Inside the Current Issue

Cover Story
Managing critical care supply tensions
Self Study Series
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN Hall of Fame
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us
Home
Subscribe

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

For Email Marketing you can trust
Special Event Photos
Contact Us
KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2012

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

 

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

January 2010

CS Solutions

Questions can be sent to:jakridge@hpnonline.com
called in to Jeannie Akridge at HPN:(941) 927-9345 ext.202 or mailed to:
HPN CS Questions, 2477 Stickney Point Road, Suite 315B, Sarasota, FL 34231
Names and hospital identification will be withheld upon request.

Filing down needle tips; micro fiber wraps; CS/SPD certification entities

by Ray Taurasi

QOne of the anesthesiologists at our hospital came to me requesting that I file down the tips of some disposable hypodermic needles to dull the tips. I told him that I could not do this as it would alter the manufacturer’s design and functionality of the needles. He said it was not an issue as the needles were not going to be used directly on the patient. I told him that did not matter and refused to do it. He became irate and stormed out of my office. Moments later I received a call from his director followed by another call from my boss both telling me I was being uncooperative and to just do as I was asked claiming there was no patient risk associated with it. After arguing my case and getting nowhere I finally succumbed to the pressure from my superiors and filed the needles down. I feel very uncomfortable about doing this and I would prefer not to do so again. I feel my superiors are basically ordering me to do something that is wrong. Do you think I am over reacting?

AUnder no circumstances should you alter the design of a medical device of any kind including needles. When you do so you are taking on the full legal responsibility and become the manufacturer of the device. As a manufacturer you must follow Good Manufacturing Practice regulations (GMPs), have FDA clearances and the like. Even though they claim the needle is not going to be used in direct patient care, you or they cannot guarantee that it will not happen. A patient’s safety and welfare could be at stake and you as the person who altered the device could be held legally responsible in a court of law.

I would suggest that you address this issue with your superiors prior to another such request coming your way again. Set up a meeting with your boss, the director of anesthesiology and risk management. Prior to the meeting, gather all the documentation you can find relative to the reprocessing, recycling and/or reuse of single use devices. Also obtain data from FDA regarding 510ks, GMPs, etc. Prepare a statement of reasoning and rationale of why you should not alter the devices include the supporting documentation and circulate prior to the meeting. In advance, schedule an appointment with your risk manager and/or legal department to discuss the situation; it would be very unlikely they would find this practice to be acceptable. You should also try to gain an understanding of how they plan to use these needles and why they need to be altered. Once you have a better understanding you can research other alternatives and possibly find a ready made device that fills the need or even find a manufacturer that could offer a solution.

QWe still use a lot of fabric packs and wraps. Recently our materials manager ordered a new kind of micro fiber wrap without consulting me. The wraps have a very different look and feel to them. When I asked him about it, he said they’re made from a new synthetic textile that is much stronger and a lot less expensive than what we had been using. I have never heard of the brand name or manufacturer, and the materials manager had no literature or technical information on the product. He said the representative told him it is the next generation of reusable wrap and that studies demonstrate it performs better than what we were using and/or competitive products. Can you provide information on using micro fiber wraps?

AThere are many different types and/or blends of synthetic fabrics and materials, both reusable and single use, that can be classified as "micro fibers" or have micro fibers as part of the material. I therefore cannot provide you information on the material you have without knowing more about it, e.g. manufacturer, brand name, technical data, etc. Microfibers, also known as microdeniers, are now very popular in the garment and upholstery industry due to their ability to repel moisture and their strength and durability. The fibers are so small that they can be tightly woven together, and as a result are strong enough to repel moisture and are more durable. Certainly such characteristics could have significant advantages as a sterile packing device. However microfibers that are too tightly woven together may not provide sufficient breathability to allow for sterilant permeation. Be mindful that sterilization packaging materials are classified as a Class II medical device and therefore must have FDA 510k clearance prior to marketing. You should not under any circumstances purchase or utilize any form of sterile packaging that has not been cleared by FDA. Insist that your materials manager obtain a copy of the FDA 510k documentation from the manufacturer of your new "microfiber" wraps, request copies of all relative technical and performance data, instructions for use, and care and handling. Until you obtain this information do not use the new product.

QI am the clinical nurse educator for perioperative services at a large community hospital. Changes in organizational structure have placed Sterile Processing under perioperative services and I am now responsible for SPD education as well. One goal is to get all staff certified. I understand there are two entities that offer certification for SPD. I find this confusing. Should SPD be certified by both? What is the difference? Is one certification superior to the other?

AThere are two professional entities that offer certification credentials for Sterile Processing personnel: The International Association of Central Service Materiel Management (IAHCSMM) and the Certification Board for Sterile Processing and Distribution (CBSPD). Both offer various levels of certification for sterile processing practitioners, technicians, supervisors and/or managers which are recognized internationally. Most SPD professionals seek and maintain certification through only one of these bodies. Many employers that require certification will accept certification from either entity, but this is not always the case. Certain states, geographic locations, hospitals and healthcare systems may have a preference for one source over the other. Prior to determining your certification policy, it is a good idea to speak to other professionals in your area as well as any regional CS associations to learn what program they support or endorse and why.

Contact IAHCSMM (800-962-8274 or www.iahcsmm.org) and CBSPD (908-236-0530 or www.sterileprocessing.org/about_cbspd.htm) to learn more about their philosophy, educational and credentialing programs.

Ray Taurasi is Eastern Regional Director of Clinical Sales and Services for Healthmark Industries. His healthcare career spans over three decades as an Administrator, Educator, Technologist and Consultant. He is a member of AORN, AHA, SGNA, AAMI and a past president of IAHCSMM and has served on and contributed to many national committees with a myriad of professional organizations, manufacturers, corporations and prestigious healthcare networks. Taurasi has been a faculty member of numerous colleges teaching in the divisions of business administration and health sciences. In addition to this column he has authored several articles and has been a featured speaker on the international scene.