|
INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE |
May 2008 |
Operating Room |
Outpatient Connection |
Dramatic rise
in hepatitis C-related deaths in the U.S.
Hepatitis C-related deaths in the United States increased by 123
percent from 1995 through 2004, the most recent year for which data
are available. Mortality rates peaked in 2002, then declined slightly
overall, while continuing to rise among people 55 to 64 years old.
These findings appear in the April issue of Hepatology, a
journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD).
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common blood-borne infection in
the United States, affecting about 1.3 percent of the population. Up
to one-in-five sufferers develop liver cirrhosis, and up to one-in-20
develop liver cancer. HCV is the top reason for liver transplantation,
and the 16th leading cause of premature death in the country. Recent
evidence has suggested that disease burden and mortality from chronic
HCV infection may increase in the coming years, as the number of
persons with longstanding infections continues to rise.
To update estimates of trends and demographics of hepatitis
C-related mortality in the U.S., a team of researchers led by Matthew
Wise of UCLA and including researchers from the CDC and the Los
Angeles County Department of Public Health analyzed mortality rates
derived from U.S. Census and multiple-cause-of-death data from
1995-2004.
During the study period, HCV-related mortality rates increased from
1.09 deaths per 100,000 persons in 1995 to 2.57 per 100,000 in 2002,
before declining slightly to 2.44 per 100,000 in 2004. Average annual
increases were smaller during 2000-2004 than 1995-1999. The most
dramatic age-specific increases were observed among 45 to 54 year olds
who had an increase of 376 percent, and 55 to 64 year olds who had an
increase of 188 percent. For the latter group, rates rose for the
entire duration of the study. "The highest mortality rates were
observed among males, persons aged 45-54 and 55-64 years, Hispanics,
non-Hispanic blacks and non-Hispanic Native American/ Alaska Natives,"
the authors report.
The observed increases likely reflect both true increases in
mortality and the growing use of serologic tests for HCV, the authors
say. "The relatively young age of persons dying from hepatitis
C-related liver disease has made hepatitis C-related disease
a leading infectious cause of years of potential life lost as well as
an important cause of premature mortality overall." They point out the
ongoing need for measures to prevent progression of liver disease
among those infected with HCV, and the need for ongoing analysis of
mortality trends. |
|
Fanning the flames of surgical fire prevention
by
Susan Cantrell, ELS
S hout "Fire!" and it’s sure to grab the
attention of everyone in hearing distance. Maybe the last place you’d want
to hear that is as you’re sailing into LaLa Land while a surgeon hovers over
you wielding an electrosurgical tool close to your tender parts. It’s a
scary—make that terrifying—thought, but unfortunately it does happen.
Possible but not probable
Mark Bruley, vice president, accident and forensic investigation,
ECRI
Institute, Plymouth Meeting, PA, told Healthcare Purchasing News that
fire in the operating room (OR) is one of three "never" events, the other
two being wrong-site surgery and leaving an instrument in the patient.
Obviously these are things that can be prevented and so should n-e-v-e-r
happen to a patient. These are the sorts of incidents for which Medicare
will soon discontinue reimbursing.
Fortunately, surgical fires don’t happen as often as you might think.
Bruley noted that figures published in September 2007 by the Pennsylvania
Patient Safety Reporting System cite the chance of a surgical fire in
Pennsylvania as being 1 in 87,646 operations, with an average of 28 per
year. Extrapolating those numbers to the entire United States, the number of
fires occurring nationally ranges from 550 to 650. That’s not good, but it’s
not much when balanced against the 50 million inpatient and outpatient
surgeries performed each year nationally. Even better news is that 80% to
90% of the fires are minor, resulting in no injury. In only 10 to 20 cases
per year are victims of surgical fires seriously burned or disfigured.
That’s seldom enough to deem surgical fires as being rare, claimed Bruley.
Are surgical fires on the rise, or are we just hearing about them more?
Roger Odell, co-founder, chairman, and director of
Encision Inc, Boulder,
CO, believes there really is no way to know the answer. "Only 1% to 2% of
complications, including death, are reported to the FDA. The data base is
flawed." Melissa K. Fischer, RN, BSN, CNOR, clinical specialist,
Megadyne
Medical Products, Draper, UT, added: "Statistics do not demonstrate that OR
fires are on the rise, but there is more awareness of the problem and better
reporting of smaller incidents."
On the rise or not, fire in the OR is definitely getting more attention,
according to Bruley. "Increased attention to surgical fires started in 1999
with the release of the Institute of Medicine study on medical errors, ‘To
Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System.’ I think fewer fires are
happening now, but they’re getting more attention because it’s more
culturally acceptable to talk about medical error now."
