Inside the Current Issue

Cover Story
Managing critical care supply tensions
Self Study Series
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN Hall of Fame
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us
Home
Subscribe

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

For Email Marketing you can trust
Special Event Photos
Contact Us
KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2012

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

 

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

May 2011

CS Equipment & Technology Guide

 

Washers & sterilizers step up quality, efficiency to meet performance demands
Medisafe Sonic Irrigator PCF

Medisafe Sonic Irrigator PCF

by Jeannie Akridge

Savvy sterile processing departments and operating suites are benefiting from next generation reprocessing equipment – gaining new efficiencies through faster cycle times, increased automation, improved material compatibility for increasingly complex instruments as well as reduced energy, water and chemical consumption.  

From washer-disinfectors and automated endoscope reprocessors to a wide array of sterilizers, manufacturers are equipping systems with versatile functionality to clean, disinfect and sterilize with ultimate confidence.

Enhanced connectivity, too, is helping to improve equipment uptime by allowing proactive troubleshooting. Erin Linville, director of marketing, Infection Prevention Technologies, STERIS Corporation, noted that "STERIS is currently focused on features related to ease of use and data connectivity. For example, our ProConnect remote monitoring solution can be connected to STERIS equipment to monitor these systems 24/7 and provide timely alerts and intervention, sometimes before the user knows there’s an issue."

Getinge 88 Turbo

Getinge 88 Turbo

Jim Gabalski, vice president marketing, North America, Getinge USA Inc., described the company’s continued investment in traceability solutions, with an expected release date of the latest offering made available to U.S. customers during the second quarter of 2011. The Getinge Online solution offers operators and Sterile Processing Managers a window into what is happening inside decontamination equipment. The system provides alerts via computer, cell phone or other device as to when a cycle has completed or if some type of issue such as a temperature deviation occurred during a cycle.

"Whether [the equipment] has a fault or a completion, it’s going to tell you that so you can actively manage the loading and unloading without wasting time," said Gabalski.

Semi-automatic and fully-automatic loading carts and trolleys, such as Getinge’s Air Glide System, further streamline processes with minimal staff intervention. "We’re building systems around those devices that allow them to be utilized to the max from beginning-to-end," he said.

While shaving a minute or two between cycles may not seem significant, "when you add those minutes together over time, it results in significantly more cycles out of a single piece of equipment," he asserted.

Service technicians can also use Getinge Online to remotely understand the history of a machine prior to making a service call. This allows them to review what’s been happening so when they arrive on site they can come prepared with needed parts and documentation. "You can do more of the diagnostic work using the information that the equipment makes available to you through Getinge Online, and therefore we can come prepared to troubleshoot and resolve with some precision," said Gabalski.

Getinge Online is an extension of Getinge’s T-DOC instrument and asset management system, which has been recently expanded with new offerings that allow users to track down to the instrument level through every phase of the sterile chain of custody, he added.

ASP STERRAD 100NX

ASP STERRAD 100NX

New from ASP (Advanced Sterilization Products), the company recently launched its EXPRESS Cycle for the STERRAD 100NX System. "The new cycle sterilizes da Vinci 3-D endoscopes and other frequently-used devices without lumens in just 24 minutes," described Kira Paniagua, group product director for terminal sterilization. "The STERRAD 100NX System is a versatile performer, providing facilities the flexibility of three different cycles for instrument processing. In addition, ASP launched the ASP SteriTite Containers, which are designed to help facilities increase efficiency by providing an alternative to wrapped trays."

As the industry continues to go "green", "hospitals are considering the environment in their sterile packaging options," said Paniagua. ASP SteriTite Containers offer "a rigid alternative packaging solution for hospitals that are looking to reduce their usage of sterilization wrap."

"Ensuring that devices can be processed in STERRAD Systems and developing new enhancements are key to helping our customers drive efficiencies and productivity," Paniagua said. "For example, the STERRAD Sterility Guide (SSG), which is now available as a mobile app, quickly allows customers to determine which devices fall within the cleared claims for sterility. ASP is proud of the relationships we’ve built with leading Medical Device Manufacturers (MDMs), and we work closely with them to ensure that STERRAD Systems are included in their instructions for use (IFUs). Finally, the materials and lumen claims of STERRAD Systems extend even beyond heat- and moisture-sensitive devices, allowing customers to process many procedure sets together."

