chavez, an epidemiologist for the California Department of Public Health. A persistent cough that lasts weeks is the tell-tale symptom of the illness, which is also known as pertussis. The state is on track to exceed the record 4,949 cases reported in 1955. The bacterial infection tends to peak during summer months, but infections could continue into coming weeks, said Chavez. The federal numbers for nationwide cases were last updated Sept. 12 and represent 519 more cases than the same period last year, according to the CDC. Other states with high numbers of infections include Texas, where health officials reported 1,783 cases, and Ohio, where federal officials reported 1,019 cases. In South Carolina, officials reported one whooping cough death and 255 confirmed or suspected cases have been found. Epidemic levels of the illness there were seen earlier this year, but no statewide epidemic was declared. All of the whooping cough-related deaths in California occurred in babies too young to be fully immunized against the illness, which is why parents and caretakers are being urged to get booster shots. Typically, babies are given a series of vaccinations, then receive booster shots between ages 4 and 6 and again after age 10. The vaccines against whooping cough are free of the additive thimerosal, a preservative containing mercury that has been the subject of a long-running public debate about whether it can cause autism.
An
Associated Press analysis found that 127 of the 7,174 public and private
schools in California reported 2009 whooping cough immunization rates of 50
percent or less for kindergartners. (Associated Press)
Visit the Washington Post for the article.
Hospital files lawsuit against FEMA COLUMBUS, IN -- Columbus Regional Hospital filed suit against the Federal Emergency Management Agency, claiming FEMA bungled providing financial assistance in response to the catastrophic flood that struck central and southern Indiana in 2008. Eleven feet of floodwater poured into the basement of the hospital that year, with 6 inches of water in the first floor. The hospital claims FEMA failed to comply with Congressional mandates on severe flooding. According to court documents, the hospital suffered $167 million in damage, 6News' Derrik Thomas reported. "The lawsuit is against FEMA on policy around accounting calculations, and that's the next step we need to take to follow that through," said Denise Glesing, hospital spokeswoman. The hospital has moved forward despite issues officials said remain unresolved. A new clinical laboratory is open and performs 1.5 million tests a year, hospital officials said. The kitchen has been rebuilt and is running. Reconstruction work is ongoing, and the hospital hopes it will be completed by summer 2011. "We were able to have cash reserves that we had set aside for a building project," Glesing said. "That has been put on hold … to rebuild from the flood."
The lawsuit
claims that FEMA hired unqualified employees who told them the hospital was
required to find replacement equipment on eBay that failed to meet medical
standards. The hospital has constructed a temporary flood wall, approved by
FEMA, to fend off future floods. A permanent flood wall is in the works.
6News called FEMA for reaction to the lawsuit but hadn't received a response
as of Thursday evening.
Visit 6News for the story.
Disease transmission model says media coverage cuts infection rate and pandemic extent At the first sign of a disease pandemic, public health officials should begin strongly communicating about the extent of the outbreak and the steps that can be taken by the public to avoid infection. That's the recommendation of two mathematical biologists who have modified the most widely used infectious disease transmission model to account for the impact of news media coverage. During outbreaks of serious infectious diseases, many individuals closely follow media reports and as a result, take precautions to protect themselves against the disease. These precautions may include staying home, getting vaccinated, avoiding crowds, using disinfectants, canceling travel plans and wearing face masks. Known as "self-isolation," these precautions can significantly reduce the severity of an outbreak, according to mathematical modeling done by researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Marshall University in Huntington, WV. "The more forcefully the media provides information about pandemic infections and deaths, the more the total number of infections is reduced," said Howard Weiss, a professor in the Georgia Tech School of Mathematics. "Media coverage also reduces the maximum number of infections at any particular time, which is important for allocating the resources needed for treating infectious diseases." The benefit of publicly reporting disease outbreaks seems obvious, and public health officials in the United States have a policy of regularly communicating with the news media about such incidents. But according to Weiss, not all world governments choose to communicate so well – and nobody had used rigorous mathematical techniques to study the impact of that communication before. Epidemiologists use the S-I-R model to anticipate the effect of disease outbreaks. The basic model places individuals into one of three groups signified by each letter of the acronym: Susceptible individuals are those that are vulnerable to the disease; Infected individuals are those who have the disease; Removed individuals are those who are not in the other groups because they have been vaccinated, have isolated themselves from the population, have already recovered from the disease – or have died. Weiss and collaborator Anna Mummert, an assistant professor of mathematics at Marshall University, modified that model to take into account ways that individuals could move from the "Susceptible" group to the "Removed" group without passing through the "Infected" group. By "self-isolating" as a result of news media warnings, they reasoned, individuals could move directly into the "Removed" class because they are no longer susceptible. "On a chart showing the number of infected people at any one time, as you increase the intensity of the media coverage, you substantially decrease the number of infections," Weiss noted. "We are assuming that people self-isolate at a rate that is proportional to the amount of media coverage, though we would like to study that in more detail."
The sooner
the media coverage of a pandemic begins, the fewer individuals will
ultimately be infected. But Weiss said the model shows that almost any media
coverage is helpful at reducing the extent of a pandemic. "Telling the
public always helps, but the longer you wait, the less it helps," he said.
"If you wait long enough, the effect of media coverage is essentially
negligible."
Visit PhysOrg,com for the article.
Endocrinologists speak out about two 'Internet diseases': adrenal fatigue and Wilson's temperature fatigue
Everyone
knows there is a lot of garbage on the Internet, particularly medical
information that is distorted, misleading or flat-out wrong. The Hormone
Foundation, the public-education affiliate of the Endocrine Society, on
Wednesday issued fact sheets about two "Internet diseases": diseases that
exist only in the minds of people who post about them on the Internet. The
so-called diseases in question are adrenal fatigue and Wilson's temperature
syndrome, diseases apparently conceived only in an effort to sell products
promoted to treat them.
September 16, 2010 Download print version Eagles’ handling of head injury draws spotlight Scientific research helps build better hospitals S. African hospital charged in organ trafficking HHS awards more than $14 million to support patient-centered outcomes research Action Bag enters new agreement to manufacture NOVAPLUS plastic specialty bags GE system to take aim at hospital errors ICAAC: Washing cuts wrestlers' infections Expert panel links popular bone drugs to rare fracture Eagles’ handling of head injury draws spotlight On Sunday afternoon, more than 28 million people were watching Fox’s national broadcast when the Philadelphia Eagles’ Stewart Bradley rose woozily, stumbled and then collapsed onto the turf. The Fox announcers Joe Buck and Troy Aikman expressed concern and even horror. Players waved frantically for medical assistance. Less than four minutes later, Bradley, a linebacker, was sent back into the game. Only at halftime was his injury diagnosed as a concussion. The Eagles said afterward that they did not permanently remove Bradley at the time of his injury — per new N.F.L. rules — because their sideline exam revealed no concussion and also because no medical person saw either the hit Bradley took or his collapse to the turf. Considering that doctors and trainers are well represented on N.F.L. sidelines and that the league has made concussion awareness an issue this season, the Eagles’ handling of Bradley’s injury raises a stark question: If a concussion this glaring can be missed, how many go unnoticed every fall weekend on high school and youth fields, where the consequences can be more serious, even fatal? According to the National Athletic Trainers’ Association, only 42 percent of high schools in the United States have access to a certified athletic trainer, let alone a physician, during games or practices. In some poorer rural communities, concussed players are taken to doctors with no experience with head injuries. Youth leagues with players as young as 8 and 9 rarely, if ever, have any medical personnel on hand; when a child is hurt, a parent, assuming one is present, walks out on the field, scoops up the child and carries him or her off. The cost of hidden head trauma among children was driven home Monday, also in Philadelphia, as a University of Pennsylvania lineman who hanged himself in April, Owen Thomas, was found to have died with the same progressive brain disease found in more than 20 N.F.L. players. Playing since age 9, Thomas never had a reported concussion; his disease silently developed either through injuries he did not report or by thousands of subconcussive blows that accumulated over time. Research suggests that 10 percent to 50 percent of high school football players will sustain a concussion each season, with as many as 75 percent of those injuries going unreported and unnoticed. Dawn Comstock of Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, OH, is the nation’s principal researcher of injuries among all high school athletes, having overseen the collecting of data that suggest about 70,000 concussions occur each year in high school football. Those that are reported, that is. There have been improvements in the three years that concussions have received national attention. More than a dozen states have passed laws requiring education for coaches and requiring clearance from an appropriate medical professional before a child is allowed to return to his or her sport. (The laws often cover only public schools, however.) Acknowledging the league’s impact on young athletes, the N.F.L. asked a skeptical Congress and public to view its protocol changes last year as proof of its commitment to lead concussion awareness efforts. N.F.L. players now must be removed for the rest of the day after a concussion is diagnosed; an independent doctor must clear the player before he can return; and a new poster warns players of head injuries with stunningly strong language. That placard even concludes, “Young Athletes Are Watching.” Yet, when the entire football world saw the Eagles put Bradley at significant safety risk by not properly diagnosing his concussion, it only emphasized the crisis that exists in high school and youth football, where almost no one is watching at all. Visit the New York Times for the article.
