Inside the Current Issue

Cover Story
Managing critical care supply tensions
Self Study Series
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN Hall of Fame
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us
Home
Subscribe

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

For Email Marketing you can trust
Special Event Photos
Contact Us
KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2012

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

 

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

May 2010

CS Solutions

Questions can be sent to:jakridge@hpnonline.com
called in to Jeannie Akridge at HPN:(941) 927-9345 ext.202 or mailed to:
HPN CS Questions, 2477 Stickney Point Road, Suite 315B, Sarasota, FL 34231
Names and hospital identification will be withheld upon request.

Cooling instruments; double pouching; cleaning verification

by Ray Taurasi

QHow cool do instrument sets need to be before they can be sent to the OR?

AThere really isn’t any one hard set blanket answer to your question. However current recommendations set forth by AAMI ST79:2009, p 74; and AORN 2009, p 650; AORN 2010, p 460, state that sterile packages should not be handled until cooled for a minimum of 30 minutes but the recommendations also note that cooling could take as long as two hours. The rationale for not handling hot sterile packages is that hot packages could act as a wicking source allowing strike through of contaminants. Hot packs exposed to radically cooler environmental conditions or surfaces could form condensate causing wet packs. Any moisture found in or on a sterilized package must be considered contaminated.

Certain packaging materials such as cellulose and woven textiles are of greater risk of strike through contamination and moisture. Closed sterilization containers are impervious and less prone to the likelihood of contamination as a result of handling while still warm or hot. Containment devices which are filterless or those that have a filter system with a tortuous path provide the greatest sterility maintenance assurance. There are various devices available which can assist you in determining when a package is cool enough to be handled. There are simple sticker-like devices that can be placed on a package or surface which can display actual temperatures or change color at a specific temperature. There are also hand held infrared (non contact) temperature scanners that can read a package and or surface temperature thus alerting you when a package is cool enough to handle.

QI am a surgical technologist at a large academic medical center in Washington, DC. I recently accepted a part time weekend job at a suburban community hospital to supplement my income to save for my wedding. At any rate I was appalled to see that at the new hospital, items are sterilized in single peel pouches whereas at my other hospital we double packaged everything in two peel pouches. I asked the supervisor why they don’t double pouch and he said it wasn’t necessary and a waste of money to do this. I further discussed this with my manager at my full time job and she said that double pouching is the proper protocol and a superior practice. It seems to me that double-pouch packaging provides a much more durable and better barrier. What is the recommended and safest practice?

AIt is not necessary to double pouch everything. Most peel pouches have been validated for use as single pouches. As with everything it is essential that you always refer to and follow manufacturer’s instructions for use. The validation of single pouch use assures that, when packaged and used appropriately, the single pouch allows for the permeation of the sterilant into the package allowing for the sterilization of the contents. Packaging materials including peel pouches must also be validated for sterility maintenance. When using peel pouches appropriately for the proper size and weight of objects a single package should suffice. Some institutions double pouch a small array of select items to allow for sterile presentation onto a sterile field, e.g. for peel pouches that may contain several small pieces and the like. If you find that routine double pouching is necessary to prevent tearing and punctures you might want to assess packaging techniques, and consider the utilization of accessories such as tip protectors, which would be more effective and appropriate than double pouching. More importantly, you should evaluate the quality of the peel pouches you are utilizing. There are many different brands on the market and quality does vary amongst the different manufacturers. Packaging products must be purchased based on quality vs. price alone. Many hospitals that routinely double pouch are doing so because of the poor quality of the pouches they use. They may have purchased based on a lower price, but having to double pouch doubles their packaging cost. Double pouching could actually be an inferior practice in that the pouch utilized may not have been validated for a double pouching application and thus its performance could be questionable. While you think it might be a better barrier to contaminants, it might not be allowing adequate sterilant permeation. If you choose to use double pouching it is imperative that you get the appropriate documentation and validation from your manufacturer to do so. To my knowledge there currently is only one peel pouch manufacturer whose product has been validated for double pouching packaging. When you are double pouching there are specific packaging methods, techniques and size configurations that must be considered for the internal and external pouch.

QI understand that cleaning verification is now a requirement for CPD but what about other areas of the hospital that are cleaning instruments? We are running a monthly test on our automated instrument washers – is that adequate?

ACurrent AAMI recommendations call for weekly, preferably daily, verification of cleaning processes. Cleaning verification is not restricted to CPD, it should be conducted anywhere in the hospital that cleaning and decontamination is being performed. Cleaning processes and procedures should be standardized throughout the entire hospital. The same principles of reprocessing, cleaning, inspection, packaging and sterilization that apply to CPD should be enforced throughout the institution. Any personnel involved in this important function must be properly educated and trained and the same principles of environmental control, work flow and OSHA requirements enforced. A quality program to validate the cleaning process includes an assessment and ongoing monitoring of water quality, manual cleaning and all automated processes including washer decontaminators, sonic washers, cart washers, and AERs.

Ray Taurasi is Eastern Regional Director of Clinical Sales and Services for Healthmark Industries. His healthcare career spans over three decades as an Administrator, Educator, Technologist and Consultant. He is a member of AORN, AHA, SGNA, AAMI and a past president of IAHCSMM and has served on and contributed to many national committees with a myriad of professional organizations, manufacturers, corporations and prestigious healthcare networks. Taurasi has been a faculty member of numerous colleges teaching in the divisions of business administration and health sciences. In addition to this column he has authored several articles and has been a featured speaker on the international scene.