Steady progress on
e-commerce and
supply chain activities

with Charles Saunders, MD

This Newsmaker Q&A is the second of two parts

HPN: Your company also has an e-commerce component. Please describe it and also discuss why medical supply e-commerce movement in general may have fallen short of expectations so far.

Saunders: Broadlane’s technology for automating supply chain processes includes the integration of data and transactions between providers, suppliers and exchanges over the Internet. This results in process efficiencies, cost savings and greater timeliness and accuracy of purchases. At the core of Broadlane’s technology is its Web-based contract management system, constituent portals (provider, supplier and GPO), an integration framework for integrating with provider ERP and materials management systems and various back-end systems of suppliers and exchanges, data analytics and reporting and robust workflow management to automate routing and complex human workflows and branching logic.

Specific transactions include:

• Product and price updates (832)

• Purchase orders (850)

• Acknowledgements (855)

• Invoices (810)

• Advanced shipment notification (856)

• Functional acknowledgement (997)

• Electronic check remittance (820)

• Electronic sales summary reports (867)

It is true that e-commerce has been a work in evolution, but continues to show great promise. During the dot-com years, expectations got ahead of adoption, primarily because of the limitations in bandwidth, inability of legacy applications to integrate easily with new web services, the large cultural and training hurdle and the investment required to upgrade infrastructure at a time when Y2K was diverting resources and attention.

However, steady progress has been made on all these fronts. The technology has matured and become integrated within mainstream applications and operating systems, familiarity with the Internet is near universal and e-commerce has become woven into the fabric of business across industries.

Broadlane’s view has always been that technology is not deployed simply for marketing reasons, but to generate productivity and efficiency gains, and hence has been highly targeted and specific. Rather than fancy websites and auctions that no one uses, and a business model that hopes for transaction fees that create more barriers to adoption rather than incentives, Broadlane focuses on integration with industrial applications, real-time transactions and workflow automation that produce a direct payback in terms of cost savings.

Broadlane provides several distinct types of technology services: data management, e-commerce and electronic contract management. All are designed to help healthcare providers accelerate contract implementation, improve measurement of contract performance, increase transaction accuracy and support the ability to make better operational decisions. Clients who use Broadlane’s technology can order more than 70 percent of their supplies electronically, track the status of those transactions on line in real time, and get immediate alerts of the wrong price is paid. This ensures discipline procurement and high contract compliance and saves time and money on both ends.

HPN: Why do you believe your business model at Broadlane will succeed?

Saunders: A key aspect of Broadlane’s customer relationships has been the recognition of the importance of clinicians – physicians, nurses and associated professionals – in driving business and purchasing decisions, and in sharing responsibility for the outcomes. Now we are building upon that bond with healthcare professionals to broaden the scope of our aspirations in addressing fundamental provider issues with new business approaches and innovative technologies that produce dramatic impact on cost, efficiency and service.

Broadlane differentiates itself through our ability to:

• assume accountability for an organization’s supply chain expenses

• provide a portfolio of more than 575 contracts for goods, purchased services and capital equipment that are managed by a team of over 150 professionals

• deliver a comprehensive suite of business processes and supporting technology to manage supply and service costs from "requisition to check"

• deploy expert resources to implement these solutions

• provide services in a leveraged delivery model that can potentially result in a lower cost to the provider

We are unique in the healthcare industry in that we seek accountability for managing an organization’s supply chain expenses. We seek relationships with providers where we become an integral part of the management team and are held accountable for results. We’re also the only company in healthcare that can provide comprehensive supply chain management services via multiple, synergistic activities, including:

• contract negotiation (national and local)

• contract implementation and utilization management improvement via clinical implementation activities deployed to the client site

• "hard wiring" contract compliance and price verification via use of technology that monitors purchases from the purchase order to invoice reconciliation

• leadership of all facets of the supply chain expense reduction initiative with an established methodology and means to track and report results

A number of market competitors claim to provide the comprehensive suite of services described above. However, Broadlane has developed a compensation model that puts us at risk for achieving contractual results.

HPN: What can and should be done to build support for medical supply e-commerce?

Saunders: First, the technology has to work. There must be a strong payback in terms of cost savings, e-commerce solutions have to integrate readily with common ERP systems, be easy to use and rock-solid reliable. As experience builds with supply chain e-commerce, the success stories and value must be demonstrated. The media can help tell the story, but the vendors should refrain from hyping vaporware and unrealistic benefits. Broadlane’s use of e-commerce is all designed for a purpose – to reduce costs, and the results are well documented.

