Ship-shape:
Managing freight before it’s fiscally too late
by Rick Dana Barlow
Managing
freight and shipping costs – both outbound and inbound – can be a process to
hate.
That is, if you’re trying
to do it yourself or even
doing it at all.
By many estimates, hospitals and other healthcare facilities typically
ignore, if not overlook, what they’re spending on shipping product out or
having products shipped in. They might blame it on extenuating circumstances
that require quick thinking and decision-making, such as those stat orders
for a looming surgical procedure, or to cover up an "oops" mistake or
oversight.
Some may turn to their group purchasing organization to set up a contract
with a distributor or third-party logistics organization; others may link up
with those vendors directly. But any potential success hinges on the
clinicians and staff members actually using the contracts.
So how do you get supply chain management, as well as its customers, to
recognize what a financial drain lackadaisical shipping habits are? How do
you even get supply chain management to recognize lackadaisical shipping
habits, short of the CFO screaming about too much red ink after the fact?
Healthcare Purchasing News tapped into the shipping intelligence
of a half-dozen experts to uncover why this issue is so invisible, as well
as how and where to keep it on supply chain management’s radar screen.
Transparency’s dark side
By definition, there’s a Catch-22 to see-through situations. On one hand
you garner a granular view into processes to identify and eliminate errors
and promote efficiency. On the other hand, some processes – like shipping –
may be so common that they’re transparent in that you overlook or see
through them.
 |
|
Jake Crampton |
"Because the top priority is to fulfill the clinical need first,
something ancillary like freight/shipping is very easy to overlook, said
Jake Crampton, CEO,
MedSpeed LLC, Elmhurst, IL. "Moreover, the cost of
freight management/shipping is almost always hidden because it is either
bundled in with product cost and/or fragmented by functional area.
Fragmented intra-system material movement is a common area of untapped
opportunity for IDNs because the total costs are diluted by department so
they do not come to the attention of either finance or supply chain."
MedSpeed provides internal and external transportation outsourcing services
to providers that spans the pick-up and delivery of laboratory specimens,
medical records and radiology films, to distribution of pharmaceuticals,
mail and supplies.
 |
|
Doug Schwieger |
Doug Schwieger, director of marketing and product management for
OptiFreight, Cardinal Health Inc., Dublin, OH, concurred that clinical priorities tend to
trump what might be ill-considered peripheral operations.
"Hospitals’ primary focus is on patient care/safety and making sure
products and resources are available to care for patients," Schwieger noted.
"When healthcare facilities try to maintain a high level of service at a
lower cost, they tend to focus on the cost of the product and not the cost
to move products. Freight management partners with the right expertise, can
help provide visibility to these supply chain costs and help manage the
program so that hospitals can focus on their patients."
 |
|
Ira Tauber |
But Ira Tauber, executive vice president and COO,
TRIOSE Inc., Reading,
PA, argued that "no one person has ownership, vision or visibility to all
inbound and outbound shipping activity" to make a difference. And this
represents something bigger than tapping one person for responsibility.
"As healthcare systems have focused on their core mission, which is
patient care, and rightly so, they have relied on suppliers to perform
various functions for them, such as logistics," Tauber said. "Healthcare
systems are not set up to manage logistics efficiently on their own so they
have relied on their vendors to handle shipping decisions and freight costs
are added onto the product invoice."
The size of shipping charges remains another visual impediment so that it
slips through the proverbial cracks.
"One of the challenges is that individual shipping charges are small
compared to the product cost, and when added to the invoice cost they
typically get overlooked. As an example, an invoice for $4,000 worth of
product, the shipping costs may be as little as $50," Tauber continued.
"This won’t get anyone’s attention. In reality the shipping cost might
really be as low as $25. This adds up over time. Accounts payable pays the
total invoice cost, and this opportunity gets missed. Thousands of purchases
occur this way, and the individual costs get buried when you’re managing at
a macro and not micro level."
Schwieger agreed.
"Many hospitals do not realize how much they spend on freight each year
or how much volume they actually ship," he indicated. "The ability to manage
these costs can greatly impact a hospital’s bottom line. The average cost
per pack for a hospital not using a freight management provider is
approximately $40. With a best-in-class freight management solution,
hospitals are able to achieve a cost per pack of less than $20."