Using hydrogen peroxide gas plasma technology, the STERRAD 100NX System offers three cycles that sterilize instruments in less than one hour. In addition to the EXPRESS Cycle, the system also offers a 42-minute FLEX Cycle for up to two single-channel flexible endoscopes and a 47-minute STANDARD Cycle for most general surgical instruments. The system features enhanced technology and expanded lumen claims that allow customers to process single-channel flexible endoscopes, semi-rigid ureteroscopes, cameras, light cords, power drills, rigid scopes and a wide range of other instruments.

3M Steri-Vac

3M Steri-Vac

Susan Flynn, Sterilization Assurance Technical Service, 3M Infection Prevention Division, described the unique advantages offered by ethylene oxide systems. "With proper installation and maintenance, a 100 percent ethylene oxide system remains one of the safest sterilization systems in the market. Recent survey results indicate that efficacy is the most important factor in the decision to purchase a new low temperature sterilization system. Over the last 50 years, ethylene oxide has been established as the ‘gold standard’ of efficacy for low-temperature sterilization and also provides the greatest penetrability and medical device material compatibility. It does not require any special packaging materials, such as polypropylene wraps or polyolefin pouches, as other systems often do. Ethylene oxide can penetrate all common packaging materials and device lumens and is compatible with most medical materials. The ‘trade-off’ of having such high material penetrability, however, is the residual ethylene oxide in the materials sterilized. To minimize staff and patient exposure, adequate aeration time is required, making the cycle time of ethylene oxide systems longer than that of other low temperature sterilants."

"Low-temperature sterilization systems continue to evolve," added Flynn. "Even with newer technological advancements that have led to faster sterilization processes, the 100 percent ethylene oxide system still remains one of the best options, providing proven efficacy, greater material compatibility and penetrability, along with a solid safety profile. While there is a place for other types of systems, and some can deliver faster cycle and turnaround times, their limitations in materials compatibility make 100 percent ethylene oxide systems a worthy consideration for any hospital administrator looking to define their portfolio of low temperature sterilization equipment."

Medivators DSD EDGE

Medivators DSD EDGE

The DSD EDGE from Medivators, cleared by the FDA for marketing in April 2010, is an automated endoscope reprocessor that uses single-use Rapicide PA (peracetic acid) High Level Disinfectant (HLD). Based on Medivators’ DSD-201 model, the DSD EDGE features two independently-controlled, asynchronous reprocessing basins that allow users to run simultaneous or independent cycles and provides fast turnaround with a reprocessing cycle as short as 22 minutes. Automated leak testing minimizes leak-related repair costs and a final alcohol purge facilitates drying of endoscope channels. An optional supplemental wash cycle provides additional and consistent cleaning of the endoscope. An optional data management system for cycle tracking and record keeping is also available.

"The most important consideration to improve efficiencies, productivity and quality outcomes is the selection of the best reprocessing system and related chemistries for the particular facility," said Alexa Chapin, associate product manager, Medivators, a Minntech Corporation Business Group. "Decision-making factors include: physical size/configuration of reprocessing area; number of procedures/day; number and type of scopes (EUS, ERCP vs colons/gastros); cycle and patient data capture, storage and analysis requirements; ventilation and environmental requirements; staff training and competency; financial considerations; and proper installation, start-up, and service of equipment."

OR suites evaluate options

Those making a transition from legacy STERIS SYSTEM 1 processors have been allowed additional time to weigh their options, according to Stephen Loes, vice president of marketing IPT, STERIS. "On March 18, 2011, we received written confirmation that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had extended the time period for transitioning from the SYSTEM 1 processor to an alternative processing technology by an additional six months. As a result, STERIS will continue to support our current SYSTEM 1 Customers in the U.S. who have not transitioned to another device through February 2, 2012, the new date for completion of the transition."

