ith information technology a hallmark of
President Obama’s ambitious and long-awaited healthcare reform program,
economic recession offers a somewhat convincing argument against making such
a costly investment with funds that could be used elsewhere.
Critics would counter that a short-term recoil is not what the healthcare
industry needs for long-term results.
Mike Cummins, CIO at VHA Inc., is one of them. Cummins steadfastly
advocates for IT to be carefully woven into the fabric of healthcare
operations. Healthcare Purchasing News asked Cummins to outline the
battle plan for IT investment and how group purchasing organizations can
play a role in making it happen.
HPN: How do you see the current economic challenges specifically
affecting IT adoption and implementation on the provider side?
 |
|
Mike Cummins |
CUMMINS: In today’s economic environment, many providers are cutting
back on major capital purchases, such as information technology. Hospitals
are having difficulty getting loans or can’t afford the rates being offered
on loans, and they can’t use the bond route to get funding either. A
low-interest government loan program would be instrumental in helping
hospitals adopt electronic medical records.
How do you see the economy specifically impacting IT development and
pricing on the supplier side? Wouldn’t more attractive pricing encourage
demand, which would, over time, lower development costs and improve
long-term profit margins?
Many suppliers are feeling the financial pinch of today’s economy and may
be more willing to offer discounts and unique pricing models than they have
previously. For example, VHA is exploring new pricing models for our supply
chain analytics tools we offer hospitals. Suppliers that offer creative
models will survive today’s challenging economic environment. Those who
maintain their traditional business models are less likely to survive.
The Obama Administration wants to dedicate more than $10 billion annually
for healthcare facilities to adopt and implement IT to improve patient care
and operations. Is that enough? How would anyone really know? And
specifically on what should these dollars be spent?
The stimulus package has earmarked $19 billion to help with healthcare IT
reform and support widespread implementation of electronic medical records.
While this isn’t enough money to pay for the implementation of this
technology, these funds can be used to offer industry guidance, reward early
adopters and provide low-interest rate loans to providers so they can
implement electronic medical records (EMR) projects.
In all likelihood, adopting and implementing IT tools to improve
efficiencies long-term will uncover an inordinate number of errors,
inefficiencies and waste in the short-term. How can the perceptions of those
seemingly insurmountable short-term costs be overcome by long-term prospects
of hope, save for a savvy PR campaign?
Beyond the efficiencies that the IT systems themselves create, the entire
effort of preparing for implementation will also force hospitals to review
their processes and identify opportunities to squeeze out additional
inefficiencies and errors. As a result, they will have a more effective
electronic medical record system and improved processes and procedures and
function more efficiently. We have seen similar results as VHA has helped
hospitals with clinical quality improvement. We work with them to map their
processes before we help them apply the appropriate clinical blueprints.
While helping hospitals to improve one clinical program, we have seen
improvements in overall processes.
Because the Obama Administration and Congress most likely will look to
VHA and similar organizations as examples, doesn’t it make sense to lead the
way with actionable changes in the form of hospital adoption and
implementation?
VHA is committed to improving the quality of patient care. A number of
our executives serve on industry panels to help promote GS1 and other
standards. We work closely with hospital CFOs and CIOs to help them address
important clinical issues. We have also developed clinical blueprints to
help hospitals rapidly improve their performance in key clinical measures,
such as treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers. As the hospitals
improve care in one area, they are better equipped organizationally to take
on other improvement projects elsewhere. I think the Obama Administration
will generate momentum for improvement and help accelerate the pace of
healthcare improvement by encouraging broader adoption of electronic medical
records.
Some observers say that healthcare facilities either won’t have access to
necessary capital dollars, or they’ll have access at higher rates, or
they’ll have to demonstrate meeting selected performance measures, including
quality and safety initiatives (as in medical error reduction), to qualify.
Thoughts?
All hospitals want to improve the health and safety of their patients –
and they want the tools, like EMRs, that will allow them to do this. Just as
with any change-management initiative, healthcare providers need to obtain
organizational readiness – buy-in – from the C-suite and from doctors before
rolling out electronic medical records. It’s not enough to simply implement
this technology – clinicians need to understand how this technology will
affect the quality of care they provide and be committed to using it.
Otherwise, they will revert to their old ways. This bill’s structure allows
providers to demonstrate the measures that matter – utilization and quality
improvement – in order to receive payment.
Despite the study results showing efficiency improvements for EHR
adoption and implementation, doctors and hospitals still hesitate to invest
in the technology, due to the perceived high costs – hard (e.g., equipment
price) and soft (e.g., training, data conversion). How do you allay those
concerns?
These concerns aren’t going to go away. However, there are a few things
providers need to consider:
1. Ensure that the management and medical teams are committed to this
initiative. They need to understand why electronic medical records are
important and how they can positively impact patient care.
2. Investigate whether open source products, such as VISTA – the existing
VA system, might be appropriate for your organization. This is a proven
technology and if a provider hasn’t already made a commitment to another
[competing] technology, this will cut implementation costs in half.
3. If you are worried about your investment, be sure to use technology
that is CCHIT [Certification Commission for Healthcare Information
Technology] compliant. If you purchase products that are CCHIT compliant,
there is a greater chance that your investment will be viable in the future.
The important thing is that the technology is used once it is installed –
and this requires not just IT, but a cultural change and commitment.
Otherwise, you won’t realize the full value of your investment.
Let’s face it: Many of the efficiencies to be realized from implementing
IT tools, such as EHR, involve reimbursement, which means the insurance
industry is a key beneficiary. Because this technology certainly helps the
payers – arguably more than the providers – why shouldn’t they foot more of
the bill for provider adoption and implementation?
Improving the quality of patient care and reducing medical errors
benefits everyone – especially the patient. The information generated allows
both employers and providers to negotiate better contracts with payers. By
the same token, employers and taxpayers will benefit from decreasing the
cost of care and improving consumers’ health.
Why does it make sense to push for EHR adoption and implementation before
the industry accepts interoperable EHR standards?
There are some baseline standards already out there because of CCHIT –
but not nearly enough. The industry will continue to expand the
interoperable standards that have been developed. Mass adoption of EMRs will
have a positive impact on consumer healthcare, and ultimately help hospitals
conserve resources that are becoming scarcer.
