s information technology issues
continue to weigh down supply chain to-do lists supply data standards
adoption and implementation seem to be the lubricant needed to make the
variety of components and projects operate more smoothly.
Take the idea of linking a facility’s or integrated delivery
network’s item master in supply chain management with the chargemaster in
revenue cycle management’s domain. Even so, take the idea of maintaining
either or both on the same or shared databases in an "enterprise-wide"
concept.
Whatever the case, many experts agree that supply data
standards should generate anticipated administrative, financial and
operational benefits.
"Having a common standard language in the items master,
fueled by the application of data standards makes linking the systems and
communicating much easier," said Deborah Petretich Templeton R.Ph., vice
president, supply chain services, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA.
"Currently, not even product descriptions are common. This makes
communication very difficult. The use of standards will enhance the ability
to maintain accurate information and therefore should lead to potential
benefits in the charge capture and revenue enhancement areas."
John Mateka, FAHRMM, executive director, supply chain
operations, Greenville (SC) Health System, concurred. "Changes should
accelerate progress and improvement," he said. "Utilizing the UNSPSC codes
will allow us to classify items based on a single global classification
system that can assist us with company-wide visibility of spend analysis,
cost-effective procurement optimization and full exploitation of electronic
commerce capabilities."
Accuracy and speed should drive momentum, according to Mary
Beth Lang, senior vice president of business intelligence, Amerinet, and
president, Diagnostix, St. Louis. "Adoption of established supply-chain
standards should speed the process by enabling the sharing of standardized
product and location information and ensuring that all partners are using
identical, up-to-date, reliable data," she said.
For an obvious example, Ken Cyr, a former supply chain
manager now serving as a product manager for software company Craneware
Inc., pointed to the drug industry.
"We don’t have to guess what that will be like," Cyr noted.
"We can see it today in pharmacy, with the universal adoption of the
National Drug Code to define pharmaceuticals. The NDC standard has
revolutionized that segment and has brought order to a system in which
anyone could name anything whatever and however they wanted. Now that we
have the NDC standard, we can tie data like CPT, HCPCS and revenue codes to
their standard NDC definitions. We can standardize on utilization,
standardize on data better. We can more easily link drug-spend information
to the chargemaster.
"For the same to happen in supplies, we need standardization
such as will be afforded by GS1," Cyr continued. "It’s the first domino that
has to fall, if we’re going to achieve true supply chain integration.
Without it, we are stuck in the mud and we will be forever."
Jean Sargent, CMRP, FAHRMM, director, supply chain, USC
Health Sciences, Los Angeles, connected the dots this way: "Using a
synchronized supply chain strategy will assist in determining what is
chargeable as well as creating the link from the item to the medical record
then to billing therefore reimbursement," she noted.
Concluded John Gaida, vice president, supply chain, Texas
Health Resources, Arlington, TX: "Standards should just make changes happen
faster and more consistently."
