No matter how you slice and dice it inventory control
represents the guts of effective materials management.
All the charisma, communication skills and confidence
won’t cut it if you can’t get the fundamentals right so that doctors,
nurses and administrators have what they need when they need it.
Smart inventory control is as simple as the acronym IOU
– identify your needs and opportunities, optimize your data and
information management tools and understand the nuances of the supply
and demand chains.
"Inventory control is about product availability and
balancing the costs of ownership with the costs of procuring, which
includes purchasing, receiving and paying," said Dave Kaczmarek, vice
president, The McFaul & Lyons Group LLC, Horsham, PA.
"Hospitals need to actively manage what is bought, when
it is bought, how much, as well as for what price, including discounts
and rebates," noted Chris Holt, vice president, UPS Supply Chain
Solutions – Consulting Services, which concentrates its coverage in the
vendor community and does not work directly with hospitals.
Although it sounds pretty basic on paper it can be just
as elusive in practice.
Supply chain ownership
One way to effectively maintain control over your facility’s
inventory is to make sure you own your internal supply and demand chain
process and not cede that control to a GPO or supplier.
"The supply chain is a series of steps," Kaczmarek said.
"The hospital can only control those steps it performs. Likewise the
suppliers and GPOs cannot actually control the hospital portion. Each
participant can – and usually tries to – influence the actions of the
others. Hospitals must resist undo influence by any partner that might
result in a negative outcome."
Conversely, for a hospital to use a GPO effectively and
control its supply chain it must maintain complete control over
inventory levels, product substitutions, identification of fast moving
inventory and obsolescence/innovation, according to Perry Kjargaard,
program director of Information Control’s DynaMed Materials Management
System, Gaithersburg, MD. In essence, you can’t have one without the
other, which is why sharing ownership can be reasonable.
"Hospitals are in the business of saving lives, not
managing inventory," Kjargaard said. "Outsourcing this function – when
it is under control – can provide huge benefits. Vendors can be
compensated through cost-savings and both parties can develop a very
productive and trusting relationship. It should be noted however, that
this may not be the answer when inventory issues are serious. The vendor
should only assume responsibility for this function when the hospital is
realizing efficiency. Contracts can be executed with vendors where
operational goals are achieved before the function is outsourced."
But the extent to which suppliers and GPOs control a
facility’s supply chain may be somewhat overstated.
"While suppliers and group purchasing organizations (GPOs)
want to ‘control’ the supply chain, it is important for hospitals to
understand that they don’t," Holt said. "While the suppliers and GPOs
can push, prod and establish incentives for hospitals to make certain
decisions, only hospitals can make the final decision about their supply
chain."
Obtaining data can impede that progress, according to
Holt. "Hospitals fail to understand that they usually don’t have quick
and easy access to data needed to make informed decisions," Holt said.
"They usually need to go to the owner of the data which often is their
supplier or their GPO. Once the hospital goes this route, the hospital’s
ability to ‘control’ the supply chain becomes extremely difficult."
Holt argued that true control, stemming from relevant
data mined from the system and presented in a useful format, "belongs to
the group that understands what is bought, when it is bought, how much
and for what price."
Certainly, suppliers that offer just-in-time, stockless,
modified stockless and vendor-managed inventory programs (where the
vendor makes deliveries directly to the end user’s storage location) can
be a tempting alternative to those who drop teeming pallets off at the
loading dock.
"The first question that needs to be understood is – why
does the hospital need to control its own inventory management
operation?" Holt asked. JIT deliveries can result in decreased
inventory, purchase orders and invoicing, allowing the facility "to have
‘control’ of the inventory process while ceding many of the activities
that are not core to the mission of the hospital."
Such strategies can make a lot of sense, Kaczmarek
concurred. "They can also be a disaster," he countered. So many
questions must be answered. "An organization needs to ask and find
answers to so many questions. "Is the relationship strategic or
business? What is the true cost and what benefits can be
reasonably expected? Are goals truly aligned? The biggest disaster comes
when a valid cost analysis is not completed.
"Any of these options mean that the organization will
pay the vendor more," he continued. "They must be assured that internal
costs will actually be decreased more than the additional vendor fee.
This means that FTE reductions must actually take place. The other
disaster comes when the organization does not manage the relationship.
You can cede the function, but you cannot cede the responsibility or
accountability."
Capability vs. performance
Healthcare facilities can improve their inventory control efforts by
either focusing on their capabilities or their performance. Certainly,
by concentrating on the former you can more easily accomplish the
latter.
Kjargaard calls for hospitals to simply understand their
inventory and how the process really works via item standardization and
data cleansing services. "When this function is successfully completed,
the client will know what they have and where it is," Kjargaard noted.
"They will know what is redundant and what their true usage is. This
inventory is then matched up to the requirements. At this point, an
organization should be able to determine how effective their inventory
management efforts have been and where the weaknesses are."
Because each situation is different, there’s no silver
bullet solution, Holt said. But hospitals can locate "opportunities for
implementing ‘quick hit’ savings by understanding the process of how and
when products are purchased, as well as the product purchase history for
both expense and non-physician preference items, and use that available
consumption (demand) data to recalculate the required level of inventory
that is needed by the customer."
Kaczmarek asserts that materials management directors
should look beyond what’s merely within their purview. "Remember that
inventory is ‘anything that is bought and held prior to use,’" he said.
