|
Questions can be sent
to:jakridge@hpnonline.com
called in to Jeannie Akridge at HPN:(941) 927-9345 ext.202
or mailed to: HPN CS Questions, 2477 Stickney Point Road, Suite 315B,
Sarasota, FL 34231 Names and hospital identification will be withheld upon
request. |
|
Cooling instruments; double pouching; cleaning
verification
by Ray Taurasi
Q How cool
do instrument sets need to be before they can be sent to the OR?
A There really
isn’t any one hard set blanket answer to your question. However
current recommendations set forth by AAMI ST79:2009, p 74; and AORN
2009, p 650; AORN 2010, p 460, state that sterile packages should not
be handled until cooled for a minimum of 30 minutes but the
recommendations also note that cooling could take as long as two
hours. The rationale for not handling hot sterile packages is that hot
packages could act as a wicking source allowing strike through of
contaminants. Hot packs exposed to radically cooler environmental
conditions or surfaces could form condensate causing wet packs. Any
moisture found in or on a sterilized package must be considered
contaminated.
Certain packaging materials such as cellulose and
woven textiles are of greater risk of strike through contamination and
moisture. Closed sterilization containers are impervious and less
prone to the likelihood of contamination as a result of handling while
still warm or hot. Containment devices which are filterless or those
that have a filter system with a tortuous path provide the greatest
sterility maintenance assurance. There are various devices available
which can assist you in determining when a package is cool enough to
be handled. There are simple sticker-like devices that can be placed
on a package or surface which can display actual temperatures or
change color at a specific temperature. There are also hand held
infrared (non contact) temperature scanners that can read a package
and or surface temperature thus alerting you when a package is cool
enough to handle.
Q I
am a surgical technologist at a large academic medical center in
Washington, DC. I recently accepted a part time weekend job at a
suburban community hospital to supplement my income to save for my
wedding. At any rate I was appalled to see that at the new hospital,
items are sterilized in single peel pouches whereas at my other
hospital we double packaged everything in two peel pouches. I asked
the supervisor why they don’t double pouch and he said it wasn’t
necessary and a waste of money to do this. I further discussed this
with my manager at my full time job and she said that double pouching
is the proper protocol and a superior practice. It seems to me that
double-pouch packaging provides a much more durable and better
barrier. What is the recommended and safest practice?
AIt
is not necessary to double pouch everything. Most peel pouches have
been validated for use as single pouches. As with everything it is
essential that you always refer to and follow manufacturer’s
instructions for use. The validation of single pouch use assures that,
when packaged and used appropriately, the single pouch allows for the
permeation of the sterilant into the package allowing for the
sterilization of the contents. Packaging materials including peel
pouches must also be validated for sterility maintenance. When using
peel pouches appropriately for the proper size and weight of objects a
single package should suffice. Some institutions double pouch a small
array of select items to allow for sterile presentation onto a sterile
field, e.g. for peel pouches that may contain several small pieces and
the like. If you find that routine double pouching is necessary to
prevent tearing and punctures you might want to assess packaging
techniques, and consider the utilization of accessories such as tip
protectors, which would be more effective and appropriate than double
pouching. More importantly, you should evaluate the quality of the
peel pouches you are utilizing. There are many different brands on the
market and quality does vary amongst the different manufacturers.
Packaging products must be purchased based on quality vs. price alone.
Many hospitals that routinely double pouch are doing so because of the
poor quality of the pouches they use. They may have purchased based on
a lower price, but having to double pouch doubles their packaging
cost. Double pouching could actually be an inferior practice in that
the pouch utilized may not have been validated for a double pouching
application and thus its performance could be questionable. While you
think it might be a better barrier to contaminants, it might not be
allowing adequate sterilant permeation. If you choose to use double
pouching it is imperative that you get the appropriate documentation
and validation from your manufacturer to do so. To my knowledge there
currently is only one peel pouch manufacturer whose product has been
validated for double pouching packaging. When you are double pouching
there are specific packaging methods, techniques and size
configurations that must be considered for the internal and external
pouch.
Q I
understand that cleaning verification is now a requirement for CPD but
what about other areas of the hospital that are cleaning instruments?
We are running a monthly test on our automated instrument washers – is
that adequate?
ACurrent
AAMI recommendations call for weekly, preferably daily, verification
of cleaning processes. Cleaning verification is not restricted to CPD,
it should be conducted anywhere in the hospital that cleaning and
decontamination is being performed. Cleaning processes and procedures
should be standardized throughout the entire hospital. The same
principles of reprocessing, cleaning, inspection, packaging and
sterilization that apply to CPD should be enforced throughout the
institution. Any personnel involved in this important function must be
properly educated and trained and the same principles of environmental
control, work flow and OSHA requirements enforced. A quality program
to validate the cleaning process includes an assessment and ongoing
monitoring of water quality, manua l
cleaning and all automated processes including washer decontaminators,
sonic washers, cart washers, and AERs.
Ray Taurasi is Eastern Regional Director of Clinical Sales and
Services for Healthmark Industries. His healthcare career spans over
three decades as an Administrator, Educator, Technologist and
Consultant. He is a member of AORN, AHA, SGNA, AAMI and a past
president of IAHCSMM and has served on and contributed to many
national committees with a myriad of professional organizations,
manufacturers, corporations and prestigious healthcare networks.
Taurasi has been a faculty member of numerous colleges teaching in the
divisions of business administration and health sciences. In addition
to this column he has authored several articles and has been a
featured speaker on the international scene. |

|