Advanced instrument tracking
paves the way for quality
by Julie E. Williamson
Instrument tracking is certainly not a new
concept, but some new developments are taking shape that are making the
function even more valuable – and making more sterile processing
professionals and even C-suite executives stand up and take notice.
That’s certainly good news for
resource-strapped SPDs that have struggled to get their facilities to even
consider building instrument tracking solutions into the budget. And it’s
also good news for the operating room and other hospital customers served by
the SPD, not to mention, the patient on the receiving end of the instruments
(and processes) being tracked.
Today, the capabilities of instrument
tracking systems go far beyond what the name implies. While tracking
instruments undoubtedly remains a critical core function, vendors are
building in a multitude of other functions and benefits that, if fully
tapped by the end user, can further enhance quality in the SPD, offer a
better return on investment, and provide even greater peace of mind. The
bottom line, sources told Healthcare Purchasing News, is that today’s
instrument tracking solutions have evolved into true instrument management
solutions that allow for effective data capture and dissemination that can
greatly improve department-wide (and even facility-wide) quality and
efficiency.
"While asset management tools can be the
most immediate and significant areas of impact for SPDs following
implementation, that can really be just the start," stressed Clay Cannady,
vice president of sales, marketing and business development for Mequon,
IL-based Materials Management Microsystems.
"There are a number of ways for robust
systems to impact productivity. Training aids, competency measurement
methods, tools for LEAN process design, and a broad range of integration
capabilities represent a pretty sizable runway for ongoing performance
improvement year after year."
Integration boosts value
More than ever, facilities are beginning to
embrace comprehensive instrument tracking solutions. A number of vendors
reported significant customer growth over the past year or two, which some
attributed to a heightened focus on patient safety and quality improvement,
and standards and regulations, such as GS1 and Unique Device Identification,
that are pushing accountability and device traceability to the forefront.
According to Michael Mancebo, director of
sales for TGX Medical Systems, Carmel, IN, business is accelerating as more
facilities try to rise above the pressure of meeting these standards and
staying one step ahead of surveyors who are becoming more keenly focused on
patient safety and traceability.
"It wasn’t long ago when having an
instrument tracking system was considered ‘pie in the sky.’ Now, we see more
facilities seeing it as a real necessity," he said. "And for many facilities
that did have instrument tracking in place, we’re now seeing them want to
really push their systems beyond the basics. They’re now coming to us and
saying, ‘We’re ready to do more. Show me everything.’"
While exact features and functions will, of
course, differ from one system to the next, some notable trends have
surfaced – with advanced equipment connectivity capabilities ranking high on
the list.
"The greatest advancement is the increased
interface capabilities to multiple types of equipment and technology
applications," confirmed Mike Patterson, senior vice president of sales and
marketing for Censis Technologies Inc., Franklin, TN. He noted that systems
can now interface with various manufacturers of washers and sterilizers, OR
scheduling systems, materials management procurement systems, online
sterilization and reprocessing guidelines, while also integrating with RFID/RTLS,
vision scanning systems, voice recognition, and robotics. "These interfaces
to equipment and having information readily available help support the
overall objective of having the right instruments in the right place at the
right time, thus, positively enhancing patient safety."
 |
|
The instacount PLUS
instrument management system from Aesculap being used in the CSSD to
assemble an instrument set. Aesculap’s surgical instruments already
come marked with a data matrix mark that includes the instrument’s
catalog number and an individual serial number. |
No question, this heightened degree of
connectivity allows for improved documentation, operational efficiency and
clinical outcomes. "Interfaces allow the hospital to automatically link data
between different software solutions, providing a more efficient and
error-free process," assured Jamie Molina, product manager, services
marketing, Aesculap Inc. Throughout the tracking process, Aesculap’s
Instacount PLUS captures data on staff productivity, sterilization,
maintenance, missing instruments, quality assurance, and more – all of which
can be easily summarized in reports that allow managers to make better
business decisions based on accurate, real-time data.
