Keep track of macro issues with micro impact on the bottom lineby
Eileen McGinnity

A reader of current industry publications can easily
recognize the buzzwords, current trends and waves of change rippling
through the healthcare arena. What may be harder to distinguish is which
trends will directly impact your world as a materials manager.
Some of these macro issues may seem inconsequential to
your daily routine. But a closer look points to surprising convergence
between hospital materials management and some "big picture" issues in
healthcare today. Some of the current buzz includes:
•Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
•Public Chargemasters
•Healthcare savings accounts (HSAs) and high deductible
insurance plans
Sarbanes Oxley.
Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) in response to
corporate scandals such as Enron and WorldCom. It directs organizations
to implement internal controls of key business processes and adopt other
corporate compliance measures. Violators face steep fines and lengthy
prison terms if found guilty of breaking the law.
The majority of U.S. hospitals are nonprofit and not
required to follow SOX. These standards are, however, increasingly seen
as "best practice" for business integrity and transparency. According to
a survey by the Healthcare Compliance Association, more than 75 percent
of large non-profit hospitals report that they intend to comply with
part or all of the SOX standards. Remember, many hospital board members
work in other sectors and have had to implement SOX. This appears to be
driving the adoption of SOX in the nonprofit healthcare world.
Because a hospital’s supply "spend" is usually the
second largest area of expenditure, you can expect that procurement
processes will quickly be put under the microscope. A primary focus of
SOX is internal controls so the purchasing function will need to show
that 100 percent of purchases adhere to a consistent and controlled
process. This means that, under SOX, your process for purchasing a hip
stem or pacemaker will need to be as systematic and well documented as
that of buying a cotton swab or a sharps container. Procurement will
need to follow transparent and repeatable steps, and you will need to
structure vendor access to physicians and define the product selection
and acquisition process.
Public Chargemasters.
Some states (California, Arizona, Michigan, Florida and
Maine, among many others) have mandated that hospitals make their
chargemasters publicly available, and many more are considering this
type of legislation. Lawmakers believe that open chargemasters will
allow consumers to compare prices of procedures and supplies between
hospitals, and make an informed choice. On May 24, the federal
government sent out a press release announcing Sen. Grassley’s request
for specific healthcare providers to provide information in regard to
their non-profit tax status. Much of the information requested addressed
the hospital’s self-pay patient pricing policies and procedures,
including their method for charge mark-up, putting further focus on
transparency of pricing and supporting processes.
You may wonder how this can possibly be related to you.
In your position, you do not manage the chargemaster and you rarely
interact with the CFO, revenue cycle managers and other patient
financial services personnel. But the amount charged for an item via the
chargemaster, must correlate and be reasonably attributable to the price
on your invoice for the item. Even if your state is not one that has
legislated an open chargemaster, with the SOX principles mentioned above
and in our next area of discussion, you may need to assess whether your
hospital is charging for supplies correctly and applying defensible and
justifiable mark-ups. (Remember, the gross price for a service is
usually the price charged to self-pay patients – another hot public
topic for another day.)
To prepare, develop a relationship with the director of
revenue cycle. Together, strategize and implement appropriate and
justifiable processes to mark up and charge for items. This is important
for patient identifiable supplies, especially medical devices where a 10
percent error on an invoice or a patient bill means thousands of dollars
lost or an embarrassing compliance issue broadcasted in your local
media.
Healthcare savings accounts (HSAs)
and high deductible insurance products.
According
to a recent survey conducted for the American Hospital Association and
Federation of American Hospitals, 72 percent of employers say they are
likely to offer healthcare savings accounts/high deductible insurance
products to their employees next year; this is up from 43 percent in
2005. These healthcare benefit products – which offer cost savings for
employers, and lower monthly payments and tax advantages for employees –
are predicted to grow rapidly and promise to change the face of
healthcare.
How? If employees do in fact opt for these plans in
large numbers, the result for hospitals will be an increasing number of
de facto self-pay patients – personally responsible to pay their
large deductible in the event they are hospitalized. In turn, such
patients would be reasonably expected to be more price-sensitive to
their hospital charges, because they are financially responsible for
more of the bill.
Drawing out this scenario, consumers will begin to shop
for their elective healthcare – childbirth, hip or knee replacement,
MRIs, heart valve repair – based on price and quality (to the extent
quality can be measured – yet another hot topic for another day). If
more patients spend their own dime, public scrutiny of the defendable
charges and mark-ups mentioned above is more likely.
Procedures involving more costly medical devices will
draw increased attention so your processes for purchasing these devices
will need to be fully under your control. Under SOX and consumer
scrutiny, inconsistent purchasing processes and vendor influence outside
the materials management control can cause high-profile problems for the
organization.
A lot of changes are in the pipeline for our industry.
You can not possibly address every issue raised in the media. But a
common thread of transparency seems to join a number of these "hot
button" issues. Our industry is moving towards a more mainstream way of
conducting business where all players are held accountable.
Some steps that will help you prepare for these trends
include:
•Seek out business partners that know about these issues
and can assist you with information technology and process solutions.
•Apply this thinking specifically to your physician
preference items management work. These items and how they are chosen
and purchased are a big part of the problem and the solution.
Preparation for these scenarios may be uncomfortable,
but the end results will be a better-run business, prices/charges that
make sense and a better hospital response to an informed and empowered
healthcare consumer.
HPN
Eileen McGinnity is president of Aspen Healthcare
Metrics. Visit the company’s Web site at www.aspenhealthcare.com.