Where to turn for help
|
Encision Inc.’s Active Electrode Monitoring |
It seems reasonable to assume that staff are surgical-fire savvy, but
often that’s not the case. Bruley pointed out that educating clinical staff
on the risk of surgical fire is critical, because it’s not something that’s
usually addressed in most surgery or anesthesia residency programs. O’Dell
added: "Education amongst all disciplines—anesthesia personnel,
perioperative nurses, and surgeons—is needed. Policies, protocols, and
procedures must be in place for preventing surgical burns. Energy sources
are not the root cause. Oxygen-enriched atmosphere or flammable liquids that
are not allowed to dry are two of the most common causes of OR fires."
Fortunately, there are some excellent resources for which to turn for
help. The bank of literature on surgical fires is growing, in large part due
to ECRI Institute’s efforts. ECRI alone has published over 50 articles on
the subject, both in their own monthly journal, Health Devices, and
elsewhere. ECRI’s clinical web site, Medical Device Safety Reports (MDSR),
is chock full of information on surgical fires. Go to
http://www.mdsr.ecri.org,
and search for "fire" to investigate articles on various aspects of surgical
fires. Bruley also recommends making use of educational aids, such as ECRI’s
poster that summarizes how to prevent surgical fires, posting them in places
where staff can’t miss seeing them, such as the back door of toilet stalls
(but not posting them where the patients can see, because it could cause
them undue stress). The poster on preventing surgical fires is available at
http://www.mdsr.ecri.org/static/surgical_fire_poster.pdf. While you’re on
the MDSR web site, check out ECRI’s Electrosurgical Checklist at
http://www.mdsr.ecri.org/summary/detail.aspx?doc_id=8271&q=fire.
Bruley also noted that, "Over the past 2 years, several professional
societies, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and AORN
have developed recommendations for preventing surgical fires. ASA’s recently
approved "Practice Advisory for the Prevention and Management of Operating
Room Fires" is slated for publication within a couple of months in their
journal, Anesthesiology.
"AORN has published recommended practices regarding fire prevention,
which are very well done, as well as recommended practices for minimally
invasive surgery and prevention of laparoscopic burns," said Odell. AORN
also offers a Fire Safety Tool Kit, which members can download and earn 4.0
contact hours. Member price is $20.95; nonmember price is $131.95. (Note:
Standard and Associate memberships to AORN are $100; so, nonmembers could
join AORN, buy the kit at member price, and save $11.00.)
The Fire Triad
|
The fire triangle relates surgical team members
to components of surgical fires |
The operating room (OR) is essentially a formula for fire. The components
necessary for creating fire are present in abundance. Fischer believes that
"training and awareness of the Fire Triad" can minimize risk. "The three
sides of the Triad represent the following: fuel source, heat or ignition
source, and oxidizer or oxygen source. These three areas, when brought
together, place the patient and room staff at a very high risk for a fire.
Each area of the triangle belongs to a specific role in the OR. The fuel
source is typically the nurse’s role, as drapes, preps, and dressings are
provided to the field by the nurses. The ignition source is frequently the
role of the surgeon, who is applying the electrosurgical pencil or laser.
The oxidizer, or oxygen source, belongs to the anesthesia provider. By
providing training focused toward all members of the surgical team, risk for
surgical fires can be greatly reduced if not prevented."
Communication key to prevention
Communication between the players is the key to balancing these
components to prevent tragedy. Bruley noted: "Preventive measures almost
solely rely on good communication in the OR. Surgeons and anesthesiologists
need to understand what the other is doing. The surgeon needs to know how
much oxygen the anesthesiologist is delivering to the patient; the
anesthesiologist needs to know which instruments are being used that have
the potential for fire. Most fires (75%) are caused by oxygen that has built
up under the drapes during surgery under local anesthesia," explained Bruley.
"This happens because the surgical team has not communicated well."
Bruley suggests following the lead of Christiana Care Health system in
Delaware. This facility developed a "time out" for surgical fire, similar to
a time out for identifying the patient or counting sponges after surgery.
About 20 seconds prior to each surgery is reserved for communication between
the surgical team. It’s a time when participants can ask each other about
the risks for surgical fire unique to the case coming up.
In case of fire
|
Breakdown of locations of surgical fires
occurring in and around patients |
Fire in the operating room presents dangers specific and unique to the
circumstances. The response that’s best in so-called average circumstances
may not be the best choice in the event of surgical fire, but one thing is
for sure: response had better be quick. Fischer explained the most important
thing to know in responding to a surgical fire: "The most important thing is
how to respond quickly to a situation. If a flame is not brought under
control, the high oxygen content, with the many fuel sources in the OR, will
result in an out-of-control situation."
If you have a surgical fire, Bruley believes instinctive reaction by the
surgical team is the best response: the anesthesia provider should stop the
flow of gas; the surgeon should remove the burning material; and the nurses
should extinguish the burning material. Once the fire has been extinguished,
attention must be turned to the patient, resuming ventilation but using only
air until it’s certain the fire is totally out, then resuming use of oxygen
appropriate to the patient’s needs; controlling bleeding; evacuating the
patient if in danger from smoke or fire; and examining the patient for
injuries. If the fire cannot be controlled quickly, the OR staff and the
fire department must be notified. The room should be isolated to contain
smoke and fire.