"If you limit any discussion on inventory control to that inventory
under the direct control of materials management, you are missing a
significant portion of the dollars.
"You improve your capability by having better trained
staff, better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of your
current system, and good collaborative relationships between the
materials department and the other departments that hold (and sometimes
even manage) inventory," he continued. Specifically target and seek the
cooperation of those departments that hold the most inventory,
especially unofficial inventory, he advised. Unofficial inventory, which
is ordered by and expensed to administrative and clinical departments
directly, can make or break a budget so it’s important for the materials
manager to reach out to those areas, he added.
Process first, software second
Software products from companies like Information Control and
Minneapolis-based Lawson Software can serve as useful tools to track
purchasing, consumption, replenishment, substitutions, replacements and
a host of other departmental key performance indicators. These products
help hospitals automate many of the manual steps in what Dan Sougstad,
Lawson’s director of healthcare market development, calls the
"order-to-pay and replenish-to-use business cycles."
In fact, Lawson’s vision is to eliminate all human
intervention starting once the time an item is consumed by the patient,
to an automated requisition (once inventory falls below re-order point),
to an automated PO, to an automated invoice, to an automated match and
pay, according to Sougstad. "This allows time for hospitals to focus on
the high-value-added activities of demand management (e.g., value
analysis, contract purchasing, contract pricing) and supplier management
(e.g., service level negotiation, strategic sourcing)," he said.
"Supplies are a significant expense for hospitals – and efficiently
getting the right supplies to the right place at the right time is a
critical part of the healthcare value chain."
While it may seem intuitive, however, many, if not most,
fundamental inventory control hurdles can best be solved with brains and
not bits and bytes.
Believe it or not, when faced with an inventory
challenge some facilities throw their professional ingenuity out the
window and their operational muscle squarely behind a software vendor,
online electronic commerce exchange or consultant to magically save the
day.
"Software is never a solution to poor processes,"
Kaczmarek said. "Software can be invaluable in optimizing your inventory
and simplifying the processes. But you cannot optimize an inventory that
is not accurate. And maintaining inventory accuracy generally is a
function of good performance – i.e., the basics. This means maintaining
accurate data, completing transactions in a timely manner and being
accurate in the physical processes such as counting, recording, etc."
Sometimes all it takes is a simple telephone call or
e-mail to a colleague, peer or even a vendor. "Many issues that
hospitals face are not unique to just one institution," Sougstad said.
"Customers do reach out to peers and information management providers to
understand the problem and results of previous efforts to address the
issue. At the end of the day, the hospital, with a good understanding of
the problem and symptoms, will have a clear picture of their path
forward."
|
 |
| Photo courtesy UPS |
An organization has to clean up its act first and master
the basics before it should implement any automated assistance. "The
first thing that needs to happen is to determine where the problem is,"
Kjargaard said. "Is it the software? The policies and procedures, the
manual intervention, etc.?" Not surprisingly, Kjargaard favors relying
on an outside source. "Making this determination will most likely be
done more efficiently with the use of an independent source. These
specialists have the advantage of having exposure to inventory practices
of many different organizations. They can bring this experience into any
type of review."
Hence, automation before preparation is a recipe for
disaster. "Once the basics and the direction the process needs to be
headed are determined, that is when a hospital should consider using
technology to improve the efficiency of the process," Holt noted. "If
the process is automated too soon, automating a broken process will
allow for wrong decisions to be made quicker resulting in a less
efficient operation."
Maximize your computing power
Solving that pesky inventory control challenge may not require a
major software or systems upgrade either. That’s because many facilities
don’t even use all of the capabilities of their current packages. In
fact, they may not even know everything that their systems can do for
them.
"From my experience most current software provides
adequate programs and access to the information that allows users to
manage inventories well," Kaczmarek observed. "More often that not,
users do not take full advantage of the programs and/or information.
Admittedly, some systems make it difficult to get the information in a
format that is conducive to good analysis."
Kjargaard agrees to an extent. While Information Control
encourages customers to use what they already have purchased and
implemented, it’s not always so absolute because expansion may be
needed. "Many organizations only use part of the software that is
installed," Kjargaard said. "Good inventory management is realized by
having complete functionality and access to critical information. An
essential ingredient of a successful supply chain operation is a robust
and fully functional material management application. Without access to
all critical information, it is virtually impossible for management to
make an educated decision."
Simply stated, a facility can’t – and shouldn’t –
separate the process from the tools. "The key is to have the software
both support and direct the right process," Sougstad said. "For
instance, if the process is fragmented before software is deployed, the
process will be fragmented after software is deployed. To be effective,
software needs to be deployed to support a good process. At the same
time, software can present actionable information to the right person at
the right time, to enable appropriate action to be taken."
Holt argues that any decision depends on myriad factors,
including how effective the current process for inventory management is,
what software is currently in place and its capabilities, how
knowledgeable the staff is in using the software and how much of the
software capabilities are being used.
The same holds true for choosing which inventory control
techniques and tools to apply, be they exchange carts or PAR levels, bar
code scanners or radiofrequency identification tags, Internet-enabled
materials management information systems or enterprise resource planning
systems, automated supply cabinets or open systems.
"Each option has its place in the lexicon of inventory
control tools," Kaczmarek noted. "It is often more a matter of
maximizing or optimizing the use of the tools rather than which
combination of tools one uses. The optimal inventory control operation
will make the most efficient use of its resources to produce the best
possible outcome."