From Dashboards to Decisions: Healthcare Supply Chain Transformation Still Lags
Key Highlights
- Healthcare supply chains are experiencing slow but meaningful progress, especially in technology adoption driven by necessity rather than innovation.
- Financial pressures have led to hospital closures and workforce reductions, highlighting the urgent need for cost-effective supply chain strategies.
- The traditional GPO model is under scrutiny, with questions about its effectiveness in controlling costs and fostering flexibility in procurement.
- AI offers significant potential for efficiency but requires a focus on operational impact rather than just visibility and reporting.
- Structural market dynamics, including supplier power and barriers for smaller vendors, continue to hinder competition and innovation in healthcare supply chains.
Healthcare supply chain leaders entered 2026 facing a familiar reality: persistent financial strain, limited structural progress, and growing urgency to modernize operations.
Despite years of discussion around transformation, many of the industry’s core challenges, like technology gaps, supplier concentration, and inefficiencies in procurement, remain largely unresolved. At the same time, new forces are beginning to reshape the landscape, from the cautious adoption of AI to a more measured shift toward ambulatory care.
In a recent conversation, Lars Thording, a longtime healthcare supply chain advisor, shared where the industry is making progress and where it continues to fall short.
Progress Is Incremental, But Directionally Important
While sweeping transformation has yet to materialize, there are early signs of change. One of the most notable is a shift in how health systems approach technology.
“Organizations are becoming more mature in how they think about AI,” Thording said. “Not just as a concept, but as a necessary lever for efficiency and cost control.”
That shift is being driven less by innovation and more by necessity. With margins under sustained pressure, health systems are increasingly viewing technology as essential to long-term financial sustainability and not optional.
There are also early indications of regulatory and legal scrutiny around supplier market dynamics. Recent rulings could help rebalance competition in a space long dominated by a small number of large manufacturers.
At the same time, the anticipated rapid migration to ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) has been more gradual than expected. Rather than a disruptive shift, the transition has unfolded in a more measured and manageable way, giving health systems time to adapt.
Financial Pressures Continue to Mount
If progress has been incremental, financial challenges have been anything but.
Hospital operating margins hovered around 1% in 2025 and that leaves little room for error. That fragility has translated into real consequences, including an increase in hospital closures and widespread workforce reductions.
“We’re seeing hospitals make layoffs in the hundreds, sometimes thousands,” Thording noted. “That’s a direct result of sustained financial pressure.”
At the same time, the underlying cost structure continues to worsen. New technologies are driving higher supply costs, while reimbursement rates fail to keep pace. The result is a widening gap that forces health systems into increasingly difficult trade-offs.
Compounding the issue is the industry’s ongoing inability to effectively aggregate demand. Despite decades of reliance on group purchasing organizations (GPOs), many providers still lack the leverage needed to counterbalance large suppliers.
Rethinking the GPO Model
That reality is fueling growing skepticism around the traditional GPO model.
Originally designed to pool purchasing power and improve pricing, GPOs have struggled to deliver on that promise in today’s environment. Prices continue to rise, and many supply chain leaders question whether these organizations are effectively shifting negotiating power.
“The value proposition hasn’t fully materialized,” Thording said. “Hospitals are still facing rising costs and limited flexibility.”
Adding complexity is the financial relationship between health systems and GPOs. Many organizations receive payments tied to participation, creating a dependency that can discourage alternative sourcing strategies, even when performance falls short.
The result is a model that, in some cases, reinforces the status quo rather than enabling transformation.
AI’s Opportunities and Pitfalls
Against this backdrop, AI has emerged as one of the most discussed, and misunderstood, opportunities in healthcare supply chain.
According to Thording, the key to success lies in shifting the starting point.
“Too many organizations begin with the technology,” he said. “It should start with identifying inefficiencies and then applying the right tools to solve them.”
There is no shortage of potential use cases. Demand forecasting, inventory optimization, warehouse automation, supplier risk management, and compliance tracking all represent areas where healthcare lags other industries.
However, one of the biggest risks is over-indexing on visibility without enabling action.
“Supply chain leaders don’t need more dashboards,” Thording said. “They need decision support and execution.”
In other words, the next phase of AI adoption must move beyond reporting and toward operational impact.
A Persistent Gap Between Healthcare and Other Industries
Part of the challenge is that healthcare continues to trail other sectors in supply chain sophistication.
Companies like Amazon have spent decades refining logistics, forecasting, and inventory management capabilities that healthcare is only beginning to explore.
“There’s a significant gap—easily a decade or more,” Thording said.
Closing that gap will require more than internal investment. It will demand greater willingness to learn from, and collaborate with, other industries that have already solved many of these challenges.
Supplier Power and the Innovation Bottleneck
While technology offers a path forward, structural market dynamics remain a major constraint.
Large medtech manufacturers continue to hold significant negotiating leverage, often leaving individual health systems with limited ability to influence pricing or terms. In some cases, bundled agreements further restrict choice, tying purchasing decisions to broader supplier relationships.
“The power imbalance is still very much in place,” Thording said.
That imbalance also has implications for innovation. Smaller suppliers face significant barriers to entry. With large distributors controlling the majority of hospital spend, many never gain meaningful access to the market.
“In reality, a small supplier often only becomes relevant once it’s acquired by a larger company,” Thording said.
The result is a system that can stifle competition and slow the pace of innovation.
Where Opportunity Still Exists
Despite these challenges, there are clear areas of opportunity.
AI, when deployed strategically, has the potential to unlock significant efficiency gains across the supply chain. At the same time, the continued growth of ambulatory care presents a chance to rethink how and where care is delivered.