Fortunately, many small surgical fires can be resolved simply by patting
them out with a gloved hand or a towel, but it’s important to be prepared
for the worst. "Fire drills can help to maintain awareness," advised Bruley.
Fire drills require advance planning and should be practiced to determine
their effectiveness. Plans should be developed for the different kinds of
fires that can occur in an OR and should clearly outline how each staff
member should respond; what, when, and how to communicate within the OR,
within the OR suite, with the remainder of the facility, and with local
authorities; where and how to remove the patient safely; how to prevent
spread of smoke; location and operation of fire extinguishers, fire-alarm
pull stations, and exits; location, operation, and coverage area of
electrical-supply panels; location, operation, and coverage of medical-gas
shutoff valves; and what to expect from the local fire fighters.
Additionally, ECRI recommends that carbon dioxide extinguishers—not
water-based or dry-powder extinguishers—be mounted just inside the entrance
of each OR in the hospital. ECRI discourages use of fire blankets in the OR
because they can worsen fire due to oxygen buildup under drapes, causing
further injury to the patient, and because the blanket can displace
instruments, also causing injury.
Stifling Murphy’s Law
"Risk management’s new buzz words are ‘loss prevention’," noted Odell.
Addressing loss prevention, things that can go wrong, can help to thwart
Murphy’s Law in the OR. "If less harm is done, you have fewer lawsuits and
lower insurance premiums. Industry can help by optimizing instruments
through engineering designs that mitigate or eliminate stray energy burns."
|
An electrosurgical pencil tip modified incorrectly
with a red catheter can cause fire and patient injuries because it is
petroleum-based. |
Encision designed and sells an instrument that automatically shuts off
when it detects stray energy due to insulation failure or capacitive
coupling. The technology is known as active electrode monitoring. "AORN has
recommended use of active electrode monitoring as best practice since 1999,"
said Odell. "Encision’s ACTIVE ELECTRODE MONITORING system is registered by
the FDA to protect patients from unseen stray energy burns during
laparoscopic procedures. Intraabdominal burns can result in peritonitis,
which carries a death rate of 20%. We have had not even one substantiated
report of a burn while our instrument was in use. Our product is warranted
to be fail-safe. Non-shielded, non-monitored laparoscopic instruments have
an inherent design defect. They’re not fail-safe, and they can kill somebody
brand new out of the box."
Recommending use of disposable active cords, Odell noted that insulation
failure can be caused when cords that deliver energy are placed in an
autoclave several times a day at 270oF. He also noted that, when not in use,
active electrodes should be placed in a sterile, insulated holster. Most
importantly, said Odell, "Always use recommended electrosurgical practices.
ECRI and AORN have covered the entire waterfront."
Fischer explained how Megadyne’s products are designed to reduce risk of
surgical fire. "Electrosurgical generators and accessories are the number
one heat source for OR fires; so, Megadyne takes product safety and
education seriously. Our generator has a clear tone alerting staff members
when the pencil has been activated. Some fires have occurred when the pencil
was activated without staff awareness. Megadyne provides a safety holster
for our pencils for storage of the active electrode when not in use.
Megadyne provides a full line of modified insulated tips for use in narrowed
cavities. Prior to this type of product, physicians often modified their own
tips
using a red rubber catheter. This modification actually led to OR fires and
patient injuries due to the product being petroleum-based and not made for
this function."
Odell observed that, in today’s medical environment, a hospital could be
called on the carpet for failing to use safety equipment to protect patients
and staff. He also noted that at least one insurance company, State
Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company (SVMIC), Brentwood, TN, strongly
encourages their physician policyholders to use active electrode monitoring
systems for patient safety. SVMIC offers an online, interactive, self-study
program entitled "Avoidance and Management of Complications in Laparoscopic
Surgery." O’Dell, who serves on the faculty, explained that physicians get a
10% discount off their annual premium for participating in the self-study
program.
Megadyne offers a CEU presentation on preventing surgical fires,
available at no charge for their customers. It can be scheduled as part of a
monthly inservice or other staff meeting. "The objectives of this program,"
explained Fischer, "are to help raise awareness of the risks of surgical
fires by identifying the sides of the Fire Triad and how those items may
interact to cause surgical fires. The program also outlines key factors that
may contribute to an OR fire and interventions that nurses and other staff
members can take to mitigate the risks." To schedule a program, call
1-800-747-6110.
Suggested Reading
1. ECRI Institute. Surgical fire safety. Health Devices 2006;35:45-66.
2. ECRI Institute. A clinician’s guide to surgical fires: how they occur,
how to prevent them, how to put them out. Health Devices 2003;32:5-24.
3. Bruley ME. Surgical fires: perioperative communication is essential to
prevent this rare but devastating complication. Qual Saf Health Care
2004;13:467-471.
4. The Joint Commission. Sentinel Event Alert: Preventing surgical fires.
http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_29.htm.
5. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses. Perioperative
standards and recommended practices, 2008. Denver, CO: AORN; 2008.
|
|