| Clearing the air on equipment
financing Payment strategies and
tactics don’t have to be eclipsed in fog
E xploring financing opportunities for
capital equipment acquisition and
choosing the right option for your facility can range from anywhere
between a panacea and Pandora’s box.
As a result, Healthcare Purchasing News Senior Editor Rick
Dana Barlow posed a series of questions to Wynn Blieberg, vice
president of sales and marketing at Olympus America Inc.’s Olympus
Financial Services unit, Center Valley, PA, to help shed some light on
an otherwise complicated and obscure process.
HPN: What types of equipment financing structures are available to
healthcare facilities?
 |
|
Wynn Blieberg, Olympus |
BLIEBERG: There are numerous types of
equipment financing structures available, each with it’s own
compelling reason for use depending upon the type of equipment, degree
of use, its technology lifecycle, the customer’s tax and accounting
situation and cash flow considerations.
Olympus Financial Services
offers a full array of financing options from the traditional capital
and operating lease structures to sale-leasebacks as well as to our
flagship product, the Olympus proprietary Cost Per Procedure (CPP).
Various structures, such as deferred payments, interest only, skip,
accelerated and declining payments as well as terms ranging from 12
months to 60 months are available for each of these financing
products. Olympus is committed to providing customers with intelligent
business solutions that meet their needs in today’s economic
environment and position them for a future with increased
technological advancement and patient care considerations.
The CPP product is very unique to Olympus. Because of our long
heritage in the healthcare field, Olympus possesses unique knowledge
from which financial products and services are created to help our
customers maximize success. By working closely with and listening
carefully to our customers, Olympus can truly serve as a resource in
helping facilities manage the costs of acquiring equipment. The CPP
product addresses costs, technology lifecycles and use ramp-up issues
associated with medical equipment, service, related devices and
consumables. It is specifically geared to optimally manage cash flow,
truly matching costs with use over the technological useful life of
our medical equipment.
What are the key differences between loans and leases and when does
either make the most sense?
Leases can be very broadly defined as instruments where ownership
is retained by the lessor from the perspective of any or all of
attributes such as: Title, tax or accounting treatment depending upon
the transaction structure. Loans are security agreements, conditional
sale contracts, promissory notes or repayment instruments, where
ownership in all respects resides with the customer (user).
Traditionally, these require a down payment and repayment for a
specified term.
Because each customer, facility and institution is unique, Olympus
works exclusively with our customers to understand their needs and
requirements, and then recommend the most favorable financing
solution.
What are the differences between the following and when does either
make the most sense?
•Capital (or $1 buy-out financing) versus Operating Leases
In the case of $1 buy-out leases, ownership for tax and accounting
purposes is with the lessee, although in some cases title of the
equipment remains with lessor for sale purposes, and passes to the
customer at the end for $1. A capital lease may be structured with
different end-of-term options specified. With operating leases, which
practically always have a fair market value option, or in some cases
no purchase option, ownership is retained in all respects by the
lessor. Generally an operating lease will provide a lower payment
because an assumption is made about the value of the equipment at the
end of the term and factored in, resulting in a lower payment than a
$1 buy-out lease payment. The designation of operating lease is really
in the hands of the lessee’s accountant based on tax and accounting
tests that are applied.
• Fair Market Value Leasing versus Rental Agreements
A rental agreement is often preferred for a shorter term, or
month-to-month agreement, and at a higher cost per month. It usually
has no purchase option and is considered to be optimal only for very
short-term needs because of the higher cost. Fair market value (FMV)
leasing is a financing option in which the lease offers end of term
options including the right to purchase at a then fair market value,
or the equipment may be returned, or the equipment lease payment may
be renewed at a fair market renewal rate for a specified term or
month-to-month at the same rate as the original lease payment. With
FMV leases, many lenders require that all, and not less than all, of
the assets be returned at the end of the term, re-leased or purchased
at the then fair market value. Olympus Financial Services provides
customers the flexibility to select various assets and choose to
either return or re-lease some of these assets depending upon their
needs and current considerations.
• Fee-Per-Procedure versus Fee-Per-Click Lease
While the CPP product is unique to Olympus, generally a
fee-per-procedure type structure is an amount that is due for each
procedure as reported under the terms of an agreement. Fee per click
is electronic terminology and applied more to computer-type
transactions. Fundamentally, both assign payments based on usage. The
difference, however, lies in the numerous variables these products may
have, leading to changes within the term of the agreement based on
volume and other factors. The Olympus CPP has a rate fixed for the
entire term with a definite start and end date and is balanced as a
true-partnership with the healthcare provider to ensure use of
product, fixed margins and capitated costs throughout the entire term
of the agreement. In addition, adding equipment during the term can be
done on a seamless basis allowing customers to continue to modify
their equipment configurations and needs while maintaining an asset
management strategy on an on-going basis.