While the announcement does buy facilities more time, Loes cautioned, "SYSTEM 1 customers must continue to diligently assess their processing needs and evaluate alternative process technologies to ensure they can complete the transition by February 2, 2012. The SYSTEM 1E Liquid Chemical Sterilant Processing System is an acceptable alternative for SYSTEM 1 users and offers several benefits over the existing SYSTEM 1."

STERIS Caviwave Pro Ultrasonic

STERIS Caviwave Pro Ultrasonic cleaning system with da Vinci tray

He described safeguards built into the STERIS SYSTEM 1E to help ensure that critical and semi-critical devices are ready for use. "The SYSTEM 1E critical parameters include temperature, time, and sterilant concentration. The sterilant temperature is monitored throughout the cycle via sensors that communicate with the system controller. If the temperature is out of specification at any time during the cycle, the cycle will abort. The exposure time for all critical steps is also monitored by the controller. If any step is not within the specified time, the cycle will abort.

"The concentration of sterilant is monitored through a number of safeguards," Loes continued. "First, extensive testing under various environmental conditions established the useful life of S40 Sterilant Concentrate, ensuring that even at the end of its useful life the sterilant will deliver an effective dose of peracetic acid (when handled and used as directed). Second, conductivity monitoring is automatically performed by the processor to ensure that the single-use chemistry has been delivered. Finally the SYSTEM 1E chemical indicator, which was recently cleared by FDA for use with the SYSTEM 1E, provides additional confirmation of the appropriate concentration under actual use conditions."

A biological indicator is not required for use, Loes clarified: "The FDA guidance document for liquid chemical sterilants and high-level disinfectants does not require the use of a BI for a liquid chemical sterilant. Therefore, FDA cleared the SYSTEM 1E Liquid Chemical Sterilant Processing System for liquid chemical sterilization of cleaned, immersible, and reusable critical and semi-critical heat-sensitive devices with the monitoring capabilities that are controlled by the processor and without requiring a BI to monitor the process. A BI is not required because SYSTEM 1E efficacy has been validated under worst-case conditions using inoculated medical devices. Monitoring and control of critical parameters by the SYSTEM 1E processor confirms that the process conditions during clinical use match those of the process validation (when used and maintained as directed)."

"Two additional enhancements with SYSTEM 1E (as compared to SYSTEM 1)", he explained, "are the addition of the MaxPure Filter integrity test at the end of every cycle, and the addition of the UV light. These enhancements provide additional verification that successful device reprocessing has been achieved. A failure associated with either the filter integrity test or the UV light will result in the processor aborting the cycle."

ASP offers two potential solutions for customers seeking an alternative to their STERIS System 1 Processor – the STERRAD NX System for customers seeking a terminal sterilization alternative and the EVOTECH Endoscope Cleaner and Reprocessor (ECR) for customers seeking a high-level disinfection alternative, Paniagua offered.

"The STERRAD NX System utilizes an advanced hydrogen peroxide gas plasma process to rapidly sterilize a wide range of instruments at a low temperature, including most single-channel flexible scopes," she said. "It offers a 28-minute STANDARD Cycle time and the flexibility of having dry, packaged, sterilized instruments available for use anytime, enabling customers to handle more caseloads without delays. Its compact size makes the system ideal for operating rooms and surgery centers."

Also from ASP, "the EVOTECH ECR is the first commercially available system to eliminate labor-intensive manual cleaning of endoscopes and the human variation inherent in it," she noted. "The EVOTECH ECR establishes a consistently high standard of automated endoscope cleaning and high-level disinfection that is comparable to professional society guidelines for manual cleaning. In addition, the advanced automation offered by the EVOTECH ECR features integrated leak testing, an onboard MEC monitor, a built-in alcohol flush, and computer tracking of all cycle parameters to provide customers with confidence from start to finish."

Langford LIC Parametirc Release Instrument Processor

Langford LIC Parametirc Release Instrument Processor

Langford IC Systems offers another potential alternative to the STERIS SYSTEM 1 with the LIC Instrument Processor System. According to Terry Langford, president, the LIC system is "unique in that the technology eliminates the need for connectors and is designed to process a variety of surgical and diagnostic medical instruments, with lumens and without lumens including but not limited to endoscopes in a single chamber."

