Are you throwing out good instruments?
by Anne Reed, vice president, Mobile Instrument
Service & Repair
Hospitals nationwide are discarding thousands of
dollars worth of good reusable instruments annually. An old rule of
thumb still prevails in the minds of buyers: If the repair cost of an
item exceeds a minimum of 50 to 70% of its replacement cost, then it’s
smarter to buy a new one. Old habits die hard. Because of enhanced
technologies in the repair industry and greater access to replacement
parts, much of their equipment does not need to be replaced.
Minimally invasive instruments
Endoscopic instruments for use in Urology,
Arthroscopy, Laparoscopy, Gynecology, Bronchoscopy, ENT, and General
Surgery are among the most costly in inventory, and by their very
design, inherently easy to damage. There are more moving parts that
are likely to break than in most instruments, and far more materials
that are subject to disintegration.
Because most MIS instruments are made up of a number
of replaceable components, the potential for preserving them is
practically infinite. Though repair costs sometimes seem high when
compared to the cost of general instrumentation repair, MIS
instruments are categorically more complex, and repairs require a
higher degree of skill and expertise. The reward in decreased capital
expenditures will be noticeable.
• Deflecting bridges retail for as much as $1,500, and
new working elements cost between $1,200-$2,800, yet they can be
repaired for an average of $100-$500, including parts.
• Similar savings of up to 90% of the replacement cost
are realizable on the full line of MIS instruments including forceps,
scissors, graspers, punches, trocars, cannulas, sheaths, bipolar tubal
forceps, retractors, obturators, hooks, spatulas, probes, etc.
• When sinuscopy instruments become stiff and dull,
and won’t perform like new, the most common reaction has been to
replace the entire tray at a cost of about $15,000. A qualified repair
provider would give the hospital the same result - functionally new
instruments with the same expected life span - at about $2,000, an 86%
savings.
Rigid endoscopes
The rigid endoscope, one of the most fragile and
sophisticated instruments in the operating room, is subject to more
frequent damage than most other equipment because of its delicate lens
system.
• Most damage results from fluid invasions or trauma
to the internal optics system. Approximately 90% of these parts can be
replaced at a charge far less than expensive repair/exchange options.
• To capitalize on the potential efficiency of an
original investment in the endoscope, the hospital or surgery center
is economically better served to repair it until it has sustained
damage genuinely beyond repair or has become technically obsolete.
• Even a scope that is broken in half can be repaired
to a like-new condition at a cost of up to 60% less than a
replacement.
Flexible scopes
Like rigid endoscopes, with today’s enhanced repair
technologies, there is very little that cannot be repaired on a
flexible unit. Most working elements can be replaced for significant
savings.
Power equipment
Most of the power equipment no longer serviced by the
OEM can effectively be made fully functioning by a competent repair
source at a fraction of its replacement cost.
• The replacement of some power hand pieces also
necessitates the purchase of all new support components like cords,
consoles, and attachments – if there’s no real technical gain in the
newer system, then repairing the broken hand piece is wise.
• The vigilant buyer will seek second opinions for the
repair of motor drives, attachments, burr guards, duraguards,
instrument power cords, shavers, etc. to help curb capital
expenditures.
• Even some battery packs can now be refurbished.
• Preventable factors contributing to power equipment
failure, such as over/under lubrication, immersion, etc., are often
identified during the repair analysis, and armed with this information
the facility can take steps to troubleshoot the abuse to help reduce
repair frequency.
General instrumentation
General instruments, the workhorses of the operating
room, need routine care and maintenance to ensure their stamina.
Regular sharpening and alignment will not only ensure optimum surgical
effectiveness, it will also keep them functioning. While users can
expect a long life, there will ultimately come a time when most
general instruments should be retired:
• Cracked box locks on ring-handled instruments
prevent the jaws or tips from aligning properly.
• Needleholders have an indefinite life span because
the tungsten carbide inserts can be replaced repeatedly, however, if
the jays are stressed, or the metal becomes too pitted, replacement is
recommended.
• Instruments with a cutting edge or shearing action
can be sharpened over and over until the blades no longer have enough
surface to overlap properly. To prevent premature replacement, only
experienced repair technicians should sharpen instruments so they
don’t remove more of the edge than necessary.
• Despite their durability, most general surgical
instruments will eventually succumb to the stress of metal fatigue
caused by user abuse or the repeated assault of corrosive chemicals,
but it’s important not to reject them based on cosmetic value alone.
Sometimes replacement is the intelligent choice
There is a time when an instrument should be replaced
and a reputable repair company will always give this advice. For
example, older laparoscopy forceps could not be dissembled for
cleaning. Sterility measures encourage the use of the newer style
which can be taken apart, therefore, replacement should be considered.
Some manufacturers have upgraded older standard sterilizable scopes to
newer models that are fully autoclavable. Given current sterility
issues and anticipated sterility mandates, this could be a good
opportunity to upgrade and take advantage of available trade-in
allowances or rebates when these break down. Technical improvements
have also been made in video endoscopes, so when there is CCD chip
damage, one might consider upgrading.
Many instruments, if not processed correctly, will
corrode over a period of time. Once the metal deteriorates and
functional integrity has been compromised, then replacement becomes
necessary.
Ultimately, buyers should understand that a surgical
tool is only the sum of its parts – carbide inserts, ratchets, jaws,
inner cables, lenses, fiberglass-ceramic tips, etc. As long as these
parts can be changed out, then the instrument can be reborn with a
renewed life expectancy equal to that of a replacement. A solid
preventive maintenance program, combined with sterile processing
procedures that don’t violate the instrument, will contribute greatly
to the preservation of these valuable assets.
|