Yet locating that individual freight/shipping cost can be
needle-in-a-haystack daunting.
"Purchasing does a great job negotiating price, but they may not have the
expertise and resources to identify the true shipping costs," Tauber told
HPN. "Freight charges are typically pre-paid and added to the
invoice, but the vendor rarely states what those actual freight costs or
markups are. Compared to other industries, healthcare is behind in this. In
the automobile manufacturing and retail industries these freight costs would
be known and spelled out prior to any purchasing or product movement. In
healthcare however, this has been overlooked and never been a big enough
dollar item to tackle in the grander scheme of project initiatives managed
internally."
 |
|
Frank Gillespie |
Frank Gillespie, vice president, Non-Clinical Supply Chain, Distribution
& Alternate Site,
MedAssets, Atlanta, understands this.
"Historically, it has been lower on the priority list," Gillespie
acknowledged. "Potential savings in the area of freight are not always
easily understood. At many facilities, freight is not broken out as a
separate line item on invoices or in a budget. Some facilities see it as a
cost of doing business, but that is not the case. Major savings are possible
in this area if there is a focus on it."
 |
|
John Menna |
Volume complicates the process in this case, according to John Menna,
director of marketing, Healthcare Logistics,
UPS, Atlanta.
"The sheer number of vendors a hospital typically works with makes it
difficult to implement a program, and even harder to manage program
compliance moving forward," Menna said. "The key is having a solution for
maintaining full visibility into which suppliers are using a hospital’s
program and which ones are not. Some transportation providers offer
analytics that provide this type of visibility to hospital supply chain
managers."
 |
|
Eric McGlade |
Eric McGlade, vice president of professional services,
HLS MedFreight,
Westerville, OH, said he thinks people easily overlook shipping for two
reasons. "One, people don’t feel they have any control over freight costs,
and two, they don’t realize the savings on managing freight costs, and how
easy it is to reduce their costs," he noted, estimating that the average
annual savings is $20,000 to $25,000 for every 100 beds.
But volume, coupled with internal resource challenges, including
management’s low priority and compliance rebellion makes identification,
control and management an ongoing uphill battle, Tauber insisted.
"With large purchases and capital items it’s an area we get involved in
because shipping costs are usually shown as a line item on the quote," he
said. "Typically, shipping may be in the hundreds of dollars. We actually
will go out and determine if that is a valid cost or make a lower cost
routing decision with one of our carriers. But for day-to-day repetitive
purchases, finding the actual shipping costs before the product is shipped
is difficult because there is limited data.
"Please keep in mind that there are some vendors that simply will not
comply with our routing or even the hospital’s routing requests," Tauber
warned. "These outliers range from large scale shippers/manufacturers down
to the specialty product manufacturers that dare you to find a functional
equivalent. They effectively hold you hostage for shipping as you won’t get
them to budge so those costs simply get passed on."
GPOs to the rescue?
Because vendors charge freight on a "pre-pay and add basis," Tauber
indicated, healthcare systems may have little to no say in the contractual
price – even through a GPO.
"A lot of these contracts are through GPOs where they’ve effectively
negotiated the price down to a point where the vendor feels they have no
recourse but to add costs to shipping to make up for some of the lower
margins on the product price." Tauber insisted. "Very few people in
purchasing notice the difference if a vendor increases shipping costs 40
percent to 60 percent to offset pricing discounts."
Schwieger, however, thinks that’s changing – even with unexpected stat
orders.
"Many GPOs have negotiated contracts for freight management services on
behalf of their healthcare members," he said. "By aggregating volume,
freight management programs are able to provide discounts to GPO members.
"There is also a trend where GPOs and their members are requiring vendors
to participate with hospital freight management programs as a part of their
contract negotiations," he continued. "An effective freight management
partner will leverage these contracts and help drive compliance. This effort
helps to ensure maximum program utilization for our customers. To deal with
unforeseen stat orders, a healthcare facility should align with a freight
management partner with a strong rate structure and deep vendor program.
This way, a healthcare facility can ensure the vendor is on the program and
reduce costs for premium shipping service."
