Room for error in CS?
Mixing packages
with Ray Taurasi
Editor’sNote:

Questions can be e-mailed to:
jakridge@hpnonline.com, called in to Jeannie
Akridge at HPN, (941)927-9345 ext.202, or mailed to: HPN CS Questions,
7650 So. Tamiami, Ste.10, Sarasota, FL 34231. Names and hospital
identification will be withheld upon request.
Question:
I have been working in CS for over five years. It seems all we ever get
is complaints, we never hear about all the sets and packs that get done
daily and are perfect. Let there be one set missing something and we get
raked over the coals. We are humans and we are likely to make some minor
mistakes from time to time. It seems to me that there should be some
acceptable error threshold. I would think a proficiency rate of 95 – 98%
would be a good target. I am sick and tired of being beat upon. What are
your thoughts?
Answer: Working in a
service entity isn’t an easy job and not everyone is cut out for the
work. Users of any service do expect excellent customer service. There
can be many challenges to meeting these expectations and keeping
customers happy. The work produced by CS is critical and impacts
directly on patient care or the clinicians’ ability to provide quality
care. Errors or even delays in service can pose a real risk to a
patient’s safety and welfare. Adverse affects of inferior services or
defects can range from minor inconveniences to patient injury, infection
or even death. CS work requires a lot of precise detail, expertise, and
technical knowledge; there are many demands and the associated work
stress can be significant. I know at times the hard work seems to go
unnoticed and I understand how the CS practitioner may feel isolated,
under-appreciated or at times beaten upon as a result of negative
feedback. It is therefore essential that service workers have what I
refer to as a "service mentality" and an understanding of the nature of
a service-related occupation. I think at times it helps to stop and
think how we react to services we might utilize outside of the hospital
setting such as a dry cleaner – when you use such services you expect
certain results. For instance if the cleaner advertises "same day
service—in by 9:00, ready by 3:00" and you bring your suit at 9:00 you
expect it to be ready by 3:00, clean, stain-free and all in tact. If you
arrive at 3:00 to pick up your suit and they can’t find it, if it’s not
ready, or you bring it home and find it’s missing a button, the hem is
down or it has a stain, how might you react? Chances are you would be
quite disturbed and in some instances you might even become loud and
offensive as a result of your expectations not being met, even though no
one is going to get hurt nor is anyone’s life at stake – unlike what
could happen when an error occurs in the processing of critical medical
devices and surgical instruments. I understand that as long as the human
element is involved that it is possible that a proficiency rate of 100%
will not always be achieved. However in the healthcare field patients
entrust us with their safety and welfare. The principles of sterile
processing are specific and the associated procedures require precision.
Service excellence must be the goal and zero defects the target
objective. Establishing or accepting any lower performance standard sets
the stage for complacency. Errors and deficiencies should be
investigated, monitored and be a focal point for process improvement
initiatives. It is very important for the CS team to take pride in their
work and to recognize, appreciate and support each other. As a team we
need to celebrate our successes and understand that on those rare
occasions when we get unsolicited positive feedback from a customer it’s
the icing on the cake. Our customers, the patient care providers, are
dependent on our services and considering the critical nature of those
services and their impact on patient care excellence is the expectation.
I once saw the following thought-provoking passage posted in a CS
department:
If 99.9% was
acceptable we could expect the following results:
• 500 incorrect
surgeries would be performed weekly
• 20,000 incorrect
prescriptions would be filled yearly
• There would be two
unsafe landings at O’Hare airport daily
• There would be
16,000 pieces of mail lost per hour
• 19,000 new born
babies would be dropped at birth yearly
• 22,000 checks would
wrongly be deducted per hour
• Your heart would
fail to beat 32,000 times per year
Question: We currently
are wrapping all of our surgical instrument sets but will begin
introducing sterilization containers into CSP at the start of the new
fiscal year in January. It will probably be a few years before we
totally have all our sets containerized so until that happens we will
have a mix of packaging methods and materials. I was wondering if there
were restrictions regarding the mixing of items packaged in peel
pouches, linen and non-woven disposable wraps with those packaged in
containers in the same sterilization load?
Answer: Containers can
be sterilized safely in the same load with other supplies, which are
packaged in peel pouches, or linen and non-woven wraps assuming they
require a common exposure and sterilization cycle. When mixing such
loads container systems should be placed on shelves below items packaged
in absorbent packaging materials such as linen, peel pouches and
non-woven disposable wraps. For more information see reference document
AAMI ST 33. It is also important that you obtain technical data,
validation documentation and copies of FDA 510k from the manufacturers
of all the packaging materials and systems you utilize. Packaging
materials including sterilization containers are class II medical
devices and must have FDA clearance for marketing. As a user of medical
devices it is imperative that you adhere to manufacturers’ instructions
for use and application.
HPN