Inside the Current Issue

Cover Story
Managing critical care supply tensions
Self Study Series
Purchasing Connection
Resources
Show Calendar
HPN Hall of Fame
HPN ProductLink
Classifieds
Issue Archives
Advertise
About Us
Home
Subscribe

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

For Email Marketing you can trust
Special Event Photos
Contact Us
KSR Publishing, Inc.
Copyright © 2012

People, Places, Processes & Products that Influence the Supply Chain

 

INSIDE THE CURRENT ISSUE

February 2011

People & Opinions

Worth Repeating

"Smart phones could replace [radiofrequency] scanners and dynamic dispatching tools. Every smart phone has a camera and with apps like RedLaser, they can scan products or locations and provide real-time transaction-level information that could be processed and optimized to direct or dispatch supply chain personnel to the next most efficient task. This transaction-level detail could also be used to track the productivity of the workforce and to establish work standards that will help in assuring the maximum utilization of all human and physical assets."

Vance Moore, senior vice president, operations,
Sisters of Mercy Health System

"UPMC decided recently to move the management of the pharmacy company under the supply chain management organization since both areas perform many of the same operational processes... In the past, these activities were governed under separate policies using different processes and technologies. Many of the pharmacy processes were manual. It made sense to tap the resources active in the supply chain transformation and avoid additional staff cost for UPMC."

Mary Beth Lang, R.Ph., MPM, senior director, supply chain management commercial services, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

"There hasn’t necessarily been an emphasis on reimbursement for the treatment of obesity, but there is a lot of emphasis on the treatment of the co-morbidities for obesity."

Cathy Denning, vice president, sourcing operations at Novation

"The prevalence of antibiotic resistance is rapidly increasing in both healthcare and community settings. According to the CDC, antibiotic resistance is a major patient and medication safety issue in modern healthcare. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and SHEA have published extensive guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship, which clearly outline that more than 50% of antimicrobial use is inappropriate."

J. Hudson Garrett Jr.,
PhD, senior director,
Clinical Affairs, PDI

"Using our tracking system in so many different ways has helped keep everyone focused on quality and following good practices."

Carmen Ferriero III, MBA,
sterile processing manager, Albany Medical Center

 

Reducing unscheduled equipment downtime in CPD and OR

by Ross W. Simon, BA and John H. Dzialo, RN, BSN, MBA, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

The key goal of the Central Processing Department (CPD) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in Boston, MA is to clean and provide sterilized surgical instrumentation when needed in the operating rooms. To do so, equipment in CPD must be available and working properly; prompt repair and effective preventive maintenance is an absolute necessity. This article describes a simple reporting tool developed and implemented at BIDMC to effectively communicate the need for repairs to the appropriate individuals and departments. The report (FIGURE 1) also provides an historical perspective of equipment performance to highlight chronic failures and therefore help make informed decisions to replace equipment for which the cost of ownership has increased to unacceptable levels; by doing so, it assists in capital planning. In addition, the report monitors compliance with preventive maintenance (PM) schedules.

Figure 1 - Click image of table above to view at full size.

The following key information is included as comments in the cell listing the name of each piece of equipment; hovering over the cells brings-up these data.

• Manufacturer

• Model

• Serial number

• Installation date

• End useful life date

• PM Schedule

Unscheduled downtime caused by aging equipment and its increased usage provided the impetus for developing this tool. As part of a multi-pronged approach including replacement of equipment that had exceeded its life cycle, a service technician on-site at the start of every day, a change to the notification system to eliminate the middleman as well as maintenance staff working directly with an equipment manufacturer representative and the CPD’s supervisor, the increased awareness and sense of urgency that this report provides helped reduced unscheduled downtime.

Discussion

Initially there was no structured method to report equipment failures. The first attempt was a daily email message; it was a point-in-time snapshot, usually in mid-afternoon stating which piece(s) of equipment were not functioning. Importantly, it did not provide an historical perspective of equipment performance. Though effective to alert personnel of which pieces of equipment were unavailable (so work-arounds and repairs could ensue) there were no means of tracking downtime and identifying or responding appropriately to equipment that was chronically down.

This initial process for reporting and initiating corrective action is outlined below:

Equipment failure

Supervisor notified of equipment failure

Supervisor notifies Service Response Center

Service Response Center notifies Maintenance

Maintenance inspects to see if it’s an infrastructure/utility related issue

99% of the time, Maintenance calls-in Manufacturer’s authorized service technician

To reduce response time we had the supervisor call the technician directly:

Equipment failure

Supervisor notified of equipment failure

Supervisor calls-in Manufacturer’s authorized service technician

To further reduce response time, we established a contract with the manufacturer’s representative to have a service technician on-staff from 0830 – 1700 Mon-Fri.

To address a continuing high level of unscheduled downtime, the authors developed a simple reporting tool providing a daily and historical perspective of equipment performance – see below. Up or down arrows on a colored field denote equipment status as follows:

- Equipment operating normally

- Unscheduled down

- Operating with problems

- Intentionally down for construction or other facility improvement requiring equipment to be shut down

The report is issued and reviewed daily by the Maintenance Department and Sr. Vice President, BIDMC Facilities. It is also reviewed at a weekly Central Processing Department Workforce meeting to discuss trends and act accordingly.

Note the cell comments which list key information for each piece of equipment:

• Manufacturer

• Model

• Serial Number

• Installation Date

• End Useful Life

• Scheduled Preventive Maintenance Dates

Ross Simon is senior management engineer at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

John Dzialo is project director, perioperative services.

As a subsequent improvement of this report, compliance with scheduled preventive maintenance (PM) will be indicated by color coding the name of each piece of equipment as follows.

GREEN - PM up-to-date

RED - PM late

Equipment reliability is, of course, linked with PM schedule compliance. These PM schedule compliance indicators enable the organization to respond in a timely manner to service provider performance or lack thereof. It provides a visible measure of the performance of the service technician to the medical center’s maintenance department, hospital administration, and the provider. It also facilitates optimization of PM by visualizing the effect (unscheduled downtime) of reducing the frequency of PM.

Conclusion

A simple equipment downtime reporting tool has been developed and implemented at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center to assist in reducing unscheduled downtime for critical path equipment used to reprocess surgical instrumentation in the CPD and operating rooms. The report shows, at a glance, patterns of unscheduled downtime indicating chronic mechanical failures that may help prioritize capital equipment purchases and save money by, in the long term, reducing the cost of ownership. The cost or replacement may outweigh the cost of continued attempts at repairs and work-arounds. It also assists in capital planning.