A new multisite hospital study has found that washrooms have significantly less bacterial contamination when equipped with paper towels for hand drying instead of using jet air dryers.
The study, led by Professor Mark Wilcox of the University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals, was carried out in France, Italy and U.K. and examined the extent of environmental contamination in hospital washrooms from potential bacterial pathogens according to hand drying method. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria – including MRSA and ESBL-resistant enterococci – were detected more frequently in the washrooms when jet air dryers were in use.
“The findings will have important implications for hand drying guidance in healthcare settings,” commented Professor Wilcox, “and they should be of particular interest to infection prevention and control doctors and nurses, procurement managers and all responsible for minimizing the spread of cross–infection.”
The study design was conceived and carried out independently by research scientists at three different hospitals: Professor Wilcox at Leeds General Infirmary, (Leeds Teaching Hospitals), U.K.; Professor Frédéric Barbut of the Infection Control Unit at Hospital Saint-Antoine (AP-HP), Paris, France; and Professor Silvio Brusaferro, of the Department of Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Italy.
The study compared two washrooms per hospital – each had paper towel dispensers and jet air hand dryers, but only one drying method was available to use at any given time. Each was frequented by patients, visitors and staff. A crossover design compared contamination levels within each over a 12-week period. During the study, 120 sampling sessions in total in each of the three hospitals were carried out. The independent study was undertaken in 2017 and supported with a grant from ETS.
Bacteria recovered included methicillin susceptible (MSSA) and resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), enterococci and enterobacteria, including ESBL (Extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers) producing bacteria.
In general, bacterial contamination was lower in washrooms using paper towels (PT) than those using jet air dryers (JAD), and total bacterial recovery was significantly greater from the JAD outer surface versus the PT dispenser at all three sites (median 100-300—vs 0-10 colony-forming units (CFU) respectively all p<0.0001). While contamination in France and U.K. was similar, it was markedly lower in Italian washrooms, thought to be due to a combination of a lower footfall and different cleaning practices.
There were differences between the three locations, and significantly more bacteria were recovered from the floors of JAD washrooms in U.K. and France (median 24 v 191 CFU, p<0.00001). In U.K. overall recovery of MSSA was three times more common and six-fold higher from JAD versus PT surfaces (both p<0.0001).
“MRSA was recovered 3 times more often in UK washrooms (21 vs 7 CFU) from the JAD outer surface or on the floor beneath compared with respective PT sites,” explained Mark Wilcox of his part of the study at Leeds General Infirmary. “There were also significantly more ESBL-producing bacteria recovered from U.K. washroom floors during JAD versus PT use.”
Commenting on the results from Hospital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Professor Frédéric Barbut said, “In France we saw significant differences in bacterial contamination between the two types of hand drying method. Higher numbers of bacteria were recovered from the floors and drier surfaces in the JAD condition than when using PT. In particular ESBL-bacteria were recovered from dust twice as much during JAD versus PT use.”
Silvio Brusaferro, Professor of Hygiene and Public Health, with regard to the experience at Udine hospital in Italy stressed the importance of selecting a hand drying system that prevented the spread of microorganisms. “We found the dispersion of microorganisms to be more than 25 times greater with jet air dryers than single use paper towels,” he explained. “Indeed, Italian infection control personnel traditionally avoid the use of jet air dryers in hospitals.”
