Healthcare-acquired infections led to 48,000 pneumonia and sepsis
fatalities and increased U.S. healthcare costs by $8.1 billion in 2006,
according to a study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine.
This is useful data to have, albeit nearly four years old. Pundits
probably could calculate what that number is today using complex
predictive modeling, and the resulting estimate might generate gasps
similar to the box office take "Gone With The Wind" generated in today’s
dollars.
But the big question remains what the healthcare industry is going to
do about it?
Better yet, let’s take a detour and hypothesize about solutions.
Let’s say we all managed to vibrate our molecular structures so that we
ended up in an alternate reality or parallel universe. In films,
television programs, novels and comic books, such a plot device is all the
rage these days. In this parallel reality, everyone behaves, follows
orders, obeys the rules of common sense, logic, infection prevention, etc.
• Surgeons don’t make mistakes – and they wash their hands all the
time! Along with nurses!
• Sterile processing professionals clean and sterilize every tool
flawlessly.
• Environmental services professionals makes sure all surfaces – walls,
floors, doors, ceilings, counters, tables, chairs and even the air – are
completely sterile.
• Supply chain management procures the products they need at the right
time that are sterile and completely functional.
• Manufacturers and distributors produce and deliver these products
without fail, without error and without bacterial passengers of any kind.
• Infection preventionists, freed from clinical and environmental
fears, focus on product evaluations and how to maintain the sterile bubble
that is the healthcare facility.
Would that reduce the number of hospital-acquired infections to zero?
Or even cut it in half?
Absolutely not.
But does that mean the healthcare industry shouldn’t strive for the
achievements in this utopian parallel universe? Absolutely not.
Yet let’s get real. No matter if we all wear a personal protective
force field around us and do all the right things we won’t eradicate the
infection rate. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try. What we do today
merely slows their level of progress. At least that’s the theory.
No one can account for the X factor – those bacterial and viral
warriors inside a patient.
Following a global nuclear holocaust that wipes out all humans and
animals, post-apocalyptic Earth will be populated by cockroaches and
whatever germs mortally infected those attacking Martians in Jules Verne’s
"War of the Worlds." So until we’re prepared to kill all the germs we’re
nothing more than a bunch of revolutionary-minded resistance cells loosely
organized around aseptic techniques and clinical and operational
performance "standards" with flexibly defined precautionary measures and
floating levels of quality.
But let’s be clear. We’re not emphasizing cleanliness over patients;
we’re emphasizing cleanliness for patients.
From a dogmatic perspective, healthcare is distracted. Researchers can
use high-cost, high-tech equipment to postulate how King Tut perished
thousands of years ago; providers can erect Waldorf-Astoria-like
facilities to make patients comfortable; payers can hike rates to pad
profit lines when forced to ignore pre-existing conditions without the
perceived benefit of added revenue from mandated coverage for the young
and healthy.
United we stand; divided we fall. What unites the healthcare industry?
Arguably, Obamacare’s net effects and emotional marketing. What divides
the healthcare industry appears more clearly and in sharp focus:
Information and medical technology, liability, risk, standards and cold,
hard currency.
Unfortunately, Americans – since the mid-20th Century – have
deluded and deceived themselves into believing healthcare is a right –
particularly taxpayer-funded, insurance-pooled services. But if the
payer-controlled industry, emergent with the rise of DRGs in the early
1980s, demonstrated anything, it’s this: Healthcare is a business.
From a clinical and provider perspective, it indeed is a business. It’s
a business of killing bugs. The fundamental question is whether that
mission involves killing bugs at all costs or at low costs. Either way,
someone will pay.