n the healthcare setting, gloving is an
important component in preventing microbial transmission as hands are the
primary means by which microorganisms are passed between patients and
healthcare workers (HCWs). Physicians, nurses, and other clinical
specialists are often the focus of barrier protection; however, ALL staff
across the healthcare continuum may be vulnerable to contracting and
spreading transmissible diseases. Therefore, it is critical that all
personnel select and use appropriate glove protection for the task to be
performed. Considerations for glove selection include the barrier protection
afforded by the glove material, potential for glove-associated reactions and
cost per use.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) noted in the
"Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious
Agents in Healthcare Settings 2007 (2007 Isolation Guideline) that "there is
considerable variability among gloves" and that "both the quality of the
manufacturing process and type of material influence their barrier
effectiveness."1 The protection a glove offers depends on the base material
used in manufacturing, formulation of the materials used in its production,
tasks performed by the glove wearer, and stresses and chemicals to which it
will be exposed. How each factor is weighted in importance is critical to
selecting the right glove for the right activities and exposure levels. The
protective ability of a medical glove is dependent upon the molecular
structure of the material from which it is made as this can lead to dramatic
differences in barrier performance.
 |
|
Nurse suffering irritation due to a latex allergy |
With the allergenic concerns for patients and staff exposed to natural
rubber latex in clinical settings, gloves made from vinyl and nitrile
materials are increasingly chosen as alternatives to latex gloves. Vinyl, or
polyvinyl chloride (PVC), is the same material used in a range of products,
from pipes to credit cards. To transform PVC from its rigid, brittle form to
a very thin and flexible material for use in glove production, a number of
plasticizers and softeners must be added. Some of these additives can amount
to 50 percent of the finished product.2 Even after compounding, "vinyl lacks
the ability to stretch when stressed or snagged and readily fractures, tears
or separates at the molecular level resulting in barrier loss."2 As the CDC
noted in the 2007 Isolation Guideline, "studies have shown repeatedly that
vinyl gloves have higher failure rates than latex or nitrile gloves when
tested under simulated and actual clinical conditions" and does not
recommend using vinyl gloves for procedures requiring manual dexterity or
more than brief patient contact.1 Still another concern with some vinyl
gloves is the uncertain fit with bagginess in the body of the glove and
loose cuffs that can impede performance and compromise safety. The
protective capacity of vinyl gloves can also be weakened by commonly used
liquids and chemicals used in the healthcare setting such as alcohols and
glutaraldehydes, thus placing the wearer at risk for exposure to potential
toxins.3
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as well as health agencies in
a number of other countries have also warned against the use of vinyl gloves
containing an additive called diethylhexylphthalate, commonly abbreviated
DEHP.4 These warnings are due to studies which show that DEHP may be harmful
to infants, young boys, and pregnant women.5,6
By comparison, nitrile-based gloves offer more consistent protection and
durability with a greatly reduced risk of punctures or tears. The molecular
structure of nitrile provides greater flexibility, conformity and in-use
durability than vinyl.6 When tested for chemical permeation resistance,
studies show nitrile performs as well as or better than natural rubber latex
against penetration by oil-based products, glutaraldehydes, and many other
chemicals.2,7,8 Certain nitrile glove products have been cleared by the FDA
for use in chemotherapy administration, having performed well when tested
with chemotherapeutic drugs to assess breakthrough times.
Vinyl is often thought of as suitable from a cost standpoint for staff
that perform ancillary or indirect patient care activities such as patient
transportation, housekeeping, or food service delivery. However, those
responsible for choosing and purchasing personal protective equipment (PPE)
should be aware that employees performing these functions are still at risk
for potentially infectious exposures and also require reliable barrier
protection which vinyl may not provide. Cost will always be a consideration
when determining which glove product to purchase. It should be remembered,
however, that the cost factor must be evaluated within the context of
product use. Because of the increased risk of barrier failure with vinyl
gloves, more gloves per task may be used by the employee. Conversely,
because of wearer dissatisfaction with product characteristics (i.e., fit,
feel), non-compliance with PPE use may result in increased infectious
exposure risk to the worker and resultant financial risk to the facility.
Either scenario demonstrates that solely considering the purchase price of
vinyl gloves may reflect a false cost savings.
In summary, the wearing of gloves is essential for all HCWs across the
continuum of care. However, not all gloves are created equal in their
inherent protective characteristics. Understanding the barrier protection
provided by the different glove materials is critical to making an informed
and appropriate choice.
References
1. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson Nm Chiarello L, and the Healthcare
Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Jun. 2007 Guideline for
Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in
Healthcare Settings. Online: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhap/pdf/isolation2007.pdf
2. Rego A, Roley L. 1999 Oct. In-Use Barrier Integrity of Gloves: Latex
and Nitrile Superior to Vinyl. American Journal of Infection Control 27(5):
405-410.
3. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI).
2005 Dec. ANSI/AAMI ST58-2005 Chemical Sterilization and High-Level
Disinfection in Health Care Facilities. Approved 6 Dec 2005.
4. U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2001 Sep. Safety Assessment
of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) Released from PVC Medical Devices.
Online: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ost/dehp-pvc.pdf.
5. Rosander P, Malkan S. 2003 Feb. Children, Pregnant Women Need
Immediate Protection from DEHP, Says Sweeping New European Union Proposal.
HCWH News Release Online: http://www.noharm.org/us/pvcDehp/reducingPVC,
accessed January 7, 2009.
6. Brody C. 2002 Dec 4. RE: Medical Devices Made with Polyvinylchloride
(PVC) Using the Plasticizer Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP); Draft
Guidance for Industry and FDA. Docket No. 02D-0325. Online: www.fda.gov and
www.noharm.org.
7. Infection Control Nurses Association. 2002 May. A Comprehensive Glove
Choice. Infection Control Nurses Association.
8. Ghosal K, Szymanski R. 2000 Jan/Feb. Nitriles - Versatile Glove
Materials. Rubber Asia 14(1): 27-30. 