Breaking away from the pack of healthcare
leaders
UPMC Health System
stresses, strives for ‘world-class’ supply chain operations
|
Receiving the award at AHRMM 2012 |
by Rick Dana Barlow
Sometimes,
going out on a limb and taking a chance can pay off — big time — regardless
of any perceived risk.
Six years ago, UPMC Health System, a
Pittsburgh-based multi-hospital system that befits the description of
integrated delivery network, broke the traditionalist mold and reached
outside the confines of healthcare supply chain — and healthcare itself — to
pluck someone from industry to realign, re-energize and reposition its own
supply chain operations.
When James Szilagy left Alcoa as vice
president of its Global Procurement Center of Excellence he made one of
those rare — but not unheard of — migrations to a healthcare organization
that desired, and needed, to get to the next level.
At minimum, Szilagy, who buttressed himself
with a solid, talent-rich group of senior-level administrators, served as a
catalyst for a supply chain management division poised for performance,
implementing an industrial philosophy as the foundation for propelling
supply chain operations closer to the C-suite, and virtually ignoring, yet
somehow integrating, all of those deep-seeded claims that healthcare’s
convoluted model is "different" from industry.
As a result, UPMC’s reinvigorated supply
chain division, which reinforces experience, higher-level talent and
training, by establishing a "culture of automation" that uses accurate data
to direct and drive centralized oversight of system-wide supply chain
operations, creating a detailed blueprint for product evaluation,
acquisition and support, cultivating trust and collaboration with clinicians
and administrators, developing and managing a consolidated service center
and originating and promoting a revenue-generating product-as-a-service that
connects everything full circle.
For these reasons Healthcare
Purchasing News chose UPMC Health System’s Supply Chain
Management Division as its 2012 Supply Chain Management Department of
the Year.
|
Standing Left to
Right – Tim Nedley, Sr. Director, Materials Management; Michael DeLuca,
Sr. Director, Supply Chain Solutions & Consulting Services; David
Hargraves, Vice President, Clinical Supply Chain; Patrick Flaherty,
Director, Supply Chain Management; Kelly Coxon, Director, Procure to
Pay; Lynn Koziak, Director, Finance
Seated – Left to
Right – Toni Silva, Director, Supplier Relations; Mary Beth Lang, Vice
President, HCP and SCM Commercial Operations; Robert Pavlik, Vice
President, Non-Clinical Supply Chain;
James Szilagy, Chief Supply Chain Officer |
Fast Facts on UPMC Health System |
Headquarters: Pittsburgh, PA |
Facilities: 20+ acute care hospitals, 9 urgent care
centers, more than 50 imaging centers, five pharmacies and a host of
non-acute care sites, including community outpatient facilities, cancer
care centers, international locations, retirement and long-term care
facilities and rehabilitation facilities |
Beds (licensed and average operating):
|
4,516 and 4,329 |
|
2011 |
2012 |
Inpatient Admissions: |
190,216 |
201,322 |
Outpatient Visits: |
3,269,844 |
3,671,558 |
Surgical cases: |
173,997 |
175,365 |
Total net revenue: |
$9 B |
$9.6B |
CEO: Jeffrey A. Romoff |
CFO: Robert A. DeMichiei |
Supply Chain Management Division |
Chief Supply Chain Officer: |
James A. Szilagy |
Joined organization: |
2005 |
Previous position: |
Vice President, Alcoa’s Global Procurement Center of
Excellence |
Started supply chain career: |
1986, Buyer, Ryobi Power Tools |
Vice Presidents, Senior Directors, Directors at UPMC: |
David Hargraves
Vice President, Clinical Supply Chain |
Kelly Coxon
Director, Procure to Pay |
Robert Pavlik
Vice President, Non-Clinical Supply Chain |
Lynn Koziak
Director, Finance |
Mary Beth Lang
Vice President, HCP and SCM Commercial Operations |
Patrick Flaherty
Director, Supply Chain Management |
Tim Nedley
Senior Director, Materials Management |
Toni Silva
Director, Supplier Relations |
Michael DeLuca
Senior Director, Supply Chain Solutions & Consulting Services |
In addition, the UPMC Supply Chain Management Division
has 3 Assistant Directors, 2 Associate Directors, 2 Senior Managers and
26 Managers. |
Employees/FTEs (UPMC Supply Chain Management Division):
501 |
Conduit to CEO: Robert A. DeMichiei, CFO |
GPO affiliation: MedAssets |
Annual purchasing volume/supply expenses (FY2011 vs.
