Central Sterile

Upping the odds of
successful decontamination
Experts come
clean on common shortcomings, best practices
by Julie Williamson
If professional prestige were based purely on job
importance, those working in decontamination would be considered
among the most elite in healthcare. After all, quality patient
care hinges on the surgeon’s ability to wield properly working
instruments that are free of blood and bioburden, and don’t pose
an unnecessary infection risk.
Despite the undeniable importance of instrument
decontamination, those in charge of the process would agree that
the task is anything but glamorous. High temperature and humidity,
and bloody instruments — coupled with many facilities’ challenges
of insufficient workspace, inadequate workflow, outdated equipment
and high staff turnover — create a less than desirable environment
for central service professionals.
"If that weren’t enough, there’s also the
challenge of having to increase [throughput] to meet the
instrumentation demands of the operating room, and disassemble and
clean more complex devices," explained consultant Charles Hancock,
president, Charles O. Hancock Associates Inc., Fairport, NY. "Even
though it’s an incredibly important job, it’s often a thankless
one. When you put it all together, you can really see that the
decontamination area is just not an easy, or particularly
pleasant, place to be."
Easy, no. But it can be dramatically improved if
CS managers and technicians are proactive and committed to making
to a few key changes both in and outside the department, sources
told Healthcare Purchasing News.
Quality trumps efficiency
There’s no doubt that time is of the essence in
CS, and that’s never been more true than today. Case loads and
surgical volume are multiplying in many facilities, and because
many hospitals aren’t matching that growth with more instrument
sets, that’s putting even more pressure on CS personnel to
streamline efficiencies and meet sometimes unrealistic demands.
Not surprisingly, experts warn that rushing the
process is the single greatest problem plaguing decontamination.
"When you’re constantly working under a time crunch and are afraid
of being yelled at for not having instruments ready fast enough,
there can be a tendency to cut corners to speed up the process,"
noted Natalie Lind, CRCST, CHL, a sterile processing veteran who
now operates Lind Consulting Services, Ada, MN.
Gregg Agoston, manager, Protection 1 Services,
Karl Storz Endoscopy America, has seen those shortcomings
firsthand. He has witnessed "significant breaches in technique"
that can not only harm the instruments, but the patient as well.
Some facilities, he said, are so afraid of breaking delicate
instruments, such as scopes, that staff opts to simply wipe them
down – or even just rinse them with water — rather than properly
disinfect them. He’s also seen staff use saline, which can corrode
instruments, and harsh chemicals not approved for use on surgical
devices (such as floor cleaner). Such gaps in technique stem from
inadequate education and mounting pressure to increase
productivity – often with too few employees.
"I believe there’s too much focus on throughput
and less on quality," Agoston noted. "I’ve seen people cut corners
and I’ve seen processed instruments filled with dried blood. It
just goes back to that same point: You can’t sterilize what isn’t
clean."
The good news is there are ways to become more
efficient without compromising quality. Even better news is that
some of the most effective strategies are also the simplest and
least costly. First and foremost, sources agreed that effective
decontamination – and sterilization, for that matter – requires
ongoing interdepartmental training, and a hands-on manager who is
accessible to staff and keeps a finger on the pulse of the changes
and challenges impacting the department.
Equally important is keeping instruments moist to
prevent blood and body fluids from drying on them. "Instrument
cleaning really needs to begin at the point of use," said Rose
Seavey, R.N., MBA, CNOR, director of sterile processing at the
Children’s Hospital in Denver. "We want the instruments to already
be soaking before they enter the decontamination."
Rick Schultz, president and CEO of Stow, OH-based
Spectrum Surgical Instruments Corp., stressed that moisturizers
and enzymatics are highly effective, but added that even a simple
moist towel can get the job done.
"Using a [suitable] spray-on product or a surgical
towel with water on it in the O.R. is fundamental to helping the
decontamination process. And it hardly takes any time at all,"
Schultz said, acknowledging that the barrier to adopting the
practice is much less about time than lack of education on its
importance.
The O.R. isn’t the only department needing the
education, either. Instruments used in other areas, such Labor &
Delivery, can prove particularly challenging because they often
aren’t picked up and taken to decontam until many hours after the
procedure, Schultz pointed out.
"These instruments are often loaded with blood and
fluids. They should be treated just like surgical instruments."
Spectrum Surgical’s Spectra-Moist is a detergent-based, spray-on
moisturizer that keeps instruments moist for approximately four
hours. One 32-ounce bottle costs $10 and can take care of an O.R.
for up to two months, according to Schultz. "All it takes is a
couple sprays per tray."
Clean designs
Poor set-up and flow in the decontamination area
can also negatively impact outcomes. Many departments don’t have
enough sinks or floor space, for example, which makes managing and
maneuvering heavy instrument sets an almost impossible task.
"I can’t stress enough the importance of good flow
and design in the decontamination area. How is a person supposed
to handle a 30-pound instrument case if there’s no room to move
around and not enough sinks or workspace available?" asked Lind.
She added that good lighting is also critical for providing staff
with a better view of the instruments being cleaned.
Of course, having good, up-to-date equipment can
also go a long way in improving efficiencies in the
decontamination area. Today’s washer-decontaminators, for example,
have greater capacity, speedier processing times and multi-cycle
programming features to increase productivity and improve
outcomes. Still, even the most cutting-edge technology can’t
replace the need for effective cleaning products and accessories.
Lind said she’s seen some facilities using the same old brushes
that came with the instruments when they were first purchased.
Further compounding the problem is that many departments use the
wrong size brushes. "If they’re too big, they can damage the
instruments. If they’re too small, they won’t be able to properly
clean," she explained.