Gillespie recognizes the significance of GPO involvement. "The greatest
benefit is that language is inserted into your GPO agreement that is
specific to freight management," he noted. "MedAssets has freight management
suppliers on contract to help facilities develop plans of action for
reducing freight costs. By using the resources within your GPO agreement,
you can aggressively and actively make managing freight costs a priority."
But McGlade emphasized that the "core benefit of the GPO is to
consistently utilize ‘bill third party’ freight language in their contract
with vendors," he said. "This allows the hospitals and freight management
companies to clearly understand which vendors are cooperating with
hospitals’ request to partner with reducing freight costs."
Stat orders may be just the motivation for a third-party healthcare
logistics specialist to be on call, according to Crampton.
"A robust technical solution combined with central oversight of all
intra-system movement provides the data points required to not only manage
and track stat orders, but to also perform creative routing to reduce and
eliminate unnecessary stats altogether," he said. "From service times to
service frequencies, data is essential to correct behavior and
control costs by either finding less expensive ways to execute these jobs or
by converting the stats to scheduled services."
In fact, MedSpeed invested in a comprehensive scan-track technology suite
to handle such demands, Crampton noted. "This is a capability an IDN would
either have to invest over six figures to obtain or forgo altogether," he
added.
Tauber offered a real-world example that happened back in May. "About two
to three weeks ago, one of our clients called us with an ‘out-of-the-box’
request," he told HPN. "One of their physicians was performing
a surgical procedure in which they were harvesting tissue from one patient
to be used for another patient transplant procedure 8 to 10 hours away at a
specialty hospital. With this type of request there may be a 40-60 hour
window of time for the tissue to be useable. Through our network of service
providers we arranged and coordinated it to be delivered in the same-day and
were able to do it for much less than alternatives.
"You can’t put a price on something as critical as this," he continued.
"However, the costs are typically in the thousands to ship. We typically
don’t get involved with these types of requests but this was one of our
long-time customers that had no resources to get it done on their own and we
needed to come through."
|
Fan favorite freight management success stories
Healthcare Purchasing News
asked
a variety of experts to share a particular success story involving
the management of an organization’s freight/shipping, highlighting what
was done, why it mattered and what the return-on-investment has been.
Here’s what they recalled.
We recently worked with one of our large health system
customers and connected them with one of our freight management
suppliers. This relationship resulted in savings of more than $3 million
for this particular customer.
– Frank Gillespie, vice president, Non-Clinical Supply
Chain, Distribution & Alternate Site, MedAssets, Atlanta
Kentucky-based Baptist Healthcare System Inc. (BHSI)
suspected that freight was contributing to BHSI’s escalating supply
costs. But that was hard to prove because every facility was managing
its own shipments, so they had no visibility into the system’s total
freight costs.
Director of Purchasing Alan McLaughlin quickly saw the
benefits of standardizing the shipping process and became an early
adopter of OptiFreight, a service that negotiates volume-based
third-party discounts and passes them onto customers, maximizes program
utilization by enrolling as their vendors, produces additional savings
through consolidated billing and freight auditing capabilities and
provides channel optimization assessments.
OptiFreight began by focusing on the top 300 BHSI
vendors, examining negotiated contracts and migrating vendors to the
system – providing them with a third-party FedEx account number to ship
all packages. OptiFreight then collected all freight-related information
so it could monitor freight spending for each vendor, including freight
mode, extra handling fees and extra fuel charges. As part of the
process, OptiFreight was able to secure $83,000 in rebates due to
contract violations.
OptiFreight and BHSI have worked together for five years
and are generating approximately $300,000 in freight cost savings for
BHSI on an annual basis. With the use of scorecard rankings and
quarterly action plans, OptiFreight has been able to drive behavior
changes that have resulted in more than $1.2 million in savings over the
life of the program. BHSI also has seen a reduction in its cost per pack
since being managed through the OptiFreight program to $15 in 2009 from
$24 in 2004. McLaughlin considers freight ‘an area of healthcare
materials management that few pay attention to — but that offers a
significant savings opportunity.’