FY2012): |
2011
$1.7B |
2012
$1.9B |
Percentage of purchase orders transmitted
electronically: |
51% |
Percentage of requisitions processed electronically:
|
100% |
Division functions: |
I. Clinical Supply Chain |
a. Strategic Sourcing |
b. Consolidated Service Center |
II. Non-Clinical Supply Chain |
a. Strategic Sourcing |
III. Hospital Operations |
IV. Materials Management |
a. UPMC Transportation |
b. Moving and Storage |
V. Finance |
|
a. Catalog & Content Team |
b. Quality Assurance Team |
VI. Procure to Pay |
VII. Commercial Operations |
VIII. Healthcare Pharmacy |
IX. Supply Chain Systems & Consulting Services |
X. Supplier Relations |
Purchasing and contract management: |
Centralized |
Total annual operating expenses: |
2011: $8.6 B |
2012: $9.2B |
Source: UPMC Health System, Supply Chain Management
Division, June 2012 |
|
C-suite puncture
To bridge the historical gulf between
supply chain management and the C-suite UPMC created the position of Chief
Supply Chain Officer (CSCO), tapping Szilagy to "guide the team in expanding
the reach of supply chain" after evaluating the health system’s challenges
and developing a strategic plan to solve them.
"UPMC’s desire to create a CSCO is a clear
indication of their belief that a progressive supply chain organization is
not a luxury but a necessity in order to be able to compete and grow within
the challenging healthcare environment," Szilagy said. "UPMC recognized
healthcare’s lagging understanding of progressive supply chain practices and
reached out to an industrial leader with world class experience."
Szilagy reports to the Chief Financial
Officer. While UPMC does not have a Chief Operating Officer, Szilagy
unofficially fills that role, even though he does not report directly to the
CEO.
"A CSCO needs to have real time access to
operational ownership of the organization," he noted. "It is more practical
to align supply chain management with finance in order to optimally affect
day-to-day operations.
"Our CEO sets the strategy for the
organization and is engaged in the operations where appropriate, but allows
his leadership team the freedom to execute on his vision across all
operating areas," he continued. "The CSCO has day-to-day autonomy and
decision-making ability for this $10 billion enterprise."
Yet Szilagy insisted that his
non-healthcare background need not be a requirement for successful change.
"At the very least you need a strong and
creative business leader who is willing to take on the high risk challenge
of leading a very large multifaceted organizational transformation in an
industry that historically has been reluctant to change," he advised.
Szilagy saw UPMC’s opportunity as the next
phase of his career and a way to parlay his experience to make a difference
for clinicians, administrators and patients.
"The opportunity to work in the healthcare
industry was appealing to me in that by leading the transformation of the
supply chain organization from an underperforming group to a high performing
team I could contribute significantly to UPMC’s primary mission of providing
outstanding patient care," he said. "Creating and managing an efficient and
predictable supply chain for our clinicians and employees who care for our
patients provides me with a personal and professional gratification beyond
what I envisioned when I
joined UPMC."
Elevating supply chain operations’ stature
at the top didn’t stop with the leader but extended more deeply into the
division as UPMC "upgraded the talent level of the supply chain team,"
according to Szilagy. In fact, UPMC requires a Bachelor’s degree for "most"
open positions, which has increased the number of degreed staff members. In
addition, a number of staff members have earned Master’s degrees and one —
Mary Beth Lang, R.Ph., MPM, ScD, vice president, Health Care Pharmacy and
Supply Chain Management Commercial Operations — recently earned a doctoral
degree.
"UPMC recognizes the value of experience
but recognizes the critical importance of higher level training as it moves
forward," Szilagy indicated. "UPMC has an education support system that
continually encourages all employees to pursue personal enrichment and
development."
|
Catherine Onorato, Lead Nurse, and Brian Haley, Supply
Specialist, replenish stock in the Radiology Department. |
|
Ray DiCaprio, Pharmacy Warehouser, Controlled
Substance Specialist, checks inventory in the Healthcare Pharmacy
Distribution Center. |
|
Michelle Felice, Supply Specialist, replenishes PAR
stock. |
|
Tyrik Watson, MedSurg Warehouser, ships a completed
order from the UPMC Consolidated Services Center. |
|
Adam Sines, MedSurg Warehouser picks supplies in the
UPMC Consolidated Services Center. |
Setting up shop
Shortly after arriving at UPMC Health
System in 2006, Szilagy created an internal "Supply Chain Management
Consulting Services" group to evaluate operations and processes and to
prepare UPMC for an automated end-to-end, procure-to-pay transformation over
time that also would serve as a litmus test for supply chain expansion and
centralization of supply chain operations.
He hired a former colleague from Alcoa with
supply chain systems and e-business integration experience in the
manufacturing, software and consulting services sectors to lead a team that
"leveraged its combined experience across multiple industry sectors to drive
automation/efficiency in the procure-to-pay and supply chain space." This
group would tackle a variety of initiatives ranging from ERP application
implementations to the project management of system-wide clinical equipment
deployments.
Szilagy originally walked into a
decentralized system of operations that didn’t extend to individual hospital
materials management departments because of inherent distrust.
"Hospital operations were reluctant to cede
control of materials management due in part to historical distrust in
purchasing/supply chain departments’ ability to maintain appropriate levels
of critical supplies," Szilagy noted. "Automation and transparent electronic
data systems, which drive measurable performance, are the foundation that
allow for these unfounded prejudices to be modified."
