AHRMM

Strategies for improving supply chain management in perioperative services
byTom Montanaro, MBA, Janet Pelczynski, RN, BSN, MS, and Chris Strasser
( First of two parts)

Healthcare provider organizations are continually searching for new strategies to increase overall operational efficiency and cost reduction outcomes. Hospitals across the country have recognized that this effort requires a significant contribution from perioperative services. Directors of perioperative services and supply chain managers recognize that as much as 50% of an organization’s supply costs are consumed in surgery where there are hundreds of subspecialties, thousands of specific supplies and instruments, and the steady introduction of new technologies that require stringent management of product introduction, utilization, and eventual obsolescence. The easy standardization opportunities have long been identified, such as, gowns and drapes, custom packs, gloves, etc. More challenging standardizations including sutures, endo-mechanicals, implants, consignments, and capitation, have also ensued with dramatic savings realized at many institutions. But variations in inventory management techniques, balancing cost and clinical quality, surgeons’ training and techniques, and utilization of differing supplies continue to exacerbate management attempts to control costs.

The Perioperative Services department demands the immediate availability of a wide array of medical supplies, specialty products, implantable devices, and consumable supplies associated with the use of specialty equipment. The primary cost reduction challenge experienced by perioperative services departments is how to initiate desired expense reductions within the constraints of an operational environment which, by nature, must have zero tolerance for product outages. Many organizations have chosen to address this challenge through the implementation of information technology designed to automate and streamline the operational processes for supply distribution and inventory management within the perioperative services department. While this is a worthy objective, appropriate caution must be exercised to ensure that operational expectations do not rely on the use of this technology alone.

Healthcare organizations must ultimately expand their understanding of perioperative product consumption and cost at the product level, case level, and surgeon level. To assist in accomplishing this task, we will focus on three primary building blocks of perioperative services’ supply chain management improvement: 1) the use of benchmarking to evaluate performance; 2) managing inventory and product replenishment to better understand consumption; and, 3) techniques for engaging clinicians and physicians in support of the process.

The Use of Benchmarking to Evaluate Performance
When used correctly, supply benchmarking can provide a valuable information source to assist front-line managers in the pursuit of improved perioperative supply chain management outcomes. However, some organizations use supply benchmarking solely as an analytical tool, used in isolation, to quantify expense reduction opportunities. This is often done by evaluating current performance in the context of a better practice to arrive at a mathematical savings opportunity. The resulting question "now what do we do?" becomes all the more imperative because of the magnitude of financial opportunity that exists within perioperative services. What most benchmarking really provides is a snapshot in time. Typically, this information may lag weeks, months, or even years behind the period of activity analyzed. In addition, the mathematical savings don’t adequately account for operational nuances, business priorities, practice patterns, the emergence of new technology, and the individual expectations of participants engaged in the delivery of perioperative services.

An interactive and cooperative process is required to engage the required participants and quantify the "realistic" opportunity. This can only be accomplished by engaging senior managers, middle managers, clinical specialists, and the surgeons themselves in the review of benchmarking data. This group must work in a cooperative manner to generate expense reduction ideas in the context of daily operations, take ownership of the ideas, and develop action plans to achieve and sustain identified improvement outcomes. In essence, the benchmarking process is best used to effectively educate and engage physicians in discussions about supply expense, and in the process, motivate key physicians to assume the role of champion to help drive perioperative supply chain management outcomes. HPN

Part II of this article will appear in the August issue of Healthcare Purchasing News.
Tom Montanaro is practice manager, IMA Consulting. Chris Strasser is senior consulting manager, IMA Consulting. Janet Pelczynski is a Health Science Consultant.

 

July
2005