Clinical Business Solutions
Balancing technology and reimbursement issues in cardiovascular PPI
by Eileen McGinnity

The scope of a materials manager’s role may vary from hospital to
hospital, ranging from transactional purchasing to a more strategic
accountability for optimal supply chain management.
Materials managers can increase their influence in the product
selection process and price negotiations no matter the depth or breadth
of their position. In order to make informed decisions that are in the
best interest of the patient and the hospital, materials managers are
challenged to stay current on the facts – including cost, reimbursement
and clinical benefit – of new high-end clinical procedures and devices.
Two recent product introductions in the cardiovascular market lend
themselves to this kind of analysis: The Medtronic Sentry and the Boston
Scientific Liberté.
Medtronic Sentry
The Medtronic InSync Sentry CRT-D implantable defibrillator received
FDA clearance in late 2004 for use in patients with severe congestive
heart failure (CHF) in combination with certain other indications. In
addition to regulating heart rhythms, the Sentry technology includes
functionality to monitor fluid build-up in the thoracic cavity. It also
has an alarm to alert the patient’s cardiologist to address this
condition proactively. Ideally, preemptive treatment can prevent
hospitalization.
Currently, fluid build-up is monitored by the patient weighing
himself daily. Weight gains at certain thresholds trigger a call or
visit to the cardiologist’s office. By the time this occurs, the
patient’s condition is already somewhat compromised. So the "early
warning system" in the Sentry can be of value in enabling earlier
intervention.
However, the alarm feature has not yet been cleared for marketing by
the FDA. The Sentry is being implanted, but with the alarm function
disabled. Until the FDA clears the alarm, patients follow the normal
protocol of monitoring their weight gain between physician office
visits.
A patient receiving the implant is classified into one of three
possible DRGs, depending upon diagnoses and additional procedures
performed. The chart reflects national average Medicare reimbursement
for the three relevant DRGs. Reimbursement covers the cost of the
implant, as well as all other costs of the hospitalization. For example,
a hospital paying $34,000 for the Sentry system, and receiving payment
at national average levels, will lose approximately $5,500-$9,200 per
admission for patients classified as DRG 536 or DRG 515, respectively.
It should be noted that the Sentry qualifies for a new technology
add-on payment. However, this add-on payment is not automatically
paid to the hospital. The parameters for obtaining the additional
payment of up to $16,000 per case are somewhat narrow, and the hospital
may not qualify to receive it once the bill has been submitted to the
Medicare fiscal intermediary. It is difficult for the hospital to
calculate prior to the case, whether added payment will be received
subsequently.
Next Steps:
Only about 8 percent of the 400,000 CHF patients in the U.S. meet the
clinical indications for this device. Hospitals should meet with their
cardiologists to understand what the expected use of this new device is
and discuss with the physicians the reimbursements that the hospital can
receive both from Medicare and from nonfederal payers. This type of
prospective technology review process – whether formal or informal –
should also include creation of clinical protocols to ensure that
patient selection is appropriate and conforms to the indications for the
Sentry.
Boston Scientific Liberté
A new bare metal stent (BMS) from Boston Scientific, the Liberté,
has received FDA marketing clearance. The Liberté is noteworthy because
it will be the platform for the next Taxus drug-eluting stent (DES) from
Boston Scientific. The Taxus Liberté DES was introduced in January 2005
for use in 18 countries outside the U.S.
Next Steps:
U.S. cardiologists may want to try out
this stent to see how it performs, before it becomes available as a DES.
Although the Liberté is a "new" product on the market, it is
nevertheless a bare metal stent technology, and hospitals will negotiate
non-premium pricing for it, comparable to current BMS agreements.
These two scenarios show the intricacies and financial impact of
decisions made about a single product. Situations such as these abound,
and the materials manager who stays abreast of new technology can be
influential in recognizing significant cost savings opportunities for
their hospital.
HPN

Eileen McGinnity is president of Aspen Healthcare Metrics, a national
clinical service line consulting and benchmark data firm, based in
Englewood, CO. Visit Aspen Healthcare Metrics’ Web site at
www.aspenhealthcare.com. |