Since then, Szilagy’s team assumed
responsibility for "on-site materials managers embedded in UPMC system
facilities to ensure that any defects or process gaps are identified and
corrected in a timely manner," he said. "The placement of these on-site
managers has strengthened supply chain’s relationship with hospital
administrators and nursing staff, who no longer have to question if a needed
supply is available, or if it is past the expiration date when it is needed
in the treatment of patients."
A supply chain process improvement team
promotes and facilitates exposure to and expansion of central supply chain
operations, and a value analysis team, led by a nurse with a Master of
Business Administration, "encourages buy-in from clinical staff. While the
nurse reports to the supply chain management division she also maintains a
"dotted-line" to UPMC’s Chief Quality Officer. Her team "meets regularly
with different clinical groups to discuss supply chain strategy and explain
different organizational decisions, demonstrating the benefits of supply
chain to the system as a whole," Szilagy said.
"The dotted line doesn’t represent a
reporting relationship as much as it illustrates the connection to the value
analysis governance structure we have established," he clarified. "Any
organization regardless of size should have a governing body that provides
oversight of the [value analysis] process and be the final stop for appeals.
The point that needs emphasis is the definition of control. Even if supply
chain ‘owned’ the value analysis nurse 100 percent and there was no matrixed
relationship to a CQO, decisions made by the CQO would trump the supply
chain decisions. The critical point of the matrix is the proactive synthesis
of business processes that allow for [supply chain management] to make
decisions and efficiently implement them without fear of competing
initiatives or decisions coming from a Quality department. I encourage
integration with a CQO or equivalent and believe it is the fulcrum on which
SCM gains more control."
Last year, UPMC’s Supply Chain Division
brought pharmacy operations under its umbrella after an in-depth assessment
generated a green light.
"Assumption of pharmacy operations was
strongly supported by the senior medical director, UPMC Hospitals, who
perceived the strategy to align clinical services and supply chain as a
significant opportunity to integrate clinical and business controls with
strategy," Szilagy said.
"The bottom line and key driver is to
demonstrate the synergistic value delivered by aligning pharmacy supply
chain activity with the supply chain organization," he continued. "The
fundamentals of contracting, buying, paying and distribution are equivalent.
I think the order of events is critical to success. Assuming strategic
responsibilities and outcomes without having supporting systems and talent
is a recipe for failure. My recommendation is leading with an honest
assessment of people and technology and building solutions accordingly."
In the current fiscal year, the supply
chain division also integrated a newly acquired UPMC hospital, ramped up
systems for a newly constructed UPMC hospital and relocated UPMC’s
consolidated service center to a more centralized location, "accomplished
with no disruption of service for the numerous entities that it serves,"
Szilagy said.
The supply chain division also assumed
management of the system’s transportation operations from a third-party
provider.
To reinforce their progress and success on
every initiative, the supply chain division produces and shares a
"structured status report" on a monthly basis for stakeholders.
Through a 7-step process (see sidebar
online), UPMC Supply Chain Division develops sourcing plans and employs
value analysis to evaluate and standardize products and remove physician and
clinician practice variation, uses Cerner Pocket PC scanners and customized
reporting of shelf inventory and purchasing trends to efficiently centralize
distribution and stocking and manages a vendor justification process,
tracking metrics monthly.
"Clinician involvement in the value
analysis process is essential in order to understand the material
differences in clinical product and services," Szilagy noted. "Controlling
the purchasing channel and offering only those products which have been
vetted and supported through an evidence-based process is the first step in
understanding and reducing practice variation."
UPMC Supply Chain Division
by the numbersIn the first
two years of eProcurement participation, UPMC Supply Chain Division
reported increased efficiencies and cost savings from front-end
(electronic procurement) and back-end (electronic transactions/payment)
operations.
-
UPMC improved procurement cost as a
percentage of spend to 0.45 percent (vs. the "World Class Benchmark"
of 0.63 percent and the "Cross Industry Average" of 0.82 percent).
-
Purchase orders per buyer currently
stand at 11,933 annually (vs. the World Class Benchmark of 7,564 and
the Cross Industry Average of 3,433).
-
Cost per purchase order is $2.76 (vs.
the World Class Benchmark of $8.69 and the Cross Industry Average of
$15.42). UPMC declined to reveal the name of the research firm that
provides the World Class Benchmarks and Cross Industry Averages of
Fortune 500 companies within and outside the healthcare industry.
-
100 percent electronic-enabled (All
PO-based requisitions originate via eProcurement).
-
77 percent of PO lines are contract
compliant.
-
85 percent of spending managed by
eProcurement.
-
40 percent reduction in time dedicated
to managing the Item Master.
-
Almost half of 340,000 POs are fully
automated.
-
Contract compliance increased 40
percent.
-
Users spend 30 percent less time to
shop/order.
-
Since June 2007, the number of users has
increased to nearly 80 percent from 15 percent with a 94 percent
end-user satisfaction rate.
-
To date, the work of 25 full-time
equivalents shifted to strategic operations from transactional
activities.
-
Supply chain also redirected resources
for five data entry positions to two senior sourcing positions, each
of whom strives to save the facility $1 million per year.