HPN: The Safe Harbor rules essentially exempt GPOs from anti-kickback laws on a federal level. Some say that this exclusion should be eliminated. What is your view of the Safe Harbor rules and their effect on group purchasing?

Saunders: GPOs aggregate customer purchasing power and create competition between suppliers, which results in discounted prices on goods and services and a lower cost of care. This is important because without GPOs the balance is normally tilted in favor of manufacturers, which are relatively consolidated vs. a highly fragmented provider base – especially among smaller and rural hospitals, which lack contracting resources and expertise to obtain favorable terms and make the best purchase decisions.

In addition, some organizations such as Broadlane also employ technology, which connects individual providers with a large number of suppliers and improves the efficiency and accuracy of purchasing, reducing cost to both sides. Providers benefit by eliminating price discrepancies and not overpaying, and suppliers reduce their cost of fulfilling purchase orders, reducing their sales and marketing costs and their days in sales outstanding (DSO.) These services are costly to provide, yet bring tremendous value to both sides, hence the justification for the admin fee.

There is an argument being made by manufacturers of some clinical preference items that their products are unique and they should not be forced to compete or pay admin fees, especially if they are in a position to successfully market directly to physicians and drive physician demand and product loyalty (which forces hospital administrators to pay retail prices). In this minority of cases, where the product category has truly unique choices, the solution is to contract for shorter periods, allow multi-vendor contracting, and most importantly, provide extensive information and decision support to clinicians to help them make informed choices and manage demand. In these cases, there is still benefit GPOs can provide, especially when the decision support they provide is combined with technology that streamlines the timeliness and accuracy of contracting, purchasing and utilization management.

The GPO Safe Harbor to the anti-kickback statute, which allows payment by the vendor for GPO services provided to the provider, does not compromise competition. It merely allows for an efficient, fully disclosed method to assess the value of, agree to, and pay for GPO services, while providing guidelines for ethical behavior.

HPN: To make group purchasing most effective, who should pay administrative fees, providers or suppliers? Why?

Saunders: In Broadlane’s view, incentives are most appropriately aligned when the provider pays a management fee for a supply chain service that results in cost savings or other productivity benefits. Traditional GPO relationships with admin fees paid by suppliers create a potential conflict of interest, in that the GPO actually makes more money as supply costs increase. Broadlane’s financial relationships with its providers are just the opposite. However, many providers are small or financially challenged and not in a position to support the investment necessary to obtain effective contracts or other supply chain efficiencies, and are absolutely reliant on the admin fees to support these services. Without them, their costs would increase with potentially disastrous results.

Therefore, the admin fees paid by suppliers are justified for several reasons: 1) suppliers benefit by reduced sales and marketing costs, market share growth, and reduced cost of processing and fulfilling purchase orders (where the GPO provides connectivity and technology services), and 2) some providers do not have the financial resources to invest in specialized contracting services, and rather than have the admin fee passed through as a further reduction in the cost of the goods (which would probably be wishful thinking to obtain anyway), the fee is paid to a third party (GPO), who provides supply chain contracting services on their behalf.

HPN: What are the keys to success in cutting supply chain expenses?

Saunders: We believe a multi-layered approach is the best way to squeeze every bit of possible savings out of the healthcare supply chain. Through our contract coverage expertise, we help clients dramatically increase the percentage of supply spending covered by contracts, thus reducing the amount of purchases that are made at list price or off contract. We work shoulder to shoulder with our clients to increase standardization and utilization, as we believe both are vital to ensuring the highest level of contract coverage, which in turn results in the most cost savings. Moreover, in effectively addressing clinical preferences, we recognize that total supply cost is driven more by the introduction and utilization of new technology products than by commodity prices, so we will actively work with client physicians and supply chain partners to prepare for the introduction of costly new devices and drugs. When national contracts will not work for a client, we actively work to establish local or regional contracts for them. We would never force compliance on a client where it does not make clinical or economic sense for them to use the contract.

Additionally, we are strong believers in actively using data to better manage business process activities. We provide advanced technology tools to accelerate savings by automating contract management processes and ensuring clients pay the right price by rigorously maintaining their item files.

