Inside the Current Issue
 
Cover Story
2008 Materials Management Department
of the Year

Self Study Series

Newswire
Around the Nation
2008 Industry Guide
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us Home
Subscribe
Special Event Photos

Contact Us

KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2008

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

January 2008

What Works

Connect with this month's featured Advertisers:

 

THE HOSPITAL

St. Lucie Medical Center,
Port St. Lucie, FL

The Problem

Providing additional staffing and instrument resources to increase efficiency and case volume in minimally invasive surgeries.

The Solution

Contracted to add dedicated technicians and additional instrumentation to assist with Minimally Invasive Surgery Support

The Vendor

IMS, the InstrumentReady Company

Partnering for case volume increase in minimally invasive surgery

Like most modern hospitals, St. Lucie Medical Center (SLMC) focuses on minimally invasive surgery procedures for the
advantages they offer to patients and hospital efficiency. And like most hospitals, St. Lucie faces common challenges such as competition for surgeons, capital equipment needs, and high demands on OR personnel. St. Lucie Medical Center discovered a unique solution to address all of these issues by partnering with IMS for minimally invasive surgery support.

Terri Benedict, director of surgical services at St. Lucie, says contracting with IMS brings a dedicated technician into the OR to remove instrument and equipment worries from the nursing staff. "Nurses are inundated with new technology, and this service helps free them up to focus on the patient and increase efficiencies around patient safety," said Benedict. "Minimally invasive and laparoscopic technology can be difficult, with video towers, printers, color balance, etc. It’s a challenge that is well served by an expert in these systems, and it takes one piece of that diversification away from the OR nurse. They don’t have to be electricians and AV experts."

With nurses free to focus on patient care and IMS personnel making sure instruments and equipment are ready for each procedure, surgeon satisfaction has improved significantly. Said Benedict, "I believe our case volumes have grown because surgeons like having that support. I’ve heard surgeons say if they have a choice, they come here. It’s an added value in the surgeon’s mind."

The combination of improved staff efficiency and surgeon satisfaction has led to more minimally invasive cases at St. Lucie. The agreement stipulated that case volume would increase to a minimum of 50 cases per month. In 2006, case volume averaged 54 cases per month, and this upward trend has continued with an average of 63 cases per month for the first 10 months of 2007.

A certified IMS surgical technologist conducts the pre-case set up for a minimally invasive procedure. Surgical technologists are also responsible for on-site intra-operative assistance, post case turnover, technical support, and trouble-shooting for instrumentation and video equipment.

Benedict says the fee-per-procedure structure of the partnership has worked very well for the hospital. "The initial goals were set at realistic improvement levels. This means the hospital isn’t paying for the service on procedures that aren’t done. We looked at our volumes and projected forward, and set the minimum number of cases that we would be charged for at 50 per month. If we are doing more than the minimum, St. Lucie and IMS both succeed." According to Bragg, VanBalen, and Cook, "One additional procedure per day can generate $4 - $7 million of revenue in an average sized facility (i.e., 250 beds) in one year,"1 obviously a significant financial benefit to the hospital.

The IMS program also provides hospitals with savings on capital equipment purchases. Because IMS provides the instrumentation under a lease agreement, the inventory is kept current and sufficient to meet procedure demand. "We have to spend a lot of capital on technology and equipment," said Benedict. "The instruments are provided by IMS and they care for them, so we don’t have to replace instruments and use our capital. IMS brought in extra sets and lenses, and even provided a safe laparascopic cautery device (active electrode monitoring technology) to eliminate arcing, as an added value to the service. We don’t have to worry about instrument replacement and loss."

St. Lucie Medical Center entered into the agreement due to an established track record with IMS. "They had proven to be a good partner and very trustworthy at every level," says Benedict, "but we had to believe that we would achieve greater efficiencies and more throughput in the OR." That proof came through the elements of the program. "Their assistance with pre-case setup and post-case turnover really provides an extra FTE in the room. The technicians are on call 24/7, and that helps our circulator, especially after hours. I don’t hesitate to call in another person for tough weekend cases, but with IMS I don’t have to, and those are hard dollars you can quantify."

Benedict also says it’s important that the integration of outside personnel into the OR go smoothly. "IMS holds its reps to high standards, and they are expected to come in and be assimilated without taking over a room. By assembling equipment before the case, it takes workload off of us. They keep preference cards for physicians and are also helpful in cutting down on use of disposables, such as disposable trocars. Their technicians are integrated to the point of being part of our process improvement plan and are very active in all of our quality indicators for surgery and reporting. They are also active in teaching and providing inservices for staff."

Of course, the most important goal in any OR is patient safety. Benedict believes the addition of IMS support furthers that overriding concern. "Their technicians perform the safety checks on all of the instrumentation," she said, "and having qualified personnel available 24/7 allows our staff to place concentration where it belongs: on the patient. We view IMS as a true partner to increase efficiencies and maintain great patient outcomes."

Reference:

1. Bragg K., VanBalen N, Cook N; Future Trends in minimally invasive surgery (Home Study Program), AORN Journal, 82(6), 2005, pp. 1005-1018.