In SPD environments with washer and
sterilizer interfaces, electronic documentation of results serves to
streamline work, eliminate opportunities for human error and improve the
ability to handle internal Joint Commission audits, Cannady added. "With a
biological monitoring interface, you get real-time status information, tools
for managing recall down to the individual device, and the means for
providing notifications to surgeons and infection control in the event that
unfit instrumentation comes into contact with patients. Operationally for
the department and clinically for the hospital, this continues to be huge."
And the benefits don’t end there.
Connectivity with other software applications in the OR further enhance
operational efficiency and clinical outcomes, Cannady continued, noting that
capabilities that eliminate the need for manual tray scanning, while
preserving the traceability of the uniquely identified instrumentation to
the patient or procedure, continue to demonstrate significant benefits to
all involved.
System integration could come in other
innovative ways, as well. Patterson predicts that hardware technology
advancements will push tracking system functionality, capabilities and ease
of use even higher. "As tablet utilization, such as the iPad, increases, we
believe tracking solutions will be required to function on these hardware
devices in the near future," he reasoned, adding that as access to
applications through this type of hardware increases, utilization will
increase as the electronic medical record initiatives advance. "Integration
with EMR data will become a requirement for the instrument tracking process.
Also, data mining and utilization analysis will become easier and more
prevalent."
The move to improve
SPD professionals from all different
backgrounds, locations and facility sizes are finding that stepping up their
instrument tracking capabilities can pay off handsomely.
When Carmen Ferriero III, MBA, sterile
processing manager for Albany Medical Center in New York, assumed his
position roughly three and a half years ago, he quickly determined that the
instrument tracking system in use,
Getinge’s T-DOC, wasn’t being tapped to
its fullest potential. In fact, he estimated that only 20 percent of the
system was being implemented. Fortunately, shortly after his start date, he
was able to travel to Rochester to attend a T-DOC user training group to
familiarize himself with all that the system could offer and formulate a
strategy for bringing his department up to speed. In short order, virtually
all features of the system were implemented and the benefits began rolling
in.
"We have been able to increase overall
process efficiency and improve instrument set accuracy, which has led to
greater overall product quality," Ferriero said, adding that the ability to
quickly locate instruments throughout the entire process, while also greatly
reducing time and headaches associated with product recalls, has helped
significantly improve customer service.
Prior to assuming his role as the SPD’s
manager, the staff would scan the barcode and then print off a component
list. "I turned to the pack on-screen function where a component screen pops
up and staff now have to actually click through each one before the barcode
is given. It’s about improving quality and accuracy." Photos and notes are
also being incorporated into the system to help technicians ensure
instrument and process accuracy, and promote staff education. Currently,
more than half of all instruments in the facility’s inventory have an
accompanying photo incorporated into T-DOC. Ferriero also plans to work with
a training specialist to develop videos that can pop up for certain
instruments or sets, and steer technicians to proper practices.
"I might be on the video saying, ‘Remember,
this is how you do this,’ or ‘don’t forget this step.’ I’ve found that
instrument tracking systems can serve as a valuable training tool – you just
have to be willing to be creative and take the time to explore the various
features."
The scores of data collected by the system
can also prove invaluable for creating productivity reports and even
justifying staffing levels. Ferriero creates monthly productivity and
quality reports, and individual productivity reports – and he also posts
errors to serve another educational purpose. "Everyone in my department
knows where they stand. They know that quality and accuracy is the focus
here, not how fast they can get something done. Using our tracking system in
so many different ways has helped keep everyone focused on quality and
following good practices."
Even smaller facilities are reaping the
benefits of instrument tracking systems. When Valley View Hospital in
Glenwood Springs, CO, adopted TGX Medical Systems’ Alex Gold instrument
tracking system in early 2011, it, too, discovered that the solution could
do far more than pinpoint instrument set location. Currently, the SPD tracks
all sets and also uses the system to scan in all peel pouch items. "We also
use the system for all our loaner instruments, which has been really helpful
for keeping track of that process," said clinical coordinator Michelle Long.