Langford explained that the LIC System "delivers the three critical steps required to process a reusable medical instrument, i.e. integrates cleaning to far less than 6.4 micrograms of protein per square centimeter residue, disinfects to greater than 10-6 with no surviving microorganisms, and rinses off the germicide residue with a unique filtered ozonated final rinse water process that has been validated to achieve a level of purification that is equal to the level of disinfection achieved during processing by the instrument processing system."

All three steps are "validated and require no user interaction during the cycle," said Langford. Because the device being processed remains throughout the disinfection and final rinse steps in the LIC system following cleaning, this eliminates the risk of touch contamination by machine operators, he added.

"Cleaning to the lowest possible quantifiable level of clean and validating having done so provides the key to successful sterilization," said Langford. "The FDA is on record as emphatically stating that one cannot sterilize without first properly cleaning."

Further, Langford explained, "The LIC Instrument Processing System eliminates manual cleaning which cannot be validated. The FDA applies and enforces a quantifiable level of clean of 6.4µg/cm2 of residual protein to the reprocessing of Single Use Devices (SUDs) to ensure their sterility which begs the question, why not all reusable instruments as well? We have provided the FDA with the validation criteria and test methods for verifying mechanical cleaning to a level of far less than 6.4µg/cm2 of protein residue. This information was cleared by the FDA under 510(k) K060458. The Health Care Industry is now in the possession of cleaning validation data that meets the FDA’s requirement for standardized criteria for the quantifiable validated cleaning of all medical devices which is outlined in their February 2002 Guideline for Washer, Washer Disinfectors. The FDA, under their charter of ensuring safe and effective devices could make the decision to mandate this standard to all reusable surgical and diagnostic instruments in the near future."

He noted that the yardstick of less than 6.4µg/cm2 of protein residue came about as a result of the FDA seeking a quantifiable cleaning measure in an assay form, versus simply visibly verifying the level of cleanliness. In 2003, AAMI published TIR30:2003, "A Compendium of Processes, Materials, Test Methods, and Acceptance Criteria for Cleaning Reusable Medical Devices". TIR30 reported test results came from a laboratory at the University of Manitoba. The University of Manitoba study defined the worst case protein soiling for endoscopes as 115 µg/cm2 and the best case residual protein level as 6.4 µg/cm2. The FDA embraced the 6.4 µg/cm2 as the measure of cleaning for reprocessing single use devices. While this provided a benchmark starting point, today, "the FDA currently would like to see a mechanical cleaner clean to far lower levels than that," Langford emphasized.

The easy-to-use system is controlled by its validated software and numerous sensors guaranteeing that the operating parameters that ensure validated cleaning and disinfecting results are achieved. If for some reason a required parameter is not met the cycle is automatically aborted and the user is alerted via an audible and written alarm, Langford explained.

While Langford IC System’s standalone cleaner and instrument cleaner/processor have received FDA 510(k) clearance for the processing of bronchoscopes, the company has also submitted a 510(k) application for a second generation instrument processor that is under review to include all endoscopes. The submittal also provides the FDA with LIC’s updated standardized criteria and test methods for validating mechanical cleaning in response to FDA’s request for cleaning requirements that meet or exceed the original AAMI TIR30 recommendation of 6.4µg/cm2 of residual protein they apply to the SUD reprocessing industry. We have provided them with the standardized criteria and test methods for a worst case soiling of endoscopes that far exceeds the AAMI TIR30 soiling of 115 micrograms of protein per centimeter squared (we soil a colonoscope with an average of 800 micrograms) and then clean it to less than 2 micrograms of protein per centimeter squared," said Langford.

Langford IC also has plans to file for marketing clearance for a cleaner/ozone sterilizer that forgoes chemicals for liquid ozone, he added.

Washer-disinfector advancements

Vendors are also loading washer-disinfectors with features designed to improve outcomes along with productivity. "For example, through the development of innovative spray patterns used in combination with our high impingement cycle options, STERIS has validated 20 minute instrument cycle times for our washer/disinfectors – this means that hospitals can buy less equipment to process the same number of trays; saving space, utilities, water and money," said Linville.