While hospitals often view ASCs as a threat to revenue, they also represent an opportunity to build more flexible, cost-effective care models.
“The organizations that embrace both technology transformation and care model evolution will be best positioned going forward,” Thording said.
Why It Matters
Healthcare supply chain is at an inflection point. Financial pressures are forcing action, but structural barriers continue to slow progress.
The path forward will require more than incremental change. It will demand a rethinking of long-standing models, from GPO relationships to supplier dynamics, and a more disciplined approach to technology adoption.
For health systems, the stakes are clear: those that move from insight to execution will be best equipped to navigate the challenges ahead.
The CFO and Supply Chain Alliance
A deeper partnership is reshaping how health systems manage cost, efficiency, and long-term sustainability.
The pandemic reshaped nearly every aspect of healthcare, but few relationships have evolved more significantly than that between finance and supply chain. As health systems face ongoing margin pressure, CFOs are taking a more active role in sourcing strategy, operational efficiency and non-clinical spend management.
In this Q&A, David Kirshner, a former health system CFO and now managing partner of healthcare at LogicSource, shares how that relationship is changing, and what it means for the future of healthcare supply chain.
How has the relationship between CFOs and supply chain leaders evolved since the pandemic?
Kirshner: The last four to five years have changed everything. Historically, CFOs focused on revenue, volume, margin and the top line of the P&L, while supply chain was more transactional and heavily tied to clinical purchasing through GPOs.
During the pandemic, we experienced dramatic swings in volume, workforce disruptions, and growing financial pressure as temporary funding began to fade. That forced CFOs to rethink how the organization operates, not just how it generates revenue.
As a result, there’s been a much deeper focus on cost structure, and supply chain has become a more strategic function. CFOs are now asking: Where are the opportunities we’ve overlooked?
What role does purchased services or non-clinical spend play in that shift?
Kirshner: It’s huge and often underappreciated. Non-clinical spend typically represents about 20% to 22% of a health system’s net patient revenue. That includes design and contruction, facilities, information technology, human resources, corporate services and more.
Historically, healthcare supply chain teams were intensely focused on clinical sourcing and supplier management. Non-clinical spending was an afterthought and did not receive the same talent, resources nor investment in those areas unless leadership made it a priority. But that’s changing.
If you’re serious about margin improvement, you can’t ignore the non-clinical capital expenditures and operating expenses. It’s simply too significant.
What does effective collaboration between finance and supply chain look like today?
Kirshner: It’s no longer optional; it’s essential. And it’s not just about finance and supply chain. IT, design and construction must be part of the equation as well.
The most successful organizations are operating as integrated teams. CFOs, CIOs, facilities executives and supply chain leaders are working together in a much more connected, workflow-driven environment.
Relationship skills are just as important as technical expertise. You need trust, alignment, and a willingness to collaborate across disciplines.
One of my former colleagues used to say, “If your goals start with ‘in collaboration with,’ you’re on the right track.” That mindset is critical today.
Where are health systems finding new efficiency opportunities?
Kirshner: Efficiency today goes far beyond price negotiation.
Take space utilization. At my former health system, we started treating departments more like tenants and holding them accountable for how they used space. When you look at whether a room is 40% utilized versus 80%, that’s a major opportunity.
Energy is another big one. Some health systems are spending $50 million or more annually on utilities. CFOs can’t just pay those bills anymore. They need to think strategically about energy usage, efficiency, and even alternative sources.
It’s really about asset optimization and getting the most value out of what you already have.
How is the role of supply chain expanding in non-clinical areas?
Kirshner: We’re seeing a much broader mandate for supply chain’s involvement, especially in areas like IT, facilities and corporate services.
At LogicSource, we bring in expertise from other industries like retail, consumer goods, and beyond to help health systems manage these categories more effectively.
Health systems recognize they can’t build deep expertise in every area internally. So, they’re looking for partners who can bring that knowledge and apply it in a healthcare context.
What can healthcare learn from other industries?
Kirshner: A lot. Health systems tend to think of themselves as a single entity, but they’re really a collection of different businesses, including real estate, hospitality, retail, research, and more.
On the clinical side, there’s a high level of regulation, which is appropriate. But sometimes that mindset carries over into non-clinical areas where it isn’t necessary.
That can lead to what I call “wedding pricing” or paying more than you should for services that could be managed more efficiently using practices from other industries.
Looking outside healthcare gives you a valuable reference point.
How are large health systems responding to this approach?
Kirshner: We’ve seen strong interest from major systems like Stanford Health Care, SSM Health, WellSpan Health, Ochsner Health, Sutter Health, and Allina Health.
Many of these organizations are highly sophisticated, but they recognize there are still gaps, especially in specialized areas.
As health systems continue to consolidate, standardization becomes critical. When you bring together multiple hospitals, you inherit a lot of variation in processes and vendors. Standardizing those elements simplifies operations and reduces cost.
What does this mean for the future role of the healthcare CFO?
Kirshner: The role is much more operational than it used to be.
CFOs are now deeply involved in how the organization runs, from supply chain and IT to facilities and energy management. There’s a growing overlap between finance and operations.
And with the financial pressures ahead, that’s only going to intensify.
We’re looking at a challenging environment over the next few years. Health systems need to find new ways to operate more efficiently, and supply chain will play a central role in that.
What should health system leaders be thinking about right now?
Kirshner: They need to broaden their perspective.
Supply chain isn’t just about clinical products or negotiating price. It’s about managing a significant portion of the organization’s cost structure in a smarter, more integrated way.
The systems that embrace that, and truly align finance, supply chain, and IT, are going to be in a much stronger position moving forward.

