An
eye toward repair reduction:
Tips on organizing your GI lab
by Nancy Schlossberg, BA, BSN, RN, CGRN and Nancy Vacante, RN BS,
Olympus
A
s an endoscopy professional, you know that
meticulous instrument care and handling can go a long way in reducing your
facility’s repair costs. But did you know that the organization and design
of your GI lab also impacts your daily operations as well as your repair
costs? Rethinking the layout of your particular setting presents an
excellent opportunity for you to cost-effectively manage resources,
improve your facility’s flow and function, and potentially reduce your
repair expenses. Here are a few key things to consider:
Take inventory of your inventory
Maintaining an optimal scope inventory is fundamental to keeping repair
expenditures at a minimum. Monitor the size and age of your resource pool
and appropriately balance your scope inventory against your current and
forecasted procedural requirements. Do you have the right scopes to meet
current and predicted case-mix demand? Too many of the wrong scopes can
unnecessarily lock up excessive capital; too few of even the right scopes
may delay procedures. This can lead to patient and physician
dissatisfaction, unplanned staff overtime and increased scope
handling-related repairs. Benchmark data for 2008 showed that endoscopes
per procedure room averaged: 2.0 workhorse (those used most often) upper
scopes; 3.1 workhorse lower scopes; and 0.2 and 0.3 specialty scopes for
upper and lower procedures, respectively.1 The following chart further
breaks down scope inventory per facility type.
Endoscope Inventory per Procedure
Room by Facility Type |
Endoscopes Per Procedure Room |
Multispecialty
ASC |
Single
Specialty ASC |
Non-teaching
Hospital |
Teaching
Hospital |
Upper workhorse |
1.9 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
Lower workhorse |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
Upper specialty |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
Lower specialty |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
Courtesy Olympus EndoSite® Consulting, 2008 Q3
Benchmark Data |
Benchmarking data from similar facilities can help you evaluate your
own scope mix, ensuring you get the most mileage out of your capital
equipment budget. You can also look at the number and frequency of
procedure start delays and cancellations resulting from unavailable
equipment. This will provide a good indicator of whether your inventory
sufficiently meets your typical procedural load.
Additionally, it is important to evaluate your inventory relative to
its age. If you hang onto a workhorse scope for too long, repair
expenditures may start to climb while your technology edge plummets.
Benchmark data for 2008 shows
the median age of all endoscopes as 2.6 years, with the overall average
ages of workhorse endoscopes reported as: colonoscopes (3.0 years), EGD
scopes (3.1), ERCP scopes (3.0) and EUS scopes (2.4).1
Proactively manage the design of your lab
There is much to be said for a well organized and effectively designed
facility. The most efficient and cost-effective labs have taken into
consideration the dynamics of staff, equipment and workspace. Below are a
few questions to think about with respect to your own facility.
• Do you have an appropriate number of prep and recovery bays to meet
the needs of your case mix and volume? For example, are cases delayed
because patients cannot be moved efficiently out of the procedure room
into the recovery room? Benchmark data in 2008 reveals the ratio of prep
and recovery bays to procedure rooms as 4:1 in both single specialty ASCs
and non-teaching hospitals and 3:1 in teaching hospitals.1
• Do your workspaces follow a dirty-to-clean flow? Is the reprocessing
room close to the procedure room for convenient transport of the dirty
scopes and accessories in a dirty-to-clean path? This is important not
only for infection control purposes, but also to ensure scopes and staff
move through the space in an efficient way, allowing sufficient time for
safe and proper handling and scope reprocessing.
• Does the procedure room have adequate space to safely protect
endoscopes before, during and after procedures?
• Does your facility have dedicated clean scope storage, separate from
accessories?
In short, a workspace that enhances effective operational throughput
may mean less rushing and fewer incidents of damage. Most importantly,
achieving optimal efficiency allows more time to ensure that proper
protocols for transport, handling, set up, reprocessing and storage are
followed.
Rearrange your reprocessing
Equally as important as a well-designed facility; GI labs must
structure reprocessing protocols and processes as well as the workspace to
maximize the throughput of scopes while minimizing the risk of scope
damage.
Location: As stated in the Society of
Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, 2008 Standards of Infection
Control in Reprocessing of Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes,
"Reprocessing of contaminated patient equipment should be done in an area
designated and dedicated for this function. This should be a room separate
from where endoscopic procedures are performed."