Having systems and controls in place that can make
employees more comfortable while in the decontamination area is
also important. The Children’s Hospital is in the process of
building a brand new facility that will allow the decontam area to
control humidity and temperature – and keep the controls separate
from the rest of the facility.
"We’ll have negative air flow with air piped in to
make [the area] more comfortable," explained Seavey. Ergonomic
issues have also been considered. The facility has a 20-pound
weight limit on instrument sets.
New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical
Center is also undergoing a departmental redesign – a positive
change that will allow the department to meet increasing surgical
volume. The department processes between 52,000 and 59,000 pieces
each quarter, and because the facility will be taking on
approximately 1,600 more cases this year, that volume will jump
even higher.
"I looked at the increasing volume and then our
space and knew there had to be a better way," said Lorraine Gatti,
R.N., director of O.R. Support Services for New
York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center. "Being in
Manhattan, though, space comes at a premium, so we have to make
the most out of the square footage. Everything will be streamlined
here." The redesign will feature seven washers and six
workstations with custom sinks that are 30 inches wide and extra
deep. Each station will have handheld compressed air and hot water
in a nozzle, along with a restaurant-style gooseneck sprayer. The
six workstations and seven washers will nearly double the
facility’s current capacity.
Specialized training
In light of increasingly complex instrumentation,
sources contend that it’s never been more important to build and
maintain productive relationships with device manufacturers to
determine the best method for managing devices.
"Not only are [these more complex devices] more
difficult to clean, there is also the challenge of knowing how
devices come apart – or even if they should come apart," Seavey
said.
Having access to manufacturer instructions, and of
course, following them to the letter, is the only way facilities
can be certain that their policies and practices are up to par.
Detailed inservicing on proper handling and care of
instrumentation is vital to the process and, according to Agoston,
should be offered at least several times per year. Aside from
that, he believes training on care and handling should be part of
every new O.R. and SPD employee’s orientation.
"If you have questions or concerns about how to
handle a device, or about the instructions themselves, contact
your vendor. I believe vendors also need to be actively involved
with the end user to help support them in the process," Agoston
said, adding that training should be multi-faceted. "Those in the
O.R. need to be taught that the way they handle instruments can
damage them and also impact efficiency down in processing. If
instruments aren’t properly handled, everyone loses."
Prime examples of improper handling include unsafe
packaging, stacking and transporting of instruments, and mixing of
sets. "I’ve seen expensive instruments teetering on top of other
sets, and I’ve seen them fall on the floor during transport. I
have to explain that dropping a scope and camera is equivalent to
driving a $20,000 car into a telephone pole," Agoston continued.
Some facilities are relying on specialized
training to help make the most of staff resources and bring
employees up to speed on the nuances of more sophisticated
equipment. In some cases, that means designating staff to certain
specialties and placing them more in an "instrument specialist"
role. Seavey’s department does just that. The department has
approximately 24 employees, ten of whom are considered "instrument
technicians," which is at a higher level on the employee ladder.
They are assigned to work in the instrument area and each one is a
liaison for a different specialty, such as orthopedics or
neurology.
"They work directly with the O.R. The nurse
service leader of that service goes to that particular instrument
tech with any changes or issues," Seavey said, adding that the
instrument tech is responsible for making the change and
communicating it to the rest of the department. "This works very
well for us, and the O.R. staff like knowing who to go to — and
that their changes will be made in a timely manner, as well as
communicated to the rest." Still, Seavey was quick to point out
that these liaisons’ instrument knowledge isn’t just limited to
their designated specialty. "They still have to learn other roles
of sterile processing, such as sterilization, decontam and case
cart picking."
At New York-Presbyterian, the Central Sterile
department is outfitted with a Minimally Invasive/Endoscopy
specialty area whereby Karl Storz-trained and -certified staff
members can carefully assess devices to ensure they’re in good
working order. "I’ve set up a light source so we can thoroughly
check instruments over before they are packaged and sterilized,"
Gatti noted. "That way, we can identify problems with instruments
early on and avoid having devices that don’t work properly from
making it into the O.R. and delaying cases."
Gatti acknowledges that her department’s hands-on,
comprehensive approach to instrument management appears to go
against the grain. While some facilities eagerly adopt processes
to reduce the steps involved in the instrument management process,
she believes her more detail-oriented approach is better for
ensuring quality.
"I believe that the more steps and checkpoints
there are in the process, the better the outcomes will be. If you
have a good, streamlined system in place, it can be done without
placing unnecessary burden on staff," she said.
Trading places
Because decontamination isn’t the most pleasant
environment, sources agreed on the importance of rotating staff
through the area, as opposed to having only certain people
managing the process 100% of the time.
Gatti’s approach? At the beginning of each shift,
every staff member goes into decontam to move instruments out more
quickly. This way, she explained, no one feels penalized, and
because "many hands make quick work," they can shorten the
duration spent in the decontam area. To further maximize staff
efficiency, Gatti advocates scheduling more employees during the
evening and night shifts, and fewer during the day.
"A lot of Central Sterile departments are chock
full of employees on the day shift, but then operate on a skeleton
crew when they really need it, which is in the later shifts," she
noted. "I do the opposite here. It’s about taking the time to
identify and understand the needs of the department – thinking
smart so you can work smart."
Gaining a better understanding of other
departments’ roles and unique challenges is another way to work
smarter. Seavey, a former O.R. nurse, knows that value firsthand
and has stayed committed to maintaining positive relations between
CS and the O.R. She has negotiated with the O.R. to send SPD staff
into the O.R. to observe cases and also encourages the O.R. to
send staff to her department for a week during orientation.
"I believe there’s value in walking a mile in each
other’s shoes."