Recent advancements to STERIS washer/disinfector technology, she explained, include "the use of PC, touch screen controls to allow users to interface intuitively with the equipment (i.e. using icons like an iPhone or laptop), and to quickly capture electronic cycle records, link to tracking systems and verify all critical parameters of completed cycles; development of water saving features that minimize cycle time, water consumption and chemistry usage; units providing dual speed pumps so that customers can select from high impingement (normal) or low impingement (gentle) cycle options to meet all of their processing needs; development of innovative validated cycles as fast as 20 minutes that meet the FDA intermediate disinfection standards and IS0 15883 Ao 600 levels; and washer cleaning indicators that provide additional assurance that the necessary parameters are being met throughout the day, much like DART tests provide for steam sterilizers."

The Medisafe Sonic Irrigator (SI) PCF automated cannulated instrument cleaning system, launched in 2004, is validated for cleaning and thermal disinfection of da Vinci EndoWrist instruments. In addition to a standard ultrasonic-only mode for convenient cleaning of standard instrument sets and trays, the Medisafe SI PCF system can be purchased with a thermal disinfection option included or as an upgrade at a future time as budgets allow, noted Gary Jordan, president, Medisafe America.

Besides a dedicated da Vinci cycle for cleaning up to 10 EndoWrist instruments in an approximately 45-minute cycle, "the SI PCF has been tested, validated and approved by leading surgical instrument manufacturers as the automated cleaning process of choice for their instruments. In addition, the SI PCF has the capacity to connect and flush 20+ MIS cannulated or fine lumen instruments per cycle," he added.

"When considering all of the necessary steps of the manual cleaning of instruments (enzyme soaking, manual flushing and brushing, followed by placing each instrument in a standard ultrasonic cycle) valuable time really adds up," said Jordan. "Also factor in the probability that the CS Technician may be interrupted during these time-consuming tasks, halting the cleaning process and further lengthening the instrument reprocessing timeframe. The Medisafe Sonic Irrigator (SI) PCF automatically combines the crucial components of enzyme soaking, thorough lumen flushing and aggressive sonication into a single tested and validated 45 +/-minute cycle. By then adding the thermal disinfection feature to the SI PCF process, users can save an additional 45 to 60 minutes off the traditional reprocessing routine."

Intelligent evaluation

Q: What questions should buyers ask when evaluating sterile processing equipment and technologies? What criteria should be included in an evaluation of sterile processing equipment?

There are more choices than ever for reprocessing technologies and this can make buying decisions complex for hospitals. Finding the best equipment solution for your SPD involves much more than just price. Here are some important questions to ask potential suppliers:

For steam sterilizers:

• What is the FDA listed load in the 510K? This includes the number of wrapped trays per cycle, weight per tray and total weight per cycle. Current AAMI ST8 guidelines state increased tray weights are becoming more common and recommend validating 25 lb trays. Can the vendor provide a copy of their sterilizers’ 510K showing the FDA listed load?

• How many "green" options are available for water savings?

For washer/disinfectors:

• What is the cycle time for the unit’s standard instrument cycle?

• How many trays can be processed per hour?

• Does the unit provide both high impingement and low impingement cycle options to meet a wide variety of washing needs?

For both washers and sterilizers:

• Can the OEM provide cycle tapes for their units showing actual in-use cycle times?

• Can the manufacturer provide a detailed total cost of ownership breakdown?

• How many of their washing or sterilizing units does the vendor have installed in the Customer’s geographic area?

• What are the vendor’s service capabilities? How many service technicians are within 1 hour of your location?

The answers to these questions may help you determine not only which systems would best meet your needs, but how many units you really need and which features and services will give you the most productivity for your investment.

~Erin Linville, director of marketing,
Infection Prevention Technologies, STERIS Corporation

What are the tradeoffs? Provide with me information on efficacy, materials compatibility, penetrability, safety, worker exposure limits and cycle time.

What do the IFUs for my instruments specify?

What low temperature portfolio of equipment will allow me to process the number of instruments that I need to in an efficient and efficacy manner?

What are the environmental considerations (utilities, water consumption, disposal/emission/waster considerations) and installation and ongoing preventive maintenance costs?