Scientific research helps build better hospitals At TriPoint Medical Center in Concord Township, a central nursing station is a thing of the past. Nurses update charts at computers in alcoves between rooms. Evidence-based design concepts are changing the look of medical centers. Imagine a single room with a spectacular view, a flat-screen television that doubles as a digital picture frame, a pullout couch for overnight visitors and a private bathroom that illuminates when you open the door. The latest in hotel design? Nope. It's the new model for a hospital patient room. These features and others are hallmarks of what is called evidence-based design -- using scientific research to build better hospitals. It is changing the face of patient care in newly built medical centers in Northeast Ohio and across the country. The modifications may sound like unnecessary amenities, but research shows that such enhancements offer a multitude of benefits: They help people recover faster, increase employee well-being and efficiency, reduce patient falls, decrease hospital-acquired infections, lower medication errors and save money. Applying knowledge gathered from scientific studies to construction projects is a fairly new approach that has been gaining momentum as the United States continues one of its largest medical-building booms in history, says Debra Levin, president and CEO of the nonprofit Center for Health Design in California. The United States has invested more than $100 billion in new construction connected to medical care in the past five years, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, with another $250 billion expected over the next decade. That includes tens of millions of dollars to be spent in Northeast Ohio on new hospitals, surgery centers, treatment centers, urgent care centers, medical offices and more. Some of the most recent projects include the Cleveland Clinic's $634 million Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Pavilion and Lake Health's $155 million TriPoint Medical Center in Concord. University Hospitals' $1.2 billion Vision 2010 endeavor includes a host of projects such as a new Cancer Hospital, Center for Emergency Medicine, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and the $230 million Ahuja Medical Center to open in Chagrin Highlands in January. The new approach has compelled designers to throw out old concepts. One landmark study published in 1984 in the journal Science captured the attention of building designers. Environmental psychologist Roger Ulrich looked at 10 years of records from patients recovering from gallbladder surgery. He found that 23 patients in rooms with views of nature complained less, used less pain medicine and had shorter hospital stays than 23 matched patients with views of a brick wall. Care of each patient with a view of nature cost $500 less, he noted. But it is a comprehensive study of 600 peer-reviewed articles by teams from Texas A&M University and the Georgia Institute of Technology that hospital designers now use to guide their projects. Here are some of the key findings from that report: • A 2004 study by Fay Hendrich in the American Journal of Critical Care reported that when Methodist Hospital in Indianapolis changed from semiprivate to private rooms, room transfers declined 90 percent and medication errors dropped 67 percent. The new rooms were "acuity adaptable" -- equipped to care for patients regardless of the seriousness of their conditions. • Data from 2.1 million patients nationwide in 2003 showed patients reported higher satisfaction with communication from nurses and doctors when they were in single rooms compared to when they had a roommate. • Confusion can be costly. A 1990 study by Craig Zimring of the Georgia Institute of Technology found that Emory University Hospital spent more than $220,000 and 4,500 work hours annually on employees (other than the designated information staffers) giving directions to people trying to find their way around the 604-bed hospital. The study made the case for hospitals to have good signage and clear directions. • Patient falls cost hospitals nationwide as much as $3.6 billion annually. The researchers found that falls occur in part because of inappropriate door openings, lack of light and slippery floors, as well as toilets and beds that are either too high or too low. Bed guardrails failed to significantly reduce falls. A 2002 study in the Health Care Design journal found that when Methodist Hospital in Indianapolis went to private rooms and decentralized nursing stations, falls were cut by two-thirds. Data were compared from two years prior to the change and three years after the change. • Views of nature and exposure to light can reduce postoperative and psychiatric patients' hospital stays, depression, requests for pain medications and negative moods of staff. One study found that a three-minute encounter with nature was enough to elicit significant relief from stress. • Decreasing noise improves sleep, increases staff concentration, lowers medical errors and lessens fatigue for all. • Social support, including patients' access to family and friends, improves recovery rates. • Nurses spend one-third of their time on the job walking, according to a 1990 study by Louis Burgio in the journal Gerontologist. A better floor plan with less walking would mean more time for patient care. These and other findings persuaded planners to cast aside even the most familiar sites seen in older hospitals, such as the sprawling central nursing station. TriPoint, which has all single rooms, has bedside computers and alcoves between rooms equipped with computers so nurses can update medical records and stay close to patients, says Cynthia Moore-Hardy, Lake Health president and CEO. To read the studies, go to: www.tinyurl.com/healthdesignstudy and www.tinyurl.com/leadershipstudy. Visit the Cleveland Plain Dealer for the article.
S. African hospital charged in organ trafficking JOHANNESBURG -- Prosecutors have charged a major South African hospital chain and its chief executive in connection with international human organ trafficking. In a statement Thursday, Netcare's board of directors denied the charges laid a day earlier against the hospital chain and its CEO, Dr. Richard Friedland. The case first became known in 2003. Investigators said Brazilians and eastern Europeans were flown to South Africa, where their kidneys were extracted at a Durban hospital for transplants into Israeli patients. Netcare's board says, "Neither Netcare nor Dr. Friedland are guilty of any wrongdoing." (Associated Press) Visit the Washington Post for the story.
HHS awards more than $14 million to support patient-centered outcomes research U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Assistant Secretary for Health, Howard K. Koh, MD, MPH, announced the award of more than $14.2 million to develop, implement, and test strategies to increase the adoption and dissemination of interventions based on patient-centered outcomes research among racial and ethnic minority populations. Patient-centered outcomes research is designed to inform healthcare decisions by providing evidence on the effectiveness, benefits, and harms of different treatment options. The evidence is generated from research studies that compare drugs, medical devices, tests, surgeries, or ways to deliver healthcare. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) awarded grants to Centers of Excellence at universities and medical schools in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, New Mexico, and New York, and the HHS Office of Minority Health awarded a contract to Westat, Inc. of Rockville, MD. “Patient-centered outcomes research must become a critical part of our strategy as a nation to understand and eliminate health disparities. This joint initiative complements the work that we are currently doing and is a testament to the value of partnerships,” said John Ruffin, PhD, director of the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Office of Minority Health (OMH) and NIMHD will jointly evaluate the scientific progress of the recipients of the grant awards following standard NIH policies and procedures. Visit HHS for more information.
Action Bag enters new agreement to manufacture NOVAPLUS plastic specialty bags Novation announced that it has awarded an agreement to Action Bag to manufacture NOVAPLUS Plastic Specialty Bags. An approved diversity supplier, Action Bag is offering the best market price by 11 percent. The agreement is effective September 1, 2010 — August 31, 2015. The following products will be available to the members of VHA, UHC and Provista: NOVAPLUS General Zip Closure Bags, NOVAPLUS laboratory/specimen bags, NOVAPLUS chemotherapy transport bags, NOVAPLUS patient belongings bags, and NOVAPLUS miscellaneous plastic specialty bags. NOVAPLUS, Novation’s private label brand of pharmacy and medical-surgical products, delivers the best financial value for VHA, UHC and Provista members on the most frequently-purchased products. Originally founded in 1985 as VHAPLUS, the private label currently includes more than 1,100 products with annual purchases of $1.4 billion. Visit www.actionbaghealthcare.com for more information.