-
EDI transaction costs have been cut in
half with guaranteed 100 percent electronic transactions regardless of
the supplier’s capability levels.
|
|
IT makes a deal
Information technology served as the
cornerstone of UPMC Supply Chain Division’s ultimate development and
progress.
"Objective data is the foundation for all
good business decisions," Szilagy assured, matter-of-factly.
In fact, IT and data collection and
analysis fulfilled the "culture of automation" that Szilagy strove to
manifest from the start. Such data would open doors and pave the way for the
supply chain division to assume its rightful oversight of product and
service evaluation, acquisition and implementation among UPMC’s more than 20
hospitals, 400 clinical service locations, an insurance services division
and a growing international and commercial services division in which
Szilagy’s team plays a key role. UPMC, which generates $10 billion in annual
revenue, also maintains relationships with more than 12,000 active
suppliers.
Case in point: Eight years ago, UPMC’s
supply chain was being smothered in paper. To wit, more than 220,000 paper
requisitions and purchase orders were filed in 2004 alone.
"UPMC’s culture of automation was an
intentional and critical step as it drove data analytics to support more
accurate contracting and was a prerequisite to overall resource
optimization," Szilagy told HPN.
That culture superseded traditional
"bread-and-butter" functions, such as contract negotiations and inventory
management.
"An efficient and reliable procure-to-pay
process is a ‘bread-and-butter’ supply chain function in my opinion,"
Szilagy corrected. "It’s about ROI. Focusing on automating the
procure-to-pay process creates multiple sources of value. First, you drive
contract compliance by establishing a defined, easy-to-use tool [or] process
for your organization to purchase goods and services with workflow aligned
with the signatory policy. [That’s] further enhanced by an electronic
marketplace that not only makes it easy for users to find what they need,
but also guides them to targeted items to ensure optimal value. When
resources are not consumed with transactional activity eliminated through
automation, they can focus on delivering value through creatively optimizing
contracting for a broader set of spend categories."
Yet, Szilagy cautioned against explaining
what they accomplished as a "linear" process.
"While we were addressing the IT
components, we were looking at all of the functions of supply chain in
improving all of the areas, which included, building a value analysis
program, increasing resources in sourcing, adopting category management and
utilizing the data that was made available through IT."
Supply chain’s efforts catalyzed its
"evolution from a heavily tactical, paper-laden operation into an
efficiently electronic one, freeing supply chain staff to focus more on
strategic activity and enabling clinicians to spend more time with
patients," he summarized.
Relying on manufacturing industry
experience, Szilagy’s team started by re-engineering its purchasing and
accounts payable processes to use an eProcurement platform for contract
compliant electronic requisitions.
"This was a vital step toward implementing
a totally automated supply chain that could accommodate the creation of
purchase orders sent electronically to the suppliers, who in turn could
issue electronic invoices that match the purchase orders, significantly
reducing match exceptions," he indicated. "It also helped to reallocate
resources by re-engineering the A/P and Buyer function within UPMC’s rapidly
growing system. The new eProcurement system was an effective solution to
operating expense pressure, including reducing staff, cutting the cost of
invoice processing, managing cash flow and gaining greater visibility into
A/P and Procurement processes."
Rather than sign a contract with a
third-party commercial system they opted to develop and use their own in the
form of Prodigo Solutions.
"We determined that we needed to move
forward with a solution that was healthcare provider-centered and not
attempt to fit a third-party solution designed to support other verticals to
the specific needs hospitals face now and into the future," Szilagy said.
"We can ensure that the product will evolve and stay ahead of the
ever-changing healthcare environment. We believed, and continue to believe,
that a highly flexible solution with a small IT footprint is correct for
healthcare providers, whatever their size or complexity.
The relationship was mutually beneficial,
according to Szilagy. "Supply Chain as user and content expert serves as the
research and development site for Prodigo Solutions," he added.
|
STAT MedEvac Flight
Crew and ER Nurse. UPMC’s supply chain team not only sources the
aircraft, but parts and fuel, too. |
|
UPMC initially worked with the Global
Healthcare Exchange (GHX) to adopt and implement eProcurement transaction
capabilities, which enabled UPMC’s Supply Chain Division to connect with
medical/surgical suppliers that participated in the GHX network. This
covered approximately 60 percent of its suppliers and 55 percent of its
total invoice lines through a single e-commerce exchange connection for
sending orders to suppliers and receiving order acknowledgements, shipping
information and electronic invoices.
Because the remaining 45 percent of invoice
lines came from about 5,000 suppliers that didn’t transact business through
electronic data interchange (EDI), UPMC’s Supply Chain Division contracted
with another software-as-a-service supplier to convert paper invoices to
electronic invoices, eliminating the manual work of entering invoices into
the UPMC enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and instead focusing
efforts on the resolution of discrepant invoices and other complex payment
issues, Szilagy indicated.