These are just some of the most important questions that cross the mind of a hospital administrator when he or she is looking to purchase a new low temperature sterilization system.

~Susan Flynn, Sterilization Assurance Technical Service,
3M Infection Prevention Division

The primary consideration for many buyers will likely be the standard of care they are providing for their patients. So, they should be concerned if the system provides the sterility assurance level that they need. They may also ask what measures are in place to ensure that proper sterilization conditions are met, what devices are validated for the system in the MDM’s IFUs, and whether the system offers terminal sterilization?

All STERRAD Systems provide the highest Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6 and are monitored using the STERRAD CYCLESURE 24 Biological Indicator (BI) to provide evidence of proper sterilization conditions. BIs provide the only direct measure of sterilization lethality, and their use is recommended by AAMI, AORN and the CDC.

Customers can reprocess a wide range of devices in their STERRAD Systems as they have been endorsed by leading MDMs in their IFUs. In addition, STERRAD Systems provide terminal sterilization so that devices can be used immediately or stored for later use, thus helping to make facilities more efficient and productive.

~Kira Paniagua, group product director for terminal sterilization,
Advanced Sterilization Products

It is reasonable to assume that the reason for considering a purchase of such a device is to process a reusable instrument and provide a safe and effective patient ready instrument for reuse. To do so would require that the instrument be cleaned to a validated quantifiable level of clean and disinfected to a state where no microorganisms survive on the surfaces.

Questions to ask:

• Does the processor clean to a quantifiable validated level of clean acceptable to the FDA?

• Does the processor disinfect to a level of >10-6 with no surviving CFUs?

• Is the process of cleaning, disinfecting and rinsing automated and tamper proof, i.e. a single cycle, multi step process?

• Can the machine process anything other than endoscopes, i.e. lumened and non lumened surgical and diagnostic instruments in the same chamber?

• Is the operation of this machine as foolproof as possible, i.e. does it use connectors?

~Terry Langford, president, Langford IC Systems

When evaluating sterile processing/cleaning equipment one should always ask whether or not the product can and will perform the specific tasks required of it. As surgical instruments become more complex, the need for efficient, specialized cleaning equipment increases. Buyers should consider products that are proven to be both versatile and effective at the various tasks required.

They should be upgradable when possible, comply with industry recognized practices and meet the surgical instrument manufacturers automated cleaning requirements.

~Gary Jordan, president, Medisafe America

• Does this reprocessing company offer a selection or range of reprocessing equipment which allows me to select the best system based on my needs?

• How is this company rated based on customer feedback by an independent outside firm like MD Buyline?

• Does the company have dedicated Clinical Specialists to support me in the training of my staff and in understanding how to properly operate it.

• How far is the reprocessing company’s Field Service Engineer located from my facility, in the situation that my reprocessor requires repair?

• Can we call one number to order consumable supplies, schedule service, or talk to billing, or do we have to have multiple telephone numbers for your company?

• What is the scope or breadth of this company? Do they offer a comprehensive endoscope reprocessing product line which addresses all areas of endoscope reprocessing including initial bedside cleaning, manual leak test, the manual cleaning detergents and flushing aids, a full line of endoscope reprocessors, and endoscope storage cabinets?

~Alexa Chapin, associate product manager, Medivators


What criteria should be included in an evaluation of AER equipment?

• Can this one reprocessor allow me to process all of my endoscopes, or will I need to purchase/find additional reprocessing equipment/methods for some of my scopes, such as the large "EUS" ultrasound scopes or Tee Probes?

• Does the reprocessor contain the Leak Testing capability which allows endoscope with a small leak to be safely reprocessed prior to being sent in for repair.

• Does the reprocessor have built-in Automated Alcohol and Air Flushing of the endoscope at the end of the reprocessing cycle, which facilitates endoscope drying and bacterial growth due to moisture during storage.

• Does the reprocessor include electronic computer storage of endoscope reprocessing cycle data, which allows endoscope traceability and Excel report generation?

• What additional construction costs will be required with this new reprocessor?

• What is the physical size of the unit and will it fit easily into my existing space?

