Inside the Current Issue
 
Cover Story
Knocking out resistant organisms

Self Study Series

Newswire
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us Home
Subscribe
Special Event Photos

Contact Us

KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2008

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

May 2007

Back Talk

Connect with this month's featured Advertisers:

AHRMM
Alco Sales & Service Co.
APIC
Armstrong Medical Industries
Artromick International Inc.
Ascent Healthcare Solutions
ASHCSP
BD Medical
Bernard Hodes Group
Boehringer Labs
Cardinal Health
ChemDAQ Corp
ConvaTec
Enthermics Medical Systems
Exergen Corp
Gebauer Company
Global Healthcare Exchange
Healthmark Industries
IMS
InnerSpace Corp.
IRSG
Kimberly Clark Professional
Lionville Systems Inc.
Masimo
Millennium Marking Co.
Olympus America Inc.
Premier Healthcare
Ruhof Corporation
SciCan
SterilMed, Inc.
STERIS
Stretchair
TekTone Sound & Signal
TSK Products, Inc.
Uni-med

Best practice: Contract management fundamentals

Automation, group purchasing no substitute for solid foundation

by David Kaczmarek, FAHRMM, CMRP

Automation continues to make the mechanics of the purchasing process easier. Use of group purchasing virtually eliminates involvement with commodity purchases. The purchasing function continues to evolve from a transactional, clerical function to one that focuses on adding value and driving down costs in more difficult areas. One of those areas where opportunity can be great is contracts. And the best performers are those materials management departments with a solid contract management process.

Not surprisingly, contract management starts with knowing what contracts you have. A large number of facilities fall out of the best practice group right here. Departments still sign and manage their own contracts without any coordination or even knowledge of the materials management department. Some hospitals have centralized the contracts but done so outside of materials. A case can be made for storing contracts in several other departments including administration, risk management, legal and finance.

Centralization outside of materials is better than not centralizing at all. But optimal outcomes will not result because these other departments will not, nor should they be expected to, actually manage the contracts. Only when the majority of
contracts are centralized in materials will contract management occur. If your organization insists on creating the centralized repository elsewhere, have an additional copy made for materials.

Managing the "paper" trail

Why have just the majority of contracts in materials instead of all? Because of the sensitive nature of some contracts, there are a couple of valid exceptions to the single storage point rule. Most organizations keep insurance and benefits contracts in the human resources office. They also keep physician services and sometimes consulting contracts in administration. Materials can still work with these departments to assist in managing them.

Actually collecting the contracts can be challenging. The first step should be publication of a policy on contract management. This should be a hospital-wide policy as described in a previous best practice. Upon publication, administration should also instruct all departments to provide copies of any current contracts to materials management. This should get many but probably not all of the contracts. The next likely source is accounts payable. Have them collect all invoices for monthly payments that are not supported by a purchase order. Check with the responsible department to see if there is a contract for the item. If the department is not aware, contract the supplier.

As you collect contracts you can take some immediate actions. Send a formal notice to each supplier to inform them of the following:

• No subsequent contracts will be valid unless signed by the Director, Materials Management;

• No modifications can be made to the current contract unless in writing and approved by the Director, Materials Management;

• No additional work or products can be provided under the contract except for those specifically included;

• If there is an evergreen clause, that is, a clause that automatically renews the contract unless the hospital gives notice of cancellation before the expiration date or some date before the expiration, give formal notice of cancellation. The notice can indicate that extension and/or renewal may still be pursued. The goal is to avoid unintended extension.

Further, if there are any terms or conditions that are especially onerous, you may consider requesting an immediate renegotiation of the contract.

Once all contracts are identified and resident in the materials department the management can begin. There are several contract management software programs available that are worth reviewing. Alternately, a simple spreadsheet can be created that includes the most important data elements for each contract. In addition to the obvious information like supplier name, product or service covered, etc., the key data elements are the expiration date and the decision date. This is usually the same date. If there is an evergreen clause, the decision date would be that date at which the contract will automatically renew. One other date should be entered. This is the date somewhat in advance of the expiration when work on the potential renewal should start.

True value begins to be added as the materials department initiates the contract renewal process well in advance of expiration dates. This allows adequate time to consider and research alternatives like different suppliers, bringing work in-house, changing scope of the contract, reducing or increasing products or services, etc. In the case of equipment service contracts, another viable option may be to go without a contract at all – just have service done on a time and materials basis. The process usually starts with notification to the user that the contract expiration is near. The user will indicate whether another contract is needed. If so, the user will meet with materials to review how well the current contract has gone, satisfaction with the work or products and other options. If it is a maintenance contract, you should review the number of service calls that were actually made and the cost that would have been incurred if the contract had not been in effect. Armed with this information decisions can be made regarding the best way to proceed.

David Kaczmarek, FAHRMM, CMRP, is principal of Healthcare Supply Chain Solutions, Derry, NH. He can be reached via e-mail at mmexec@verizon.net.