"UPMC’s solution was to leverage a provider
of optical character recognition (OCR) services, a generally available
solution to deal with the remaining sub-optimized invoices," he noted. "We
are still forced to use this because of the continued immaturity of the
healthcare market, relative to electronic invoice processing."
Since then, UPMC migrated this service to a
platform offered by its Prodigo Solutions subsidiary, ProdigoXchange, which
enables them to send POs from non-EDI compliant suppliers through the
exchange by converting electronic purchase orders to XML files or e-mails
for routing to the appropriate suppliers, which can reply with electronic
acknowledgements and invoices, according to Szilagy.
"Procurement Specialists (which are buyers)
and Catalog Content and Data Integrity Team personnel are proactively sent
personalized reports and data via e-mail so they don’t need to sift through
data by login to another application," he noted. "Automated e-mail alerts
notify individuals when specific action is required, allowing personnel to
stay on task."
Through Prodigo tools, UPMC managed to
funnel 100 percent of PO requisitions and 80 percent of spending through
electronic procurement. Moreover, nearly half of all POs are fully
automated. As a result, in less than two years Szilagy’s team recorded a 40
percent reduction in time spent on managing the Item Master, a 40 percent
increase in contract compliance and a 50 percent reduction in EDI
transaction costs, all of which translated to $3.5 million in annualized
hard-dollar savings to date.
Early efforts to convert to electronic
forms from paper ones using first-generation tools and voucher modules were
rife with shortcomings, according to Szilagy.
|
UPMC Health System
Chief Supply Chain Officer Jim Szilagy in his element. |
"At first, users continued to reinvent the
wheel with many of the orders they placed, leaving supply chain out of the
loop," he said. "Users initially sent their requests directly to suppliers
without involving supply chain and in turn had invoices sent directly to
them. This resulted in no visibility regarding how many disbursement
requests were out there or what they were for because they weren’t being
entered into a cohesive system. The initial eProcurement tools had limited
search functionality and did not allow for quickly finding contracted items.
This led to 80 percent of orders being entered as ‘free-form’ or as special
requests that required excessive time from the buyers who had to qualify
orders, confirm prices, check vendors and decipher what the requestor was
trying to order."
Today, end users can click on a single link
to access a hosted application containing more than 2 million contracted
items as well as contract terms, searchable spreadsheets and aggregated data
from supplier Web catalogs. "Customized reports are sent daily to buyers,
including information on backorders, price changes and out-of-stock
situations, enabling supply chain staff to focus real-time on critical
activities without having to use multiple Web sites and passwords," he
added.
Springing from that success, UPMC Supply
Chain Division also added catering and purchased services into the
eProcurement system for improved accountability and control.
Szilagy developed a "goal dashboard" for
his teams, including Strategic Sourcing, Finance, Materials Management,
Supply Chain Systems and Consulting Services, Strategic Sourcing for
Clinical Supplies, Strategic Sourcing for Non-Clinical Supplies, Supplier
Relations, Commercial Services, Accounts Payable, Quality Assurance, Catalog
Content Team, Value Analysis, Travel Program, Employee Transit, Corporate
Distribution and Pharmacy Operations. He routinely shares goal progress
reports, divisional initiative reports and other data with C-suite
executives, he indicated. "These communications provide a transparent view
into supply chain management activities strengthening our credibility with
UPMC’s leadership team and employees," he emphasized.
Prodigo’s prodigy
Not every supply chain professional has the
opportunity to participate in a genuine revenue-generating enterprise for
his or her organization. Typically, they’re too busy trying to control the
other side of the balance sheet. Not so for Szilagy’s team.
"As the originator and test lab for what
eventually became
Prodigo Solutions, UPMC is, and continues to be, the poster child, and
happily can report that several other healthcare providers have seen similar
value in Prodigo by becoming Prodigo customers," Szilagy said. In fact,
commercial customers exist across the nation and around the world.
As a wholly owned UPMC subsidiary legally
operating under UPMC’s International and Commercial Services division, the
for-profit Prodigo Solutions remains separate from UPMC’s not-for-profit
functions. Szilagy wears the two hats in stride, along with his group.
"Several members of UPMC Supply Chain’s
senior leadership allocate portions of their time to guide the strategic
development of Prodigo Solutions as well as providing operational
oversight," he noted.
And they’re not finished yet. Within the
next year, UPMC Supply Chain will implement a warehouse management system at
the CSC, fully integrate a recently acquired hospital, deploy PeopleSoft
eSupplier Connection to allow suppliers to inquire on their own POs,
invoices and payments, and fully integrate McKesson Automation Pharmacy
Devices to Oracle E-Business Suite.
"UPMC SCM is attacking inefficiency and
waste in an era of reform that demands this intensity," Szilagy noted. "As
the healthcare industry moves forward with uncertainly, what is certain is
that Supply Chain Management at UPMC will be ready to answer the call."
