Inside the Current Issue
 
Cover Story
2008 Materials Management Department
of the Year

Self Study Series

Newswire
Around the Nation
2008 Industry Guide
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us Home
Subscribe
Special Event Photos

Contact Us

KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2008

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

March 2007

CS Questions ● CS Answers

Connect with this month's featured Advertisers:


 

Questions can be sent to:jakridge@hpnonline.com
called in to Jeannie Akridge at HPN:(941) 927-9345 ext.202
or mailed to: HPN CS Questions, 50 So. Tamiami, Suite.10, Sarasota, FL 34231
Names and hospital identification will be withheld upon request.

Flushing scope lumens?
Timing of BI test cycle?

by Ray Taurasi

Q I work in a busy outpatient clinic where we do a high volume of en-doscopic procedures. All endoscopes are processed by hand and each tech is responsible to care for the scopes and equipment used in the rooms they are assigned to. I have noticed that not everyone uses compressed air or alcohol to flush the lumens. Some techs immediately take the scopes back to their rooms after the final rinse is completed. When I have confronted my colleagues about this some feel that if a scope is going to be reused during the shift it is not necessary to do the alcohol flush. What do you think is the best protocol to follow?

A Endoscope reprocessing is a multi-stepped process that renders a contaminated used endoscope safe for reuse on another patient. The steps include thorough cleaning, followed by complete immersion in a liquid chemical sterilant (LCS) or disinfectant for the prescribed period of time recommended by the chemical manufacturer to achieve high-level disinfection or liquid sterilization. After removal from the chemical soak, endoscopes, lumens and surfaces must be copiously rinsed with water to completely removal chemical residual.

Endoscopes must be carefully handled and stored. Endoscope drying can be easily, quickly, and inexpensively achieved by flushing the endoscope’s internal channels, and wiping its external surfaces, with 70–90% ethyl or isopropyl alcohol, to facilitate drying after reprocessing, followed by flushing with compressed air. Wetness or moisture left inside or on scopes can be a source of contamination creating a breeding field for microbes. The longer moisture remains in or on a scope the greater the likelihood for contamination as organisms multiply. The environment and storage condition can also impact the rate and degree of microbial growth. Drying of endoscopes may be as important to the prevention of nosocomial infection as is the cleaning and disinfection. Wet or inadequately dried endoscopes can pose an increased risk of contamination and have been associated with transmission of waterborne microorganisms and nosocomial infection. Properly cleaned, disinfected and thoroughly dried endoscopes have not been linked to nosocomial infection.

Not all healthcare facilities dry their endoscopes after reprocessing. Published guidelines and individual hospital policies vary. Some guidelines and policies recommend drying the endoscope after completion of every reprocessing cycle, both throughout the day and before storage, while others deemphasize the importance of routine drying and recommend endoscope drying only before storage. Instead of recommending endoscope drying before storage, some guidelines and hospital policies recommend reprocessing endoscopes before the first patient of the day. Endoscope manufacturers also are required to provide users with cleaning and reprocessing instructions. Regardless of what guidelines or manufacturers recommendations may indicate no harm can be done to endoscopes by drying after each cleaning process.

I am very much in favor of having a standardized procedure in place for the reprocessing and drying of all endoscopes which is followed by all personnel consistently throughout the day. The likelihood of error and the transmission of infectious agents are increased when processing protocols are varied allowing individuals to alter processing methods. Each and every patient deserves the same quality of service and care regardless of where their procedure may fall on the daily schedule. We know that moisture allowed to stand in scopes can provide a reservoir for bacteria and with the passage of time the bacteria will multiply; waterborne organisms and inadequately processed scopes have been linked to disease transmission between endoscopic procedures and patients. Properly processed endoscopes, which included thorough drying, with an alcohol flush, have never been linked to a nosocomial infection. In my opinion the best practice would therefore include the drying of all endoscopes by flushing scope lumen channels, (in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions) with 70–90% ethyl or isopropyl followed by compressed air.

Q I’ve been searching discussion forums regarding the delay time between the warm-up cycle and Biological Indicator (BI) test cycle and found nothing. We use 3M (Prepackaged) Rapid Readout BIs. What is the minimum time gap between the warm-up cycle and BI test cycle? Using the pre packed BIs, is it preferred to be tested together with a load or an empty cycle? Our procedure in the beginning of the day is as follows: (1) preheating the sterilizer using its empty cycle, (2) warm-up cycle with BI test follows.

A This is the procedure according to ANSI/AAMI ST79:2006 Comprehensive guide to steam sterilization and sterility assurance in health care facilities in a 270-275°F, dynamic-air-removal sterilizers that are ³ 2 cubic feet.

1. Run an empty cycle to warm up or preheat the sterilizer to operating temperature.

2. Run the Bowie-Dick test pack in an empty cycle, place on the bottom shelf over the drain if required.

3. Run the biological indicators process challenge device (PCD) in the first full load of the day, place on the bottom shelf over the drain.

In summary, only one warm up, empty cycle is required and that is a requirement for the Bowie-Dick testing. The biological indicator PCD can be run whenever you have your first full load.

Ray Taurasi is director of professional services for Case Medical Inc. Ridgefield, NJ. His healthcare career spans over three decades as an administrator, educator, technologist and consultant. He is a past president of IAHCSMM and has served on and contributed to many national committees with a myriad of professional organizations, manufacturers, corporations and prestigious healthcare networks. Taurasi has been a faculty member of numerous colleges teaching in the divisions of business administration and health sciences. In addition to this column he has authored several articles and has been a featured speaker on the international scene.