GE system to take aim at hospital errors In its century in the healthcare business, General Electric Co has tackled big tasks from inventing the X-ray machine to helping drive the spread of electronic medical records. Now the largest U.S. conglomerate is turning its attention to a seemingly simple problem that costs the U.S. healthcare system $10 billion to $15 billion per year -- making sure that physicians and nurses wash their hands. That's one of the first things the company's forthcoming "Smart Patient Rooms" system is intended to track. "(Caregivers) get into such a routine that it's, 'This is what I do,' and they don't realize that they haven't" washed their hands properly before treating patients, said Mike Harsh, chief technology officer at GE Healthcare. "We're able to analyze that in real time and say, 'Hey, remember to do this.'" GE, which generates about $16 billion of annual revenue from its healthcare business, is getting ready to test the system at Bassett Medical Center, a 180-bed hospital in Cooperstown, NY, not far from GE's Global Research Center in Niskayuna. Hand-washing is just one of the practices that the system is designed to track. Using a series of cameras that attract and analyze movement, it can also warn hospital staff if a patient is trying to get out of bed -- a time when patients are more likely to fall and injure themselves. The system relies on technology GE developed for security services, initially to provide automated scanning of large crowds in public places for signs of unusual activity. It can also track how frequently doctors and nurses check in on patients in their hospital beds. All these practices, GE officials said, are key indicators of how well a patient is being cared for and whether he or she is likely to contract a new infection or be injured while in the hospital. The system is designed to make it easier for hospitals to track "near-miss" incidents -- skipped steps that could have left a patient sicker or injured. Today hospitals rely on doctors and nurses to report these incidents themselves. Bassett will be testing an early version of the system. GE officials said they have not yet estimated potential revenue for the business, which joins a healthcare portfolio ranging from CT-Scan machines to consulting with hospitals on how to run their operations more efficiently. GE's goal is for the smart room system over time to track a wider range of doctor and patient behaviors, which can be added on to the existing infrastructure over time. (Reuters) Visit ABC News for the article.
ICAAC: Washing cuts wrestlers' infections Sometimes the simplest solutions are best -- high school wrestlers may be able to reduce skin infections picked up during matches by cleaning exposed skin with a soap and water wipe after matches, a researcher said here. A study of 151 high school wrestlers in Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, found those who used a soap and water wipe after a match reduced their risk of skin infection by 97%, compared with those who used a 75% alcohol wipe or no wipe at all, according to Bruce J. Anderson, MD, of Boynton Health Service at the University of Minnesota. "[Wrestlers] engage in weekend tournaments where they have three to five matches over a 10- to 12-hour period, presenting potential exposure to a pathogen that stays on the skin that long and allowing itself to propagate," Anderson remarked at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Additional stresses on the athletes make hygiene a greater issue, he added. According to background information provided by the authors, skin infections routinely plague high school wrestlers -- with the vast majority arising within one week after exposure, the most common including tinea corporus, folliculitis/impetigo and herpetic infections. Athletes' personal hygiene is also compromised because they shower at the end of the day, allowing any pathogens transferred from one athlete to remain on the skin of another competitor for 10 to 12 hours before they shower. The authors theorized that the use of a medicated skin wipe after each match could hypothetically reduce the number of skin infections in these athletes. The participating wrestlers competed in an average of about three matches per participant over the course of two weekend tournaments, with daily skin lesion checks performed over the week following each event. Measures of where the athletes showered and compliance with wiping down after matches, as well as number and type of infections, when present, were also measured. The study found that those who used soap and water wipes only had one instance of bacterial infection, with an odds ratio of infection at 0.089 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.75.) In comparison, those in the alcohol wipe group had three bacterial and one herpes infection with an odds ratio of infection at 0.44 (95% CI 0.11 to 1.69). Wrestlers (acting as controls) who did not wipe off after a match had four instances of tinea corporis, two bacterial infections, and two outbreaks of herpes. Those in the alcohol group complied with wiping down after a match 95.2% of the time, while those in the soap and water wipe group complied 98.2% of the time. The study also found that 8.2% of the enrolled wrestlers did not shower after wrestling, either waiting until they got home to shower or did not report showering at all. The remaining 91.8% either showered at schools or showered at school and at home. Anderson said that future research may compare results to the use of baby wipes or other inexpensive alternatives. “Considering [baby wipes are] two cents a sheet, you can get maybe the same efficacy; I wouldn't say it would, but if ... it's effective, it'd be a great way to go," Anderson said. More research may further test the 75% alcohol wipes for significant effectiveness, according to Anderson. Wipes in the study were supplied by Matguard USA and Sage Products. Visit here for the article.
Expert panel links popular bone drugs to rare fracture An expert panel concludes that bone-strengthening bisphosphonate drugs such as Actonel, Boniva and Fosamax can actually raise risks for a rare type of fracture of the thighbone. The panel is urging the U.S. Food and Drug Administration -- which has been awaiting the report -- to add a special warning to that effect on the drugs' labeling. "Bisphosphonates may be related to atypical femur fractures," said Dr. Elizabeth Shane, a professor of medicine at Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York City. She is the lead author of the report, which was compiled by a special task force at the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. "These fractures are very unusual," Shane added. "But we are still concerned that patients could still have these fractures. There may well be a link between these fractures and bisphosphonates." The FDA has been given a copy of the panel report for review, she said. The findings are published Sept. 14 in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. Bisphosphonates -- a class of prescription medications use to treat osteoporosis -- have been shown to lessen the odds of getting common bone fractures of the hip and leg. However, they may also help trigger a weakness that makes a particular type of thigh bone fracture more likely in rare cases, the panelists said. There has been conflicting evidence on a such a link, however. For example, one study published in 2008 in the New England Journal of Medicine did find a correlation between the long-term use of Fosamax and atypical fractures in postmenopausal women. But a study published this March in the same journal seemed to refute the connection. The FDA had looked to the expert panel to help provide some clarity. The group's new recommendations came after a thorough review of 310 of these atypical thigh fractures. In that review, the panel found that 94 percent of these patients had taken bisphosphonates. Most had taken the drugs for five years or more. In the report the panel is recommending that the FDA: Change the product's labeling to alert doctors and patients to the risk of these fractures and their warning signs; Develop new diagnostic codes for these fractures that will improve reporting of these cases; Establish an international registry of patients with these fractures to track cases and provide data for research. Bisphosphonates include: Aclasta, Actonel, Aredia, Bondronat, Boniva, Didronel, Fosamax, Fosavance, Reclast, Skelid, and Zometa. Visit Healthday for the article.
September 15, 2010 Download print version Medtronic accused of using deal to gain an unfair advantage Simplified heart-risk guideline may miscalculate risk for millions Researchers create new weapons to destroy bacteria, fungus, viruses The Joint Commission launches Targeted Solutions Tool Working while sick? Study finds even doctors do it Daily bleach washdown wipes out VRE Bacteremia Panel says no to reclassifying cough syrup ingredient New drug-resistant 'superbug' reaches U.S. Medtronic accused of using deal to gain an unfair advantage A Colorado manufacturer of bone-milling equipment has sued Medtronic Inc., alleging that the medical device giant illegally used its position as a distributor for the smaller company to build a market for its own competing product. Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp., maker of equipment used to shape bone in spinal fusion operations, said it wants Fridley-based Medtronic to pay damages, as well as its attorneys' fees, for the loss caused to its business, according to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Colorado. A Medtronic spokesman said the company believes the issues raised in the case have already been resolved in a similar lawsuit dismissed earlier this year. Lenox MacLaren said Medtronic agreed in 2000 to buy its bone mills as the product's distributor and resell them to surgeons and hospitals. But Lenox MacLaren alleges Medtronic did not end up selling the bone mills as agreed and instead lent them out to surgeons to create market demand. In addition, Lenox MacLaren said in the lawsuit it believes Medtronic purposefully issued a false voluntary recall of its Lenox MacLaren products, so it could advise its surgeons to use Medtronic's own competing product. "Medtronic's improper, intentional, and wrongful recall of the Lenox MacLaren Bone Mill effectively destroyed the Lenox MacLaren Bone Mill's reputation," Lenox said. Medtronic spokesman Brian Henry said the company does not comment on pending litigation. However, in a statement, Henry said, "It does not appear that there is anything raised that was not already resolved in the first case." (Star Tribune) Visit QMed for the article.
Simplified heart-risk guideline may miscalculate risk for millions A method that is widely used to predict the risk of a major coronary event may over- or underestimate risk for millions of Americans, according to a study directed by a researcher at the San Francisco VA Medical Center and the University of California, San Francisco. The method in question is the simplified version of the so-called Framingham model, which is used to estimate a patient's 10-year risk of a heart attack, stroke, or other coronary event based on risk factors such as age, cholesterol levels, blood pressure, and smoking. National guidelines recommend using the risk estimates generated by the Framingham model to classify patients as among one of three risk groups. Guidelines recommend more aggressive strategies to treat cholesterol in patients classified into higher-risk groups. The original Framingham model uses a complicated mathematical equation to calculate risk, while the simplified version is based on a point system, with a certain number of points for each risk factor. "We thought there might be significant differences between the two methods, which would have significant impacts on how people are treated for cholesterol," says principal investigator Michael Steinman, MD, a physician at SFVAMC and an assistant professor of medicine at UCSF. "And in fact, that turned out to be the case." For the study, which appears in the Online First section of the Journal of General Internal Medicine, the researchers assessed data from 2,543 subjects who participated from 2001 to 2006 in National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The subjects were chosen to be representative of 39 million adults in the United States for whom guidelines recommend using the Framingham method to predict future cardiovascular risk. For each subject, the researchers calculated risk based on the original Framingham model and on the simplified model, and compared the differences, "which turned out to be substantial for many patients," says Steinman, who is senior author of the paper. Under the point-based system, 15 percent of the subjects were classified as being at a different level of risk than they were under the original model. Nationwide, say the authors, 5.7 million Americans would be placed into different risk groups using the point-based model than they would be using the original model, with 3.9 million misclassified into higher risk groups and 1.8 million misclassified into lower risk groups. Steinman notes that
the point-based model, which can be completed in a few minutes with pen and
paper, was introduced over a decade ago, when computers and personal digital
assistants were less powerful and not so common in private medical
practices.
