Study Finds Some Hospitals Have Much Higher Rates of Post-Heart Surgery Infection Than Others

Bringing low-performing hospitals up to par with high-performing ones could prevent 2,600 infections annually and reduce Medicare spending by about $440 million.

Key Highlights

  • - Patients undergoing heart surgery at hospitals with higher infection rates face more than double the risk of post-surgical infections.
  • - Common infections include urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and sepsis, often leading to readmissions and increased mortality.
  • - Over 25% of infections are diagnosed during readmissions to different hospitals, indicating fragmented care may contribute to poorer outcomes.
  • - Improving hospital practices could prevent approximately 2,600 infections annually in the U.S.
  • - Addressing disparities in hospital performance could lead to significant cost savings and better patient health outcomes.

A new study from Michigan Medicine found that where a patient undergoes heart surgery significantly affects their risk of infection following the procedure.

Researchers estimated that if U.S. hospitals with higher infection rates for heart surgery patients could achieve outcomes similar to hospitals with the lowest rates, they could prevent around 2,600 infections annually and reduce Medicare spending by over $440 million. These findings underscore the need to determine why some hospitals achieve better outcomes in postsurgical infections.

Roughly one in five patients develop an infection in the months following heart surgery. Urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and sepsis are some of the infections that are most common. The study found that hospitals with the highest infection rates experienced more than twice as many infections as the best-performing hospitals, regardless of differences in patients and procedures.

Hospitals with higher infection rates had higher rates of stroke, readmission, and death up to six months after surgery. More than one-quarter of postsurgical infections were identified when patients were readmitted to a different hospital than the one where they underwent surgery, which could point to fragmented care being a factor.

About the Author

Matt MacKenzie

Matt MacKenzie

Associate Editor

Matt is Associate Editor for Healthcare Purchasing News.

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates