Inside the Current Issue
 
Cover Story
2008 Materials Management Department
of the Year

Self Study Series

Newswire
Around the Nation
2008 Industry Guide
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us Home
Subscribe
Special Event Photos

Contact Us

KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2008

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

February 2008

People & Opinions

Worth Repeating

"If there are limitations to the [lighting system] today that you can identify, just let a year or two go by and see how much more magnified those immediate limitations are now becoming."

Randy Tomaszewski
vice president of marketing, Skytron

"Our ICPs started monitoring results of the rapid MRSA tests, that is, how many tests were run compared to how many results were positive. We started tracking the dollars associated with being able to take a patient out of isolation earlier. At $500 saved per day, we saved $170,000 in the first month by taking patients out of isolation that didn’t need to be there."

Jackie Whitaker, RN, MS, CIC,
infection control director
University Community Hospital

"When you think about it, instrument tracking is really the least of the issues facing CS. It’s less about the instruments themselves and more about what staff is doing with those instruments that matter most. That’s why the solutions they [adopt] need to offer so much more."

Michael Mancebo, CRCST, director of sales, TGX Medical Systems LLC

"Physicians are above all scientists and they want to see the business case. Second, they are clinicians who want to understand the clinical impact. So if a materials manager approaches a physician and simply says they have a new contract to save money on physician preference items, the doctor typically will not give them the time of day."

Dee Donatelli, vice president of supply chain services, VHA Inc.

"Asset recovery and asset delivery, and having the asset in the right place at the right time, are essential to improving asset management and reducing cost while improving service levels."

Peter Seiff, vice president,
customer solutions, Aethon Inc.

Connect with this month's featured Advertisers:

Amerinet
Applied Logic, Inc.
Arrow International
BD Diagnostics
Boehringer Labs
ChemDAQ Corp.
Coverall Cleaning Concepts
Enturia
Exergen Corp.
HealthTrust
Purchasing Group
Hill-Rom
IAHCSMM
InnerSpace Corp.
Metrex Medical Corp.
Olympus America Inc.
Premier Healthcare 
Rice Lake
Weighing Systems
Ruhof Corporation
Skytron
Spectrum Surgical 
Instruments Corp.
Strategic Value Analysis
Stryker Instruments
Sunnex Medical
SYMX
TSK Products Inc.
Uni-med
VHA
 
RFID tags and healthcare supply chain management

by Jerry D. VanVactor, MHM, CMRP

In today’s techno-savvy marketplace, the idea seems odd that industry leaders would still be searching for best alternatives for process improvements and data sharing among vested stakeholders. More impressive still is that with so many options available healthcare organizations still seem to be searching for a place to begin. Fragmented as it is, in many cases, how can healthcare organizational leaders within multi-faceted institutions develop best business practices through the enhancement of existing opportunities to optimize supply chain management and reduce ancillary costs associated with the effective management of materiel? Radio frequency identification (RFID) technology may be an appropriate start point for such an answer.

What is RFID technology?

Radio frequency identification (RFID) tags are microchips that replace traditional barcode labels on devices as they are being shipped, moved, or used throughout organizations. Once embedded in a device, piece of equipment, or shipping label, an item can be tracked, potentially, from a point-of-origin through an end-users’ distribution (cradle to grave per se). Some of the tags being used presently are not only passive latent devices, but can be used to store and be programmed to transmit data throughout movement from one location to another. In many cases, managers believe RFID tags to be merely a static device used for in-transit visibility (ITV) during transnational or transoceanic shipment of goods. This, however, does not capture the full range of capabilities for which RFID tags can and should be used. If the information available through RFID technology is used appropriately and is managed effectively and efficiently, it could result in greater benefits to multiple supply chain partners resulting in enhanced efficiency, increased speed to shelf of products, significant cost savings opportunities, and enhanced customer satisfaction.1

Benefits

RFID technology can be beneficial in a number of ways. The device, once embedded into a process can assist materiel managers in the tracking of shipments and the movement of goods in storage. The information associated with the RFID tag attached to a device creates an overlay of databases that are shared among multiple users and organizations. This overlap of information opens operational information to multiple partners and can be viewed by many interested stakeholders. In this sense, many opponents to RFID implementation see this as a limiting factor of RFID technology while advocates see it as an enhancement to ongoing practices and processes.2

The implementation of RFID technology increases visibility of assets across a broad spectrum of supply chain operations and can be used to assist in the development of more accurate re-order objectives, re-order points, and PAR (periodic automatic replenishment) levels. Additionally, RFID technology can aid in identifying lost goods due to inefficient property management accounting processes. In this respect, RFID technology reduces overall lost revenue resultant of mismanaged supply chain practices.6

Financial ramifications

No matter how integrated information management systems become there will be unexpected applications or systems that need to share information or problematic messaging or file types.10 This must be worked around, but the return on investment far outweighs the cost of doing business in this regard. Usability, as defined by Ng, Sim, Tan, and Wong11, involves "devices that do not affect the appearance and function of the user" (p. 134). RFID permits this and permits cost savings potential for healthcare organizations regardless of size and function.

In a futuristic context, integrating wireless technology solutions into healthcare supply chain management may become a requirement, not just a differentiator, for efficient healthcare delivery.11 Healthcare supply chain expenditures account for approximately 40% of a hospital organization’s costs.3 Typical shortfalls in a healthcare organization’s processes is a lack of standardization, delays in implementing automation technology, and a lack of high quality data on which to base strategic decisions.

Data synchronization provides organizations with the opportunity to save both time and money. Reports indicate, according to Garvin9, that through data synchronization organizations can see increased sales, product availability, enhanced velocity management, productivity and maintenance, and reduced ancillary costs associated with the management of a supply chain. Tools that enhance synchronicity and the contiguous flow of goods and services provide consistency in information and bring the information, often, right to the user’s desktop.

Synchronizing data is a two-step process that can result in tremendous value to a healthcare organization and RFID technology provides a large portion of the data associated with the visibility required for asset management. Step 1 involves acquiring a system for "in-house ordering".9 The reason for this process is the insurance that information in the organization’s internal supply pipeline, ordering processes, and billing procedures is consistent throughout the organization. Step 2 involves a data repository development wherein all information is centrally stored, synchronized, audited, verified, and distributed to stakeholders throughout an organization’s supply chain.9

Best practices align with internal and external stakeholders to improve product flow, services, information, and monies across a wide spectrum of multi-directional supply lines. RFID technology represents a strategic solution to an ongoing problem. The employment of strategic supply chain management requires a paradigm shift in philosophy and organizational attitude. The shift needs to be away from an isolated departmental perspective that orients the focus toward suppliers in one respect and revenue in another. Supply chain managers and professionals must assist organizational leaders in developing more service-line perspectives that focus on the lines of communication and supply chain as a critical component of cost, revenue, and profit margin centers.3

Supply chain management in other industries, like grocers and other types of retailers, is more successful than healthcare organizations in managing asset visibility.5 Retailers know exactly what products they have, how many units of each product they have used and how many items have been processed, sold, and are in the supply lines or need to be re-ordered. Much of this is due to the implementation of RFID technology. "A traditional material management team using a task-driven, transaction processing, stock and inventory management system cannot effectively stem the cash leakage" resulting from inefficient supply chain management practices.3 Healthcare leaders may need to refocus perspective on touch points between the patient, caregiver, and supply line with an understood goal of data synchronization, consolidation, or elimination of superfluous data as needed up- and downstream. Automating this process through the implementation of RFID technology will generate definite gains in productivity and workflow.4 Most of the economic threat to healthcare organizations, according to Hermann8, stems from automation asymmetry – one party knowing more information than another does.

Ethical issues

Wireless and mobile device technologies may continue to revolutionize healthcare over the next few decades. Successful merchandizing and retailing of goods and services requires accurate, complete, and consistent information related to products. The use of RFID technology permits organizations better opportunities to monitor the disposition of products including in- and out-flow from storage facilities as well as tracking and monitoring devices used for specific needs.6 This total asset visibility capability is developed through passive identification systems attached to products, goods, and device service tags and may be invisible to an uninformed eye. RFID readers, called interrogators, collect data from those devices on a continual basis and captures information beginning at a point-of-origin to the end user of an item providing near real-time information to whomever is recording the data.