Researchers create new weapons to destroy bacteria, fungus, viruses Antibiotic-resistant superbugs have become a big public health concern, but the existing antibacterial cleaners and soaps on the market are often based on harsh chemicals that kill everything they come into contact with or leach out into the environment. In other cases, their effect is only temporary. Now scientists are working on a new crop of antimicrobials—microscopic weapons that prevent or defeat bugs—to improve their effectiveness, kill specific types of bugs, or reduce their potential side effects on people and the environment. Researchers hope the new antimicrobials can be used to attack bacteria, viruses and fungus on everything from the human body to materials used to build homes, hospitals, boats and medical devices. Researchers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY, recently developed a new way to kill methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA—one of the most widespread and deadliest superbugs—on contact using tiny tubes coated with proteins to destroy the bugs by deflating them like balloons. When Rensselaer professor Jonathan Dordick, a biochemical engineer, began his research in the 1990s, he wanted to figure out how to make enzymes—proteins that speed up biological reactions—work better in environments in which they don't typically occur. He hoped to create items like self-cleaning fabric, in which enzymes embedded in cotton could simply be activated by water to remove stains. In his team's recent work, published last month in an American Chemical Society journal called ACS Nano, Dr. Dordick, Professor Ravi Kane and other colleagues investigated whether enzymes could be added to tubes a million times smaller in diameter than a human hair. These "nanotubes," could be inserted, along with the enzyme, into paint or other substances. The researchers chose the enzyme lysostaphin, which is known to kill the Staphylococcus bacteria. Lysostaphin breaks down one piece of the bacteria's cell wall, and like a pin popping a balloon, causes the cell to "deflate." First they had to figure out how to successfully attach the lysostaphin to the nanotube. Then, they made sure the enzymes didn't leach into the environment by soaking the combination in solution. After placing a glass plate covered with the enzyme-coated nanotubes in a laboratory dish, the researchers added MRSA. They found that within two hours the enzyme combination killed more than 99% of MRSA. And, as expected, it didn't kill other kinds of bacteria, like E. coli. The goal is to add the enzyme-coated nanotubes to paint and other substances to coat hospital walls or medical instruments, says Dr. Dordick. Several questions remain about safety and the duration of effectiveness of the compound. If the enzyme remains in a dry environment, like on a hospital wall, early testing suggests it would work for up to six months, Dr. Dordick says. Other scientists are taking different approaches to enhancing antimicrobials. Len Pinchuck, an inventor who helped develop drug-coated stents for the heart, is developing a product based on metal ions, which have long been known to have natural bacteria-killing properties. Metals such as silver, copper and zinc penetrate the bugs and destroy their DNA. But metals kill whatever bugs they come into contact with, which can be a problem in the human body, which has "good bugs" and live cells that need to be kept alive. Visit the Wall Street Journal for the article.
The Joint Commission launches Targeted Solutions Tool For the first time ever, Joint Commission-accredited hospitals have access to an interactive tool that simplifies the process for solving the most persistent healthcare quality and safety problems that exist within our healthcare system. The Targeted Solutions Tool (TST), which encapsulates the work of the Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare, provides a step-by-step process to measure performance, identify barriers to excellent performance, and implement proven solutions. The first set of targeted solutions, created by eight of the country’s leading hospitals and healthcare systems that worked with the Center, is for improving hand hygiene. The TST provides accredited hospitals the foundation and framework of an improvement method that, if implemented well, will improve an organization’s hand hygiene compliance and contribute substantially to its efforts to reduce the frequency of healthcare-associated infections. The complimentary data-driven tool provides validated and customized solutions to address an organization’s particular barriers to excellent performance. Self paced and confidential, the TST offers instantaneous data analysis. At the start of the project in April 2009, the participating hospitals were surprised to learn that their rate of hand hygiene compliance averaged 48 percent. By June 2010 they had reached an average rate of 82 percent that had been sustained for eight months. Nineteen small, medium and large hospitals across the country also collaborated with the Center to test the work of the original eight hospitals and provide guidance on the development of the solutions that are now available through the TST. These hospitals are experiencing similar gains as the original eight. Visit www.jointcommission.org/. As issues such as wrong site surgery, surgical site infections and hand-off communications are tackled through the Center, the solutions developed by the projects will be incorporated into the TST. Learn more about the Center here.
Working while sick? Study finds even doctors do it Junior doctors quickly learn that exposure to patients' germs is part of the job, but a study suggests many are returning the favor. More than half of doctors in training said in a survey that they'd shown up sick to work, and almost one-third said they'd done it more than once. Misplaced dedication and fear of letting other doctors down are among reasons the researchers cited as possible explanations. The researchers analyzed an anonymous survey of 537 medical residents at 12 hospitals around the country conducted last year by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The response rate was high; the hospitals were not identified. The results appear in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association. Nearly 58 percent of the respondents said they'd worked at least once while sick and 31 percent said they'd worked more than once while sick in the previous year. About half said they hadn't had time to see a doctor about their illness. Dr. Thomas Nasca, the accreditation council's CEO, said residents are trained to put patients' needs above their own but also should recognize that if they're sick, their patients' would be better served by having another doctor take care of them. Residents' hands-on postgraduate training is rigorous and demanding. Many work up to 80 hours a week and sometimes 24 hours a day in hospitals. The council, which accredits hospital residency programs, has proposed revisions on residents' work hours and time off to reduce sleep deprivation and the chances for medical errors. The work week limit would remain at 80 hours. The revisions, to be voted on by the council's board later this month, also call for residents and faculty not to ignore signs of illness and fatigue in themselves and colleagues and make sure that they're fit for duty. That might help reduce the reporting-while-sick problem, said study co-author Dr. Vineet Arora, associate director of the University of Chicago 's internal medicine residency program. A growing push to require flu shots for health workers also could help reduce the number of junior doctors who work while sick. (Associated Press) Visit the Washington Post for the article.
Daily bleach washdown wipes out VRE Bacteremia An Australian hospital that instituted aggressive infection control measures including daily facility-wide washdowns with high-strength bleach completely eliminated bloodstream infections with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in high-risk wards, researchers reported here. Following implementation of the new protocols, the rate of VRE bacteremia in the intensive care unit, transplant units, and other wards at high risk for such infections fell to zero, compared with 0.48 per 100 patients with blood cultures before the intervention, according to Andrew Mahony, MD, of Austin Health in Melbourne. Rates of VRE colonization in new patients were also reduced significantly, he said in a platform presentation here at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Besides the daily bleach cleaning, the new protocol also included sleeveless plastic aprons for patient care workers in place of the standard gowns, and eliminating a requirement that workers wear gloves at all times. Mahony said the Austin Health hospital had followed CDC infection control guidelines since 1994, yet was experiencing a dramatic increase in VRE colonization rates. In 1994, he said, the hospital identified one patient with a positive rectal swab for VRE. In 2009, the number had risen to 597. The CDC guidelines call for single rooms for VRE-positive patients; requiring that staff serving these areas wear gloves and gowns at all times; bleach cleaning of "VRE rooms" after patient discharge; and regular hand washing for all staff. Mahony said the hospital's dialysis unit had tried a more aggressive approach with daily bleach cleaning of all surfaces and the sleeveless, disposable plastic aprons for staff, with large reductions in VRE rates. The hospital also found that bleach-based "supercleaning" of wards following VRE outbreaks appeared to suppress infections for two to three months. As a result, the hospital decided to implement these procedures throughout the facility in late 2009. It also hired "cleaning supervisors" to ensure that housekeeping workers were doing an adequate job of washing down surfaces. Mahoney reported data on a six-month period before the new protocols were introduced and another six-month period ending in July 2010 after they were fully implemented. There was no notable change in rates of VRE colonization in newly admitted patients or in those already admitted and known to have VRE colonization before the study period began. But there was a decline in rates of VRE acquisition while patients were staying in the wards, Mahoney reported. Before introduction of the new protocols, new VRE colonizations occurred at a rate of 10.0 per 100 patients screened. It fell to 7.9 per 100 after the new procedures were implemented. (World Book and News) Visit here for the article.