UPMC Health supply chain team shares strategies, tactics for
success
UPMC Health System
Chief Supply Chain Officer Jim Szilagy and a quartet of
senior-level colleagues revealed to Healthcare Purchasing News
their team’s
attitudes and motivations behind what, how and why
they do what they do with valuable insights on what makes them so
successful. Commenting with Szilagy are David Hargraves, vice
president, Clinical Supply Chain; Mary Beth Lang, R.Ph., MPM, ScD,
vice president, Health Care Pharmacy and Supply Chain Management
Commercial Operations; Michael DeLuca, senior director, Supply
Chain Solutions & Consulting Services; and Patrick Flaherty,
director, Supply Chain Management.
HPN:
What’s the secret formula that makes a leader in supply chain
management? How does your department implement that secret
formula?
SZILAGY:
The basic formula includes integrity, a passion for
learning, a fearless commitment to growing and promoting staff,
and the ability to continually execute to a strategic plan.
Execution of this formula is self-promulgating if the
professionals hired match this profile.
The next
big trend in healthcare supply chain management will be...what?
Why?
FLAHERTY:
The next big trend will be in the move away from a cost-based
approach to a value-based approach. A value-based system is in
accord with the ACO/Bundled Care model and more naturally aligns
with population management.
Some in the
“C-suite” have criticized materials managers for being too
technical and not strategic enough to “join their club.” Do you
agree? Why?
LANG:
The answer to this is entirely dependent on the context in which
it is considered. At first blush, one could easily say “yes” given
the tactical demands placed on material managers as a whole. I
think the better question to ask is whether those in the C-suite
are prepared to address, let alone embrace, the very real
strategic recommendations that an empowered materials manager
could put forth.
What
specific project did your department complete where you felt they
didn’t lived up to your expectations?
HARGRAVES:
Our initial efforts on orthopedic implants, while moving us
forward, were not comprehensive and dynamic enough to deal with
the ongoing operational demands placed on this spend category. We
have since addressed this initial shortfall and more than
compensated in our subsequent strategic management of this
category.
What
specific project did your department complete where you felt they
exceeded your expectations?
DELUCA:
The design, build and deployment of our eMarketplace application,
[which is] now a commercialized product through Prodigo Solutions.
This single application, used by more than 7,000 users across the
health system ensures compliance to contract, creates an efficient
customer experience and flexes to whatever sourcing strategy we
deploy. Compliance at the point of requisition has been the
keystone to enable downstream automation.
If you
could change one thing about your facility’s corporate resources
and materials management department, what would it be and why?
HARGRAVES:
Healthcare, as an industry, does not make the same significant
financial commitment to formal educational support as can be
readily found within industrial segments. I think a more
progressive approach to providing a material subsidy to
professionals seeking to further their education would allow
healthcare to better compete in hiring and retaining top supply
chain talent.
In your
opinion, what is your department’s toughest administrative
challenge? How might you solve it?
SZILAGY:
I think the toughest problem is to continually function within a
tactical space where success is generally measured primarily in
cost reduction. I believe the migration to value-based purchasing
and contracting will require the practical use and execution of
the strategic skills that many supply chain professionals have but
have not been fully leveraged within the healthcare market.
What is
your department’s toughest operational challenge? How might you
solve it?
HARGRAVES:
The toughest operational challenge is finding and retaining
clinical strategic sourcing professionals. Our solution continues
to be a hire-and-train approach: Hire the best supply chain talent
at the entry level and provide progressive clinical exposure and
training in order to develop the specialized skill sets required
for a high-performing clinical supply chain professional.
What are
your top three priorities for the remainder of 2012 and for 2013?
SZILAGY:
Consolidate and refine the business processes within our Pharmacy
GPO, for which we recently assumed responsibility. Complete a
strategic plan to address and support the issues and opportunities
raised by the continued consolidation and affiliation of
healthcare providers. Assess and prepare for the fundamental
changes required to meet the demands of accountable care models.
What do you
believe are some barriers to growth for your department in the
future and how do you plan to overcome them?
DELUCA:
IT resources. Supply chain management must continue to find ways
to chart our own destiny as it relates to maintenance and
proactive management of the applications/technology we use to run
our business. While there will be a need for technical resources
on the build/development of specific functionality or
enhancements, we must use products and create admin tools to allow
supply chain management business analysts to move the ball
forward. This concept becomes critically important when you
consider that static resource growth will be a reality…in other
words, we need to continue to automate and find ways to do more
with less. In some cases this will call for us to leverage the
development abilities found in our for-profit business, Prodigo
Solutions.
What’s the
most enjoyable part of your department’s function?
HARGRAVES:
The ability to directly impact the quality of the care and
services we provide to our patients.
What’s the
most difficult part of your department’s function?
HARGRAVES:
Assessing the impact of differences in technology and applying it
to the real-world of patient care where cost and quality each have
an impact on delivering the best outcomes.
How does
the CEO view your department? Does he or she see it as a strategic
function or a support service? What resources can the department
count on and will they come every year – and not just in response
to clinician complaints?
LANG:
The progressive expansion of this department, which now includes
pharmacy distribution, medical/durgical fistribution (internal to
hospitals as well as primary distribution), and employee transit,
all essential to the continued day-to-day operations of this $10
billion enterprise, is proof positive that the CEO views UPMC
Supply Chain as a strategic function.