Limitations and delimitations

The implementation of technology should support an overall business plan to include financial, clinical, and administrative initiatives.10 Planning strategically is an important aspect of new technology implementation and must be tied to an organization’s strategic vision. "Organizations must consider incremental progress toward realizing their vision and introducing technology that allows them to take meaningful steps toward goals while accounting for cost restrictions, resource knowledge, and legacy capabilities".10

A perceived disadvantage to the implementation of RFID technology is a further fragmentation of healthcare sectors.1 In June 2006, the FDA stated "that it considered RFID to be the most promising technology for electronically tracking and documenting the chain of custody" of goods and services.7 With the right strategies and technology solutions in place, hospitals and other types of healthcare organizations could greatly reduce incidence of medical errors and improve overall patient safety and supply chain efficiency. If none of those organizations understands, communicates, or maximizes these successes, however, the lessons learned become mere lessons observed and the associated data goes toward no further development of a common good. For example, according to Hartman7, the cost savings per provider could be significant with the implementation of RFID technology. With each elimination of a medication error, an organization could realize $2,000 in cost avoidance. Additionally, a 25% increase in the reduction of errors at bedside point-of-care related to improved data synchronization.7 This, however, highlights one of many misunderstandings related to RFID implementation in that the healthcare industry associates internal automation advancements only with the enhancement of patient care. "Software solutions for the healthcare industry frequently focuses on enhancing the quality of patient care" but fails to realize opportunities for boosting the organization’s revenue cycle.10

Conclusion

Far too many senior healthcare leaders do not place enough emphasis on savings associated with effective supply chain management when it is one of the largest expenditures in a healthcare organization.3 Pertinent data should be made available to multiple consumers via low-cost technology platforms such as RFID tags. Interrogators can be placed, easily, in door frames, ceilings, and nursing stations to automatically and directly read RFID information to eliminate much of the manual entry errors associated with supply chain practices. This relates directly to the technology enhancements of ongoing practices by (1) not requiring direct contact or line-of-sight scanning, (2) improving/enhancing stored data, and (3) enhancing asset visibility resulting in lower lost goods reporting when equipment or supplies cannot be found. In this respect, RFID technology is commonly seen as an alternative or complement to traditional bar coding – a common practice in many organizations.10

As organizations progress into the future, supply chain IT may focus on ease-of-use, flexibility, and portability rather than on high-tech devices and gadgetry.4 As these strategies are developed organizations will need to re-look some of the strategic implications associated with implementation and inculcation. "Research directed toward the development of technical solutions to fulfill these requirements will underpin the practicable, versatile, universal, and unfettered use of telemedicine" tools and devices.11

Jerry D. VanVactor, MHM, CMRP is Healthcare Logistics Officer, Medical Service Corps for the U.S. Army, Europe.

References

1. Anonymous. (2004, September). RFID: good or bad. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53, (5/6), 565. Retrieved on September 2, 2007, from the ProQuest database.

2. Anonymous. (2004, October). Technology-supported health care. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53, (7), 648. Retrieved on September 2, 2007, from the ProQuest database.

3. Ballard, R. (2005, April). Strategic supply cost management: physician preference without deference. Healthcare Financial Management, 59, (4), 78-84. Retrieved on July 14, 2007, from the ProQuest database.

4. Barlow, R. D. (2007, July). Debugging supply chain IT hurdles: High-tech developments encourage low-tech processes. Healthcare Purchasing News, 31, (7), 58-62.

5. Burt, T. (2006, Jan/Feb). Seeing the future: Innovative supply chain management strategies. Healthcare Executive, 21, (1), 16-21.

6. Endicott, C. (2007, August). Managing inventory with RFID yields financial and operational benefits. Healthcare Purchasing News, 31, (8), 54-55. Retrieved on September 2, 2007, from the ProQuest database.

7. Hartman, L. R. (2006, August). Printers offer positive patient identification. Packaging Digest, 43, (8), 50-52. Retrieved on September 2, 2007, from the ProQuest database.

8. Hermann, D. (2007, July). Searching for supply chain sentries to prevent bottom line attacks. Healthcare Purchasing News, 31, (7), 80.

9. Garvin, K. (2006, May). The time is right for the healthcare supply chain to reap the benefits of data synchronization. Healthcare Purchasing News, 30, (5), 48-49. Retrieved on July 28, 2007, from the ProQuest database.

10. Mayer, M. (2007, August). Coping with connectivity. Healthcare Financial Management, 61, (8), 84-88. Retrieved on September 2, 2007, from the ProQuest database.

11. Ng, H. S., Sim, M. L., Tan, C. M., & Wong, C. C. (2006, April). Wireless technologies for telemedicine. BT Technology Journal, 24, (2), 130-137. Retrieved on September 2, 2007, from the ProQuest database.