• Will it connect to 110VAC electrical power or will an electrician need to run new wiring.

• Does the reprocessor use standard incoming tap water, or does it require specialized "softened" water which will require additional plumbing costs?

~Alexa Chapin, associate product manager, Medivators


What can help with determining the financial impact of equipment purchases as well as quantifying productivity benefits such as throughput capabilities?

Productivity, total cost of ownership over the life of the product, and the environmental impact of the product can all contribute to the financial impact and advantages of one piece of equipment over another. Not all sterilizers or washer/disinfectors are equal – these are not "me too" or commodity products. One of the best ways to determine the financial impact and productivity benefits of an equipment purchase is to have the vendor work with you to complete an in-depth sizing study and then determine your true equipment and capacity requirements. This information can illustrate where your gaps are and help identify the best piece of equipment to solve your problem. Additionally, you should work with vendors who can provide technical monographs illustrating the microbial log reduction for their washer/disinfector’s disinfection phase – these documents provide details on how the supplier tested and met FDA’s thermal disinfection requirements. Details on the cost of consumables (instrument cleaning chemistries, BIs, CIs, etc), cost of steam, water and electricity per cycle are critical as well. In order to compare "apples to apples" you need to use these types of tools to ensure that you know the equipment you are buying can meet your needs.

~Erin Linville, director of marketing, Infection Prevention Technologies, STERIS Corporation

When evaluating the overall financial impact of a purchase, it is important to look beyond just the cost of the system. Facilities should also consider how the system fits with their reprocessing needs. Is it validated for the instruments they use? How much can they reprocess in a cycle? What are the operational costs? What are the costs for service and maintenance?

To help customers minimize the financial costs of their purchases, ASP offers a variety of alternatives for customers, promotions and available financing options. In addition, a one-year warranty is included with the purchase of all STERRAD Systems.

From an operational standpoint, STERRAD Systems can process a wide range of devices, so staff often saves time by running complete sets of instruments in one container or tray in one cycle. And because devices are terminally sterilized, the facility does not have to incur the costs of rerunning instruments that are not used. ASP representatives are available to customers to help them determine the best way to maximize their STERRAD Systems.

Select scalable solutions for instrument processing. Hospitals should consider the versatility of a sterilization system. A platform with expandable capabilities will provide healthcare facilities a long-term solution with the flexibility they need to maximize their investment.

~Kira Paniagua, group product director for terminal sterilization,
Advanced Sterilization Products

For a hospital administrator looking to purchase a new sterilization system, cost impact is of utmost importance. Both acquisition/installation costs and daily operating costs, including sterilant, monitoring products and wrapping materials, should be considered.

100 percent ethylene oxide’s initial equipment cost can be lower which, combined with a typical the operating cost per cubic foot advantage, can lead to significant savings.

~Susan Flynn, Sterilization Assurance Technical Service,
3M Infection Prevention Division

• Can the reprocessing company provide me with a "TCO" or "Total Cost of Ownership" spreadsheet, which identifies the full cost of purchasing the reprocessor, as well as the cost of operating it on an annual basis, based on my endoscope throughput?

• What is the "CPC" or Cost per Cycle of running the endoscope reprocessor?

• What is endoscope reprocessing cycle reprocessing time? Does the reprocessor quickly turn over a scope which allows me to minimize my overall investment in endoscopes?

• If the reprocessor has two asynchronous reprocessing basins, will one basin continue to allow me to reprocess endoscopes if the other basin goes down, or will I have to revert to manual endoscope cleaning?

~Alexa Chapin, associate product manager, Medivators


What are some ways to maximize investments in equipment?

• Does the company offer a trade-in program for my old reprocessor?

• How long will the unit continue to be manufactured, and how long will service parts be available for the reprocessor.

• What is the recommended "PM" or Preventative Maintenance" schedule for the reprocessor and how much will it cost on an annual basis?

• Can the reprocessor be remotely accessed (via the internet) and diagnostics performed by the reprocessing company, which would identifying potential service areas before they actually come up?

~Alexa Chapin, associate product manager, Medivators

 SPS Technolgy & Equipment Vendor Chart