Inside the Current Issue
 
Cover Story
Unleashing the potential of RFID, RTLS

Self Study Series

Newswire
Around the Nation
2008 Industry Guide
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us Home
Subscribe
Special Event Photos

Contact Us

KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2008

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

February 2008

CS Solutions

Connect with this month's featured Advertisers:

Amerinet
Applied Logic, Inc.
Arrow International
BD Diagnostics
Boehringer Labs
ChemDAQ Corp.
Coverall Cleaning Concepts
Enturia
Exergen Corp.
HealthTrust
Purchasing Group
Hill-Rom
IAHCSMM
InnerSpace Corp.
Metrex Medical Corp.
Olympus America Inc.
Premier Healthcare 
Rice Lake
Weighing Systems
Ruhof Corporation
Skytron
Spectrum Surgical 
Instruments Corp.
Strategic Value Analysis
Stryker Instruments
Sunnex Medical
SYMX
TSK Products Inc.
Uni-med
VHA
 

Questions can be sent to:jakridge@hpnonline.com
called in to Jeannie Akridge at HPN:(941) 927-9345 ext.202 or mailed to:
HPN CS Questions, 2477 Stickney Point Road, Suite 315B, Sarasota, FL 34231
Names and hospital identification will be withheld upon request.

Security locks; degassing ultra sonic washers; containers for pre vac flash

by Ray Taurasi

Q At our staff meeting we were discussing an issue that came up at a recent CS Forum regarding replacing damaged or missing security locks on sterilization containers. We have always maintained a supply of sterilized locks for this purpose. The practice is only allowed if the container has not been opened and only if just one lock is broken or missing. We have done this for a long time without any negative outcomes. Many of my staff claims they also did this at other hospitals. I was surprised to hear several folks at the forum say this is not an acceptable practice. How do you weigh in?

A I would have to agree that this is a totally unacceptable and very dangerous practice. And here’s why:

1. These locks are called "tamper evident" locks for a reason: When a lock is damaged or missing you cannot guarantee that the sterile integrity of the container contents has not been compromised or violated.

2. A missing or damaged lock is a red flag that something is faulty and that the container may have been tampered with.

3. You should never pre-sterilize open security locks for future use…this may lead to inappropriate use and lead to a mix up of unsterile and sterile goods.

4. You should immediately stop this practice and dispose of all pre-sterilized security locks.

5. If you have frequent reoccurrences of damaged and/or missing locks you need to find the cause and resolve the problem (whether it be a product or staff performance issue).

6. This practice is a definite breech in technique and the continuation will lead to other inferior practices and complacency on behalf of your staff.

I observed this practice at a hospital where I was consulting once – the practice evolved into techs actually opening sterilized containers and adding missing instruments back into sets and then placing a pre-sterilized lock back onto the container. My point here is that one bad practice can lead to others. The business of sterile processing is a serious and exacting practice. There are absolutely no short cuts to doing things right! If a container is missing a lock or a lock is damaged following sterilization, you must breakdown and reprocess the set. Doing things right may not always be the fastest or easiest thing to do, however as CS practitioners we have an obligation to protect the patient’s safety and welfare and that requires a commitment to service excellence and doing the right thing at the right time – ALL THE TIME! To quote my mentor and good friend Dr. Bertha Litsky, "an unsterile item used in surgery is as dangerous as a loaded gun." If you are in doubt about the sterile integrity on a package and allow questionable products to be used in patient care it’s like putting a loaded gun to a patient’s head.

Q I am embarrassed to admit that as a seasoned CS manager I have just recently heard about degassing of the sonic washer. I really don’t understand what this is, why it’s so important, how it is accomplished and how frequently it must be done.

A First and foremost there is no need to be embarrassed. You can be sure there are many others who, like you, have not heard about degassing or understand the process. By asking the question, other readers will also glean new information. Degassing the ultra sonic bath is an essential step to be done before processing any instruments in the ultra sonic. It should be done each time the ultra sonic is filled. Dissolved air bubbles are present in water and cleaning solutions; this entrapped air can inhibit and interfere with the efficiency and effectiveness of the cavitation energy and action required for proper cleaning. Degassing will disperse and release these dissolved air bubbles. The Degassing process is done after the cleaning agent detergents or enzymatic solutions are added to the water bath. While the amount of time required to complete the degassing process may vary depending on the type of chemical agents used, water quality, tank capacity, and temperature, generally the process can be completed by running one cycle without any instruments in the water tank. For more specific detailed instructions you should consult with the manufacturer of your particular equipment; they will provide you written instructions which you in turn can incorporate into your procedure manual.

Q I work at an Ambulatory Surgery Center. We do several procedures a day, our pace is quick and our scheduling is tight. All of our sets require a fast turn around. We do not compromise the decontamination process at all – every instrument goes through proper cleaning, automated washing, thermal disinfection and inspection during set assembly. We do however run all sets through pre vacuum flash sterilization utilizing standard sterilization containers. Recently another container sales representative has gone to the OR director stating we are improperly sterilizing sets by using these containers and that we need to purchase Sealed Flash Sterilization container with valves which his company sells. Why would I need a special container for flashing in a pre vac sterilizer?

A There has been lots of confusion on this topic – most flash processes are done by using a gravity cycle; some OR flash sterilizers have the capability of running either gravity or pre vac. In such cases some cycles might be programmed for gravity and others for pre vac. By pressing a button a cycle may be changed so it is critical that sterilizer operators be knowledgeable and certain about the cycle they are using. Gravity cycles will require a containment device that is designed and validated for use in gravity cycles. That said, if a pre vac cycle is run the sterilization parameters in flash are the same as they are in a terminal conventional pre vac cycle except that the dry phase is eliminated or abridged. Therefore any containment device with FDA 510k clearance and validated for use in pre vac cycles are acceptable for use in a pre vac flash cycle. It is important that you obtain and follow the manufacturer’s instructions for use and that you verify the container’s performance in your sterilizer and in each cycle.


Ray Taurasi is Eastern Regional Director of Clinical Sales and Services for Healthmark Industries. His healthcare career spans over three decades as an Administrator, Educator, Technologist and Consultant.He is a member of AORN, ASHCSP, AAMI and a past president of IAHCSMM and has served on and contributed to many national committees with a myriad of professional organizations, manufacturers, corporations and prestigious healthcare networks. Taurasi has been a faculty member of numerous colleges teaching in the divisions of business administration and health sciences. In addition to this column he has authored several articles and has been a featured speaker on the international scene.