Failure to properly clean endoscopes produces a host of avoidable
consequences that drain resources from safe, effective delivery of GI
endoscopy services. As previously mentioned, this dedicated area ideally
should be located close to the procedure rooms. Additional time spent
moving scopes to remote sites may inadvertently encourage infection
control risks associated with delayed reprocessing. Always check with your
original
endoscope manufacturer (OEM) for instructions on delayed reprocessing.
In addition, to expedite transport to remote reprocessing areas, staff
may be more tempted to tightly coil and stack scopes together or scopes
and accessories together in the same transportation bins. Such shortcuts
make scopes more vulnerable to kinks, cuts, punctures and other damage.
Time: In the reprocessing area, allow staff adequate time to
complete all cleaning, disinfection and sterilization (CDS) steps in
accordance with original equipment manufacturer’s (OEM) guidelines. The
procedural schedule can often get hectic. Unfortunately, the more rushed
the reprocessing technician gets, the more opportunity there is to omit
steps, causing endoscope damage and downtime. Insufficient or improper
leak testing can result in accidentally missing a small leak, which left
unchecked can escalate into a major repair. Failure to inspect
water-resistant caps before attaching them to the scope or forgetting to
attach the water-resistant cap before immersing the scope into the basin
of water can also cause damage and additional repair work that could have
largely been avoided.
On average, 2008 benchmark reprocessing time data showed that 8.2
minutes were required for leak testing and mechanical cleaning, 32.5
minutes for AER cycle time and 6.4 minutes for post-automated time, for a
total of 47 minutes from start to finish.1 Compare your average scope
turnaround time from patient scope extraction until the scope is once
again patient ready. This is one benchmark whereby faster is not
necessarily better. Factor in sufficient time to cover all of the
necessary reprocessing steps based on your staff and equipment
requirements.
Protocols and processes: Make sure to complete pre-cleaning in the
procedure room. Pre-cleaning removes bioburden before it has a chance to
harden, avoiding the need for more aggressive cleaning and potential
damage to the scope. Check the integrity of the water-resistant cap,
making sure it is dry and attach it to the scope at bedside. Transport
scopes to the reprocessing area in covered containers. Then in the
reprocessing room, always perform leak testing prior to moving on to
manual cleaning and high-level disinfection. Consistent leak-testing
practices can help you largely avoid fluid invasion damage to the scope,
which is the number one cause of expensive, refurbishment-level repairs.
(More information about avoiding fluid invasion is available at
olympusamerica.com/msg_section/files/handleendoscopes withcare.pdf.)
Space: The reprocessing room should be of adequate size with proper
ventilation. Check the sink and drain and work areas to ensure they are
free of sharp edges. Remove all unnecessary objects that might
inadvertently damage the endoscope. The reprocessing room should leave
ample counter space for leak testers, basins, flushing pumps and so forth
so that there is adequate room to maneuver the scopes without stacking or
bumping them into other equipment.
Benchmark data indicates that appropriately sized reprocessing space
is a recognized and ongoing issue. Just over 10 percent of survey
participants in 2008 agreed that their workspace was too small.1
Sinks: Use a sink large enough to avoid crimping the instrument
during leak testing and manual cleaning. The sink should be deep enough to
allow full immersion of the endoscope to effectively accomplish leak
testing and manual cleaning. Never use sinks to stack scopes waiting for
leak testing and manual cleaning.
AERs: If your facility uses automated endoscope reprocessors (AER),
make sure you have the appropriate number and types of machines to
adequately process your volume of scopes. Benchmark data for 2008 shows
that the average number of scopes which can be reprocessed at once per
endoscope procedure room is 1.3.1
It is also a good idea to design enough space to allow access for
planned and unplanned maintenance and repairs. Make sure you are using an
AER that is appropriate for the types of scopes at your facility. Use
caution and care when placing and removing scopes from AERs. Follow the
scope manufacturer’s instructions for use of the AER and for approved
protocols for high-level disinfection or sterilization. Also, use only
FDA-approved liquid chemical germicides (LCG) recommended by the endoscope
manufacturer to protect your equipment from chemical damage. LCG potencies
should be tested and recorded prior to every cycle. Staff can avoid undue
chemical damage to the scope as well as cross-contamination risks by
adhering to the detergent and/or disinfectant/sterilant OEM’s instructions
for reprocessing times, temperatures, dilution, shelf life and expiration.