"We’ve also started incorporating sterilization processes into the tracking
system and we’ll begin adding photos, too. We’re also scanning in our load
receipts that come off the sterilizers [with an actual scanner, not a
barcode scanner], so we can know the parameters and see exactly what was in
a load." An added perk: the facility is also using Alex Gold for tissue
tracking, allowing the materials coordinator and circulating nurse to easily
scan it in upon receipt. Prior to this, circulators relied on an archaic
sticker-based process that was time consuming and highly inefficient.
"Tissue tracking has become a very big
Joint Commission issue. When we had a surveyor come, he really concentrated
on the tissue tracking component," Long noted. "We are very proud of our
progress with our tracking system and we actually wanted the surveyor to
come into our department."
Broadening the scope
Although the exact extent that surveyors’
focus, as well as GS1 barcoding standards and unique device identifier
regulations, will have on the instrument tracking segment – particularly in
regard to instrument-level tracking – remains to be seen, some predict that
the impact will be significant. That push will likely begin with providers
and manufacturers of surgical instruments and then flow throughout the
supply chain. Food and Drug Administration regulations are also on the
horizon, and not as far away as some might expect.
"From our discussions with the FDA, we know
the timeline is within five years from the regulations becoming final for
Class III medical devices," said Patterson, noting that, ultimately, it will
be the Joint Commission or the hospitals themselves that will help push the
requirement to track instruments to the patient level. "This capability
already exists and we have many Censitrac customers utilizing it now."
More hospitals are showing an interest in
instrument-level tracking, with some vendors seeing the greatest push from
multi-facility organizations that aim to embrace instrument-level tracking
at the corporate or regional level. "These organizations are seeing the
value brought by standardization on a single solution that enhances
information about the assets used during surgical procedures. [That] results
in greater patient safety, while generating a return on investment," added
Patterson. "These for-profit and government-owned multi-hospital networks
are investing in tracking capabilities by budgeting dollars at the
individual facility level for the purchase and implementation of
instrument-level tracking solutions."
Mancebo, too, is seeing more hospital
networks getting on board, as opposed to just individual hospitals buying
for themselves. "They want one database, so they can have that visibility
and transparency across their different facilities," he said. "If there are
three hospitals in a network, for example, and they have to share
instruments, they can see exactly where those instruments are – plus, they
can have the record to show where and how those instruments were last
processed, and by whom," he said. Alex Gold also features new document
scanning technology, allowing any PDF document to be scanned into the
system, thereby giving staff easy, at-a-glance access to processing
instructions and other pertinent information on virtually any item in
inventory.
While Albany Medical Center isn’t yet
tracking to the patient level, it’s one of Ferriero’s top goals. "From an
infection control standpoint, this is an invaluable capability because you
can trace the instruments all the way to the patient and you can establish
whether there were any anomalies in the processing of instruments for that
particular patient," he explained, noting that this could be a particularly
valuable tool for hospitals facing lawsuits associated with infections or
other adverse events. Another goal, which will soon become a reality by
2013, is tying T-DOC to the OR’s scheduling system, he said.
 |
|
Advanced tracking with
T-DOC at Albany Medical Center improves process efficiency, accuracy and
customer service. |
Tony O’Hehir, product manager for T-DOC and
Getinge Online, further pointed out that the opportunity to eliminate lost
instruments and enable full traceability back to the patient and procedure
is invaluable – especially when managing a process failure or instrument
recall. "The time, cost-savings, level of detail, and confidence that the
SPD and OR teams gain with these benefits enables them to focus on other key
areas that improve patient safety," O’Hehir said. In addition to ensuring
that procedures are met and that effective washing, disinfection and
sterilization occurs, it also helps prevent the skipping of required steps,
added O’Hehir.
Because coding a hospital’s entire
inventory can be a long and costly process, instrument manufacturers are
working to take away some of that burden. When hospitals are ready to move
forward with implementing individual instrument tracking, purchasing
instruments that already have the code on the instrument will save time and
money because they won’t have to code the individual devices themselves,
noted Molina.