– Doug Schwieger, director of marketing and product
management for OptiFreight, Cardinal Health Inc., Dublin, OH
MedSpeed designed and built a centralized intra-system
transportation network for a large integrated delivery network (IDN) and
subsequently eliminated their intra-system FedEx/UPS orders. The
development of this transportation network connected the systems’ 285+
locations on a predictable schedule and tracked the materials as they
moved, just like the guaranteed overnight delivery carriers. Thus, once
the solution was in place, the system no longer needed their services,
wiping a six-figure expense completely off the books and capturing a 100
percent savings.
Another IDN MedSpeed came to work with was allowing its
clinicians to dictate their needs instead of working together to
streamline routes and behavior. This ongoing practice had led to
inefficient and inconsistent service levels across the system. After
extensive analytical work that included the adoption of standardized
service levels for ‘like’ facilities as well as the consolidation of
transportation into a single operation, MedSpeed reduced the IDN’s stop
count by 15 percent. Once implemented, the MedSpeed solution produced an
immediate savings of 20 percent, and today the system is reaping other
benefits as well, including reduced stat orders and a scalable platform
for streamlined growth.
– Jake Crampton, CEO, MedSpeed LLC, Elmhurst, IL |
|
Finding the numbers
Ask a logistics specialist what his or her facility’s freight/shipping
expenses are, as well as their percentage of the total budget and you’ll
likely elicit eyebrow arching and head scratching. In fact, it may be easier
to quantify on an individual facility basis.
"From our experience consulting with large IDNs to assess their
intra-system material movement, we have found that none of them know exactly
how much these services cost because the costs are fragmented by functional
area, and there is no central data or knowledge of the disparate
operations," Crampton admitted.
Meanwhile, Gillespie estimated something a bit more tangible with some
caveats. "Usually 2-4 percent of the cost of a supply is tied to the cost of
shipping," he noted. "In order to effectively measure these expenses, a
facility has to have data available at the local level."
But Schwieger projected something more concrete based on Cardinal’s
extensive supplier background. "Freight expenses often comprise 1 to 2
percent of a hospital’s annual direct supply spend," he said. "These
expenses cost hospitals on average $40 per package if freight is not
properly managed."
While McGlade echoed Gillespie’s estimate of 2 to 4 percent of the supply
expense, he also noted that in general one-third of shipping costs are
"pre-pay and add" charges that are visible on the invoice to the hospital,
another third is bundled into the price of the product coming direct from
manufacturers and the final third is bundled into the distribution fees.
"The industry is working on reducing the ‘pre-pay and add’ portion of
shipping because it is very visible, thus easier to manage," McGlade
said. "The GPO or distributor will not have visibility into pre-pay and add
shipping costs for products not going through the distribution mode so they
are not viable partners to help reduce those costs. There will always be
products that don’t go through a distributor.
"The hospitals have to take the lead on measuring their own freight
costs, whether they do it themselves or work with an independent freight
management company," he continued. "The reality is that a typical hospital’s
general ledger account for ‘freight’ includes many other types of charges,
such as handling, minimum order fees, loaner fees, etc. So a third-party
freight management company, who is only billing for freight charges, can
help clearly identify for hospitals their true freight costs. HLS MedFreight
also has the benefit of providing clear information to their customers on
‘hidden freight costs,’ such as minimum order fees, handling fees, etc."
Schwieger suggested three ways to identify and measure freight expenses.
1. Measure cost per pack. "Many healthcare facilities manage
freight expenses without fully understanding what is taking place within the
hospital," he said. "As demand increases for hospital services, so do the
amount of small packages being shipped. This increase automatically drives
up overall freight costs. To remedy this, emphasis needs to be placed on
containing the entire cost of a shipment – including elements like handling
fees and fuel charges – and not solely on the discount associated with
sending that shipment."
2. Allocate freight expenses to a general ledger account in order to
provide a line of site and accountability. "Once freight expenses
are visible, smarter shipping decisions and better freight management
practices can be developed," he added.
3. Break out freight costs. "Suppliers oftentimes build freight
charges into the final cost of product, making it important to know the
difference between actual product cost and freight cost," he said. "Even if
hospitals are told they are receiving free freight, the true cost of product
may be inflated to account for the lack of shipping charges."
The big question mark
Amid the foggy notion of freight/shipping costs begs the fundamental
question of whether ignorance or oversight of the issue can be a symptom of
a much larger supply chain management problem, a knee-jerk reaction to a
process breakdown or a misunderstanding of total costs?