Panel says no to reclassifying cough syrup ingredient An FDA advisory panel voted 15 to 9 on Tuesday against recommending that dextromethorphan -- the active ingredient in many common cough medicines -- be classified as a controlled substance. The Drug Safety and Risk Management Committee decided that doing so would make hundreds of over-the-counter cough suppressants -- including Robitussin, NyQuil, Dimetapp, and Vicks -- too difficult to access. The vote came despite growing concern that adolescents are taking large doses of the medications to get high. The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) asked the FDA to revisit the issue of whether dextromethorphan has a high potential for abuse and should therefore be classified as a controlled substance. The DEA cannot add a drug to the schedule unless the FDA recommends it. The agency has convened panels on the same issue twice before, most recently in 1992. Since then, however, there has been an increasing number of reports of adolescents "robo-tripping" -- taking doses of cough medicine that are 10 to 20 times greater than the amount recommended for cough suppression. Such doses can result in a euphoric, hallucinogenic high, and "zombie-like walking," FDA reviewers said in briefing documents prepared before the Tuesday's hearing. A larger overdose can result in nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, dizziness, blurred vision, nystagmus, ataxia, shallow respiration, urinary retention, stupor, toxic psychosis, seizures, and coma. Dextromethorphan played a role in 8,000 emergency room visits in 2008 -- up 70% percent from 2004 -- according to the FDA staff. However, they noted, people who abuse dextromethorphan generally are abusing other drugs as well, so it's difficult to tease out which drug was responsible for the hospitalization. Of the five reported deaths in 2008 in which dextromethorphan played a role, the victims all had other drugs in their systems as well, an FDA reviewer said. Although the panel was concerned that some adolescents are using dextromethorphan to get high, the majority of members felt the abuse problem wasn't widespread enough -- especially compared with the abuse of other controlled substances such as oxycodone -- to warrant classifying the drug under the Controlled Substances Act. The panel did express support for making it illegal for anyone under age 18 to purchase medication that contains dextromethorphan and limiting sales of bulk dextromethorphan. Doing so would require an act of Congress. Visit here for the article.
New drug-resistant 'superbug' reaches U.S. A new antibiotic-resistant germ that apparently has it origins in India has sickened a handful of people in North America, with three of the cases reported in the United States, health officials said Tuesday. But the bacterium -- designated New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase NDM-1 -- is a close genetic cousin of another bacterium that's been present in the U.S. for many years. Both germs produce an enzyme that makes them resistant to a group of antibiotics called carbapenems, which include drugs such as penicillin and ampicillin. "NDM-1 is a newly recognized mechanism of resistance that allows certain bacteria to become resistant to certain antibiotics," said Dr. Alexander J. Kallen, a medical epidemiologist and outbreak response coordinator with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion. "Unfortunately, carbapenem resistance is not uncommon even in the United States," Kallen added. "We have our own homegrown version of NDM-1 that has been recognized for quite a few years." In the United States, carbapenem-resistant bacteria -- designated carbapenem-resistant carbapenemase (KPC) -- are usually transmitted in healthcare facilities such as hospitals and nursing homes, and are typically spread from patient to patient from contaminated surfaces and hands, he said. While none of the patients in the U.S. died from their infections with the NDM-1 germ from India, people should be very concerned about this new breed of germs that are showing resistance to carbapenem antibiotics, Kallen said. "What is new in NDM-1 is a new mechanism that produces a strain [of bacterium] that looks the same as KPC," Kallen said. The three cases reported were in Massachusetts, Illinois and California, Kallen said. Infectious diseases expert Dr. Marc Siegel, an associate professor of medicine at New York University in New York City, said that "the number of [NDM-1] cases is small, but what is concerning about this is this is a new bacteria that is emerging because of a genetic change that is causing a garden-variety bacteria to become resistant to most antibiotics." Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are emerging because of lack of cleanliness and sterility in hospitals, too many antibiotics being prescribed, and drug companies not developing new antibiotics because they aren't profitable, Siegel said. (HealthDay) Visit Business Week for the article.
September 14, 2010 Download print version MedAssets signs definitive agreement to acquire The Broadlane Group STERIS launches ComplyTrack Hand Hygiene Compliance Platform VHA to recognize member hospitals leading the way in sustainability Public handwashing takes a hike New study: Serious gaps in medical journals' disclosure of physician relationships with industry The cost of over-triage on our nation's health system Survey: Most hospital CIOs plan to get first-round IT incentives Surgical sponges designed to reduce infections may actually increase them in some cases MedAssets signs definitive agreement to acquire The Broadlane Group MedAssets, Inc. today announced that it has entered into a definitive purchase agreement to acquire The Broadlane Group. Based in Dallas, TX, The Broadlane Group is a provider of supply chain management, strategic sourcing of supplies and services, capital equipment lifecycle management, medical device or PPI cost management, centralized procurement, clinical and lean process consulting, and clinical workforce optimization. The Broadlane Group serves more than 1,100 acute care hospitals and 50,000 non-acute care facilities across the United States, and MedAssets serves more than 3,300 hospitals (inclusive of 1,700 in its Spend Management segment) and 40,000 non-acute healthcare providers. The combined companies' client footprint will be calculated at closing. "The Broadlane Group and MedAssets are an outstanding strategic fit, and this combination offers numerous benefits for our clients and stakeholders. We are bringing together some of the best contract pricing in the industry, with highly complementary technology and clinical consulting expertise from both companies," said John Bardis, chairman, president and chief executive officer of MedAssets. "Our core strategy is to enable broader clinical and operating effectiveness throughout our nation's health system, and this transaction will further enhance our ability to help hospitals and other healthcare providers drive their operating and supply costs lower, while improving patient care. The collective strengths and business models of our two companies will also enhance MedAssets' financial profile, with highly visible, recurring revenue as well as cash flow and profit expansion opportunities," Bardis added. Patrick Ryan, chairman and chief executive officer of The Broadlane Group, is expected to join the MedAssets board of directors and also assume the role of President of the Company's Spend Management segment upon completion of the transaction. "This transaction offers an exceptional opportunity to bring together two very strong enterprises and deliver end-to-end cost management capabilities. As a combined entity, we offer a strategic opportunity for our clients to drive operating expenses down while improving quality of care," said Ryan. "The collective strengths of The Broadlane Group and MedAssets will provide expanded supply chain capabilities, and further enhance the financial improvement opportunities, both near and long-term, for our healthcare provider clients." Under the terms of the agreement, MedAssets will purchase The Broadlane Group for approximately $850 million in cash, with $725 million to be paid at closing and $125 million to be paid in January 2012. To fund the transaction, MedAssets has obtained financing commitments from J.P. Morgan and Barclays Capital. MedAssets hosted a conference call this morning, Tuesday, September 14, 2010, at 7:30 a.m. ET to discuss its proposed acquisition of The Broadlane Group. The live audio webcast will be accessible from the "Events & Presentations" page at http://ir.medassets.com.
To access
the conference call, dial 866-811-1812 or 706-902-0609 (international), and
provide the conference ID number 99384154. A webcast replay will be archived
on MedAssets' website for 30 days. A conference call replay will be
available for one week by calling 800-642-1687 or 706-645-9291
(international), and entering ID number 99384154. Visit
www.medassets.com.
STERIS launches ComplyTrack Hand Hygiene Compliance Platform STERIS Corporation announced the renaming and expansion of its hand hygiene compliance offering for healthcare providers. The new ComplyTrack Hand Hygiene Compliance Platform includes two programs; one that is already relied upon by U.S. hospitals, and a new, more automated program that tracks a second type of hand hygiene data. The new FasTrack Hand Hygiene Compliance Program, expected to be available in October 2010, is a user-friendly, automated tool for tracking and providing reports on hand hygiene product purchasing in healthcare facilities. With a one-step command from the user, this program collects purchase-based data and generates monthly reports automatically. Trends for both hand sanitizers and handwashing products can be displayed in graph format, and the product mix by percentage can also be illustrated. Infection Preventionists can use the information to get trend data on their hospitals hand hygiene performance and can export the data for their own customized use. The second option, the AccuTrack Hand Hygiene Compliance Program, is based on the program formerly known as Partners in Your Care; it tracks and provides detailed reports on hand hygiene product consumption. This program is already valued by more than 100 U.S. hospitals for its ability to report on hand hygiene compliance data down to the department level if needed, and for its ability to produce benchmarking data that allows comparison with other hospitals around the country. Users also have interactive around-the-clock access to the site, and the data is more detailed than the data supplied in the FasTrack Compliance Program. In addition, current customers will not have to start over or learn different software when they go to the website to access their data. The name will be different, but the AccuTrack Hand Hygiene Compliance Program website (www.sterisaccutrack.com) will have the same functionality.
