In search
of …
a single stocking location
by David S. Kaczmarek
Reducing
touches and consolidating stock are two keystones of inventory management
and productivity. These are the basis for a best practice centered on
inventory: Having a single official stock location for each item in each
inventory.
This is primarily an issue in
departmental inventories — and especially the operating room (OR) inventory.
In most large ORs there is a storeroom of sorts that houses the high-volume
common items. Here you will find lap sponges, trocars, electrocautery
pencils, IV solutions, Foley catheters, packs, gowns, gloves and many other
items that are used in most of the suites. But there are many more products
that are used in more specialized procedures. These are things like nasal
trumpets used in ENT cases, perfusion catheters used in heart cases, iris
retractors used in eye cases and shunts used in neurosurgery cases.
The common practice for these specialty
items is to have some quantity of each stored in any room where a procedure
might be performed. So while ENT procedures may typically only be done in
one or two OR rooms, nasal trumpets may be stored in many rooms throughout
the OR pavilion. This approach to storage has many unintended consequences,
including:
- Overstocking. Far more of these
specialty products may be on hand than are actually needed. When the
normal stock is low it may be reordered even when many more might be found
in other rooms. This is one of the reasons why many OR inventory turnover
rates are abysmally low.
- Inability to find stock. If a product is
not found in the room where a procedure is usually performed, a search
committee must go out looking for it in other potential storage locations.
Sometimes product is not ordered because it is assumed that more are in
the other rooms and an emergency order must be placed, often at a premium
cost.
- Loss through expiration. Stock in
alternate rooms may expire if it is rarely accessed.
- Loss through obsolescence. When
procedures change, unused stock may go to waste. Even if there is an
effort to use up old stock before introducing the new product, these items
in alternate rooms may be missed.
- Clutter and disorganization. With
specialty products stored in many OR rooms, it is much harder to keep
things in order and where they can be easily located. As a result, all
products become harder to find, which impacts efficiency.
The solution is the best practice of a
single location for all specialty items. The ideal approach is to store
specialty items in a small storeroom adjacent to or near the primary rooms
where they will be used. If a case is done in another room, these items can
be picked as part of case set-up. Alternately, appropriate items can be
stored in the OR room where those procedures are most frequently completed.
Using this approach, no matter what the circumstance, staff knows exactly
where to go to find the items they need.
Except for specialty rooms noted above, the
OR rooms should only have very small amounts of common items that are either
not normally part of the case cart or that frequently need to be added.
Examples of the former might be surgeons gloves, wound vac drains or steri-strips.
Examples of the latter might be lap sponges, a couple of extra surgeons’
gowns or irrigation solution.
One large hospital in the Midwest developed
this best practice approach to streamlining surgical supplies. Their OR had
24 rooms and performed most types of surgery except organ transplant. To
support these rooms there was a central core storeroom that had all the
common goods, including the primary suture and endomechanical storage. They
had smaller storerooms for their largest services: Heart, orthopedics,
neurosurgery, urology and eye. One OR stored specialty ENT supplies, and
another had robotic supplies. Some of their operating rooms had small
amounts of suture, but the majority of sutures were located on suture
"trees" that were refilled from the main storeroom and moved between
operating rooms. The operating rooms themselves had very limited supplies of
the extras and were all similarly equipped with some variation based on the
service usually using it. Most of these rooms had less than $3,000 worth of
supplies stored in them. This was clearly a best practice organization.
Departmental inventories are not the only
places where a single location is desired. I see many central storerooms
where there are multiple locations for a single item. This often occurs for
one of two reasons: There is not enough space in the primary location for a
full complement of the item or there is both a bulk and low-unit location
for the item. In both cases this leads to double handling and more chance
for error. If space in the primary location is the problem, it can be solved
by reducing the maximum on-hand quantity or relocating the goods to a
location with more available space. The second situation can be more
difficult.
Please note that this concept is the same
for any departmental inventory — not just OR inventory. Initiating a project
to reduce multiple locations can be a challenging endeavor. But the end
result is well worth the effort through reduced cost and better staff
efficiency.
David S. Kaczmarek, FAHRMM,
CMRP, is a senior director at Chicago-based
Huron Healthcare. Kaczmarek has more than 30 years of experience
in healthcare administration and supply chain, including director positions
at several hospitals and systems. He can be reached via e-mail at
dkaczmarek@huronconsultinggroup.com.