Our capital equipment program provides access to the clinically preferred products that our client physicians and staff desire at some of the most aggressive discounts available in the nation – up to 10 percent savings. It also allows for a degree of customization of an equipment portfolio that makes it possible for clinicians to obtain the equipment they want at prices our clients can afford.

And since we know that pricing is a primary factor in determining which company can best assist healthcare organizations in achieving their cost management objectives, you will be interested to know that as a rule, when Broadlane has gone head to head with group purchasing organizations, our pricing has been superior. According to third party audits, prices available through Broadlane’s contract portfolio are consistently lower than those of traditional group purchasing organizations – often to the tune of 10-12 percent. We target non-supply-chain related expenses too, including labor management as well as other controllable expenses such as logistics and facilities management.

HPN: What is your view of self-contracting programs in use in a few IDNs today?

Saunders: We have noticed that trend in which hospitals and health systems are considering self-contracting in the hope that it will help them lower their supply costs. Most of the time, it’s because they believe they can do a better job sourcing and negotiating contracts on their own. However, it’s Broadlane’s view that these strategies rarely work and that costs increase rather than decrease.

Having said that, in some cases it makes sense to custom contract, especially where an IDN has particular programs or expertise that allow special manufacturer relationships for selected items – some orthopedic devices, cardiac devices or imaging equipment, for example. However, even if these special circumstances exist, no IDN can cost-effectively support the contracting infrastructure needed for maintaining 800+ contracts necessary to cover the 200,000 – 300,000 SKUs typical of an IDN. Broadlane, for example, has more than 200 contract specialists and dozens of highly specialized attorneys with years of supply contracting expertise, which even the largest IDNs cannot replicate, without prohibitive cost.

In Broadlane’s view, a custom contracting approach is often justified to support unique IDN needs, such as special clinical programs, the existence of important regional manufacturers or minority businesses that must be included. Broadlane’s approach in these cases is to blend a national portfolio of contracts with custom contracts, optimally designed for the unique needs of the IDN. Broadlane then provides the support for identifying, executing and managing those custom contracts on behalf of the IDN, leveraging Broadlane’s contracting infrastructure, expertise and technology.

Let me share an example: There was a time when both Continuum (NY) Health Partners and Kaiser Permanente thought self-contracting was the best solution for lowering costs and gaining control of their procurement activities. That was before the years that both systems struggled against the complexities of their own internal organizations in an attempt to self-contract. Continuum even tried contracting with a large national group purchasing organization and then attempted to establish its own GPO. Both Continuum and Kaiser Permanente learned that it was simply impossible to manage the more than 500 complex agreements required for an IDN of that size, especially with a modest materials management staff. And in each case Broadlane performed an assessment that showed Continuum and Kaiser Permanente that instead of reaping cost savings from their self-contracting programs, their supply costs actually went up. That’s why they came to Broadlane.

We applied two very different, highly customized approaches to the supply operations at Continuum and Kaiser Permanente. As a result, both organizations were able to balance the benefits of local contracting where it made sense, access a national contract portfolio to help lower costs on commodity items, and take advantage of Broadlane’s clinical consulting services to improve physician compliance on preference items. At Continuum Health Partners, Broadlane has helped generate $33 million in recurring savings and is on track to generate $45 million in recurring savings by the end of 2003. And at Kaiser Permanente, increasing contract coverage from 40 percent to more than 76 percent has generated more than $39 million in recurring savings. HPN

Charles E. Saunders, M.D., is chief executive officer of Broadlane Inc. Prior to joining Broadlane, Chuck served as president of the Healthcare Global Industry Solutions division of Dallas-based EDS, where he was responsible for leadership of EDS’ global healthcare solutions, including strategy, thought leadership, business development and sales. He also served as chief medical officer for Healtheon/WebMD, where he was a key member of the senior management team responsible for growing the company from a start-up to the largest IPO in healthcare history. Prior to that, he served as a principal of AT Kearney/EDS, executive director for San Francisco General Hospital’s managed care programs, as medical director for the emergency medical services of the City and County of San Francisco, as associate director for Vanderbilt University’s Life Flight emergency medical services and as director of the emergency department for the University of Colorado Health Sciences division. Chuck received his doctorate in medicine from Johns Hopkins University and his bachelor’s degree from the University of Southern California. He is board certified in internal medicine and in emergency medicine and is a fellow of both the American College of Physicians and the American College of Emergency Physicians.