In addition
to these enhanced measurement tools, STERIS offers a menu of hand hygiene
solutions that includes effective compliance-enhancing alcohol-based rubs,
handwashing products and surgical scrubs, and hand hygiene awareness tools
and posters. Moreover, STERIS University provides convenient, certified
clinical education self-study modules on several hand hygiene topics to help
facilities strengthen their knowledge base. Visit
www.steris.com.
VHA to recognize member hospitals leading the way in sustainability VHA Inc., the national healthcare network, announced that it will offer a new leadership award to honor not-for-profit member hospitals that are leading the way in developing and implementing outstanding sustainability programs. "Most hospitals in the U.S. are intensely focused on the care they deliver to patients but not always as focused on the impact they have on the environment," said Michael Regier, senior vice president of legal and corporate affairs at VHA. "However, due to heightened awareness and commitment to the global and local communities, a growing number of hospital leaders are looking at their organization's environmental impact and they are doing some pretty amazing things about it. VHA plans to honor those leading hospitals and encourage others to step up." VHA will recognize hospitals that have:
The Sustainability Excellence Award is part of VHA's existing Leadership Award series that honors hospitals for excellence in supply chain management, clinical care and community benefit leadership. The new award is also part of VHA's larger commitment to recognizing and advancing innovative sustainability initiatives through its own Corporate Citizenship & Sustainability program.
The
Sustainability Excellence award program is open to VHA hospitals that were
active members in 2010 and that have developed organizational sustainability
programs and initiatives. To enter, visit VHA's Web site and download the
Sustainability Excellence Award overview, criteria and application
materials. Awards will be given in two categories -- one for large IDNS and
one for hospitals, and winners will be recognized at the 2011 Leadership
Conference in San Diego.
Visit Marketwire for more information.
Public handwashing takes a hike In the latest observational study sponsored by the American Society for Microbiology and the American Cleaning Institute (formerly The Soap and Detergent Association), 85% of adults washed their hands in public restrooms, compared with 77% in 2007. The 85% total was actually the highest observed since these studies began in 1996. The results were announced at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, an infectious disease meeting sponsored by the American Society for Microbiology. In a separate telephone survey, 96% of adults say they always wash their hands in public restrooms, a percentage that has remained relatively constant over the years. On behalf of ASM and ACI, Harris Interactive discreetly observed 6,028 adults in public restrooms in August 2010 to note whether or not people washed their hands. Researchers returned to six locations in four cities where two previous studies were conducted: Atlanta (Turner Field), Chicago (Museum of Science and Industry, Shedd Aquarium), New York City (Grand Central Station, Penn Station), and San Francisco (Ferry Terminal Farmers Market). Men stepped up to the sink a bit more than they have in the past when it comes to public handwashing. More than three-quarters of the guys (77%) washed their hands publicly in 2010, compared to 66% in 2007. The men still strike out more on handwashing in sporting venues, though. Turner Field by far fielded the worst percentage for the guys – barely two-thirds (65%) – though that's still better than just 57% in 2007. Perhaps as a counter to the men's poor handwashing practices, Turner Field brought out the best in women's handwashing among all venues: 98%. Overall, the rate of women washing their hands in public restrooms improved from 88% in 2007 to 93% in 2010. The best observed handwashing in 2010 was in Chicago and San Francisco, with 89% of adults lathering up in public restrooms. Atlanta was next (82%), followed by New York City (79%). The venue with the best overall handwashing regimen was Chicago's Museum of Science and Industry (93%). In a 2010 telephone survey of 1,006 American adults, Harris Interactive's survey for ASM and ACI found the vast majority of us say we always wash our hands after using the bathroom at home (89%). More Americans now report that they always wash their hands after changing a diaper (82%), an increase from 2007 (73%). Women are better than men at this practice: 88% of the ladies say they always wash their hands after diaper duty, compared to 80% of the guys.
Those of us
who say we always clean our hands before handling or eating food is staying
about the same: 77% in 2010, compared to 78% in 2007. Among women, 83% say
they clean their hands before touching their food; just 71% of men say they
do. And only 39% of Americans say they always wash their hands after
coughing or sneezing. More details from the surveys are available online at
www.washup.org
and
www.cleaninginstitute.org/news.
New study: Serious gaps in medical journals' disclosure of physician relationships with industry Nearly half the surgeons who made at least $1 million in payments from orthopedic device companies did not have that relationship published in their scientific articles, according to a study released today in the on-line edition of the Archives of Internal Medicine. The study shows that readers are not being adequately informed about conflicts of interest even when the funds involved are significant. The study, conducted by researchers at the New York-based Institute on Medicine as a Profession (IMAP), is the first of its kind to use company records to check on the accuracy of disclosure information listed in medical journals. The five manufacturing firms studied disclosed the dollars they paid to consultants in a public database. IMAP researchers searched the database and compared the list to the financial disclosure information, if any, listed in the journal articles. "The findings raise troubling questions about undisclosed payments or royalties and other fees from medical device companies that could lead to biased scientific conclusions," says senior author David Rothman, president of IMAP (www.imapny.org), a think tank based at the Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons in New York City. He co-authored the study with IMAP colleagues Susan Chimonas, associate research scholar and Zachary Frosh, research associate. The authors note that journal editors typically don't check multiple databases that are now available and simply rely on the honor system. They expect a researcher to disclose all conflicts but do not verify if the information is complete and accurate. Rothman and colleagues argue that full disclosure in medical journal articles is vital. "These articles constitute a permanent scientific record that is used by practicing physicians, guideline committees, purchasers and patients to evaluate treatment options. Journal editors, reviewers and readers must be fully informed about authors' industry relationship to consider the potential for bias," they write. IMAP compared 2007 physician payment information from five orthopedic device companies with disclosure of company payments in journal articles. These five companies (Biomet, DePuy Orthopedics, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, and Zimmer) made a total of 1,654 payments that amounted to $248 million in 2007 for consulting, honoraria or other payments for services. The analysis also showed that payments to 41 orthopedic surgeon researchers ranged from just over $1 million to a high of $8.8 million, representing 62 percent of all company expenditures. These highly paid orthopedic consultants became the focus of the analysis because of the size of their payments. The IMAP team homed in on 95 articles published in the scientific literature after researchers received their large payments and found that fewer than half of the journal articles disclosed a financial relationship between the author and company. In no case did journal articles reveal how substantial the payments were to the authors. Almost all of articles were directly related to a device, like a hip implant, made by the company. This study focused on orthopedic surgeons but other studies suggest other medical specialists also fail to have their industry ties published. Rothman says editors and others need to start using the company's data bases to get information about physician-industry relationships. No less than 15 drug and device companies are now putting payment information on their websites, says Rothman, a practice that will be accelerated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Under the new health reform law, all drug and device manufacturers will have to report payments to physicians in a searchable public database by 2013. Editors, consumers, deans of medical schools and others will then be able to search for any doctor's name and a list of payments from drug or medical device manufacturers.
A copy of
the article "From Disclosure to Transparency, The Use of Company Payment
Data" in the September 13 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine
can be obtained by e-mail at
mediarelations@jama-archives.org.
The cost of over-triage on our nation's health system Researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine have identified "secondary over-triage" as a potential area of cost savings for our nation's healthcare. The phenomenon of over-triage occurs when patients are transferred twice, and discharged from a second facility in less than 24 hours. These findings will be published in the September 10th issue of The Journal of Trauma. "By looking at the number of times patients are transferred, we can evaluate the overall efficiency of our trauma system and its impact on healthcare costs," said Hayley Osen, research analyst for the UCSD Center for Surgical Systems and Public Health. "The average cost of a patient who faces secondary over-triage is $5,917, a significant burden given that per capita spending alone in the U.S. is around $8,000." "Primary over-triage" refers to the transport of patients from the field to hospitals while "secondary over-triage" refers to the transport of patients between hospitals, involving the decision making of hospital-based medical personnel. "The paper highlights the issue of defensive medicine," said David Chang, PhD, MPH, MBA, director of the UCSD Center for Surgical Systems and Public Health. "We found that pediatric patients are most prone to secondary over-triage, which may be due to physicians or hospitals being overly cautious for fear of legal repercussions."