What’s the
one project or task you’ve always wanted your department to tackle
but it has yet to pick up the ball?
DELUCA:
Further design, test and deployment of strategic sourcing
technologies. We have a robust 7-step strategic sourcing process
but consistently deploying technology around the process will
allow us to further optimize the process, collaborate more
efficiently with our vendors, and drive down costs (through tools
like reverse auction). Our organization will deploy PeopleSoft
Strategic Sourcing in the near future as it fits our ERP strategy
and we have it licensed.
What are
some practical, common sense ways that supply chain managers can
keep patient satisfaction in mind as they’re performing their
duties?
FLAHERTY:
The easiest way is the most obvious; consider yourself or your
loved one as the ultimate end-user of the products and services
you are directly or indirectly providing.
If you
could change one public perception of your department, what would
it be and why?
HARGRAVES:
The perception that we do nothing more than compare costs and
universally choose the lowest priced products. This perception, as
far from the truth as possible, diminishes the significant
strategic knowledge required to develop and execute progressive
category strategies which solve multi-factorial business problems.
What’s the
one job/assignment your department probably should have turned
down?
LANG:
Executing a limited business strategy for affiliating with
non-related facilities before all departments within the
enterprise were formally aligned.
What’s the
most creative thing your department has ever done?
DELUCA:
Reinvents itself constantly. It is not any one project, but rather
a culmination of efforts led by a dedicated, creative leadership
team that drives our constant re-engineering. The continual
transformation is striking and successful…as indicated by recent
awards (Gartner 25 Healthcare Supply Chain Top 25, HPN
Elite 18). More than the awards though, it is the comments of
other large IDNs that visit UPMC that allow us to validate how
much change we really make over a short amount of time.
How can
supply chain managers collaborate with other departments and
professionals and convince them that their decisions are based on
the financial health of the organization and not in denying them
quality products or dictating patient care as the clinicians might
tell the CEOs?
HARGRAVES:
Good data drive the ability to address this very real-world issue.
A deeply knowledgeable and engaged supply chain professional, with
a full working knowledge of the category (the products, how and
why they are used, and the key quality drivers) can produce, in
conjunction with other departments, a logical presentation that
accurately represents the differences between incremental and
material technological variations.
What advice
do you have for professionals outside of healthcare wanting to
enter into the field of healthcare supply chain management?
FLAHERTY:
Healthcare as an industry is several years behind other industries
in incorporating best business practices. Yet there is no more
dynamic and essential industry on the face of this planet, and no
other industry where the progressive practice of supply chain
management can better serve as a catalyst for fundamental change,
change that has the potential to impact each and every person
living in this country. |
|
|
7 steps for strategic innovation
Pittsburgh-based UPMC Health System’s supply chain division
manages $1.8 billion in annual purchasing volume and processes more than
70,000 invoices and 4,000 requisitions each month.
So it’s easy to understand why it cultivated a “culture of
automation” to streamline operations and create “efficiencies of scale.”
This way the supply chain staff could focus more acutely on strategic
initiatives and spend less time on “traditional purchasing activities.”
That’s why the supply chain team developed a 7-step process
to oversee day-to-day operations for its internal customers in an effort to
improve efficiency, maintain compliance in supplier management and rein
supply chain’s importance to the organization.
Here’s what it looks like:
Step 1: Standardize Product Formularies
The Value Analysis Program, through the Value Analysis
Steering Team and Specialty Value Analysis Teams, ensures the preservation
and improvement of quality patient care while controlling costs and risks
related to the purchase and use of products and services. FDA Class 3
medical devices must be evaluated through the value analysis process.
Non-Class 3 products that have a unit cost of less than $100 are expected to
be low volume in use and/or are from an approved vendor do not require a
full review.
Nearly 40 teams that span hospital purchasing from pathology
and infection control, to cardiology, ophthalmology and surgical services,
to environmental services and plant maintenance, carefully evaluate and
select the best products and services that promote the highest quality
patient care.
Encouraging participation and compliance to these product
formularies is rather cut and dry, according to Chief Supply Chain Officer
Jim Szilagy.
“Participation is required in order to vote, and
non-participation is equivalent to disenfranchising the participating
facility,” Szilagy said. “Compliance to these product formularies is a full
function of the ubiquitous deployment of UPMC’s eMarketplace from Prodigo
Solutions. Centrally controlling all purchasing channels is a great thing.”
Step 2: Implement Custom Local Contracting
Due to success in the adoption of a culture of automation and
the accompanying re-deployment of staff from tactical to more strategic
activities, UPMC Supply Chain Management has been able to cultivate a
“robust strategic sourcing team” that has shifted approximately 82 percent
of total purchasing volume to local (non-GPO) contracts.
UPMC works favorably with MedAssets as its GPO.
“We value our relationship with MedAssets as they provide a
resource extension to our sourcing organization in terms of selected GPO
contracts and some technology tools that UPMC Supply Chain incorporates into
its operations,” Szilagy said.