Tauber classifies the lack of managing freight/shipping costs as part of
a larger problem, comparing the combative relationships in healthcare
operations to that of the cooperation in automobile manufacturing.
"If there was more collaboration and sharing of information between
suppliers and hospitals much of this could be avoided," Tauber advised.
"Over the last several years, product prices have been negotiated down.
However, vendors could offer a lower shipping price by altering their
shipping processes if hospitals could share product demand forecasts with
them.
"The bigger picture is that the industry is set up with a silo mentality
of confrontation and friction between suppliers and providers based on
transactions," he continued. "If they could sit down and discuss demand
levels, order quantities and other factors impacting the total supply chain,
they could reduce freight costs as a first step of a larger process
improvement. The healthcare industry needs to look at best practices from
other industries for guidance."
As an example, Tauber cited the auto industry whose players know how many
cars to build, and share that information with their suppliers who then can
manage component parts production and shipping schedules more effectively in
a predictable and synchronous fashion. "That’s not the case in healthcare,"
he said. "Arguably, you can call a hospital a manufacturing plant that fixes
people and use some of the same principles. You may not be able to forecast
everything but you could apply this process to some degree. In the long run
there are more improvements that can be gained by taking supply chain
management to a different level."
But supply chain professionals have been consumed by larger challenges,
according to McGlade, so they generally have not been able to focus on
freight management. "I also think that hospitals are recognizing that there
can be significant savings with managing their freight costs, and the great
thing is that it does not affect the clinical side of the hospital at all,"
he added. "Implementing a third-party freight program is a quick and easy
way to lower your freight costs, which they previously did not recognize or
understand."
Indeed, Tauber called freight management the "low-hanging fruit to drive
expense reduction" and a "good first step" to improved supply chain
management.
Tauber acknowledged the complexity of the healthcare provider’s inbound
supply chain, which justifies the need for it to be managed professionally.
But Schwieger attributed freight/shipping cost ignorance to just that –
ignorance.
"Many healthcare organizations are focused on just the cost of product
and not the cost to move and manage that product from point of origin to
consumption," he said. "Manufacturers will often add the cost of logistics
into product cost, creating a blind spot for healthcare organizations."
Further, distributed product shipments make up about 40 percent of hospital
shipments, whereas direct-from-manufacturer shipments account for 60
percent. This information has opened doors for distribution partners and
freight management service companies to offer assistance.
"The biggest issue is simply a lack of awareness and facilities not
making it a focal point," Gillespie admitted. "It has long been overlooked,
but materials managers are now starting to see the benefit of managing
freight costs."

|
Ship-to best-practice tips for you
Healthcare Purchasing News
compiled a short list of sure-fire recommendations from a series of
experts for successfully managing freight/shipping. Here’s what they
suggested.
• Lower total cost via cost per pack. When
analyzing freight expenses, focus on the total cost of purchasing and
receiving each product. Take into account any savings the hospital may
be receiving through rates, utilization, mode optimization and channel
optimization.
• Break out freight costs. Freight charges should
always be listed as a separate line item to allow the hospital’s finance
team to analyze freight costs. The more detailed the invoice, the
better. Beware when a supplier promises ‘free freight.’ Delivery is
never really free. When a line item for freight charges is not included
on an invoice, chances are the freight costs have been included in the
cost of the product.
• Require hospital suppliers to participate. The
more suppliers that agree to use a hospital’s third-party account number
when shipping product, the more savings the hospital will reap.
• Educate staff. Staff participation in a
hospital’s freight management program is key to reducing overall freight
costs. Train your staff to consistently use the correct account number
when ordering products directly from the manufacturer. Also, regularly
share costs savings in order for your staff to better understand the
importance of adhering to the hospital’s freight management practices.
• Measure performance. Once the organization has
established a freight management program, benchmark its performance
against that of similar hospitals. This will help the organization
identify opportunities for improvement.
– Doug Schwieger, director of marketing and product
management for OptiFreight,
Cardinal Health Inc., Dublin, OH
• Start with good data about your freight expense to
create a baseline.
• Engage, assess and educate the stakeholders –
including the purchasing department.
• Know your existing purchase terms.