The paper
indicates that 20 percent of pediatric patients were discharged within 24
hrs after transfer to a second facility. Rapid discharge after transfer was
defined as patients who were discharged within one day and did not receive
any surgical procedure. Chang noted that if patients are discharged within
24 hrs, it is unlikely they needed to be transferred in the first place.
Visit PhysOrg.com for the article.
Survey: Most hospital CIOs plan to get first-round IT incentives The government’s final “meaningful use” regulations, which tell hospitals and medical practices to what extent they must implement electronic medical records in order to qualify for a first round of federal incentive payments, came out in July. And now there’s some word on whether hospital IT brass think they’ll actually be able to qualify. A survey out today from the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives finds 28% of the 152 respondents expect to qualify for the stimulus funds before April 1, 2011. Another 62% say they’ll likely qualify between then and Sept. 30, 2012, when the first stage of the incentive program ends. That leaves just 10% of respondents who say they won’t qualify for funds until fiscal 2013 or 2014. About 11% of the group’s membership responded to the online survey, and of course it’s possible that the institutions farther along on the road to digitizing records were more likely to respond. Readiness varied by the type of institution — CIOs at academic medical centers were more likely than those from community hospitals to say they’ll qualify in the first six months. And larger hospitals were more likely than small ones to say they’ll qualify. The hospital execs cited certification of applications, the need to implement a computerized order entry system and the need to gather data on quality measures as the major obstacles to meeting the requirements.
A survey of
120 CHIME members conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers in June, before the
final requirements were set, found about half of CEOs expected to meet
requirements in 2011.
Visit the Wall Street Journal for the article.
Surgical sponges designed to reduce infections may actually increase them in some cases
New data
reported this week show that implanting sponges soaked with antibiotics into
surgical wounds may not reduce the incidence of infections as intended and
may, in fact, actually increase them. The findings represent a blow to the
manufacturer's efforts to get the sponges approved for use in the United
States.
September 13, 2010 Download print version AHRMM Membership selects 2011 Board of Directors Cesareans more likely for women at for-profit hospitals, study finds AHIMA files response to HHS Privacy rules 3M to buy Arizant in third acquisition in a month After adverse effects, Roche ends trials of diabetes drug India's market in generic drugs also leads to counterfeiting AHRMM Membership selects 2011 Board of Directors The Association for Healthcare Resource & Materials Management (AHRMM) has announced the results of its 2011 board of directors elections. Newly elected officials include: president-elect Beverly Slate, CMRP, FAHRMM; healthcare provider representatives Brent Petty, CMRP and Mickey Sparrow, CMRP, FAHRMM; and GPO/consultant/supplier/distributor representative Michael Ferris, CMRP, FAHRMM. The new board representatives will begin their terms on January 1, 2011. AHRMM elections are held each year via the association's website. AHRMM posts each candidate’s biographical information and platform so every member can make an informed decision when voting. President-elect Slate is director of Supply Chain Operations for Memorial Health Care System in Chattanooga, TN, and brings more than 20 years of materials management experience to the president-elect position. Slate has been a member of AHRMM for more than 10 years and is currently serving as the Region 4 National Board Representative. Slate’s service history with AHRMM includes: member of the Fellow Review Committee, and member of the AHRMM/HFMA Benchmark Task Force, the AHRMM/HFMA Supply Expense Definition Task Force, and the Environmental Sustainability Task Force. She was also a board member and chapter president of the Virginia Association for Healthcare Resource Materials Management from 1996 to 2006. In her capacity as AHRMM president-elect, Slate’s responsibilities include serving on both the AHRMM Executive and Nominating Committees, developing the association's strategic plan and budget, and in the absence of the president, assuming the duties of that office. The new healthcare provider representatives, Petty and Sparrow are responsible for advocating for their constituents by conveying provider issues to the board as well as carrying out the mission of the organization. Brent Petty is the system director of Supply Chain, Wellmont Health System in Kingsport, TN, and brings over 15 years of experience in the resource and materials management field and four years of AHRMM membership experience to the board. Mickey Sparrow is the Materiel Manager, Tuomey Healthcare System in Sumter, SC, and brings over 14 years of experience in the resource and materials management field and nine years of AHRMM membership experience to the board. The new GPO/consultant/supplier/distributor representative is Michael Ferris, who is responsible for advocating for non-provider issues to the board as well as carrying out the mission of the organization. Ferris is the co-founder and executive vice president of operations for Management Health Solutions, Inc. in Ambler, PA. He brings over 33 years of experience in the resource and materials management field and 25 years of AHRMM membership experience to the board. Ferris also previously served on the AHRMM board of directors from 2004 to 2006. "On behalf of AHRMM, I am honored to welcome these newly elected officials to the board. Their experience and insight will bring fresh perspectives to their positions and help AHRMM continue its mission of advancing healthcare through supply chain excellence,” said AHRMM president Ray Moore. "The AHRMM board of director elections are an important member event, as it is the board’s responsibility to determine AHRMM's strategic direction as well as new professional development opportunities for the field at large." For
more information, please visit
www.ahrmm.org.
Cesareans more likely for women at for-profit hospitals, study finds For-profit hospitals across the state are performing cesarean sections at higher rates than nonprofit hospitals, a California Watch analysis has found. A database compiled from state birthing records revealed that women were at least 17 percent more likely to have a cesarean section at a for-profit hospital than at a nonprofit or public hospital from 2005 to 2007. A surgical birth can bring in twice the revenue of a vaginal delivery. In addition, some hospitals appear to be performing more C-sections for nonmedical reasons -- including an individual doctor's level of patience and the staffing schedules in maternity wards, according to interviews with health professionals. The statewide database revealed significant differences among 253 hospitals in California. New mothers with low-risk pregnancies had a 10 percent chance of giving birth by C-section at the public Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, for example, whereas low-risk pregnancies at the for-profit Los Angeles Community Hospital ended in a surgical birth nearly half of the time. The numbers provide ammunition to those who have long suspected that unnecessary C-sections are performed to help pad the bottom line. This was the first independent analysis of C-section rates at the 253 hospitals reporting birth statistics to state health authorities. The data focuses on low-risk pregnancies where cesareans are more likely to be unnecessary -- excluding deliveries by older mothers, women with certain medical conditions and women with previous C-sections. But some hospital officials dispute the notion that their institutions could be pushing C-sections for money. "Decision-making about C-section versus vaginal birth is between a doctor and the patient, and our goal is to support that decision-making process with evidence-based practices," said Leslie Kelsay, a spokeswoman for Good Samaritan Hospital in San Jose, which had the highest cesarean rate for low-risk pregnancies in Santa Clara County at 22 percent. Rick Black of Tenet Healthcare, which owns a number of hospitals in California and elsewhere, agreed. "You don't just come into a hospital and they say, 'We want to give you a C-section so we can drive up profits'”, he said. Gene Declercq, professor of community health sciences at the Boston University School of Public Health, agrees that hospitals would not explicitly push C-sections for profit. But subtle incentives to increase efficiency could have the same effect. "It's a lot easier if you can do all your births between seven and 10 in the morning and know exactly how many operating rooms and beds you need," he said. Vaginal births are unpredictable, creating inefficiencies that can hurt the bottom line. In 2008, more than 180,000 C-sections were performed in California. Medical experts have been unable to pinpoint exactly why some hospitals perform far more C-sections, or "operative deliveries," than other medical facilities. Yet one important factor has always loomed over the debate about the rise in C-sections: the bottom line. In California, hospitals can increase their revenues by 82 percent on average by performing a C-section instead of a vaginal birth, according to a 2007 analysis by the Pacific Business Group on Health. The group -- a coalition of business, education and government agencies -- estimated that average hospital profits on an uncomplicated C-section were $2,240, and profits for a comparable vaginal birth were $1,230. California Watch examined the births least likely to require C-sections, those in which mothers without prior C-sections carry a single fetus -- positioned head down -- at full term, and found that, after adjusting for the age of the mothers, the average weighted C-section rate for nonprofit hospitals was 16 percent, and for-profit hospitals had a rate of 19 percent. That
may seem like a small percentage gap to the casual observer, but medical
experts consider it significant. It means women are 17 percent more likely
to have a C-section if they give birth at a for-profit hospital.
Visit the San Jose Mercury News for the article.