The team follows a structured seven-step process seen in
Figure 1.
Figure 1
This process ensures that, for all sourcing projects greater
than $100,000 annually, the proper due diligence is followed and all
regulatory requirements are met, Szilagy indicated. It has also allows UPMC
to expand the breadth of sourcing that is handled by the supply chain
sourcing team to include non-clinical and/or high expense categories such as
travel, advertising, warehouse/logistics, construction and helicopters.
“Sustained success and excellence drives the ability to
control these expense categories,” he said. “The ability to execute
world-class supply chain is what drove and continues to drive this type of
control.”
But electronic operations and data transparency contributes
to the process, he acknowledged. “The automated operation is a key enabler
to resource optimization,” he added. “Said simply; we can cover more
categories with fewer resources because we are not consumed by the tactical
activity many organizations are.”
Step 3: Streamline Purchasing: Compliance at
the Point of Requisition
UPMC Health System stresses one simple equation: Compliance
equals savings. Senior leadership at UPMC directs and drives the
standardization of systems and business processes.
“Full Integration of the entire procure-to-pay process in
conjunction with ProdigoMarketplace make it exceedingly difficult for
non-compliant behavior,” Szilagy said. “This reality is supported at the
enterprise level by strict management policies and procedures.”
Currently, 85 percent of purchase order lines originate in
ProdigoMarketplace, allowing UPMC supply chain to process 80 percent of them
“lights-out,” meaning there is no human intervention in the process,
resulting in significant match exception improvement, according to Szilagy.
This eProcurement system offers better catalog control and improves both
business compliance and reporting capabilities, he added. UPMC continues to
explore avenues to further enhance P2P efforts with ProdigoMarketplace to
mirror the typical online shopping experience, allowing any employee, not
just experienced buyers, to accurately, efficiently and securely place an
electronic requisition for their supply needs.
“[Security is] an essential reason why we have integrated
full workflow approval and strategic content boundaries into the
ProdigoMarketplace and supply chain processes,” he said.
Step 4: Optimize Delivery Logistics
UPMC Supply Chain manages centralized distribution operations
for about 8,000 eProcurement requisitioners, from more than 6,000 active
delivery locations, servicing 650 point of consumption carts and 500 unique
physical buildings. The consolidated service center offers increased service
capacity, supports projected future demand as well as the system’s growth
strategy, removes third party costs, reduces waste and increases compliance
to preferred vendors, generating more than $1.1 million in annual net
savings. This centralization has resulted in reduced headcount through the
streamlining of processes. Hospitals are now able to stock less inventory
and can anticipate supply deliveries by set schedules.
They’re even open to offering its CSC services to non-UPMC
facilities as a supply chain management-driven revenue-generating operation,
Szilagy acknowledged. “UPMC will consider all opportunities for optimal
return on investment generation of CSC services,” he said.
Step 5: Drive Compliance
Approximately 60 percent of clinical supply categories are
physician preference items (PPI), and the benefits of tight PPI control are
substantial, according to Szilagy. Strong control of PPI also leads to
increased compliance in other spend categories, he added. UPMC’s supply
chain has achieved more than $100 million in hard-dollar savings since 2008,
primarily from PPI spending categories. UPMC continues to work toward
improved PPI compliance by including physicians in the value analysis and
product selection processes, incenting them to perform with a tiered rebate
structure and increasing program transparency with spend reporting, he
said.
Just don’t label this gainsharing.
“The tiered rebate structure should not be considered as
gainsharing,” he emphasized. “UPMC does not currently utilize this approach.
Our tiered rebate structure should be perceived as a preferred supplier
strategy, which incents behavioral modification based on increased financial
value to the enterprise.”
In short, better financial performance remains the key
incentive, Szilagy stressed. “Supply Chain is part of the Finance Department
as are all of the CFOs. We leverage the accuracy of our financial
information to highlight variation in supply expenses and integrate the CFOs
within the decision-making process. This alignment, when coupled with the
purchasing channel controls leads to compliance.”
Step 6: Evaluate Supplier Performance
Using a systematic, process-driven and technology-enabled
sourcing approach, UPMC measures suppliers through a variety of quantitative
metrics in the following categories: Quality, delivery, cost,
responsiveness, innovation, risk, [corporate social responsibility] and
customer complaints. UPMC employs a formal vendor justification process to
evaluate all new suppliers and maintains a supplier scorecard to ensure that
factors other than cost alone are considered in the vendor selection and
ongoing performance evaluation process. See Figure 2.
“Our defined and stringent buying process strategy is our
primary means of controlling off-contract purchases,” Szilagy noted.
Figure 2
Step 7: Close the Loop: Experience Improves
Processes
By continually monitoring the work accomplished through the
first six steps, UPMC Supply Chain holds itself accountable to all
stakeholders, according to Szilagy. Common metrics across payer-provider
tracking for clinical and financial outcomes create value and place UPMC in
a position of strength moving forward to build sustainable programs that
will deliver quality and use resources efficiently, he added. |
|
|