• Develop easy-to-gather, easy-to-understand, meaningful
metrics to guide you to see if there have been improvements.
• Tap the resources of an organization with logistics
expertise.
– Ira Tauber, executive vice president and COO, TRIOSE
Inc., Reading, PA
• Create a program to achieve your goals, whether it’s
self-managed or through a transportation provider or another third
party.
• Make sure all of your suppliers and the group
purchasing organizations (GPOs) you work with have an understanding of
your purchasing strategy.
• Ensure that your program is transparent with regard to
the discounts you should be receiving, and create a baseline for your
current spending and savings.
• Implement processes for measuring compliance and
savings.
• Make sure that your transportation and logistics
vendors are passing all of the savings along to your hospital.
– John Menna, director of marketing, Healthcare
Logistics, UPS, Atlanta
• Demand transparency in pricing to understand how
prices are derived and enable freight/shipping to become a negotiable
line item on a contract.
• Work with a transportation and logistics expert to
review and analyze intra-system material movement for cost savings and
operational improvement opportunities.
• Centralize oversight and execution of transportation
for accountability and to facilitate efficiency gains.
• Consolidate the movement of intra-system
transportation by location, rather than functional area, to save both
time and resources.
• When outsourcing, choose a partner with specialized
expertise, healthcare focus and experience working with large integrated
delivery networks (IDNs).
– Jake Crampton, CEO, MedSpeed LLC, Elmhurst, IL
• Make sure that freight is listed separately on your
invoices and not absorbed into the price of the product.
• Take a look at your GPO agreement as it pertains to
freight to better understand it.
• Work with your GPO to discover best practices that can
help you with freight management.
• Insist that freight costs are fully visible to you
while working with suppliers.
• Work with other members of your team at your facility
to educate them on the implications of freight cost as it pertains to
your budget. Ensure that controlling freight cost is a priority for
everyone.
– Frank Gillespie, vice president, Non-Clinical Supply
Chain, Distribution & Alternate Site, MedAssets, Atlanta
• Start negotiating terms on your contracts to ensure
freight is not buried in the price of the product.
• Do not ask vendors to ‘bury’ the freight costs into
the price of the product. Make them break it out so it is visible, and
then ask for the corresponding reduction in the price of the
product. This will allow the industry to start down the path of
‘activity-based costing’ like other industries that may have more
visibility into their supply chain cost. You can only manage what you
can see!
• Engage your GPO to ensure third-party freight language
is in every contract they negotiate. It makes it easier to hold vendors
accountable.
– Eric McGlade, vice president of professional
services, HLS MedFreight, Westerville, OH |
|
|
Common
freight/shipping errors by supply chain, clinicians
What are some of the typical freight/shipping mistakes that drain budgets on
one side and pad profits on the other?
• One of the largest mistakes for hospital materials managers is not
having full visibility across their supply chain. To ensure that they have a
true picture of their savings, hospital materials managers should ask
questions such as: What discount would they get by going directly through
their transportation carriers, compared to what discount their third-party
logistics providers receive through the carrier? Also, are they passing
along that entire discount to the hospital or taking a large margin for
themselves?
• If hospitals have an inbound freight management program, they should
also know what percentage of their suppliers are compliant with the program
– the answer should be at least 50 percent.
• To ensure visibility across the supply chain, managers should ask for
regular reports on the savings they are getting through their program and
schedule quarterly business reviews with their transportation provider.
– John Menna, director of marketing, Healthcare Logistics,
UPS, Atlanta
• Contracting with a vendor for freight terms and not requiring them to
use a freight management partner. Healthcare facilities will often spend a
lot of time negotiating contracts with vendors, but not put in the necessary
controls to monitor compliance. A freight management partner will give
healthcare facilities a line of site and control over freight costs and can
help monitor contract compliance with vendors.
•Supply chain management professionals often focus on discount rates and
overall savings numbers, but what really drives permanent cost savings for
an organization is the ability to achieve the lowest cost per pack. By
focusing purely on rates, hospitals are not able to truly optimize the
mode/service level that should be used to lower cost. A successful freight
management approach includes a focus on reducing shipment costs with an
emphasis on overall cost reduction by focusing on cost per pack.