TeleTracking's RadarFind offers tamper-resistant reader real time locating system, application-specific tags RadarFind, a subsidiary of TeleTracking Technologies, has developed a tamper-resistant version of its real time locating system's (RTLS) plug-in readers to further address hospital patient safety needs. Developed at the request of hospital clients, the tamper-resistant reader features a shutter system that prevents patients from inserting paper clips, pins and similar objects into the slots containing the energized contacts. The product enhancement fully complies with National Electrical Code (NEC) safety standards applicable to tamper-resistant receptacles and patient care areas; many states commonly adopt NEC standards as law. When the RadarFind system is fully deployed throughout a hospital facility, these devices are typically used in high-risk areas where there may be limited supervision such as pediatric units, alcoholism and substance abuse units, psychiatric units, exam rooms and waiting areas. RadarFind's enhanced plug-in readers are part of a distributed sensor-network based system where intelligent RTLS tags continuously communicate with readers placed throughout a hospital facility to report location, status, contextual awareness and environmental conditions regarding medical devices and people. Their pass-through design accommodates most electrical outlets, yet preserves electrical sockets for use by other medical equipment. RadarFind offers hospitals their choice of electrical socket colors to match existing outlets, including red receptacles to indicate outlets that are powered by back-up generators in the event of an electrical power outage. The
company recently announced plans to install their RTLS across five hospitals
that are part of Methodist Healthcare in San Antonio, a 24-facility system
jointly owned by Methodist Healthcare Ministries and Hospital Corporation of
America. For more information, please visit
www.teletracking.com and
www.radarfind.com.
AHIMA files response to HHS Privacy rules The following statement was released today by Rita K. Bowen, President, AHIMA Board of Directors: "While AHIMA continues to applaud federal government support for the ideal of protecting patients' health information rights, the proposed rule-making for HIPAA privacy, security and enforcement by HHS has a number of requirements that we do not believe the industry is ready to undertake; especially as it gears up for Meaningful Use. Today AHIMA is releasing its recommendations to the HHS Office of Civil Rights (OCR) that speak to the issues we believe are most critical to the patients of America, the healthcare industry and the best practice of health information management. "As staunch supporters of patients' health information rights, AHIMA agrees the single most contentious issue in the proposed regulation is the ability of individuals to restrict the information held by their healthcare providers from being shared with their health plan. While AHIMA believes an individual's control over this data flow is valid, data flow restrictions in the HHS proposal creates unintended repercussions for data integrity, data processing and other elements within the current US reimbursement system. "Many AHIMA members are engaged in providing patients' individual and aggregate data for a variety of approved uses. There is a continued discussion within the profession on how to best cover the costs of the retrieval, analysis and release of information within the context of the privacy and security regulations, patient restrictions; and the need to verify the requesting individual as a means of keeping released information available to a necessary minimum. Additionally, we remain concerned the charges permitted by states or HIPAA do not cover all costs and ultimately raise the cost of healthcare. "AHIMA also questions the sale of patient health information when an organization is being absorbed by a second organization. The OCR's approach, while practical, raises the issue of whether consumers have the right to determine if their health information should be transferred with the ownership of a health organization.”
"Finally, AHIMA feels strongly that the OCR needs to provide greater
clarification regarding the definition of 'agents' as it relates to covered
entities and who should be covered by HIPAA, including its hybrid
organizations." Visit
www.ahima.org.
Small intravenous devices (IVDs) commonly used in the hand or arm do not need to be moved routinely every 3 days. A randomized controlled trial comparing regular relocation with relocation on clinical indication, published in the open access journal BMC Medicine, found that rates of complications were the same for both regimens. Claire Rickard, from Griffith University, Australia, worked with a team of researchers to carry out the study with 362 patients at Launceston General Hospital, Tasmania. She said, "Recommended timelines for routine resite have been extended over the past three decades from 24 to 72 hours. Currently, 72- to 96-hour resite is recommended. Even with these extended durations, such policies still cause increased workload in hospitals, where the task of removing and replacing well-functioning IVDs generally falls to busy nursing and junior medical staff. Our results indicate that the average duration of IV therapy is 5-6 days and that many catheters can remain complication-free for this period, or even longer". The
researchers found that complication rates between the groups were not
significantly different. The policy of resite on clinical indication led to
one in two patients needing only a single cannula to receive treatment,
whereas a 3-day change policy resulted in one in five patients having this
scenario, with the rest requiring multiple cannulations and therefore
additional pain and inconvenience. According to Rickard, "The routine resite
of peripheral IVDs increases patient discomfort and healthcare costs, but
does not reduce IVD complications as has traditionally been thought".
Visit
here for the article.
3M to buy Arizant in third acquisition in a month 3M Co. agreed to acquire Arizant Inc., a maker of blankets used to protect hospital patients against hypothermia, for $810 million to expand its infection-prevention offerings, marking its third acquisition in a month. Arizant, also the maker of gowns to keep patients warm on the operating table, will add to the St. Paul, MN-based 3M’s healthcare unit, its second biggest after the industrial and transportation division. 3M, whose products range from Post-It notes to flu tests and sanding tools, still sees one or two potential acquisition targets among industrial companies, Chief Executive Officer George Buckley said in a Bloomberg Television interview last week. He told the Financial Times this month that 3M may make two purchases still this year. The company plans to spend about $2 billion on acquisitions in 2010. At the
end of August, 3M said it would buy Cogent Inc., a maker of
fingerprint-identification devices, for $943 million and Attenti Holdings
SA, a maker of electronic tracking tools including ankle bracelets, for $230
million.
Visit Bloomberg for the article.
After adverse effects, Roche ends trials of diabetes drug The drug maker Roche has stopped giving patients its experimental diabetes treatment taspoglutide in late-stage clinical trials because of a high rate of adverse reactions, a major blow to a drug once expected to have $2 billion-a-year potential. Roche said on Friday that the decision was based on a higher-than-expected rate of discontinuations because of gastrointestinal intolerability and as a result of serious hypersensitivity reactions experienced by some patients, according to 52-week data from the trials. “These discontinuation rates compromise interpretation of the long-term safety data from the T-emerge studies, therefore continuing treatment with the current taspoglutide formulation is not considered to be in the best interest of patients,” Roche said. The
drug, given once weekly by injection, suffered a setback in June, when it
was reported that there were cases of patients’ suffering hypersensitivity
reactions to the medicine in clinical trials. Roche said it was not
abandoning its drug, but was considering a reformulation. (Reuters)
Visit the New York Times for the article.
India's market in generic drugs also leads to counterfeiting In New Delhi, private investigator Suresh Sati rattled off the popular brand names listed on the boxes of cough syrup, supplements, vitamins and painkillers sprawled across the desk and shelves in his basement office. "They look real, but all these are fakes," said Sati, head of a New Delhi-based agency that helps police conduct raids against counterfeit-drug syndicates across the country. "A regular customer cannot make out if a drug is fake. . . . The biggest giveaway is when someone is selling medicines very cheap. It is almost always fake." India, the world's largest manufacturer of generic drugs, has become a busy center for counterfeit and substandard medicines. Stuffed in slick packaging and often labeled with the names of such legitimate companies as GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Novartis, the fake drugs are passed off to Indian consumers and sold in developing nations around the world. Experts say the global fake-drug industry, worth about $90 billion, causes the deaths of almost 1 million people a year and is contributing to a rise in drug resistance. Estimates vary on the number of these drugs made in India. The Indian government says that 0.4 percent of the country's drugs are counterfeit and that substandard drugs account for about 8 percent. But independent estimates range from 12 to 25 percent. Indian officials say the clandestine industry has hurt the image of India's booming pharmaceutical industry and its exports, worth $8.5 billion a year, mostly to African and Latin American countries. To clamp down on the illegal trade, the health ministry launched a reward program this year offering $55,000 to those who provide information about fake-drug syndicates. Last year, the ministry also strengthened its drug law to speed up court trials. Suspects found guilty of manufacturing and selling fake drugs can be sentenced to life in prison. The number of people arrested for manufacturing and selling fake drugs rose from 12 in 2006 to 147 last year, and drugs worth about $6.5 million were seized over this period. The tricks of the trade include sticking fraudulent labels on expired products, filling vials with water, stuffing small amounts of real ingredients in packages of popular licensed brands and putting chalk power in medicine packets. But more than the concern for public safety, officials here have been particularly alarmed about recent incidents that discredit India's image abroad. In June, officials at Nigeria's Abuja airport caught a shipment of fake antibiotics, containing no active ingredients, with a "Made in India" label. Nigerian investigators later said that a Chinese company shipped the drugs via Frankfurt. In a similar incident last year, a shipment of fake anti-malaria drugs from China arrived in Nigeria with an Indian tag. Over the years, drug companies have used holograms or embossed their logo on the packaging to protect their brands, but these have also been counterfeited in India. One company, MSN Labs, is using a technology developed by U.S.-based start-up firm PharmaSecure that allows consumers to check the authenticity of medicines by sending in a text message of the code written on them. Visit the Washington Post for the article.
|