Safety-proof your storage
To safeguard endoscopes when they are not in use, store them in clean,
dry, well-ventilated, protective cabinets maintained at an ambient
temperature. Store endoscopes without valves and caps; they can trap
moisture in the channels and promote unwanted microbial growth. A
well-ventilated storage cabinet reduces the chance of microbial
contamination by encouraging continued air-drying of the endoscope’s
surfaces and channels.
Proper storage of the endoscope should support the control body. The
insertion tube and universal cord should hang in a vertical position with
the distal tip hanging freely. Finally, to prevent stretched or broken
angulation wires, place the angulation locks in the unlocked position.
Never store endoscopes in their carrying cases. Use appropriate
carrying cases or shipping containers for transporting endoscopes to and
from repair facilities. Do not pack the scopes with accessories to prevent
further damage during transport.
Be proactive about prevention
An ounce of prevention can heavily influence your repair expenditures.
Fix minor damage quickly before it escalates. This includes ensuring
regularly scheduled preventive maintenance checks,
habitually checking instruments and equipment for wear, and documenting
post-repair inspections of all returned endoscopes. Systematically track
and trend scope repairs by individual scope serial number. This type of
data will help point to areas of reprocessing that need improvement.
Finally, keep appropriate staff trained on handling, operating and
reprocessing practices and protocols.
Delegate those duties
Every member of your staff, from physician to technician, needs to
understand the direct correlation between proper endoscope care and
handling and repair expenditures. This is particularly true of
reprocessing staff. Facilities that have the lowest rate of repairs tend
to have highly trained, dedicated reprocessing staff members that have
been given ownership of the reprocessing responsibilities. These staff
members comprehend that skipping and/or ineffectively performing
reprocessing steps, or failing to follow OEM instructions, can adversely
affect patient safety and directly increase the incidence and cost of
repair.
As already noted, it is important for all staff working with endoscopes
to receive proper training and to keep current on handling, operating and
reprocessing protocols. Proper handling and CDS protocols go a long way
toward maintaining properly operating equipment, reducing repair
expenditures and supporting positive infection control outcomes. Seek the
support and resources of your scope manufacturer to help you train your
staff on this important topic. (More information is available at
www.olympusamerica.com/cds,
www.olympusamerica.com/endoscopecare,
www.olympusamerica.com/reprocessing and
www.olympusuniversity.com.)
Encourage certification
One very positive note for the GI and bronchoscopy industry is that a
new Certified Flexible Endoscope Reprocessor exam was introduced in the
United States in February 2008. All reprocessing staff should be
encouraged to take this important test. The exam provides the industry
with a set of uniform guidelines and standards for evaluating the
knowledge and skill set necessary to competently fill this critical
reprocessor position. (More information is available at
sterileprocessing.org.)
In summary, a well-organized and efficiently designed GI lab that
enables and encourages careful equipment handling, preventive maintenance
and proper storage protocols can eliminate the need for many repairs and
ensure continued delivery of safe, cost-effective quality care. You can
greatly promote cost-containment efforts by following proper reprocessing
protocols, monitoring the utilization and age of your scope inventory,
regularly inspecting endoscopic equipment for damage and functionality,
fixing minor issues quickly before they escalate into major repairs, and
having all required scope repairs performed to OEM specifications.
Nancy Schlossberg, BA, BSN, RN, CGRN, is a business development
specialist for Olympus’ Business Development Group, responsible for
designing consulting services for hospital and ambulatory settings. A GI
nurse for over 30 years, she has a broad clinical and business background,
including past president for the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and
Associates, Inc.
Nancy Vacante, RN BS, is the director of R&D for
Olympus’ Business
Development Group, responsible for the development of the company’s
consulting, benchmarking and new service initiatives. During her tenure
with Olympus, she has been instrumental in the creation of innovative
tools and deliverables for the company’s healthcare solutions business.
Reference:
1. 2008 Q3 benchmark survey data, Olympus EndoSite® Consulting.
EndoSite offers a comprehensive collection of professional services to
help healthcare facilities improve efficiency, maximize revenue and
optimize service delivery while enhancing patient care, safety and
satisfaction. olympusamerica.com/consulting.
Introduction
and Vendor Chart
Optimal Care & Handling of Scopes
Six Steps to Long Scope Life
Anatomy of an Endoscope
10 Best Practices for Cleaning and Caring for Endoscopes
Choosing a Repair Vendor
Organizing a GI Lab
Inspecting Repaired Endoscopes
6 tips for proper, patient-safe scope repair inspections