Is it more economical/efficient to negotiate the equipment price
separate from the service contract price? Why?
No, there really is no reason to separate the negotiation of these
two prices, particularly in the case of Olympus Financial Services. We
simply take the total cost of service contract and divide it by the
number of months or total procedures in the agreement, charging no
interest. The service price connection to the equipment is the amount
of use and the resulting cost to service the equipment over the term.
Healthcare organizations benefit from having their equipment and
service payments all on one monthly invoice as it helps facilitate
customer monitoring, tracking and cost accounting efficiencies.
What are some of the key misconceptions about equipment financing?
The objective of financing or leasing is to provide the optimal
methodology to manage costs, technology life and use of equipment as
the equipment is used and while it is offsetting revenue, income or a
specific business benefit. Because the benefit of any acquisition is
in its use, as opposed to its ownership, it is important that
financing and leasing options be explored. Often leasing or financing
options are overlooked simply because cash is available from a capital
budget. In some cases ‘cash’ may be the best way to acquire, however,
many times the cost of using capital from retained earnings is not the
best financial recommendation. Other credit lines – especially
revolving – are best used for short-term day-to-day working capital.
So in addition to the fact that use of retained earnings for
acquisitions can sometimes be more expensive, as opposed to an
appropriate lease structure, the asset is on the books and the buyer
will end up with a depreciation write down should the item need to be
upgraded before its book life ends.
Here are two misconceptions.
Misconception No. 1: ‘Leasing or Financing is always more
expensive than paying cash.’
When dealing with advanced technology and equipment that constantly
changes, there are hidden costs in purchasing these assets outright.
If a facility wants to remain on the cutting edge and wants to upgrade
their equipment to continuously make improvements that enhance human
life and patient care, there are balance sheet considerations they
must consider. For example, if the original equipment is replaced
before it has been fully depreciated, the institution will have to
write-off the remaining balance from their books. Off-balance sheet
financing allows an institution to better tie its costs to the
equipment’s utilization.
Misconception No. 2: ‘Our cost of funds are low, so we usually
finance it through our bank.’
Some of the most successfully financial hospitals use off-balance
sheet financing to keep their costs low. If structured correctly,
leasing can be shown to be less expensive, and more efficient than
using a bank line, when you consider utilization of the equipment and
the effect of additional borrowing on the balance sheet.
What five tips would you give healthcare facilities exploring
financing options?
Since not all lease offerings are alike and each organization is
unique, we highly recommend and urge healthcare facilities to
understand and explore all of their potential financial options,
including that of Olympus Financial Services. At Olympus, customers
have the ability speak to our financial experts who provide sound
business counsel and recommendations based on decades of experience.
We are fortunate to be able to offer this expertise nationwide. We
understand that every customer’s requirements differ. Thus, Olympus
strives to develop sound relationships with our customers, rather than
just transactions, so that we can be a resource and partner helping
healthcare facilities achieve exceptional clinical and financial
outcomes.
1. Know the ‘utility time horizon’ of a piece of equipment. If it’s
technology with a short-term life, you do not want to put those assets
on a long-term financing agreement, such as a note or bond. You may
get caught financing an obsolete piece of equipment over a long time
period.
2. Maximize your gross margin on each case performed by exploring
cost-per-procedure agreements. Such contracts are flexible and can
help control costs by better identifying the component costs of what
it takes to deliver a procedure.
3. Leverage your buying strength. Leverage the buying power of
Master Financing and Volume Purchasing Agreements to keep your costs
under control.
4. Beware of fees. When financing is being quoted, make sure you
are comparing apples to apples, or like products. Some banks offer low
rates, but you need to check the fine print. Some rates are not fixed
for the term and may be floating rates. In some cases, if you want a
rate fixed for the term you have to pay an additional fee. Banks may
also require legal and filing fees to a loan, which can increase your
cost as well as an up-front deposit or down payment.
5. Finance with entities that have experience lending on specific
assets.

For more information about Olympus and Olympus Financial Services
please log on to www.olympusamerica.com/financialservices or contact
Virginia Stockwin, senior marketing manager at
virginia.stockwin@olympus.com.
Distinguishing the pros from the cons
Pitfalls of used equipment
Equipment Financing
Group Buy
Terminology
|