The majority of Aesculap surgical
instruments are already manufactured with a data matrix code that includes
an individual code, the UNICOS code, to each instrument, she said.
"This means each instrument marked with
UNICOS code is uniquely identifiable. The instrument carries the UNICOS code
both in plain text and encoded in a machine-readable Data Matrix," Molina
continued. "The information that can be read consists of the article number
and a five character unique identifier. This data matrix code can be read
with a 2-D camera system and tracked individually through a hospital’s
instrument management system."
Other marking technologies are available
that are compliant with Global Harmonization Task Force final guidance for
unique device identification. SignaKey, for example, is an encrypted
automatic identification technology (Auto-ID) marking system that uses laser
DMP on the instrument’s surface and can guarantee that every instrument is
unique – an obvious requirement for any UDI. Using only five of the 14
available fields, a SignaKey mark can track 281 trillion unique instruments
– and a SignaKey UDI cannot be duplicated or cloned, said Richard McDermott,
Ph.D., CEO of SignaKey LLC.
"The FDA hopes that UDI can improve
visibility for a range of issues that include medical device recalls, plus
tracking and tracing, and anticounterfeiting/diversion," he said. SignaKey
is based on proprietary closed system software that can track, trace and
authenticate. "Almost all other marking systems depend on Data Matrix, which
is based on an open source technology," he said.
Scalable solutions offer
security
With the looming regulations, it’s prudent
for facilities in the market for instrument tracking systems to explore
solutions and vendors that can offer them a scalable technology that can
allow for instrument-based, patient-level tracking – even if the hospital
isn’t yet ready to tackle tracking to that level.
"We think it is a proactive measure when
our prospects take instrument-level tracking capabilities into consideration
when choosing a tracking solution, as it will one day be a requirement,"
said Patterson. "While we obviously encourage our customers and prospects to
adopt instrument-level tracking as quickly as possible, we also assist in a
phased-in implementation of functionality." Many customers start with
tracking flexible endoscopes or mobile equipment or sterilization data, for
example, and then begin phasing in tray tracking and, eventually, individual
instruments as budgets and staffing resources allow – or as staff become
more familiar with the application and tracking concepts, he noted. To
provide greater scalability, Censis introduced several new entry-level
products focused on specific areas of traceability and management, such as
endoscope tracking, count sheet management or electronic sterilization
record-keeping. Further, the new modular design of Censitrac allows
customers to increase their system’s functionality whenever they are ready.
To maximize a systems’ long-term value,
facilities should lean heavily on their vendor partners for as-needed
training, inservices and system upgrades and enhancements. As part of
Microsystems’ technical support agreement, for example, customers receive an
annual upgrade that includes all enhancements since the previous upgrade.
The second phase of case cart management tools are being introduced, Cannady
said, and will continue to have a favorable impact on departmental flow,
service levels and fill rates to users. Additionally, Immediate Use
Sterilization capabilities and enhanced tools for high-level disinfectors
were introduced in February 2012.
As part of its annual software management
agreement, Aesculap’s Instacount PLUS releases software updates annually,
with a new software version due for release this year that Molina said will
increase functionality, while providing customers with a new user-friendly
look and feel.
Getinge typically releases a new version of
T-DOC every 12 to 24 months – with the most recent software, Version 9.0,
released in July 2011. This version features new flexibility in
custom-naming error messages and alerts, and also includes two new optional
modules – the remote messaging module that allows T-DOC alerts to be sent to
cell phones – and the OR PlanAssure module that lets staff manage transport
and turnaround times to predict the availability of instruments.
Whichever vendor and tracking system a
hospital ultimately chooses, Ferriero confirmed that there’s tremendous
value in creating a true partnership with the vendor and working together to
drive the most benefits and functionality of the system.
"An instrument tracking system is a big
investment for a hospital, and it’s one that I believe it definitely worth
the expense and hard work," he said. "But if you’re going to implement it,
it’s important to do more than scratch the surface. I know firsthand how
staying committed and finding creative ways to make it work better and
harder for you can really pay off in the end."

