| Inside the Current Issue | ||
|
||
|
Cover Story Managing critical care supply tensions |
||
![]() |
||
| Self Study Series | ||
| Purchasing Connection | ||
| Resources | ||
| Show Calendar | ||
| HPN Hall of Fame | ||
|
||
| Classifieds | ||
| Issue Archives | ||
| Advertise | ||
| About Us | ||
| Home | ||
| Subscribe | ||
|
For Email Marketing you can trust
|
||
| Special Event Photos | ||
| Contact Us | ||
|
KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2012 |
|
INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010 Supply Chain Management Salary Survey |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recession? What recession, right?
by Rick Dana Barlow I n one of the biggest blows to any recent recessionary aftershocks, save for the winding retail lines of iPhone 4-crazed Apple-philes earlier this summer, average salaries of healthcare supply chain management professionals continued climbing for the second consecutive year.The latest annual industry-wide survey by Healthcare Purchasing News showed that supply chain salaries on average in 2010 increased more than 7 percent over 2009 levels to $74,816.
While this year’s overall result represents a momentum-slowing rise above the previous year’s 12.7 percent spike, it looks remarkably more dramatic if you extend the jump over a two-year span. Since 2008 when most economists and pundits attribute the recession originated, average supply chain management professional salaries soared nearly 21 percent. For a Wall Street analogy, supply chain salaries seem to resemble the bond market in a bear economy. If you’re looking for more evidence that supply chain professionals should reserve their sobs for, say, Toy Story 3 viewing this summer, try this on for size. Fifty-eight percent of survey respondents indicated that their base salaries represented an increase over last year, a five percent dip from 2009 responses, but 37 percent replied that their compensation remained the same, a six percent rise.
Quivering confidence? Those who reported a salary increase for 2010 saw their pay boosted on average 3.4 percent from the previous year, which represents roughly half a percentage point over 2009. But overall supply chain professionals reported an average 2 percent salary bump. That’s slightly less than half a percentage point over 2009’s results. In a sliver of a shift away from confidence, 45 percent of survey respondents admitted they feel "very secure" in their current position; 46 percent indicated they feel "somewhat secure." Both figures were down slightly from last year. To keep these data in perspective, however, please remember that results tend to reflect the number and title variations of respondents. For example, more senior-level executives who lead integrated delivery network (IDN) operations will push salary data higher, while more buyers at community hospitals responding may pull the salary data down.
For this year’s survey, slightly fewer than half (49 percent) of respondents surveyed worked at a director level, with 43 percent indicating they serve as a director of materials management and 6 percent a corporate or senior vice president of materials or supply chain management. Another 18 percent indicated they were purchasing directors. Also noteworthy: Slightly more than half (51 percent) of respondents worked at standalone hospitals and more than a third (37 percent) indicated that they were IDN, alliance or multi-hospital system staffers, a roughly 7 percent shift from last year’s demographics.
Location-wise, respondents were almost evenly split with 38 percent working in urban hospitals (where the average salary was $80,173), compared to 31 percent in suburban hospitals (where the average salary was $79,994) and 31 percent in rural hospitals (where the average salary was $63,003). Not surprisingly, the average salary for the highest-level supply chain executives at the corporate and senior vice president positions at $119,864 was greater than those in the director’s office at $84,707. Purchasing directors and managers reported a $68,505 average salary while senior buyers and buyers responded with $47,576 in average compensation. On the more clinically-oriented side, value analysis coordinators clocked in at $73,667 on average, and operating room materials or business managers at $58,000. Both were roughly unchanged from the previous year. Materials management information systems managers said they earned $63,500 on average, nearly equivalent to last year’s response.
More than half of survey respondents (58.3 percent) handle supply chain duties for
Depending on their own titles, 31 percent said they report to their organization’s CFO, 13 percent to the vice president of supply chain, 29 percent to the corporate director or director of materials management. At 51.4 years of age, the average respondent has spent 15.6 years in materials management, 8.7 of which has been at their current facility, which has an average bed size of 358. On average, their department includes 17.6 employees. It’s important to note that these data are relatively close to last year’s responses with about two fewer years in materials management and at their current facilities that may have more than 40 fewer beds, but two more staff members. More than 60 percent of respondents identified themselves as standalone hospitals but part of a group purchasing organization (GPO), while more than 31 percent indicated they were part of an IDN.
Of the 36 percent of respondents who held certification, more than 58
percent earned the Certified Materials & Resources Professional (CMRP)
designation through the Association for Healthcare Resource & Materials
Management (AHRMM), while nearly 12 percent earned the Certified Purchasing
Manager (CPM) designation through the more industry-focused Institute for
Supply Management. More than 8 percent said they hold a Certified Registered
Central Service Technician (CRCST) and more than 3 percent are AHRMM
Fellows, according to the survey.
No surprises here. Men, who outnumbered women 54 percent in survey respondents, also out-earned them on average, $84,051 vs. $64,223, a nearly $20,000 gulf that remains consistent with previous years’ results. On a somewhat brighter note, men saw their average salaries jump nearly $4,700, while women saw their results jump $4,900. From a regional perspective, men earn the most in the Pacific states at
$96,914 on average, followed by the Southeast at $85,910. Rounding out the
other three regions was the Northeast at $81,995, followed ever-so-closely
by the Mountain states at $81,095 and the Central region at $79,253. Nearly
$18,000 separated the highest-earning from the lowest-earning regions for
men, a much-wider gap than the previous year’s results, which found the same
regions bookending the spectrum.
Women in the Pacific region earned the most at $70,500 on average, followed by the Southeast at $66,115. Rounding out the other three regions was the Northeast at $65,825, then the Central region at $61,816 and the Mountain states at $53,222. More than $17,000 separated the highest-earning from the lowest-earning regions for women, more than twice the spread shown in last year’s results. Based on gender, the regional salary spread saw the Mountain states
leading at $27,873 on average between men and women, followed by the Pacific
at $26,414, Southeast at $19,795, Central at $17,437 and Northeast at
$16,170. Canada was the only region where women fared slightly better than
men, $106,250 to $103,333.
Grow west, young people Make it a "four-peat" for the Pacific region as the most lucrative area to work, regardless of gender. The average salary for supply chain professionals in the Pacific states was $83,521, a $4,700 rise from 2009 and roughly half the gap from 2008. The Southeast trailed in second place with $76,013 on average, nearly $6,000 higher than the previous year. In a reversal from the previous year and an equivalent spread, the Northeast slipped in next at $75,793, nearly $5,600 higher than 2009 results. The Central region came in fourth with $70,359 on average, more than
$4,700 higher than last year’s results, followed by the Mountain states at
$65,417, a $2,250 decline from the previous year.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||