•Hospitals have a tendency to ship most of their small packages priority
overnight. It is important to understand that products can be shipped
utilizing different service levels and still arrive on time. By using a
different service level or mode optimization, such as ground shipping
instead of overnight shipping, healthcare facilities can dramatically reduce
their overall freight costs.
•Not optimizing the supply chain. Supply chain optimization allows
customers to understand when it would be more cost effective to order a
product through the distribution channel rather than direct from the
manufacturer. A solid freight management partner has distribution experience
and knowledgeable resources to help hospitals optimize their channel spend
between direct and distributed products.
– Doug Schwieger, director of marketing and product
management for OptiFreight,
Cardinal Health Inc., Dublin, OH
• Allow manufacturers/suppliers to bundle the cost of freight/shipping
into their product costs.
• The IDN does not centralize and consolidate its intra-system material
movement.
• User community (caregivers, nurses, administration, etc.) is either
unaware of, or ignores, the transportation schedule and over uses stats.
• The IDN allows its clinicians to dictate their needs vs. working
together to streamline, which often requires the clinicians to change
behavior/plan ahead.
– Jake Crampton, CEO, MedSpeed LLC, Elmhurst, IL
• Not taking advantage of existing – or pre-negotiated – product purchase
terms.
• Program needs to encompass all areas of freight and shipping including
inbound, outbound and capital and construction logistics.
• Program needs to encompass entire health system.
• Gather good baseline data before you get started.
• Not engaging purchasing, as in buyers, in the process.
– Ira Tauber, executive vice president and COO, TRIOSE
Inc., Reading, PA
The biggest mistakes are made because of a lack of awareness of how
freight is managed, and also of the benefits their GPO may be able to bring
to them in the area of freight. An example would be not addressing freight
in local agreements.
– Frank Gillespie, vice president, Non-Clinical Supply
Chain, Distribution & Alternate Site, MedAssets, Atlanta
Many people think that there is not a big difference in price between
various modes of service – and there is. So that means there is potential
savings opportunities by selecting a less costly mode that will still get
the shipment to its destination in the appropriate amount of time.
That leads to a second educational opportunity – which is the fact that
less costly modes, such as second-day air and ground, may get the product to
its destination within a day, depending where the product is shipped from
and to.
The key is that robust data is needed to evaluate shipments to determine
what mode optimization opportunities there are. I think the last opportunity
we have in healthcare is to not drive the cost of shipping back into the
price of the product.
A contract negotiator – whether at the hospital or a GPO – may find it
easy to succumb to the vendors request to remove any ‘third-party freight’
language. However, we all need to understand that shipping is not ‘free,’
even if that is what the vendor is saying. Our industry needs full
visibility of these freight costs so that they can be managed.
– Eric McGlade, vice president of professional services,
HLS MedFreight, Westerville, OH |
|
|
Red flags on freight/shipping processes
What issues in the freight/shipping process should alert supply chain
professionals to search for savings?
For TRIOSE Inc., it’s all about compliance, education and expertise.
"From our perspective the fundamental essence is vendor
implementation and compliance – instructing and monitoring the vendor to
use the program. As a hospital or health system you can take advantage
of rate savings only if the vendors agree to implement the routing
requests and then actually comply. Vendors have to agree to the terms in
the routing guide. When vendors agree to the terms then the key piece is
that someone has to manage the process and monitor compliance – make
sure vendors follow through consistently. We’re contracted by the
hospital to manage and monitor this so the hospital gets the maximum
savings and benefits. In a case when a hospital uses its own people
resources to manage the logistics, then they have to be accountable for
managing and monitoring the process. The reality is that most hospitals
don’t have the resources to do it on their own so that’s why they look
to us.
"We become the traffic department of the hospital as custodians of
the process and data for freight and shipping. Service level
optimization is the next level of driving cost savings. We constantly
ask, ‘Can we do it better?’ When making these recommendations, you have
to educate people on changing the behavior and past shipping patterns.
As an example, you can effectively ship something locally via ground
rather than expedited based on the delivery geography, thereby providing
more than just rate savings. To do so, you need data to validate that it
can be done without degradation of service and then use that to educate
the stakeholders. The decisions are all data driven. Once you get data
you can present a compelling case to individual department users and
management, showing them how they can save by shipping something a
certain way. You have to validate and then educate.
"We make these decisions on how to route something based on the
lowest cost alternatives. We’re always acting on our customers behalf.
They are buying that expertise from us. It’s the easy way out to do
things the same way as before. The same-old process may never get
changed because it’s easy and vendors generate revenue through shipping.
But we’re not hired to do the easy stuff. Our mandate is to get
something there at the lowest cost without sacrificing service."
– Ira Tauber, executive vice president and COO, TRIOSE Inc., Reading,
PA
For UPS, it’s all about controlling available options and managing
the management companies.
"From an outbound perspective, hospitals should take stock of their
‘overnighting’ habits and take a close look at each shipment to
determine the most cost-efficient mode of transportation for their
needs. For example, could a shipment actually travel via ground freight
instead? In order to make the right decision, hospitals will need to
familiarize themselves with ground time-in-transit to weigh the options.
Many would be surprised at the significant savings they could achieve by
examining their shipping habits.
"There are certainly large savings opportunities with inbound
transportation by implementing an inbound freight collect solution.
Material managers and hospital CFOs should be cautious about inbound
freight management companies that offer to implement a program for no
additional cost. The vast majority of these companies do not pass along
the full carrier discount to hospitals and often will not disclose how
much margin they are keeping. These are missed savings that could be
realized if hospitals use the right inbound freight management service –
and the savings can be significant."
– John Menna, director of marketing, Healthcare Logistics, UPS,
Atlanta
For Cardinal Health’s OptiFreight unit, it’s focusing on total costs
involving all aspects of the process.
"It is important for a healthcare facility to evaluate all areas that
receive or ship product and the type of freight associated with the
product. This includes inbound/outbound small package and bulk/capital
goods that are sent on larger trucks. Typically inbound shipments
comprise 80-85 percent of a customer’s total freight cost, with outbound
shipments equaling 10-15 percent and larger packages shipped via trailer
(LTL) amounting to 0-5 percent.
"In terms of savings, healthcare facilities should look beyond
discounted rates to achieve cost reductions. An important part of the
freight management discipline is focusing on reducing the total cost
associated with shipping a package."
– Doug Schwieger, director of marketing and product management for
OptiFreight,
Cardinal Health Inc., Dublin, OH
For MedSpeed LLC, it’s understanding the guts of pricing and where
savings can be wrung.
"For inbound deliveries of product/equipment/pharmaceuticals, etc.,
transparency is the key to understanding how pricing from suppliers is
actually derived. When freight/shipping is broken out as a component of
the final cost, it becomes a negotiable line item in the supplier’s
contract and provides supply chain with an additional means of driving
down expenses.
Beyond inbound and outbound freight/shipping, there is a third
opportunity for savings: The same day intra-system movement of patient
and business critical materials across the IDN. Delivering care requires
a multitude of items to move daily around a system and the larger the
system, the greater this need – and the costs – become. Laboratory
specimens, pharmaceuticals, medical records, X-rays, supplies and
internal communications, such as mail and reports, travel continuously
from location to location. Health systems need to make sure this area of
freight/shipping is not being overlooked as the opportunity to reduce
costs directly and improve operational quality and service waits.
Moreover, when done right, a centrally managed, interconnected operation
can be leveraged to drive future strategic initiatives and cost save
opportunities not possible before."
– Jake Crampton, CEO, MedSpeed LLC, Elmhurst, IL
For HLS MedFreight, it’s about harnessing the data.
"First and foremost, in order to reduce costs, hospitals need to
track their baseline well by standardizing their code freight in their
[general ledger]. Data/information is the key to effectively managing
costs. If hospitals don’t have a good baseline of their current costs,
they may want to work with a freight management company to not only save
on their shipping costs, but to provide great data to analyze for
savings initiatives. One example of that would be savings related to
mode optimization. However, without the data, hospitals are not able to
analyze where there is potential savings to ship products via a less
costly mode, without sacrificing delivery time. Hospitals don’t
necessarily need to ship ‘priority overnight’ if a less costly mode will
get there in the same amount of time, but at less costs."
– Eric McGlade, vice president of professional services, HLS
MedFreight, Westerville, OH |
|

|